TICACOS international: A multi-center, randomized, prospective controlled study comparing tight calorie control versus Liberal calorie administration study.

Since the first TICACOS study, 3 additional studies have been published comparing a medical nutrition therapy guided by indirect calorimetry to a regimen prescribed on the basis of predictive equations. A recent guidelines document included a meta-analysis including these 4 papers and found a trend for improvement (OR 0.98-1.48) in favor of medical nutrition therapy guided by indirect calorimetry in terms of survival. The aim of our study was to perform a multicenter prospective, randomized, controlled non blinded study in critically patients to assess the added value for measuring daily resting energy expenditure as a guide for nutritional support. The primary objective was to decrease infectious rate of these critically ill patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This phase III, multi-center, randomized, controlled non blinded study was planned to include 580 newly-admitted, adult ventilated ICU patients that were planned to stay more than 48 h in the ICU departments. The nutritional support was aimed to meet 80-100% of energy requirement measured by indirect calorimetry. The calorie needs were determined by IC in the Study group and by an equation (20-25 kcal/kg ideal body weight/day) in the Control Group. The ICU staff was trained to strive to supply 80-100% of a patient's energy requirements through artificial nutrition, preferably enteral feeding. Primary endpoint was infection rate and secondary endpoints included other morbidities and mortality during ICU, at 90 and 180 days. Comparison between the study and the control group was performed using T test for equality of means (independent samples test). Correlations were performed using the Pearson correlation test. A p level of 0.05 or below was considered as significant. Cross tabs procedure used Chi-square test for testing differences in complication rates, length of stay and length of ventilation. Correlations between energy balances and complications was also be tested using one way analysis as well as ANOVA analysis between groups and within groups. Kaplan Meir curves assessed the proportion of surviving patients in the 2 groups. RESULTS: Seven centers with a calorimeter available participated to the study. Due to slow inclusion rate, the study was stopped after 6 years and after inclusion of 417 patients only. From the 417 intended to treat patients, 339 followed the protocol. There was no differences between control and study groups in terms of age, sex BMI, SOFA (7.1 ± 3.1 vs 7.4 ± 3.3) and APACHE II scores (22.4 ± 7.9 vs 22.2 ± 7.4). The rate of infection (40 vs 31), including pneumonia rate, need for surgery, dialysis requirement, length of ventilation, ICU length of stay, and hospital length of stay were not different between groups. Mortality (30 in the control vs 21 in the study group) was not significantly different between groups. The decreased mortality observed in the study group when added to previous studies may have a positive effect on the meta-analysis previously published. CONCLUSION: Tight Calorie Control guided by indirect calorimetry decreased the rate of infection and mortality but not significantly. This may be explained by the not relatively small sample size. There results together with the previous 4 prospective randomized studies, may improve the results of the meta-analysis exploring the effects of IC guided nutrition on mortality.

Predictors of clinicians' underuse of daily sedation interruption and sedation scales.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to identify predictors of underuse of sedation scales and daily sedation interruption (DSI). METHODS: We surveyed all physicians and seven nurses in every Belgian intensive care unit (ICU), addressing practices and perceptions on guideline recommendations. Underuse was defined for sedation scales as use less than 3× per day and for DSI as never using it. Classification trees and logistic regressions identified predictors of underuse. RESULTS: Underuse of sedation scales and DSI was found for 16.6% and 32.5% of clinicians, respectively. Strongest predictors of underuse of sedation scales were agreeing that using them daily takes much time and being a physician (rather than a nurse). Further predictors were confidence in their ability to measure sedation levels without using scales, for physicians, and nurse/ICU bed ratios less than 1.98, for nurses. The strongest predictor of underuse of DSI among physicians was the perception that DSI impairs patients' comfort. Among nurses, lack of familiarity with DSI, region, and agreeing DSI should only be performed upon medical orders best predicted underuse. CONCLUSIONS: Workload considerations hamper utilization of sedation scales. Poor familiarity, for nurses, and negative perception of impact on patients' comfort, for physicians, both reduce DSI utilization. Targeting these obstacles is essential while designing quality improvement strategies to minimize sedative use.

Strengths and limitations of industry vs. academic randomized controlled trials.

Clinical research has evolved substantially over the last two decades, but industry-sponsored research is still substantially superior to academic research in preparing, organizing and monitoring studies. Academics have to realize that conducting clinical research has become a real job with professionalism requirements. The primary objectives of research and development clearly differ between industry and academics. In the first case, new drug development is expected to generate profit, whereas in the latter case, research is aimed at understanding mechanisms of disease, promoting evidence-based medicine, and improving public health and care. However, a large number of clinical studies do not achieve their goals, and the reasons for failure may also differ between sponsored and academic studies. Industry and academics should develop better constructive partnerships and learn from each other. Academics should guide industry in study design and in investigator site selection, and academics should benefit from industry's expertise in improving monitoring and reporting processes. Finally, the existing database from former studies should be opened and shared with academics, to enable the exploration of additional scientific questions and the generation of new hypotheses. The two types of research should not be opposed, but should take the form of a constructive collaboration, increasing the chances of reaching each individual goal.

Assessment of panobacumab as adjunctive immunotherapy for the treatment of nosocomial Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia.

The fully human anti-lipopolysaccharide (LPS) immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal antibody panobacumab was developed as an adjunctive immunotherapy for the treatment of O11 serotype Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. We evaluated the potential clinical efficacy of panobacumab in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. We performed a post-hoc analysis of a multicenter phase IIa trial (NCT00851435) designed to prospectively evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of panobacumab. Patients treated with panobacumab (n = 17), including 13 patients receiving the full treatment (three doses of 1.2 mg/kg), were compared to 14 patients who did not receive the antibody. Overall, the 17 patients receiving panobacumab were more ill. They were an average of 72 years old [interquartile range (IQR): 64-79] versus an average of 50 years old (IQR: 30-73) (p = 0.024) and had Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores of 17 (IQR: 16-22) versus 15 (IQR: 10-19) (p = 0.043). Adjunctive immunotherapy resulted in an improved clinical outcome in the group receiving the full three-course panobacumab treatment, with a resolution rate of 85 % (11/13) versus 64 % (9/14) (p = 0.048). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed a statistically significantly shorter time to clinical resolution in this group of patients (8.0 [IQR: 7.0-11.5] versus 18.5 [IQR: 8-30] days in those who did not receive the antibody; p = 0.004). Panobacumab adjunctive immunotherapy may improve clinical outcome in a shorter time if patients receive the full treatment (three doses). These preliminary results suggest that passive immunotherapy targeting LPS may be a complementary strategy for the treatment of nosocomial O11 P. aeruginosa pneumonia.

Upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding management: Belgian guidelines for adults and children.

UNLABELLED: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) remains a common disease affecting 100 to 170 per 100 000 adults per year and causing thereby a significant burden to healthcare resources. Despite the improvements in the management of this disorder, the associated mortality ranges from 5 to 14%. Since the general management of UGIB is not uniform, the main objective of this work is to provide guidelines for the care of adults and children presenting with bleeding caused by gastro-duodenal ulcer or variceal rupture. METHODS: In the absence of evidence-based recommendations, these guidelines were proposed after expert opinions reconciliation and graded accordingly. They are based on the published literature up to September 2010 and graded according to the class of evidence. RESULTS: The current guidelines for the management of UGIB include recommendations for the diagnostic process, general supportive care, pharmacological therapy aiming at bleeding control, specific and endoscopic treatment of acute bleeding and follow-up for both gastro-duodenal ulcers and portal hypertension-induced bleeding.

Toll-like receptor 4 modulation as a strategy to treat sepsis.

Despite a decrease in mortality over the last decade, sepsis remains the tenth leading causes of death in western countries and one of the most common cause of death in intensive care units. The recent discovery of Toll-like receptors and their downstream signalling pathways allowed us to better understand the pathophysiology of sepsis-related disorders. Particular attention has been paid to Toll-like receptor 4, the receptor for Gram-negative bacteria outer membrane lipopolysaccharide or endotoxin. Since most of the clinical trial targeting single inflammatory cytokine in the treatment of sepsis failed, therapeutic targeting of Toll-like receptor 4, because of its central role, looks promising. The purpose of this paper is to focus on the recent data of various drugs targeting TLR4 expression and pathway and their potential role as adjunctive therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock.

Color Doppler sonography of small bowel wall changes in 21 consecutive cases of acute mesenteric ischemia.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To describe the small bowel wall changes observed with color Doppler sonography in acute mesenteric ischemia with comparison with its outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed the sonographic findings of 21 patients with a final diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia (12 acute arterial forms and 9 acute venous forms). These examinations included identification of non peristaltic thin-walled fluid-filled intestinal loops (with or without pneumatosis), thickened intestinal wall (> 3 mm) (noted as stratified or not), and preserved or absent mural flow assessed with color Doppler. Sonographic findings were compared with the surgical data (n = 16) or with the clinical outcome (n = 5). RESULTS: In acute arterial ischemia, non-peristaltic thin-walled intestinal loops were detected with sonography in five cases, with visualization of pneumatosis in one. Bowel infarction was diagnosed in four of these five patients including one patient with pneumatosis. Thickened bowel loops were sonographically detected in four cases, of which 3 required resection. Conservative therapy was performed in the remaining case having preserved wall stratification and mural flow with color Doppler. In acute venous ischemia, thickened bowel loops were detected with sonography in six cases. Conservative therapy was performed in three cases for whom preserved mural flow was noted. Stratification was present in two of these three cases. CONCLUSION: In acute arterial ischemia, intestinal resection is frequently required when non-peristaltic, thin-walled, fluid-filled loops are detected with sonography. In arterial and venous ischemia, absence of wall stratification and mural flow are frequently associated with ischemia requiring surgery.

90-day follow-up of patients treated with Drotrecogin Alfa (activated) for severe sepsis: a Belgian open label study.

INTRODUCTION: Severe sepsis is the major cause of mortality in intensive care units (ICUs). The BOOST study (= B (Belgian) OO (Open Label) ST (Study)) is a Belgian open-label trial designed to pragmatically assess the safety and efficacy of Drotrecogin Alfa (activated) (DAA), the only registered treatment in this indication with favourable ratio benefit/risk. METHODOLOGY: Adult patients with severe sepsis and 2 or more sepsis-induced organ dysfunctions (OD) within the 48-hour period preceding the treatment (DAA at 24 microg/kg/h for 96 hours), were included between January 2003 and October 2003. Platelet count < 30 000/mm3 and increased risk for bleeding were exclusion criteria. Mortality and location were evaluated at 28 and 90 days. RESULTS: Of the 100 included patients, 97 (median age: 66 years; men/women: 57/40) were treated and completed the study. The predominant infection sites were lung (49%) and abdomen (29%) and 35% had had recent surgery. The mean and median numbers of OD were 3.4 and 3.0, respectively, and most patients (80 %; 77/97) had 3 or more organ failures at baseline, predominantly respiratory (95%) and cardiovascular (87%). The mean APACHE II score was 25.3 (range: 6-53). The 28-day mortality rate was 32.0% (90% CI: 24.2-39.7) and increased with the number of OD: from 15% (1.9-28.1) for2 ODs, to 71% (52.4-88.8) for 5 ODs. At day 28, the 66 surviving patients were located in general ward (35%), in the ICU (32%) or at home (30%). The 90-day mortality rate was 42% (90% CI: 34.0-50.5), with most of the survivors (73%) staying at home. Eight serious adverse events, including 4 bleedings, were reported between study days 2 and 5, in 5 patients (5.2%) and led to death in 2 patients (2.1%). CONCLUSION: Despite a higher severity of illness at baseline, this phase IV open-label long-term study in Belgian ICUs shows consistent results with previous studies with DAA. Importantly, most of the surviving patients at day 90 were staying at home.

Adjunctive therapies for severe sepsis.

Severe sepsis-associated mortality may still be improved by earlier recognition, faster and adequate source control, and targeted resuscitation. Patients who may benefit from the administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated) are currently those at high risk of death, and other indications should be better defined by ongoing trials. Use of low-dose steroids for the treatment of severe sepsis must be re-clarified by new studies and should be restricted to patients with refractory septic shock. Trials exploring the role of natural anticoagulants and Toll-like receptor inhibitors are ongoing and should be completed in the coming 3 years. Future trials in severe sepsis should target more homogeneous populations with a well-defined focus of infection and severity, receiving appropriate standard of care, and the tested intervention should be administered in a timely fashion according to the expected host response.

A registry of patients treated with drotrecogin alfa (activated) in Belgian intensive care units--an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Drotrecogin alfa (activated) [DrotAA] is the only specific sepsis therapy that has been shown to reduce mortality. The objectives of this study were to document the profile of patients treated with DrotAA in Belgian intensive care units (ICUs), using data from a database established as part of drug reimbursement conditions in Belgium, and to compare the observed hospital mortality of these patients with their expected mortality, calculated using data from non-DrotAA-treated patients from the Belgian section of PROGRESS, a separate, voluntary, international sepsis registry collecting data from patients with severe sepsis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from the non-DrotAA-treated patients in PROGRESS were used to calculate the expected mortality rates for DrotAA-treated patients in the Belgian registry. Using a logistic regression equation, these rates were controlled for age and the presence or absence of organ dysfunction in each of 5 organ systems. The same logistic regression technique was used to control the mortality rates observed in the DrotAA-treated patients from the Belgian registry for age and the presence or absence of each of the 5 organ dysfunctions. Adjusted expected and observed hospital mortality rates could then be compared. RESULTS: There were 436 DrotAA patients in the Belgian registry. Almost all the patients (99.5%) had at least 2 organ failures and the hospital mortality was 51.6%. Two hundred and eighty-six of the patients had enough baseline data to be included in the regression model. Using data from the PROGRESS non-DrotAA patients, the predicted hospital mortality, controlled for age and organ dysfunction, of Belgian registry patients, had they not been treated with DrotAA, was 63.5%. The observed hospital mortality, again controlled for age and organ dysfunction, of the 286 Belgian registry patients was 50.7%, implying an adjusted absolute mortality reduction of 12.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing Belgian reimbursement registry data with those of a voluntary severe sepsis register provides support for the observation that DrotAA reduces mortality rates in severe sepsis and septic shock.

Non-heart-beating donor, 10-year experience in a Belgian transplant center.

All over the world, transplant teams are looking for ways to increase and improve the donor pool. Non-heart-beating donation may increase the number of donors, even if some technical, logistical, and emotional problems are still encountered. The results obtained by our team should stimulate other centers to implement this kind of donation in their hospitals. Herein we have described our experience with non-heart-beating donation.

Current surgical management of acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: About 20% of the patients with acute pancreatitis may run a rapidly progressive or fulminant course resulting in the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome with or without accompanying sepsis. In this subset of patients, the mortality rate still ranges from less than 10% with sterile to over 30% with infected pancreatic necrosis. The goal of this review is to assess the available treatment strategies to allow the development of a formalized surgical approach to those patients. METHODS: A literature review of management of acute pancreatitis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Over the past 20 years, there has been a substantial change in the surgical management of severe acute pancreatitis. This change has been away from a preventive surgery based on early major interventions towards a surgery of complications based increasingly on less aggressive options that take place at a later stage of the attack with specific criteria governing the timing of surgical therapy. Non-surgical options remain more than ever the cornerstone of management in many of these patients.

Antimicrobial therapy for intra-abdominal infections: guidelines from the Infectious Disease Advisory Board (IDAB).

Intra-abdominal infection is a common cause of severe sepsis in a hospital setting and remains associated with a significant morbidity, mortality and resource use. Early adequate surgery or drainage remain the cornerstones of intra-abdominal infection management and impact on patients outcome. Concomitant early and adequate empiric antimicrobial therapy further influences patients morbidity and mortality. Multiple empirical regimens have been proposed in this setting, but rarely supported by well designed, randomized-controlled studies. The current manuscript summarizes the recommendations of the Infection Disease Advisory Board on the management of intra-abdominal infections. Empiric antimicrobial therapy for the most common causes of abdominal infections is proposed. In addition, particular attention has been paid on antibiotic treatment duration.

[Traumatic perforation of the sigmoid colon: role of computed tomography]. / Perforation sigmoïdienne traumatique: intérêt du bilan tomodensitométrique.

The authors report a case of a delayed traumatic perforation of the sigmoid colon, presenting three days after a motor vehicle accident. A review of the literature is presented.

Focal bowel wall changes detected with colour Doppler ultrasound: diagnostic value in acute non-diverticular diseases of the colon.

We performed a study to determine if colour Doppler findings may help to identify the cause of wall thickening in acute non-diverticular diseases of the colon. The study group included 66 patients admitted to the emergency department with a final diagnosis of infectious colitis (n=23), inflammatory colitis (n=10), ischaemic colitis (n=23) and malignant tumours (n=10). The following ultrasound features were assessed: maximal wall thickness, wall stratification, arterial flow in the colonic wall and arteriolar resistive index. Higher values of wall thickness were observed in malignant tumour (18.2+/-6.2 mm, p<0.001). Moderately thickened wall (6.6+/-1.3 mm, p< or =0.06), preserved stratification (90% versus 46% in the remainder of the study population) and lower resistive index (0.51+/-0.10, p< or =0.05) were significantly related to inflammatory colitis. Absence of arterial flow was more frequently observed in ischaemia (43% versus 12% in the remainder of the study population). In conclusion, despite some overlap, both ultrasound and colour Doppler features are helpful in the differential diagnosis of colonic thickening related to non-diverticular colonic lesions.

Adult liver transplantation at UCL: update 2002.

The authors present the results of a single centre study of 587 liver transplants performed in 522 adults during the period 1984-2002. Results have improved significantly over time due to better pre-, peri- and post-transplant care. One, five, ten and fifteen year actuarial survivals for the whole patient group are 81.2; 69.8; 58.9 and 51.2%. The high incidence of de novo tumors (12.3%), of cardiovascular diseases (7.5%) and of end-stage renal function (3.6%) should be further incentives to tailor the immunosuppression to the individual patient and to direct the attention of the transplant physician to the long-term quality of life of the liver recipient.

Early multi-system organ failure associated with acute pancreatitis: a plea for a conservative therapeutic strategy.

The mortality of severe acute pancreatitis still ranges between 10 and 20%. Nowadays, infected pancreatic necrosis is the leading cause of death. Despite advances in intensive care therapy, however, early and worsening multi-system organ failure remains a source of substantial morbidity and still accounts for 20 to 50% of the deaths. In recent years, the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and the relevant cascades of inflammatory mediators have been implicated as the key factor in the emergence of remote tissue damage. Early multi-system organ failure that supervenes in the first week is typically associated with a sterile necrotizing process. There are no pathophysiological, clinical or economical data to support the practice of debridement of sterile necrosis to prevent or to control early multi-system organ failure. This issue has never been addressed in a controlled study. Besides intensive care support, non-surgical therapeutic modalities including urgent endoscopic sphincterotomy for impacted stones, antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of pancreatic infection and early jejunal nutrition have been specifically developed hopefully to attenuate multiple organ failure, to obviate the need of surgical drainage and to improve survival. Fine needle aspiration of necrotic areas must be incorporated in any conservative therapeutic strategy in order to identify and not to jeopardize those with infected necrosis that remains an absolute indication for drainage. A specific treatment of acute pancreatitis is still lacking, so far. However, there is ample experimental and pathophysiological evidence in favour of immunomodulatory therapy in severe acute pancreatitis. The administration of one or several antagonists of inflammatory mediators possibly combined with a protease inhibitor may at last provide the opportunity to interfere with the two major determinants of prognosis: the severity of multiple organ failure and the extent of necrotic areas that creates the culture medium for bacterial superinfection. These benefits remain to be substantiated in a controlled study, however.