[Expansion of the Multilink-Tristar stent after direct implantation and predilatation: comparison of clinical, angiography and intravascular ultrasound parameters]. / Expansion des Multilink-Tristar-Stents nach direkter Implantation und Vordilatation: Vergleich klinischer, angiographischer und intravasaler sonographischer Parameter.

Coronary stenting has become the primary therapeutic option for many coronary lesions. As opposed to conventional stenting the advantages of direct stenting are a reduction of procedural time, radiation exposure and costs. However, data about the incidence of in-stent restenosis are so far not available. It was the aim of this prospective study to compare the expansion of the Multilink stent after direct stenting and predilatation by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Between January 2000 and June 2001, 82 patients were assigned to direct stenting (46 lesions) or predilatation (40 lesions) in lesions of coronary arteries > 3 mm. The procedural success rate was 92% in patients undergoing direct stenting. The baseline clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. The comparison of the angiographic data shows that direct stenting was performed in lesions with a lower degree of stenosis (71 +/- 12% vs 79 +/- 11%, p = 0.01) and that significantly shorter stents were used (14.4 +/- 3.0 vs 17.8 +/- 4.1 mm, p = 0.0007). The mean stenosis length was not significantly different in either group (10.5 +/- 3.4 vs 11.7 +/- 4.3 mm, n.s.). The QCA data after stent implantation show no differences of either implantation technique. Stent expansion was assessed by IVUS estimation of the proximal, distal and minimal in stent area. The minimal in-stent area (9.53 +/- 3.23, mm2 vs 8.65 +/- 1.96 mm2, n.s.) and the stent symmetry index (0.88 vs 0.88 n.s.) were not different in either patient group. These results indicate that in this subset of selected coronary lesions > 3 mm, elective stent implantation with and without predilatation effectively can achieve comparable stent expansion as assessed by QCA and IVUS. In comparison to conventional stent implantation stents, which were implanted without predilatation, were significantly shorter to cover the same lesion length.

Role of vessel size as a predictor for the occurrence of in-stent restenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Intracoronary stents have been shown to reduce the rate of restenosis when compared with balloon angioplasty, but in-stent restenosis continues to be an important clinical problem. It was therefore the aim of this registry to identify procedural and angiographic predictors for the occurrence of in-stent restenosis. We analyzed 368 patients with 421 lesions who underwent coronary stent implantation between January 1998 and February 2000. Indications for the placement of a coronary stent were severe dissections (37%), suboptimal angiographic results (38%), restenotic lesions (20%), and graft lesions (4%). Angiographic follow-up was obtained in 270 patients (73%) with 293 lesions after 6 months. Clinical and angiographic variables were analyzed by univariate and multivariate models for the ability to predict the occurrence of in-stent restenosis, defined as a diameter stenosis >50%. In-stent restenosis was angiographically documented in 67 patients and 68 lesions (23%). Under all tested variables the reference luminal diameter before stent implantation (p = 0.006) and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.023) were identified as independent predictors for the occurrence of in-stent restenosis. The comparison of diabetic and nondiabetic patients according to vessel size revealed a 2 times higher rate of in-stent restenosis in small vessels (44% vs 23%, p = 0.002), whereas in vessels >3.0 mm the rate of in-stent restenosis was not significantly different between the 2 groups. In this registry, the clinical variable diabetes and the procedural variable reference vessel size were independent predictors for the occurrence of in-stent restenosis. In these patients, the rate of in-stent restenosis was as high as 45%.

Haemodynamic quantification of different provocation manoeuvres by simultaneous measurement of right and left atrial pressure: implications for the echocardiographic detection of persistent foramen ovale.

AIMS: Persistent foramen ovale (PFO) is found in 9.2--32% of echocardiographic examinations. The gold standard for the detection of a PFO is transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and the mostly used provocation test is the Valsalva manoeuvre. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Valsalva manoeuvre compared to other provocation tests by simultaneous haemodynamic measurements of the right and left atrial pressure. METHODS: Fifty patients underwent Swan-Ganz catheterization. Right atrial pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, which corresponds to the left atrial pressure, were measured simultaneously. The following manoeuvres were compared: the Valsalva manoeuvre, coughing, deep inspiration and expiration pressures of 20 mmHg, 40 mmHg and 60 mmHg. The main objective of our study was to compare the occurrence of pressure gradients (right atrial pressure> left atrial pressure). For further quantification mean gradients, time duration of pressure overlap, as well as products of mean gradients and overlap time were analysed. RESULTS: During the Valsalva manoeuvre a significant pressure gradient could be observed in 84% of the patients, followed by an expiration pressure of 60 mmHg (82%), inspiration (78%), expiration pressure of 40 mmHg (76%), coughing (75%) and an expiration pressure of 20 mmHg (62%). Comparing the mean gradients and the products of mean gradients and overlap time duration during the different manoeuvres, we could detect the significantly best results with the Valsalva manoeuvre. CONCLUSIONS: The Valsalva manoeuvre might be the most effective test to provoke a right-to-left atrial shunt for the detection of a PFO during echocardiographic examinations.