Triboelectric behaviour of selected MOFs in contact with metals.

MOFs have been effectively used to magnify the triboelectric charge of polymers. However, so far the individual triboelectric properties and charge transfer mechanisms of MOFs haven't been reported. Triboelectric property investigation for selected MOFs show that the main mechanism for MOF triboelectrification in contact with metals is electron transfer.

Probing Contact Electrification: A Cohesively Sticky Problem.

Contact electrification and the triboelectric effect are complex processes for mechanical-to-electrical energy conversion, particularly for highly deformable polymers. While generating relatively low power density, contact electrification can occur at the contact-separation interface between nearly any two polymer surfaces. This ubiquitousness of surfaces enables contact electrification to be an important phenomenon to understand energy conversion and harvesting applications. The mechanism of charge generation between polymeric materials remains ambiguous, with electron transfer, material (also known as mass) transfer, and adsorbed chemical species transfer (including induced ionization of water and other molecules) all being proposed as the primary source of the measured charge. Often, all sources of charge, except electron transfer, are dismissed in the case of triboelectric energy harvesters, leading to the generation of the "triboelectric series", governed by the ability of a polymer to lose, or accept, an electron. Here, this sole focus on electron transfer is challenged through rigorous experiments, measuring charge density in polymer-polymer (196 polymer combinations), polymer-glass (14 polymers), and polymer-liquid metal (14 polymers) systems. Through the investigation of these interfaces, clear evidence of material transfer via heterolytic bond cleavage is provided. Based on these results, a generalized model considering the cohesive energy density of polymers as the critical parameter for polymer contact electrification is discussed. This discussion clearly shows that material transfer must be accounted for when discussing the source of charge generated by polymeric mechanical energy harvesters. Thus, a correlated physical property to understand the triboelectric series is provided.

Measuring Piezoelectric Output-Fact or Friction?

Piezoelectric polymers are emerging as exceptionally promising materials for energy harvesting. While the theoretical figures of merit for piezoelectric polymers are comparable to ceramics, the measurement techniques need to be retrofitted to account for the different mechanical properties of the softer polymeric materials. Here, how contact electrification, including friction and contact separation, is often mistaken for piezoelectric charge is examined, and a perspective for how to separate these effects is provided. The state of the literature is assessed, and recommendations are made for clear and simple guidelines in reporting, for both sample geometry and testing methods, to enable accurate determination of piezoelectric figures of merit in polymers. Such improvements will allow an understanding of what types of material manipulation are required in order to enhance the piezoelectric output from polymers and enable the next generation of polymer energy harvester design.

Contact electrification between identical polymers as the basis for triboelectric/flexoelectric materials.

Polymer contact electrification offers the possibility to harvest mechanical energy using lightweight, flexible and low-cost materials, but the mechanism itself is still unresolved. Several recent studies confirm heterolytic covalent bond breaking as the mechanism for surface charge formation. Here it is shown that the reason for the formation of surface charge by contacting two identical polymers results from the fluctuation in the surface irregularities, and that contacted materials with a greater porosity or surface roughness differential result in a greater generation of surface charge. Porosity and surface roughness create uneven surface length percentage changes in the lateral direction during deformation, which changes the charge density across the surface during relaxation. Multilayered membranes exhibit flexoelectric properties upon pressing and releasing by generating charge without separating individual membrane layers. This new insight deepens the understanding of polymer contact electrification and highlights better ways to prepare triboelectric or flexoelectric nanogenerator devices.

Matching the Directions of Electric Fields from Triboelectric and Ferroelectric Charges in Nanogenerator Devices for Boosted Performance.

Embedding additional ferroelectric dipoles in contacting polymer layers is known to enhance the performance of triboelectricnanogenerator (TENG) devices. However, the influence of dipoles formed between the triboelectric surface charges on two contacting ferroelectric films has been ignored in all relevant studies. We demonstrate that proper attention to the alignment of the distinct dipoles present between two contacting surfaces and in composite polymer/BaTiO3 ferroelectric films can lead to up to four times higher energy and power density output compared with cases when dipole arrangement is mismatched. For example, TENG device based on PVAc/BaTiO3 shows energy density increase from 32.4 µJ m-2 to 132.9 µJ m-2 when comparing devices with matched and mismatched dipoles. The presented strategy and understanding of resulting stronger electrostatic induction in the contacting layers enable the development of TENG devices with greatly enhanced properties.