Outcomes with durvalumab by tumour PD-L1 expression in unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer in the PACIFIC trial.

BACKGROUND: In the PACIFIC trial, durvalumab significantly improved progression-free and overall survival (PFS/OS) versus placebo, with manageable safety, in unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients without progression after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We report exploratory analyses of outcomes by tumour cell (TC) programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to intravenous durvalumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks or placebo ≤12 months, stratified by age, sex, and smoking history, but not PD-L1 status. Where available, pre-CRT samples were tested for PD-L1 expression (immunohistochemistry) and scored at pre-specified (25%) and post hoc (1%) TC cut-offs. Treatment-effect hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated from unstratified Cox proportional hazards models (Kaplan-Meier-estimated medians). RESULTS: In total, 713 patients were randomly assigned, 709 of whom received at least 1 dose of study treatment durvalumab (n = 473) or placebo (n = 236). Some 451 (63%) were PD-L1-assessable: 35%, 65%, 67%, 33%, and 32% had TC ≥25%, <25%, ≥1%, <1%, and 1%-24%, respectively. As of 31 January 2019, median follow-up was 33.3 months. Durvalumab improved PFS versus placebo (primary-analysis data cut-off, 13 February 2017) across all subgroups [HR, 95% confidence interval (CI); medians]: TC ≥25% (0.41, 0.26-0.65; 17.8 versus 3.7 months), <25% (0.59, 0.43-0.82; 16.9 versus 6.9 months), ≥1% (0.46, 0.33-0.64; 17.8 versus 5.6 months), <1% (0.73, 0.48-1.11; 10.7 versus 5.6 months), 1%-24% [0.49, 0.30-0.80; not reached (NR) versus 9.0 months], and unknown (0.59, 0.42-0.83; 14.0 versus 6.4 months). Durvalumab improved OS across most subgroups (31 January 2019 data cut-off; HR, 95% CI; medians): TC ≥ 25% (0.50, 0.30-0.83; NR versus 21.1 months), <25% (0.89, 0.63-1.25; 39.7 versus 37.4 months), ≥1% (0.59, 0.41-0.83; NR versus 29.6 months), 1%-24% (0.67, 0.41-1.10; 43.3 versus 30.5 months), and unknown (0.60, 0.43-0.84; 44.2 versus 23.5 months), but not <1% (1.14, 0.71-1.84; 33.1 versus 45.6 months). Safety was similar across subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: PFS benefit with durvalumab was observed across all subgroups, and OS benefit across all but TC <1%, for which limitations and wide HR CI preclude robust conclusions.

Predictive biomarkers for response to EGFR-directed monoclonal antibodies for advanced squamous cell lung cancer.

Background: Upregulated expression and aberrant activation of the epidermal growth-factor receptor (EGFR) are found in lung cancer, making EGFR a relevant target for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Treatment with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is associated with modest improvement in overall survival in patients with squamous cell lung cancer (SqCLC) who have a significant unmet need for effective treatment options. While there is evidence that using EGFR gene copy number, EGFR mutation, and EGFR protein expression as biomarkers can help select patients who respond to treatment, it is important to consider biomarkers for response in patients treated with combination therapies that include EGFR mAbs. Design: Randomized trials of EGFR-directed mAbs cetuximab and necitumumab in combination with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or antiangiogenic therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC, including SqCLC, were searched in the literature. Results of associations of potential biomarkers and outcomes were summarized. Results: Data from phase III clinical trials indicate that patients with NSCLC, including SqCLC, whose tumors express high levels of EGFR protein (H-score of ≥200) and/or gene copy numbers of EGFR (e.g. ≥40% cells with ≥4 EGFR copies as detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization; gene amplification in ≥10% of analyzed cells) derive greater therapeutic benefits from EGFR-directed mAbs. Biomarker data are limited for EGFR mAbs used in combination with immunotherapy and are absent when used in combination with antiangiogenic agents. Conclusions: Therapy with EGFR-directed mAbs in combination with chemotherapy is associated with greater clinical benefits in patients with NSCLC, including SqCLC, whose tumors express high levels of EGFR protein and/or have increased EGFR gene copy number. These data support validating the role of these as biomarkers to identify those patients who derive the greatest clinical benefit from EGFR mAb therapy. However, data on biomarkers for EGFR-directed mAbs combined with immunotherapy or antiangiogenic agents remain limited.

Survival, quality-adjusted survival, and other clinical end points in older advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with albumin-bound paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: This analysis compared the quality-adjusted survival and clinical outcomes of albumin-bound paclitaxel+carboplatin (nab-PC) vs solvent-based paclitaxel+carboplatin (sb-PC) as first-line therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in older patients. METHODS: Using age-based subgroup data from a randomised Phase-3 clinical trial, nab-PC and sb-PC were compared with respect to overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life (QoL), safety/toxicity, and quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) with ages ⩾60 and ⩾70 years as cut points. RESULTS: Among patients aged ⩾60 years (N=546), nab-PC (N=265) significantly increased ORR and prolonged OS, despite a non-significant improvement in PFS, vs sb-PC (N=281). Nab-PC improved QoL and was associated with less neuropathy, arthralgia, and myalgia but resulted in more anaemia and thrombocytopenia. Nab-PC yielded significant Q-TWiST benefits (11.1 vs 9.8 months; 95% CI of gain: 0.2-2.6), with a relative Q-TWiST gain of 10.8% (ranging from 6.4% to 15.1% in threshold analysis). In the ⩾70 years age group, nab-PC showed similar, but non-significant, ORR, PFS, and Q-TWiST benefits and significantly improved OS and QoL. CONCLUSION: Nab-PC as first-line therapy in older patients with advanced NSCLC increased ORR, OS, and QoL and resulted in quality-adjusted survival gains compared with standard sb-PC.

Safety and efficacy of weekly nab®-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin as first-line therapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: This analysis evaluates safety and efficacy in elderly (≥ 70 years old) versus younger patients enrolled in a phase III advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Untreated stage IIIB/IV patients with PS 0/1 were randomly assigned (1:1) to carboplatin AUC6, day 1 every 3 weeks, and either nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane) 100 mg/m(2) weekly (nab-P/C) or solvent-based paclitaxel (Taxol) 200 mg/m(2) day 1 every 3 weeks (sb-P/C). The primary end-point was overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Fifteen percent of 1052 enrolled patients were elderly: nab-P/C, n = 74; sb-P/C, n = 82. In both age cohorts, the ORR was higher with nab-P/C versus sb-P/C (age ≥ 70: 34% versus 24%, P = 0.196; age <70: 32% versus 25%, P = 0.013). In elderly patients, progression-free survival (PFS) trended in favor of nab-P/C (median 8.0 versus 6.8 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.687, P = 0.134), and overall survival (OS) was significantly improved (median 19.9 versus 10.4 months, HR 0.583, P = 0.009). In younger patients, PFS (median 6.0 versus 5.8 months, HR 0.903, P = 0.256) and OS (median 11.4 versus 11.3 months, HR 0.999, P = 0.988) were similar in both arms. Adverse events were similar in both age groups, with less neutropenia (P = 0.015), neuropathy (P = 0.001), and arthralgia (P = 0.029), and increased anemia (P = 0.007) with nab-P/C versus sb-P/C. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly NSCLC patients, nab-P/C as first-line therapy was well tolerated and improved the ORR and PFS, with substantially longer OS versus sb-PC.

Differential effect of age on survival in advanced NSCLC in women versus men: analysis of recent Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) studies, with and without bevacizumab.

BACKGROUND: The impact of age on prognosis in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may differ by sex. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients (N=1590) from E1594, a 4-arm platinum-based chemotherapy trial, and E4599 (carboplatin/paclitaxel ± bevacizumab) chemotherapy arm were divided into male and female cohorts and separated into age groups of <60 or ≥60 years old. Eligible E4599 patients (N=850) were similarly separated by age and sex and by treatment (± bevacizumab). Survival was calculated separately for each cohort. RESULTS: The median survival time (MST) for women ≥60 years old treated with chemotherapy alone on E1594 and E4599 was 11.6 months versus 9.0 months for women <60 (p=0.03). MST was 7.4 and 8.3 months for men ≥60 and <60 years old respectively (NS). In E4599 the age <60 by bevacizumab treatment interaction was statistically significant (p=0.03) for women (younger had greater benefit), with no age effect in men. CONCLUSIONS: In this unplanned, exploratory subgroup analysis of advanced stage NSCLC ECOG trials, women ≥60 years old treated with chemotherapy live longer than men and younger women. In contrast, bevacizumab survival benefit was more pronounced in men of any age and in younger women on E4599.

Pre-treatment levels of circulating free IGF-1 identify NSCLC patients who derive clinical benefit from figitumumab.

BACKGROUND: Phase III trials of the anti-insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor (IGF-IR) antibody figitumumab (F) in unselected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were recently discontinued owing to futility. Here, we investigated a role of free IGF-1 (fIGF-1) as a potential predictive biomarker of clinical benefit from F treatment. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Pre-treatment circulating levels of fIGF-1 were tested in 110 advanced NSCLC patients enrolled in a phase II study of paclitaxel and carboplatin given alone (PC) or in combination with F at doses of 10 or 20 mg kg(-1) (PCF10, PCF20). RESULTS: Cox proportional hazards model interactions were between 2.5 and 3.5 for fIGF-1 criteria in the 0.5-0.9 ng ml(-1) range. Patients above each criterion had a substantial improvement in progression-free survival on PCF20 related to PC alone. Free IGF-1 correlated inversely with IGF binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1, ρ=-0.295, P=0.005), and the pre-treatment ratio of insulin to IGFBP-1 was also predictive of F clinical benefit. In addition, fIGF-1 levels correlated with tumour vimentin expression (ρ=0.594, P=0.021) and inversely with E-cadherin (ρ=-0.389, P=0.152), suggesting a role for fIGF-1 in tumour de-differentiation. CONCLUSION: Free IGF-1 may contribute to the identification of a subset of NSCLC patients who benefit from F therapy.

The role of UFT and the combination of UFT/leucovorin in non-small cell lung cancer.

Although 5-FU administered as a single agent in different intravenous bolus schedules has been shown to have minimal activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), several lines of experimental evidence suggest that 5-FU in combination regimens may be synergistic with the 'anchor' drug of the combination. Moreover, the recent availability of oral formulations of 5-FU together with the ability to modulate the anabolic and catabolic metabolism of 5-FU with leucovorin and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inhibitors, respectively, may provide a substantial improvement in the ease of administration and the efficacy of fluoropyrimidine therapy. Several oral fluoropyrimidines are under investigation. Orzel [UFT (uracil:tegafur) plus oral leucovorin] is the first oral DPD-inhibitory fluoropyrimidine. Orzel administered daily achieves similar concentrations of 5-FU obtained with continuous-infusion 5-FU. This paper reviews the clinical experience with UFT and Orzel in the treatment of NSCLC.

The emerging world role of irinotecan in lung cancer.

Irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar), either alone or in combination with cisplatin (Platinol), has demonstrated activity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In single-agent studies, response rates as high as 35% have been observed; in combination with cisplatin, response rates have ranged as high as 50%, with 1-year survival rates of 33% to 58%. A critical phase III randomized trial comparing irinotecan, either alone or in combination with cisplatin, to vindesine/cisplatin, demonstrated superior survival for stage IV patients receiving irinotecan. The first North American effort to replicate the schedule used in the phase III trial (cisplatin 80 mg/m2 and irinotecan 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every month) yielded a response rate of 29%, median survival time of nearly 10 months, and 1-year survival rate of 37%. A subsequent multi-institutional trial conducted through Vanderbilt Cancer Center Affiliate Network and Fox Chase Cancer Center combined both agents on a weekly schedule in an attempt to exploit their putative synergy and to potentially decrease toxicity. This schedule, which employed irinotecan 65 mg/m2 and cisplatin 30 mg/m2 both weekly x 4, was better tolerated than the monthly cisplatin combination with a higher response rate (36%), median survival (11.6 months), and 1-year survival rate (46%). Multiple phase I and phase II studies have combined irinotecan with taxanes, either alone or in concert with carboplatin (Paraplatin), yielding similar response and survival rates. Finally, a critical phase III trial from Japan has demonstrated superior outcome for irinotecan and cisplatin vs standard etoposide/cisplatin in the treatment of extensive small-cell carcinoma of the lung. At least one North American trial will determine if these results are reproducible.

Phase II radiation therapy oncology group trial of weekly paclitaxel and conventional external beam radiation therapy for supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme.

PURPOSE: Fractionated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) +/- carmustine (BCNU) is the standard of care for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), but survival results remain poor. Preclinical studies indicate synergy between RT and paclitaxel (TAX) in astrocytoma cell lines. Phase I studies in GBM have demonstrated a maximum tolerated dose for TAX of 225 mg/m(2)/3 h/week x 6, during EBRT, with no exacerbation of typical RT-induced toxicities. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) therefore mounted a Phase II study to determine the feasibility and efficacy of conventional EBRT and concurrent weekly TAX at its MTD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients with histologic diagnosis of GBM were enrolled from 8/16/96 through 3/21/97 in a multi-institutional Phase II trial of EBRT and TAX 225 mg/m(2)/3 h (1-3 h before EBRT), administered the first treatment day of each RT week. Total EBRT dose was 60 Gy (200 cGy/fraction), 5 days per week. A smaller treatment field, to include gross disease plus a margin only, was used after 46 Gy. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (98%) were evaluable. Median age was 55 years (range, 28-78). Seventy-four percent were > or = 50 years. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) Classes III, IV, V, VI included 10 (17%), 21 (34%), 25 (41%), and 5 (8%) patients, respectively. Gross total resection was performed in only 16%. There was no Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Hypersensitivity reactions precluding further use of TAX occurred in 4 patients. There were 2 instances of late neurotoxicity (4% Grade 3 or 4). Ninety-one percent of patients received treatment per protocol. Seventy-seven percent completed prescribed treatment (6 weeks). Of 35 patients with measurable disease, CR/PR was observed in 23%, MR in 17%, and SD in 43%. Seventeen percent demonstrated progression at first follow-up. Median potential follow-up time is 20 months. Median survival is 9.7 months, with median survivals for RPA classes III, IV, V, and VI of 16.3, 10.2, 9.5, 2.5 months, respectively. Ten patients remain alive. CONCLUSION: Concurrent full-dose EBRT and weekly high-dose TAX is feasible in the majority of GBM patients. Acute toxicity is acceptable; myelosuppression and peripheral sensory neuropathy are surprisingly modest, despite considerably higher overall dose intensity, compared to that achievable in other disease sites. Median survival by RPA class without prolonged adjuvant therapy is comparable to RTOG controls treated with standard EBRT and BCNU (1 year of BCNU).

Treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer in North America: the emerging role of irinotecan.

Topoisomerase I inhibitors have demonstrated significant activity in non-small-cell lung cancer. In phase II studies, particularly in Japan, single-agent irinotecan (Camptosar, CPT-11) has produced response rates as high as 35%. In combinations with cisplatin (Platinol), it has also resulted in overall response rates of 41% to 52%, with median survival of 10.2 to 13 months, and 1-year survival rates of 33% and 58%. A Japanese phase III randomized trial of irinotecan, either alone or in combination with cisplatin vs vindesine/cisplatin in previously untreated stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer, demonstrated that survival among stage IV patients was significantly better in the irinotecan arms compared to the vindesine/cisplatin group. However, another Japanese phase III study comparing irinotecan/cisplatin to vindesine/cisplatin failed to show a survival difference. Initial North American efforts recapitulated this work, while a follow-up study incorporated weekly irinotecan with weekly cisplatin, yielding a response rate of 36%, median survival of 11.6 months, and a 1-year survival rate of 46%. Irinotecan/taxane combinations have also shown promise. Phase I/II studies in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with paclitaxel (Taxol), irinotecan, and carboplatin (Paraplatin) produced a response rate of 38%, median survival of 11 months, and a 1-year survival rate of 47%; other trials with irinotecan and paclitaxel are ongoing. Phase I data for irinotecan/docetaxel (Taxotere) have indicated an overall response rate of 32%, median survival of 39 weeks, and a 1-year survival rate of 38%; subsequent phase II trials used either cisplatin or irinotecan in combination with docetaxel and yielded a promising median survival of 45.6 weeks, comparable to the standard cisplatin/docetaxel combination. Phase I trials with irinotecan and gemcitabine (Gemzar) have also yielded promising results. Follow-up efforts include phase II studies in both chemonaive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and progressive small-cell lung cancer (salvage therapy). Clearly, clinical trial data have demonstrated the utility of irinotecan in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Planned combinations with new chemotherapeutic agents and biological response modifiers may provide additional treatment options.

Weekly irinotecan and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase II study.

The combination of weekly irinotecan (CPT-11) and monthly cisplatin has shown promising activity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in previous Phase I and II studies. However, same-day administration of these agents may better exploit their therapeutic synergy and minimize toxicities. This multicenter Phase II study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination of weekly CPT-11 and weekly cisplatin in patients with advanced NSCLC. Patients with chemotherapy-naive stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were treated with repeated cycles of therapy comprising weekly treatment with both cisplatin and CPT-11 for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest. The starting doses of CPT-11 and cisplatin were 65 and 30 mg/m2, respectively. Treatment was continued until the occurrence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a maximum of six cycles. Fifty patients were enrolled. The median age was 59 years (range, 44-79 years). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 in 22 patients, 1 in 19 patients, and 2 in 9 patients. Seven and 43 patients had stages IIIB and IV disease, respectively. Five patients had brain metastasis. Patients received a median of three 6-week cycles (range, 1-6). The objective response rate was 36% (18 of 50; 95% confidence interval, 24-54%) and included 18 partial responses. Median time to tumor progression was 6.9 months (range, 0.6-15.2). The median survival was 11.6 months (range, 0.16-21.9 months), and the 1-year survival rate was 46%. Grade 3/4 nonhematological toxicities included vomiting (12%) and diarrhea (26%). Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities included anemia (14%), neutropenia (26%), and thrombocytopenia (14%). Relative dose intensities for CPT-11 and cisplatin were 89 and 62%, respectively. Weekly combined administration of CPT-11 and cisplatin achieved a promising overall response rate, median time to tumor progression, and median survival in patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. The regimen was well tolerated, and the planned dose intensity was well maintained. Further evaluation of this combination in NSCLC is warranted.

Induction and concurrent paclitaxel/carboplatin every 3 weeks with thoracic radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an interim report.

The paclitaxel/carboplatin combination has demonstrated promising activity in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); therefore, we mounted an exploratory study of these agents with thoracic radiation (TRT) in locally advanced NSCLC. Eligibility stipulated a Karnofsky performance status >or= 70%, weight loss or= 2 esophagitis has corresponded to length (> 16 cm) of esophagus in the radiation treatment field (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.006). The partial response rate to induction therapy was 40% and to the combined modality therapy was 60%. The median survival for all 49 patients is 15.3 months, with a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 7.8 months. In the subset of 22 patients treated on the phase I portion of the study, the median survival and DFS were 18.5 months and 13.5 months, respectively. Induction therapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with the same agents is an active and well-tolerated treatment approach in locally advanced NSCLC. To date, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 plus carboplatin AUC 5 administered at 3-week intervals for 2 cycles is safe in combination with TRT.

The role of new agents in advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma.

Over the past 5 to 7 years, new and promising systemic agents have entered the therapeutic armamentarium in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. In particular, the taxanes, irinotecan, vinorelbine, and gemcitabine, have each been shown to perturb the natural history of this disease. In combination with cisplatin, these agents have yielded improvements in response rates and in survival, compared with either cisplatin alone or with older platinum combinations, with consistent 1-year survival rates of 30% to 40% or more and response rates exceeding 25%. Other factors may also be responsible for improved survival rates, including patient selection, improved supportive care, and more extensive screening procedures, such as CT and positron emission tomography, which have resulted in stage migration. Future directions will focus on the role of nonplatinum combinations, particularly in the elderly and in patients with compromised performance status; salvage therapy in patients with intact performance status; quality of life and quality adjusted survival; and the role of new biologic agents, which alter the tumor milieu and may be readily integrated into standard cytotoxic regimens. Except for unfit or unwilling patients, there is no room for therapeutic nihilism.

Phase I pharmacokinetic trial of perillyl alcohol (NSC 641066) in patients with refractory solid malignancies.

Perillyl alcohol (POH) is a monoterpene with anticarcinogenic and antitumor activity in murine tumor models. Putative mechanisms of action include activation of the transforming growth factor beta pathway and/or inhibition of p21ras signaling, leading to differentiation or apoptosis. In this Phase I trial, 17 patients took POH p.o. three times daily for 14 days of each 28-day cycle. The starting dose of POH was 1600 mg/m2/dose, with escalations to 2100 and 2800 mg/m2/dose in subsequent cohorts. Chronic nausea and fatigue were dose-limiting toxic effects at 2800 mg/m2. Grade 1-2 hypokalemia was common at 2100 and 2800 mg/m2. Although POH could not be detected in plasma, two of its metabolites, dihydroperillic acid (DHPA) and perillic acid (PA), were measured in plasma and urine on days 1 and 15 after the first and last doses of POH, respectively. Both area under the concentration versus time curve and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) values increased with dose and exhibited high intersubject variability. Day 15 DHPA Cmax values ranged from a mean +/- SD of 22.6+/-12 microM at 1600 mg/m2/dose to 42.4+/-15.24 microM at 2800 mg/m2/dose. Corresponding mean +/- SD Cmax values for PA were 433.2+/-245.8 and 774.1+/-439.6 microM. One patient treated at the 2800 mg/m2/dose had markedly prolonged plasma levels of both PA and DHPA and developed grade 3 mucositis. POH treatment did not consistently alter the expression of p21ras, rap1, or rhoA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained from patients treated at the highest dose level. The metabolites PA and DHPA did not change expression or isoprenylation of p21ras in MCF-7 breast or DU145 prostate carcinoma cells at concentrations that exceeded those achieved in patient plasma after POH treatment. We conclude that POH at 1600-2100 mg/m2 p.o. three times daily is well tolerated on a 14-day on/14-day off dosing schedule. Inhibition of p21ras function in humans is not likely to occur after POH administration at safe doses of the present oral formulation.

Advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma: the emerging role of docetaxel.

The treatment of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) has improved greatly over the past decade. With the advent of new agents, in particular taxanes, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and topoisomerase I inhibitors, response rates have improved from 15-20% to 25-35%, with commensurate improvement in median and one year survival rates to 8-10 months and 35-45%, respectively. These improvements have proven statistically significant in multiple studies [1-4]. Docetaxel, either alone or in combination with platinols, has shown particular promise; and, in some arenas, it has become a standard component of our therapeutic armamentarium. We will review the preclinical data and single agent activity of docetaxel in treatment-naive and previously treated NSCLC patients, its activity in combination with cisplatin and carboplatin, as well as other new agents, and finally focus on ongoing studies evaluating its role in locally advanced disease.

Paclitaxel by 1-h infusion in combination with carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

In our previous study, FCCC 93-024, paclitaxel by 24-h infusion combined with carboplatin yielded a response rate of 62% and median survival of 54 weeks in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Myelosuppression proved dose-limiting, requiring the routine use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Based on the reported activity of 1-h paclitaxel infusion in NSCLC and minimal myelosuppression at doses of 135 and 200 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and the suggestion of a dose-response relationship, we launched an intrapatient dose escalation trial of combination carboplatin and 1-h paclitaxel. Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 1-h and carboplatin dosed to a fixed targeted area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 7.5 at three weekly intervals for six cycles. In the absence of grade 4 myelosuppression, paclitaxel was escalated by 35 mg/m2/cycle on an intrapatient basis to a maximum dose of 280 mg/m2 by cycle 4. G-CSF was not routinely used. 57 patients (pts) were accrued from November 1994 through to April 1996. 44 pts (77%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 1. Median age was 64 (range: 34-80) years. Cumulative peripheral sensory neuropathy proved dose-limiting and prohibitive in the first 20 evaluable patients (cohort A): grade > or = 1 in 15 patients (75%), grade 3 in 6 (30%), generally occurring at paclitaxel doses > or = 215 mg/m2 and obligating 3 patients to have treatment halted in the absence of disease progression. The protocol, therefore, was revised and the initial paclitaxel dose reduced to 135 mg/m2 with intrapatient dose escalation of 40 mg/m2/cycle to a maximum dose of 215 mg/m2, recapitulating the original dosing schema used in FCCC 93-024. 35 patients were enrolled in this second cohort (B); 33 proved evaluable. Whilst 17 (52%) experienced peripheral sensory neuropathy, grade 3 neurotoxicity developed in only 3 (9%). Myelosuppression also was less pronounced, with 42% exhibiting grade 4 granulocytopenia and 30% grade > or = 3 thrombocytopenia in cohort B compared with 70% and 50%, respectively in cohort A. Of the first 22 patients accrued to cohort A, 12 (55%) had major objective responses. Median survival was 48.5 weeks, 1-year survival rate 45% and 2-year survival rate 18%. Of 33 evaluable patients in cohort B, 9 (27%) had major objective responses. Median survival was 46 weeks, 1-year survival rate 47% and 2-year survival rate 12%. Combination paclitaxel by 1-h infusion and carboplatin at a fixed targeted AUC of 7.5 is active in advanced NSCLC. Neurotoxicity, not myelosuppression, proved dose-limiting at paclitaxel doses exceeding 215 mg/m2. Lower doses may be associated with lower response rates, but do not appear to compromise survival.

Phase II trial of induction high-dose chemotherapy followed by surgical resection and radiation therapy for patients with marginally resectable non-small cell carcinoma of the lung.

The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is an active regimen in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Historically, patients with stage III disease have manifested higher response rates than patients with metastatic disease, and patients achieving a pathologic complete response to induction chemoradiation therapy prior to surgery have shown better long-term outcome. Based upon our pilot data using high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel, we designed a phase II trial in patients with marginally resectable stage IIIA NSCLC. Ten patients, with bulky nodal stage IIIA disease, initially received etoposide (2 g/m2) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Two cycles, 28 days apart, of carboplatin (AUC 12 in seven patients; AUC 16 in three patients) and paclitaxel (250 mg/m2) were administered with filgrastim (5 microg/kg) and PBSC support. After re-evaluation, patients underwent a thoracotomy followed by radiotherapy (44-60 Gy) if deemed resectable, or radiotherapy alone (60 Gy) if not resectable. The median age was 58.5 years (48-66) with a median ECOG performance status of 0 (0-1). Histology was adenocarcinoma in seven patients; the remainder had either squamous cell, large cell or bronchoalveolar carcinoma. Based on CT radiography, the overall response rate was 40%. Eight of ten patients underwent resection with four right pneumonectomies, three right upper lobectomies and one wedge resection of the right upper lobe. Six patients had a complete resection. Of eight patients resected, four were downstaged by induction therapy, three remained unchanged and one was found to have more extensive disease. The remaining two patients developed metastatic disease while receiving chemotherapy. The median dose of postoperative radiotherapy was 54 Gy (35-66 Gy). Actual median follow-up for all patients was 89 weeks (25 to 136+). The actuarial median overall survival was 124 weeks (25 to 136+) and time to progression was 57 weeks (17 to 136+). The median dose of carboplatin delivered expressed as mg/m2 was 779 (615-1540). Neutropenic fever occurred in two patients during the initial mobilization cycle only. The median number of units of RBC and/or platelets transfused was 0 (0-2 and 0-6, respectively). There were no significant non-hematologic toxicities. High-dose induction chemotherapy with stem cell rescue is feasible and safe with an acceptable response rate. Thoracotomy, including pneumonectomy and postoperative radiotherapy, were well tolerated by patients after undergoing high-dose induction chemotherapy with no apparent increase in peri-operative morbidity. The pathologic complete response rate was low--one out of ten patients. These results indicate that dose escalation of induction chemotherapy does not improve response rates even in this highly selected patient population. Accordingly, the complexity and potential toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy, as delivered in this trial as neoadjuvant treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, is not warranted.