Assessment of opioid use following septorhinoplasty and its association with pain catastrophizing.

PURPOSE: Anxiety towards pain is correlated with increased post-surgical pain and assessed with the "Pain Catastrophizing Scale" (PCS). We assess patient reported pain and opioid usage following septorhinoplasty and their association with the PCS. METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients over 18 years of age undergoing open septorhinoplasty on an outpatient basis at a single academic institution. Participants completed the PCS preoperatively and recorded post-operative pain and analgesic use with a daily online based survey through post-operative day 5. Total opioid use and highest pain rating are assessed. RESULTS: Postoperative pain was assessed in 34 patients with a median age of 37 years (Range: 22-62y). The average highest pain rating was 6.2/10 (σ = 2.03) and occurred on post-operative day 2. A median of 20 5-mg narcotic tablets (Range: 10-25) was prescribed to study participants though only an average of 7.25 (Range: 0-15) were reported as used. Medical comorbidities and surgical characteristics, including history of anxiety, cosmetic indication, surgical revision, use of osteotomies, Doyle splints, costal or conchal cartilage grafts, or inferior turbinate reduction, were not associated with increased pain or narcotic use. Those using >10 tablets scored higher on the PCS ([10.6] v. [4.8], p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Most patients require <10, 5 mg opioid tablets following septorhinoplasty. Surgeons should attempt to decrease opioid prescriptions while considering that patients with significant anxiety towards pain may report higher narcotic needs.

Effect of 3 Commercially Available Botulinum Toxin Neuromodulators on Facial Synkinesis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Botulinum toxin neuromodulators are an important treatment for facial synkinesis. Whether a difference in efficacy exists among the 3 different botulinum neuromodulators used in treating this condition remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of 3 commercially available botulinum toxin neuromodulators in the treatment of facial synkinesis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this single-blind, 3-arm comparison randomized clinical trial, 28 patients at the Facial Nerve Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, were randomized to onabotulinumtoxinA, abobotulinumtoxinA, or incobotulinumtoxinA treatment. Each patient was given the Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ) to assess severity of synkinesis before treatment and 1, 2, and 4 weeks after treatment, and improvements were compared among the groups. Data were collected from July 3, 2012, to March 31, 2015. INTERVENTIONS: Botulinum toxin type A neuromodulator (onabotulinumtoxinA, abobotulinumtoxinA, or incobotulinumtoxinA) injected into synkinetic areas of the face. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Synkinesis assessed using the SAQ (score range, 20-100; lower scores indicate less severe synkinesis) before treatment and 1, 2, and 4 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients (mean [SD] age, 49.1 [18.5] years; 8 [28.6%] male and 20 [71.4%] female), with 6 patients enrolled multiple times, received 38 treatments (15 onabotulinumtoxinA, 13 abobotulinumtoxinA, and 10 incobotulinumtoxinA). No significant difference existed in baseline pretreatment SAQ scores among the 3 groups. Mean (SD) SAQ score improvement at 4 weeks was 41% (31%) for the onabotulinumtoxinA, 42% (20%) for the abobotulinumtoxinA, and 17% (18%) for the incobotulinumtoxinA groups. No significant differences were noted in SAQ score improvements among the 3 groups at weeks 1 and 2 after treatment (week 1 mean improvements of 42% in the onabotulinumtoxinA, 45% in the abobotulinumtoxinA, and 26% in the incobotulinumtoxinA groups; P = .19; week 2 mean improvements of 43% in the onabotulinumtoxinA, 46% in the abobotulinumtoxinA, and 28% in the incobotulinumtoxinA groups; P = .20). The difference in mean SAQ score improvement for abobotulinumtoxinA vs incobotulinumtoxinA from pretreatment to 4 weeks after treatment was not significant (30 vs 12 points; P = .11) despite a significant difference in mean total SAQ score for abobotulinumtoxinA vs incobotulinumtoxinA (40.34 vs 58.00; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: AbobotulinumtoxinA had similar efficacy to onabotulinumtoxinA and incobotulinumtoxinA for the management of facial synkinesis up to 4 weeks after treatment. IncobotulinumtoxinA had significantly less effect on SAQ score improvement than onabotulinumtoxinA at 4 weeks, perhaps because of the shorter duration of action. Shorter intervals between treatments or larger doses may be required when using incobotulinumtoxinA treatment for facial synkinesis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03048383. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1.