A Review of the Psychology That Underpins the Creation of a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Committee.

Although all committee work can be fraught with difficulty and laborious time commitments, committees designed to disrupt the cycle of inequity and bias are particularly fraught with social and emotional land mines that come as baggage to years of unaddressed inequity. As such, leaders must take special care and attend to the complex psychology that underpins the difficult discussions that must be had by these committees as they begin to address topics of inequity within professional medical institutions. The authors describe, in an accessible summary format, how to lay the foundations for a smooth transition into the work of a diversity, equity, and inclusion committee, the best steps to build a team, and the core concepts that should underpin all diversity, equity, and inclusion work, starting from the intrapersonal level and moving toward the organizational level. This is done with the help of available scientific data where they are available, including literature on teamwork, health equity, and psychological safety, among other topics.

Pathway Programs in North Carolina: A Historical Perspective.

To diversify the medical workforce, programs must be developed that enhance and prepare students from minoritized and underresourced communities to compete for admission to medical education. North Carolina has a rich history of providing pathway programs that assist minoritized students in developing into the physicians who will serve the communities from which they emerged.

Translational Research Training at Various Levels of Professional Experience to Address Health Disparities.

Translational research addressing health disparities brings interventions and medical discoveries into clinical practice to improve health outcomes. However, academic researchers' and clinicians' lack of understanding of methodologies limits the application of basic science to clinical settings. To solve the problem, a multidisciplinary collaboration from two academic institutions offered a workshop building on translational research methodologies to clarify the measures and interventions needed to address health disparities from a research perspective. Three two-day workshops targeted underrepresented minority participants whose research experience and professional development varied. The evaluation surveys administered after the three workshops indicated that workshop 1 which focused on translational and educational research increased participants' knowledge, and made all participants think critically about the subject. Training opportunities focused on translational research can enhance researchers and clinicians' confidence and capabilities to address health disparities.

A National Long-term Outcomes Evaluation of U.S. Premedical Postbaccalaureate Programs Designed to Promote Health care Access and Workforce Diversity.

UNLABELLED: The National Postbaccalaureate Collaborative (NPBC) is a partnership of Postbaccalaureate Programs (PBPs) dedicated to helping promising college graduates from disadvantaged and underrepresented backgrounds get into and succeed in medical school. This study aims to determine long-term program outcomes by looking at PBP graduates, who are now practicing physicians, in terms of health care service to the poor and underserved and contribution to health care workforce diversity. METHODS: We surveyed the PBP graduates and a randomly drawn sample of non-PBP graduates from the affiliated 10 medical schools stratified by the year of medical school graduation (1996-2002). RESULTS: The PBP graduates were more likely to be providing care in federally designated underserved areas and practicing in institutional settings that enable access to care for vulnerable populations. CONCLUSION: The NPBC graduates serve a critical role in providing access to care for underserved populations and serve as a source for health care workforce diversity.

Mentoring programs for underrepresented minority faculty in academic medical centers: a systematic review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Mentoring is critical for career advancement in academic medicine. However, underrepresented minority (URM) faculty often receive less mentoring than their nonminority peers. The authors conducted a comprehensive review of published mentoring programs designed for URM faculty to identify "promising practices." METHOD: Databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC, PsychLit, Google Scholar, Dissertations Abstracts International, CINHAL, Sociological Abstracts) were searched for articles describing URM faculty mentoring programs. The RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) formed the model for analyzing programs. RESULTS: The search identified 73 citations. Abstract reviews led to retrieval of 38 full-text articles for assessment; 18 articles describing 13 programs were selected for review. The reach of these programs ranged from 7 to 128 participants. Most evaluated programs on the basis of the number of grant applications and manuscripts produced or satisfaction with program content. Programs offered a variety of training experiences, and adoption was relatively high, with minor changes made for implementing the intended content. Barriers included time-restricted funding, inadequate evaluation due to few participants, significant time commitments required from mentors, and difficulty in addressing institutional challenges faced by URM faculty. Program sustainability was a concern because programs were supported through external funds, with minimal institutional support. CONCLUSIONS: Mentoring is an important part of academic medicine, particularly for URM faculty who often experience unique career challenges. Despite this need, relatively few publications exist to document mentoring programs for this population. Institutionally supported mentoring programs for URM faculty are needed, along with detailed plans for program sustainability.