Correlation between Cranial Nerve Microstructural Characteristics and Vestibular Schwannoma Tumor Volume.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Vestibular schwannomas are common cerebellopontine angle tumors arising from the vestibulocochlear nerve and can result in cranial nerve dysfunction. Conventional MR imaging does not provide information that could correlate with cranial nerve compression symptoms of hearing loss or imbalance. We used multitensor tractography to evaluate the relationship between the WM microstructural properties of cranial nerves and tumor volume in a cohort of patients with vestibular schwannomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in 258 patients with vestibular schwannomas treated at the Gamma Knife clinic at Toronto Western Hospital between 2014 and 2018. 3T MR images were analyzed in 160 surgically naïve patients with unilateral vestibular schwannomas. Multitensor tractography was used to extract DTI-derived metrics (fractional anisotropy and radial, axial, and mean diffusivities of the bilateral facial and vestibulocochlear nerves [cranial nerves VII/VIII]). ROIs were placed in the transition between cisternal and intracanalicular segments, and images were analyzed using the eXtended Streamline Tractography reconstruction method. Diffusion metrics were correlated with 3D tumor volume derived from the Gamma Knife clinic. RESULTS: DTI analyses revealed significantly higher fractional anisotropy values and a reduction in axial diffusivity, radial diffusivity, and mean diffusivity (all P < .001) within the affected cranial nerves VII and VIII compared with unaffected side. All specific diffusivities (axial, radial, and mean diffusivity) demonstrated an inverse correlation with tumor volume (axial, radial, and mean diffusivity, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Multitensor tractography allows the quantification of cranial nerve VII and VIII WM microstructural alterations in patients with vestibular schwannomas. Our findings support the hypothesis that tumor volume may cause microstructural alterations of the affected cranial nerves VII and VIII. This type of advanced imaging may represent a possible avenue to correlate diffusivities with cranial nerve function.

Re-irradiation for Paediatric Tumours.

Despite best available therapy, many children with cancer develop recurrence after multimodal treatment, including initial radiation therapy. Re-irradiation is defined as the use of a second course of radiation therapy with a retreatment volume that overlaps substantially with that of a previously delivered course of radiation therapy. Re-irradiation is an important part of salvage treatment for patients with recurrent ependymoma, diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, medulloblastoma and germinoma. In patients with ependymoma, conventionally fractionated re-irradiation (1.8 Gy/day) can provide long-term disease control with low rates of high-grade toxicity. For children with progressive diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, re-irradiation provides effective palliation of symptoms and a survival gain as compared with those treated without re-irradiation. Repeat radiation therapy that includes craniospinal irradiation, if safe to deliver, may provide long-term tumour control in patients with medulloblastoma. Patients with recurrent intracranial germinoma can be effectively salvaged with re-irradiation that includes craniospinal irradiation. Finally, the emerging role of re-irradiation in non-brainstem high-grade glioma and extracranial solid tumours requires further study regarding its efficacy and safety. When given, re-irradiation should be delivered with care so that doses to organs at risk are minimised. In all cases, re-irradiation should be considered as an option alongside, or concurrently with, other salvage treatments, including surgery or systemic therapy, to maximise the likelihood of durable disease control.

The Brain Metastases Symptom Checklist as a novel tool for symptom measurement in patients with brain metastases undergoing whole-brain radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the feasibility, reliability, and validity of the Brain Metastases Symptom Checklist (bmsc), a novel self-report measure of common symptoms experienced by patients with brain metastases. METHODS: Patients with first-presentation symptomatic brain metastases (n = 137) referred for whole-brain radiotherapy (wbrt) completed the bmsc at time points before and after treatment. Their caregivers (n = 48) provided proxy ratings twice on the day of consultation to assess reliability, and at week 4 after wbrt to assess responsiveness to change. Correlations with 4 other validated assessment tools were evaluated. RESULTS: The symptoms reported on the bmsc were largely mild to moderate, with tiredness (71%) and difficulties with balance (61%) reported most commonly at baseline. Test-retest reliability for individual symptoms had a median intraclass correlation of 0.59 (range: 0.23-0.85). Caregiver proxy and patient responses had a median intraclass correlation of 0.52. Correlation of absolute scores on the bmsc and other symptom assessment tools was low, but consistency in the direction of symptom change was observed. At week 4, change in symptoms was variable, with improvements in weight gain and sleep of 42% and 41% respectively, and worsening of tiredness and drowsiness of 62% and 59% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The bmsc captures a wide range of symptoms experienced by patients with brain metastases, and it is sensitive to change. It demonstrated adequate test-retest reliability and face validity in terms of its responsiveness to change. Future research is needed to determine whether modifications to the bmsc itself or correlation with more symptom-specific measures will enhance validity.

Factors influencing overall survival specific to adult low-grade astrocytoma: a population-based study.

AIMS: We report a population-based overall survival and prognostic factor analysis specific to adult patients diagnosed with low-grade astrocytoma (LGA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All histologically confirmed cases of LGA diagnosed between 1992 and 1996 in the province of Ontario, Canada, were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry and reviewed. RESULTS: In total, 182 patients were identified; the mean age was 50 years and the mean survival time was 4.1 years (standard deviation = 5.1 years). Fifty-four per cent of patients had a surgical excision and 46% were biopsied alone. Both univariate and multivariate analyses showed that patients aged <30 years were significantly more likely to undergo an excision as compared with a biopsy alone (odds ratio = 4.26, 95% confidence interval 1.54-11.77). For the entire cohort, we observed a significant relationship between decreasing survival as a function of increasing age at diagnosis. In the biopsy sub-group, relative to patient's age <30 years, the hazard of dying increased significantly according to age when stratified by decade. However, in those patients having had a primary surgical excision, the hazard of dying relative to patient's age <30 years was similar for those aged 30-49 years and then significantly greater as patient age surpassed 50 years. CONCLUSIONS: Age is a significant prognostic factor for LGA. Our analysis suggests that in those patients amenable to a primary tumour excision, a survival benefit may be confined to those under age 50 years.

Canadian recommendations for the treatment of recurrent or progressive glioblastoma multiforme.

Recommendation 1: Multidisciplinary ApproachTo optimize treatment outcomes, the management of patients with recurrent glioblastoma should be individualized and should involve a multidisciplinary team approach, including neurosurgery, neuropathology, radiation oncology, neuro-oncology, and allied health professions.Recommendation 2: ImagingThe standard imaging modality for assessment of recurrent glioblastoma is Gd-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (mri). Tumour recurrence should be assessed according to the criteria set out by the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group. The optimal timing and frequency of mri after chemoradiation and adjunctive therapy have not been established.Recommendation 3: Pseudo-progressionProgression observed by mri after chemoradiation can be pseudo-progression. Accordingly, treated patients should not be classified as having progressive disease by Gd-enhancing mri within the first 12 weeks after the end of radiotherapy unless new enhancement is observed outside the radiotherapy field or viable tumour is confirmed by pathology at the time of a required re-operation. Adjuvant temozolomide should be continued and follow-up imaging obtained.Recommendation 4: Repeat SurgerySurgery can play a role in providing symptom relief and confirming tumour recurrence, pseudo-progression, or radiation necrosis. However, before surgical intervention, it is essential to clearly define treatment goals and the expected impact on prognosis and the patient's quality of life. In the absence of level 1 evidence, the decision to re-operate should be made according to individual circumstances, in consultation with the multidisciplinary team and the patient.Recommendation 5: Re-irradiationRe-irradiation is seldom recommended, but can be considered in carefully selected cases of recurrent glioblastoma.Recommendation 6: Systemic TherapyClinical trials, when available, should be offered to all eligible patients. In the absence of a trial, systemic therapy, including temozolomide rechallenge or anti-angiogenic therapy, may be considered. Combination therapy is still experimental; optimal drug combinations and sequencing have not been established.

PRODIGE: a randomized placebo-controlled trial of dalteparin low-molecular-weight heparin thromboprophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in 20-30% of patients with malignant glioma per year of survival. We tested the efficacy of long-term dalteparin low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for prevention of VTE in these patients. PATIENTS/METHODS: Adults with newly diagnosed malignant glioma were randomized to receive dalteparin 5000 anti-Xa units or placebo, both subcutaneously once daily for 6 months starting within 4 weeks of surgery. Treatment continued for up to 12 months. The primary outcome was the cumulative risk of VTE over 6 months. The target sample size was 512 patients. Events were adjudicated by a committee unaware of treatment. RESULTS: The trial began in 2002 and closed in May 2006 because of expiration of study medication. Ninety-nine patients were randomized to LMWH and 87 to placebo. Twenty-two patients developed VTE in the first 6 months: nine in the LMWH group and 13 in the placebo group [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19-1.4, P = 0.29]. At 6 months, there were three major bleeds on LMWH and none on placebo; at 12 months, 5 (5.1%) major bleeds on LMWH and 1 (1.2%) on placebo occurred (HR = 4.2, 95% CI: 0.48-36, P = 0.22). All major bleeds were intracranial and occurred while on study medication. The 12-month mortality rates were 47.8% for LMWH and 45.4% for placebo (HR = 1.2, 95% CI: 0.73-2.0, P = 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: Trends suggesting reduced VTE and increased intracranial bleeding were seen in the LMWH thromboprophylaxis group. The role of long-term anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in patients with brain tumors remains uncertain.

Clinical outcomes of adult patients with primary intracranial germinomas treated with low-dose craniospinal radiotherapy and local boost.

The authors document the long term follow up of adult patients with histologically proven primary intracranial germinoma treated with radiotherapy alone using a craniospinal with local boost technique. A retrospective review was conducted on adults diagnosed with intracranial germinoma who received radiotherapy at the Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto from 1990 to 2007. The study group consisted of 10 males with a median age of 24.1 years. All patients received radiotherapy alone using craniospinal radiotherapy and local boost. There were 10 patients (all male) with a median follow up of 10.9 years (range 2.2-18.9 years). At date of last follow up all patients were still alive, none with relapsed disease. Seven of ten patients (70%) had panhypopituitarianism prior to commencing radiotherapy and hormonal function was not affected in those with an intact pituitary axis. There was no reported cognitive decline in the treated cohort. For adult intracranial germinomas, with long term follow up, low-dose craniospinal radiotherapy with in field boost is highly effective with minimal morbidity.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for treatment of juxtapapillary choroidal melanoma: 3-year follow-up.

AIMS: To report the treatment outcomes and complication rates of stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of patients with juxtapapillary choroidal melanoma. METHODS: A retrospective review of 64 consecutive patients with juxtapapillary choroidal melanoma, located within 2 mm of the optic disc, treated with stereotactic radiotherapy at Princess Margaret Hospital between October 1998 and January 2006. RESULTS: The median age was 63 years. The median tumour height was 4.2 mm, and median largest basal diameter was 9.8 mm. The prescribed radiation dose was 70 Gy in five fractions over 10 days, and the median follow-up was 37 months. Post-treatment, the actuarial rates of local tumour control, metastases and survival at 37 months were 94%, 15% and 90%, respectively. Actuarial rates of radiation-induced complications at 37 months were neovascular glaucoma 42%, cataract 53%, retinopathy 81% and optic neuropathy 64%. Secondary enucleation was necessary for 10 patients (16%), in four patients for tumour recurrence and in six for painful neovascular glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic radiotherapy offers a non-invasive alternative to enucleation and brachytherapy in the management of juxtapapillary choroidal melanoma with a high tumour control rate, however, at the expense of a significant rate of long-term ocular complications.

Primary CNS lymphoma with intraocular involvement: International PCNSL Collaborative Group Report.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the demographics, diagnostic details, therapeutic management, and outcome in patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) with ocular involvement. METHODS: A retrospective study of 221 patients was assembled from 16 centers in seven countries. Only HIV-negative, immunocompetent patients with brain and ocular lymphoma were included; none had systemic lymphoma. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 60. Fifty-seven percent were women. Median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 2. Ocular disturbance and behavioral/cognitive changes were the most common presenting symptoms. Diagnosis of lymphoma was made by brain biopsy (147), vitrectomy (65), or CSF cytology (11). Diagnosis of intraocular lymphoma was made by vitrectomy/choroidal/retinal biopsy (90) or clinical ophthalmic examination (141). CSF cytology was positive in 23%. Treatment information was available for 176 patients. A total of 102 received dedicated ocular therapy (ocular radiotherapy 79, intravitreal methotrexate 22, and both 1) in addition to treatment for their brain lymphoma. Sixty-nine percent progressed at a median of 13 months; sites of progression included brain 52%, eyes 19%, brain and eyes 12%, and systemic 2%. Patients treated with local ocular therapy did not have a statistically significant decreased risk of failing in the eyes (p = 0.7). Median progression free survival and overall survival for the entire cohort were 18 and 31 months. CONCLUSION: This is the largest reported series of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) with intraocular involvement. Progression free and overall survival was similar to that reported with PCNSL. Dedicated ocular therapy improved disease control but did not affect overall survival.

Gliadel wafers in the treatment of malignant glioma: a systematic review.

QUESTION: What is the safety and efficacy of interstitial chemotherapy with carmustine-loaded polymers (Gliadel wafers: MGI Pharma, Bloomington, MN, U.S.A.) in the treatment of newly diagnosed or recurrent malignant glioma (that is, glioblastoma multiforme, anaplastic astrocytoma, anaplastic oligoastrocytoma, and anaplastic oligodendroglioma)? PERSPECTIVES: Malignant glioma is the most common type of primary brain tumour in adults. In general, efficacy of systemic therapy in this patient population has been disappointing, and novel treatment approaches are needed. Because several randomized controlled trials (RCTS) investigating the safety and efficacy of Gliadel are available, the Neuro-oncology Disease Site Group of Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care decided that a systematic review of the evidence was necessary. OUTCOMES: The outcomes of interest for this review were overall survival, adverse events, and quality of life. METHODOLOGY: Systematic searches of the medline, embase, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted for relevant evidence. Fully-published reports of RCTS comparing treatment with Gliadel wafers to placebo or alternative treatment were selected for inclusion. Prospective cohort studies were also included. RESULTS: Two RCTS that compared Gliadel to placebo in patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma were obtained. Both RCTS reported a significant survival benefit for patients who received Gliadel as compared with patients in the control group. One RCT and one prospective cohort study were obtained that examined the role of Gliadel in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. The rct demonstrated a significant survival benefit for Gliadel only after adjustment for prognostic factors, and the prospective cohort study reported no survival benefit for Gliadel as compared with a historical control group. All three RCTS reported similar rates of adverse events in the treatment and control groups. The most frequently reported adverse events were convulsions, confusion, brain edema, infection, hemiparesis, aphasia, and visual field defects. CONCLUSIONS: Gliadel is an option for selected patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma where a near gross total resection is possible. No evidence is available comparing Gliadel with systemic therapy, and a decision to combine Gliadel with systemic therapy should be made for patients individually. The patient population that would benefit from Gliadel (age, histology, and performance status) is unclear; further investigation is needed. Gliadel is also an option for patients with surgically resectable recurrent malignant glioma.

Primary intraocular lymphoma: an International Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Collaborative Group Report.

BACKGROUND: Primary intraocular lymphoma (PIOL) is an uncommon subset of primary central nervous system lymphoma. Because it is rare and difficult to diagnose, the natural history and optimal management are unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 83 HIV negative, immunocompetent PIOL patients was assembled from 16 centers in seven countries. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 65. Median ECOG performance status was 0. Presenting symptoms included blurred vision, decreased visual acuity, and floaters. Median time to diagnosis was 6 months. Diagnosis was made by vitrectomy (74), choroidal/retinal biopsy (6) and ophthalmic exam (3). Eleven percent had positive CSF cytology. Initial treatment was categorized as focal in 23 (intra-ocular methotrexate, ocular radiotherapy) or extensive in 53 (systemic chemotherapy, whole brain radiotherapy). Six received none; details are unknown in one. Forty-seven relapsed: brain 47%, eyes 30%, brain and eyes 15%, and systemic 8%. Median time to relapse was 19 months. Focal therapy alone did not increase risk of brain relapse. Median progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 29.6 and 58 months, respectively, and unaffected by treatment type. CONCLUSION: Treatment type did not affect relapse pattern, median PFS or OS. Focal therapy may minimize treatment toxicity without compromising disease control.

Management of single brain metastasis: a practice guideline.

QUESTIONS: Should patients with confirmed single brain metastasis undergo surgical resection? Should patients with single brain metastasis undergoing surgical resection receive adjuvant whole-brain radiation therapy (wbrt)? What is the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (srs) in the management of patients with single brain metastasis? PERSPECTIVES: Approximately 15%-30% of patients with cancer will develop cerebral metastases over the course of their disease. Patients identified as having single brain metastasis generally undergo more aggressive treatment than do those with multiple metastases; however, in the province of Ontario, management of patients with single brain metastasis varies. Given that conflicting evidence has been reported, the Neuro-oncology Disease Site Group (dsg) of the Cancer Care Ontario Program in Evidence-based Care felt that a systematic review of the evidence and a practice guideline were warranted. OUTCOMES: Outcomes of interest were survival, local control of disease, quality of life, and adverse effects. METHODOLOGY: The medline, cancerlit, embase, and Cochrane Library databases and abstracts published in the proceedings of the annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (1997-2005) and American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (1998-2004) were systematically searched for relevant evidence. The review included fully published reports or abstracts of randomized controlled trials (rcts), nonrandomized prospective studies, and retrospective studies. The present systematic review and practice guideline has been reviewed and approved by the Neuro-oncology dsg, which comprises medical and radiation oncologists, surgeons, neurologists, a nurse, and a patient representative. External review by Ontario practitioners was obtained through an electronic survey. Final approval of the guideline report was obtained from the Report Approval Panel and the Neuro-oncology dsg. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: The literature search found three rcts that compared surgical resection plus wbrt with wbrt alone. In addition, a Cochrane review, including a meta-analysis of published data from those three rcts, was obtained. One rct compared surgical resection plus wbrt with surgical resection alone. One rct compared wbrt plus srs with wbrt alone. Evidence comparing srs with surgical resection or examining srs with or without wbrt was limited to prospective case series and retrospective studies. BENEFITS: Two of three rcts reported a significant survival benefit for patients who underwent surgical resection as compared with those who received wbrt alone. Pooled results of the three rcts indicated no significant difference in survival or likelihood of dying from neurologic causes; however, significant heterogeneity was detected between the trials. The rct that compared surgical resection plus wbrt with surgical resection alone reported no significant difference in overall survival or length of functional independence; however, tumour recurrence at the site of the metastasis and anywhere in the brain was less frequent in patients who received wbrt as compared with patients in the observation group. In addition, patients who received wbrt were less likely to die from neurologic causes. Results of the rct that compared wbrt plus srs with wbrt alone indicated a significant improvement in median survival in patients who received srs. No quality evidence compares the efficacy of srs with surgical resection or examines the question of whether patients who receive srs should also receive wbrt. HARMS: Pooled results of the three rcts that examined surgical resection indicated no significant difference in adverse effects between groups. Postoperative complications included respiratory problems, intracerebral hemorrhage, and infection. One rct reported no significant difference in adverse effects between patients who received wbrt plus srs and those who received wbrt alone. TARGET POPULATION: The recommendations that follow apply to adults with confirmed cancer and a single brain metastasis. This practice guideline does not apply to patients with metastatic lymphoma, small-cell lung cancer, germ-cell tumour, leukemia, or sarcoma. RECOMMENDATIONS: Surgical excision should be considered for patients with good performance status, minimal or no evidence of extracranial disease, and a surgically accessible single brain metastasis amenable to complete excision. Because treatment in cases of single brain metastasis is considered palliative, invasive local treatments must be individualized. Patients with lesions requiring emergency decompression because of intracranial hypertension were excluded from the rcts, but should be considered candidates for surgery. To reduce the risk of tumour recurrence for patients who have undergone resection of a single brain metastasis, postoperative wbrt should be considered. The optimal dose and fractionation schedule for wbrt is 3000 cGy in 10 fractions or 2000 cGy in 5 fractions. As an alternative to surgical resection, wbrt followed by srs boost should be considered for patients with single brain metastasis. The evidence is insufficient to recommend srs alone as a single-modality therapy. QUALIFYING STATEMENTS: No high-quality data are available regarding the choice of surgery versus radiosurgery for single brain metastasis. In general, the size and location of the metastasis determine the optimal approach. The standard wbrt regimen for management of patients with single brain metastasis in the United States is 3000 cGy in 10 fractions, and this treatment is usually the standard arm in randomized studies of radiation in patients with brain metastases. Based solely on evidence, the understanding that no reason exists to choose 3000 cGy in 10 fractions over 2000 cGy in 5 fractions is correct; however, fraction size is believed to be important, and therefore 300 cGy daily (3000/10) is believed to be associated with fewer long-term neurocognitive effects than 400 cGy daily (2000/5) in the occasional long-term survivor. For that reason, many radiation oncologists in Ontario prefer 3000 cGy in 10 fractions. No data exist to either support or refute that preference; therefore, finding a resolution to this issue is not currently possible. The Neuro-oncology dsg will update the recommendations as new evidence becomes available.

Value of whole brain re-irradiation for brain metastases--single centre experience.

AIMS: There is controversy in published studies regarding the role of repeat whole brain radiation (WBRT) for previously irradiated brain metastases. The aim of our retrospective study was to document the practice at Princess Margaret Hospital with respect to the re-irradiation of patients with progressive or recurrent brain metastatic disease after initial WBRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive computerised database was used to identify patients treated for brain metastases with more than one course of WBRT between 1997 and 2003. Seventy-two patients were treated with WBRT for brain metastases and retreated with WBRT at a later date. The records of these patients were reviewed. RESULTS: The median age was 56.5 years. The most common primary sites were lung (51 patients) and breast (17 patients). The most frequent dose used for the initial radiotherapy was 20 Gy/5 fractions (62 patients). The most common doses of re-irradiation were 25 Gy/10 fractions (22 patients), 20 Gy/10 fractions (12 patients), 15 Gy/5 fractions (11 patients) and 20 Gy/8 fractions (10 patients). Thirty-one per cent of patients experienced a partial clinical response after re-irradiation, as judged by follow-up clinical notes; 27% remained stable; 32% deteriorated after re-irradiation. Patients who had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 at the time of retreatment lived longer. In responders, the mean duration of response was 5.1 months. The median survival after re-irradiation was 4.1 months. One patient was reported as having memory impairment and pituitary insufficiency after 5 months of progression-free survival. CONCLUSION: Repeat radiotherapy may be a useful treatment in carefully selected patients. With increased survival and better systemic options for patients with metastatic disease, more patients may be candidates for consideration of repeat WBRT for recurrent brain metastases, but prospective studies are needed to more clearly document their outcomes.

Canadian recommendations for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme.

RECOMMENDATION 1: Management of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) should be highly individualized and should take a multidisciplinary approach involving neuro-oncology, neurosurgery, radiation oncology, and pathology, to optimize treatment outcomes. Patients and caregivers should be kept informed of the progress of treatment at every stage. RECOMMENDATION 2: Sufficient tissue should be obtained during surgery for cytogenetic analysis and, whenever feasible, for tumour banking. RECOMMENDATION 3: Surgery is an integral part of the treatment plan, to establish a histopathologic diagnosis and to achieve safe, maximal, and feasible tumour resection, which may improve clinical signs and symptoms. RECOMMENDATION 4: The preoperative imaging modality of choice is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium as the contrast agent. Other imaging modalities, such as positron emission tomography with [(18)F]-fluoro-deoxy-d-glucose, may also be considered in selected cases. Postoperative imaging (mri or computed tomography) is recommended within 72 hours of surgery to evaluate the extent of resection. RECOMMENDATION 5: Postoperative external-beam radiotherapy is recommended as standard therapy for patients with gbm. The recommended dose is 60 Gy in 2-Gy fractions. The recommended clinical target volume should be identified with gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted mri, with a margin in the order of 2-3 cm. Target volumes should be determined based on a postsurgical planning MRI. A shorter course of radiation may be considered for older patients with poor performance status. RECOMMENDATION 6: During RT, temozolomide 75 mg/m(2) should be administered concurrently for the full duration of radio-therapy, typically 42 days. Temozolomide should be given approximately 1 hour before radiation therapy, and at the same time on the days that no radiotherapy is scheduled. RECOMMENDATION 7: Adjuvant temozolomide 150 mg/m(2), in a 5/28-day schedule, is recommended for cycle 1, followed by 5 cycles if well tolerated. Additional cycles may be considered in partial responders. The dose should be increased to 200 mg/m(2) at cycle 2 if well tolerated. Weekly monitoring of blood count is advised during chemoradiation therapy in patients with a low white blood cell count. Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia has been reported, and prophylaxis should be considered. RECOMMENDATION 8: For patients with stable clinical symptoms during combined radiotherapy and temozolomide, completion of 3 cycles of adjuvant therapy is generally advised before a decision is made about whether to continue treatment, because pseudo-progression is a common phenomenon during this time. The recommended duration of therapy is 6 months. A longer duration may be considered in patients who show continuous improvement on therapy. RECOMMENDATION 9: Selected patients with recurrent gbm may be candidates for repeat resection when the situation appears favourable based on an assessment of individual patient factors such as medical history, functional status, and location of the tumour. Entry into a clinical trial is recommended for patients with recurrent disease. RECOMMENDATION 10: The optimal chemotherapeutic strategy for patients who progress following concurrent chemoradiation has not been determined. Therapeutic and clinical-molecular studies with quality of life outcomes are needed.

Focal stereotactic external beam radiotherapy as a vision-sparing method for the treatment of peripapillary and perimacular retinoblastoma: preliminary results.

AIMS: Chemotherapy with aggressive focal ablative therapy is now the mainstay of retinoblastoma therapy. Our experience presents an evolution from conventional radiotherapy by treating posterior pole tumours with focal stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy (SRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of five patients (six eyes) treated with SRT at the Hospital for Sick Children and Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Canada, between 1999 and 2004. The prescribed dose was 40 Gy delivered in 20 fractions once daily using 6 MV photons. RESULTS: Five patients (six eyes) were treated. The median age at the time of SRT was 18 months. The median follow-up was 46.5 months as of September 2004. Four patients were treated for a posterior pole focal tumour by focal SRT, and one patient was treated for vitreous seeding with whole-eye SRT. In patients treated with focal SRT, the median doses to the tumour, optic chiasm and brainstem were 41.92, 0.25 and 0.07 Gy, respectively, and to the ipsilateral optic nerve, globe and lens were 9.98, 19.11 and 3.74 Gy, respectively. The median doses to the ipsilateral and contralateral orbital bone were 6.73 Gy (range 5.99-8.29 Gy) and 2.31 Gy (range 0.88-7.08 Gy), respectively. A complete response (residual inactive scar tissue) was seen in four of the five focal tumours treated, with one tumour responding with a partial response (suspicious residual scar tissue). No acute or late side-effects occurred in patients treated with focal SRT. Only the patient treated with whole-eye SRT developed late effects of cataract and corneal ulceration. One patient suffered recurrence within the radiation field 5 months after focal SRT. Control of this recurrence was successful using chemotherapy and focal therapy. No eye has been enucleated. CONCLUSION: Vision-sparing focal SRT for localised tumour masses in critical locations can control tumours with minimal side-effects and a minimal dose to the surrounding critical normal tissue.

Whole brain radiotherapy for the treatment of multiple brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Brain radiotherapy is used to treat cancer patients who have brain metastases resulting from various primary malignancies. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and adverse effects of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in adult patients with multiple metastases to the brain. SEARCH STRATEGY: CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CANCERLIT, and CINAHL were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which adult patients with multiple metastases to the brain from any primary cancer and treated with WBRT were included. Trials of prophylactic WBRT were excluded as well as trials that dealt with surgery or WBRT, or both, for the treatment of a single brain metastasis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently abstracted information for each predetermined outcome: overall survival at six months, intracranial progression-free duration, local brain response, local brain control, quality of life, symptom control, neurological function, and the proportion of patients able to reduce the daily dexamethasone dose. Adverse effects were also collected. MAIN RESULTS: Eight published reports (nine trials) showed no benefit of altered dose-fractionation schedules as compared to control fractionation (3000 cGy in 10 fractions) of WBRT on the probability of survival at six months. These studies also showed no difference in symptom control nor neurologic improvement among the different dose-fractionation schemes. The addition of radiosensitizers, in five RCTs, did not confer additional benefit to WBRT in either overall median survival times or brain tumor response rates. The addition of the radiosensitizer motexafin gadolinium did not improve quality of life nor time to neurologic progression overall. For the radiosensitizer misonidazole, there was no improvement in Karnofsky performance score outcomes. Three RCTs found no benefit in overall survival with the use of WBRT and a radiosurgery boost as compared to WBRT alone for selected patients with multiple brain metastases (up to four brain metastases). Overall, however, there was a statistically significant improvement in local brain control favoring the whole brain radiotherapy and radiosurgery boost arm. Only one trial of radiosurgery boost with WBRT reported an improved Karnofsky performance score outcome and improved ability to reduce dexamethasone dose. One RCT examined the use of WBRT and prednisone versus prednisone alone and produced inconclusive results. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: None of the RCTs with altered dose-fractionation schemes as compared to standard delivery (3000 cGy in ten fractions) found a benefit in terms of overall survival, neurologic function, or symptom control. The use of radiosensitizers or chemotherapy in conjunction with WBRT remains experimental. A radiosurgery boost with WBRT may improve local disease control in selected patients, although survival remains unchanged. The benefit of WBRT as compared to supportive care alone has not been studied in RCTs. It may be that supportive care alone, without WBRT, may be appropriate for some patients, particularly those with advanced disease and poor performance status.

The use of prophylactic anticonvulsants in patients with brain tumours-a systematic review.

QUESTIONS: Should patients with newly diagnosed brain tumours receive prophylactic anticonvulsants to reduce seizure risk? What is the best practice for patients with brain tumours who are taking anticonvulsant medications but who have never had a seizure? PERSPECTIVES: Patients with primary or metastatic brain tumours who have never had a seizure still have a 20% risk of experiencing a seizure over the course of their disease. Because considerable practice variation exists in regard to the management of patients with brain tumours who have never had a seizure, and because conflicting evidence has been reported, the Neuro-oncology Disease Site Group (dsg) of Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-based Care felt that a systematic review of the evidence was warranted. OUTCOMES: Outcomes of interest were incidence of seizures and adverse effects of prophylactic anticonvulsant therapy. METHODOLOGY: The medline and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for relevant evidence. The review included fully published reports or abstracts of randomized controlled trials (rcts), systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and practice guidelines. The present systematic review was reviewed and approved by the Neuro-oncology dsg, which comprises medical and radiation oncologists, surgeons, neurologists, a nurse, and a patient representative. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: The literature search located one evidence-based practice guideline, one systematic review, and five rcts that addressed prophylactic anticonvulsants for patients with brain tumours. Evidence for the best management of seizure-naïve patients who are already taking anticonvulsants was limited to one retrospective study and exploratory analyses within several rcts. BENEFITS AND HARMS: Pooled results of the five rcts suggest that the incidence of seizures in patients who receive prophylactic anticonvulsants is not significantly different from that in patients who do not receive anticonvulsants (relative risk: 1.04; 95% confidence interval: 0.70 to 1.54; p = 0.84). This analysis accords with results from a published meta-analysis. Evidence is insufficient to determine whether patients who are currently taking anticonvulsants but who have never had a seizure should taper the anticonvulsants. Patients who received anticonvulsants reported adverse effects, including rash, nausea, and hypotension, but whether these effects are a result of the anticonvulsants or of other treatments could not be determined. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, the routine use of postoperative anticonvulsants is not recommended in seizure-naïve patients with newly diagnosed primary or secondary brain tumours, especially in light of a significant risk of serious adverse effects and problematic drug interactions. Because data are insufficient to recommend whether anticonvulsants should be tapered in patients who are already taking anticonvulsants but who have never had a seizure, treatment must be individualized.

Radiotherapy and Marfan syndrome: a report of two cases.

Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a heritable disorder of the connective tissue which has been linked to mutations in the FBN (fibrillin-1) gene. Murine knockouts of the FBN gene show increased interstitial fibrosis and TGF-beta (tumor growth factor-beta) gene activation. Abnormal TGF-beta expression has previously been linked to radiation-induced fibrosis, suggesting a possible link between MFS and increased late effects following radiotherapy. Herein we report two cases in which MFS patients treated with radical radiotherapy without undue acute or late radiotherapy toxicity suggesting that radiotherapy should not be withheld from MFS patients. MFS patients may provide a unique clinico-translational setting to test associations between FBN mutations, TGF-beta activation and the risk of tissue fibrosis.

Defining the impact and contribution of steroids in patients receiving whole-brain irradiation for cerebral metastases.

AIMS: To assess the impact of steroid therapy in the management of brain metastases by review of the published literature on whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for multiple cerebral metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one full manuscripts of published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving WBRT for multiple cerebral metastases were identified from a literature search and included studies from 1971--2003. Details on the use and type of steroid, timing of steroids relative to radiotherapy, response assessment and contribution of steroids to overall outcome were extracted. RESULTS: Eighteen out of 21 trials commented on steroid use. All studies used overall survival as an assessment of outcome; 13 studies assessed neurological response and 10 used imaging assessment. Ten studies acknowledged a contribution from steroids in the response assessment or analysis, but only one study gave a fixed steroid dose to control for its palliative effect. CONCLUSIONS: Reporting of steroid use in published RCTs assessing treatment for patients with brain metastases is non-uniform and not sufficiently detailed. As such, it is difficult to assess the additional benefit of WBRT. A standardised approach to the incorporation of steroid effect in assessment of WBRT would be advantageous to determine symptom response or durability of response. Side-effects of steroid use and the ability to taper off steroids after treatment intervention are also important outcomes of interest.

A population-based study of malignant spinal cord compression in Ontario.

DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. BACKGROUND: Malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC) has long been recognized as an important complication of cancer, but its incidence is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To describe the incidence, the management, and the outcome of MSCC in the cancer population of the Canadian province of Ontario. METHODS: Episodes of MSCC, and treatments used for each episode, were identified by linking electronic hospital separation records and cancer centre records to Ontario's population-based cancer registry. The cumulative frequency of MSCC in the last 5 years of life was described in the 121435 patients who died of cancer in Ontario between 1990 and 1995. Survival after the first episode of MSCC, and duration of hospitalization with MSCC, was described. RESULTS: The cumulative probability of experiencing at least one episode of MSCC in the 5 years preceding death from cancer was 2.5% overall, and ranged from 0.2% in cancer of the pancreas to 7.9% in myeloma. Overall, 60.2% of first episodes of MSCC were treated with primary radiotherapy, and 16.1% with surgery +/- postoperative radiotherapy, while in the remaining 23.7%, there was no record of radiotherapy or surgery. Overall, the median survival following the first episode of MSCC was 2.9 months. The diagnosis of MSCC was associated with a doubling of the time spent in hospital in the last year of life. CONCLUSION: MSCC is a fairly common occurrence among patients dying of cancer. There is a 40-fold variation in the cumulative incidence of MSCC among different types of cancer.