Targeted Marrow Irradiation Intensification of Reduced-Intensity Fludarabine/Busulfan Conditioning for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens frequently provide insufficient disease control in patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We evaluated intensification of fludarabine/busulfan (Flu/Bu) RIC with targeted marrow irradiation (TMI) in a dose escalation with expansion phase I clinical trial. TMI doses were delivered at 1.5 Gy in twice daily fractions on days -10 through -7 (dose levels: 3 Gy, 4.5 Gy, and 6 Gy), Flu (30 mg/m2 for 5 days) and Bu (area under the curve, 4800 µM*minute for 2 days). Eligible patients were age ≥18 years with high-risk hematologic malignancy and compromised organ function ineligible for myeloablative transplantation (n = 26). The median patient age was 64 years (range, 25 to 76 years). Nineteen patients (73%) had active or measurable residual disease at transplantation. One-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 55% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34% to 76%) and 65% (95% CI, 46% to 85%), respectively. Day +100 and 1 year transplantation-related mortality were 4% (95% CI, 0.6% to 27%) and 8.5% (95% CI, 2% to 32%), respectively. The 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 43% (95% CI, 27% to 69%). Rates of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD rates were 57% (95% CI, 39% to 84%) and 22% (95% CI, 9% to 53%), respectively. Whole blood immune profiling demonstrated enrichment of central/transitional memory-like T cells with higher TMI doses, which correlated with improved survival compared with control samples from patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT. Intensification of a Flu/Bu RIC regimen with TMI is feasible with a low incidence of transplantation-related mortality in medically frail patients with advanced malignancies. The recommended phase 2 TMI dose is 6 Gy.

Identities Hidden in Challenges: The Sequential Mediation of Thriving at Work and Employee Investment.

The present study explores the influence of challenge stressors on identity orientation directly and via thriving at work and employee investment. Drawing on the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions, this study proposes challenge stressors as a critical predictor of identity orientation. The purpose of this article is to explore if a particular identity is salient in different contextual factors, and this study suggests that challenge stressors stimulate personal, relational, and collective identities to respond to a situation. The relationships hypothesized in this study were tested using a sample of 225 employees from the banking sector of Pakistan. A time-lagged research design consisting of two waves of data collection was employed. A structural equation modeling technique was used to test the hypotheses regarding the relationship between challenge stressors and identity orientation, including the role of thriving at work and employee investment as intervening mechanisms of this relationship. Results showed that challenge stressors had a significant positive relationship with identity orientation. The results also confirmed the sequential mediation of thriving at work and employee investment in the relationship between challenge stressors and identity orientation. The findings suggest that the positive side of stress as a strength motivates employees for continued self-development. Importantly, challenge stressors enhance employees' ability to thrive at work and, in turn, they invest in the work more and identify themselves strongly with their organization and work.

Higher Order Chromatin Modulator Cohesin SA1 Is an Early Biomarker for Colon Carcinogenesis: Race-Specific Implications.

Alterations in high order chromatin, with concomitant modulation in gene expression, are one of the earliest events in the development of colorectal cancer. Cohesins are a family of proteins that modulate high-order chromatin, although the role in colorectal cancer remains incompletely understood. We, therefore, assessed the role of cohesin SA1 in colorectal cancer biology and as a biomarker focusing in particular on the increased incidence/mortality of colorectal cancer among African-Americans. Immunohistochemistry on tissue arrays revealed dramatically decreased SA1 expression in both adenomas (62%; P = 0.001) and adenocarcinomas (75%; P = 0.0001). RT-PCR performed in endoscopically normal rectal biopsies (n = 78) revealed a profound decrease in SA1 expression in adenoma-harboring patients (field carcinogenesis) compared with those who were neoplasia-free (47%; P = 0.03). From a racial perspective, colorectal cancer tissues from Caucasians had 56% higher SA1 expression than in African-Americans. This was mirrored in field carcinogenesis where healthy Caucasians expressed more SA1 at baseline compared with matched African-American subjects (73%; P = 0.003). However, as a biomarker for colorectal cancer risk, the diagnostic performance as assessed by area under ROC curve was greater in African-Americans (AUROC = 0.724) than in Caucasians (AUROC = 0.585). From a biologic perspective, SA1 modulation of high-order chromatin was demonstrated with both biophotonic (nanocytology) and chromatin accessibility [micrococcal nuclease (MNase)] assays in SA1-knockdown HT29 colorectal cancer cells. The functional consequences were underscored by increased proliferation (WST-1; P = 0.0002, colony formation; P = 0.001) in the SA1-knockdown HT29 cells. These results provide the first evidence indicating a tumor suppressor role of SA1 in early colon carcinogenesis and as a risk stratification biomarker giving potential insights into biologic basis of racial disparities in colorectal cancer. Cancer Prev Res; 9(11); 844-54. ©2016 AACR.