The comparison of outcomes from tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy in second- or third-line for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with wild-type or unknown EGFR status.

BACKGROUND: Second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients includes monotherapy with a third-generation cytotoxic drug (CT) or a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). These options are the actual standard for EGFR wild-type (WT) status, as patients with EGFR mutations achieve greater benefit by the use of TKI in first-line treatment. Some clinical trials and meta-analyses investigated the comparison between CT and TKI in second-line, but data are conflicting. METHODS: We designed a retrospective trial to gather information about TKI sensitivity in comparison with CT. We selected from clinical records patients treated with at least 1 line of CT and at least 1 line of TKI. We collected data about age, sex, performance status, comorbidity, smoking status, histotype, metastatic sites, EGFR status, treatment schedule, better response and time-to-progression (TTP) for each line of treatment and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: 93 patients met selection criteria. Mean age 66,7 (range: 46-84). M/F ratio is 3:1. 39 EGFR-WT and 54 EGFR-UK. All patients received erlotinib or gefitinib as second-line treatment or erlotinib as third-line treatment. No TTP differences were observed for both second-line (HR:0,91; p = 0,6333) and third-line (HR:1.1; p = 0,6951) treatment (TKI vs CT). A trend of a benefit in OS in favor of 3rd-line TKI (HR:0,68; p = 0,11). CONCLUSIONS: This study explores the role of TKIs in EGFR non-mutated NSCLC patients. OS analysis highlights a trend to a benefit in patients who received TKI in third-line, even if this result is statistically non-significant. Further analysis are needed to find an explanation for this observation.

Weekly pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma: A phase II study.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has the advantage of delivering active anthracycline directly to the tumor site, while exposing the patient to a lesser degree of doxorubicin-associated toxicities. Recently, a regimen in which paclitaxel is infused weekly over 1 h produced substantial antitumor activity with little myelosuppression. We designed a phase II trial to study the efficacy and toxicity of 10 mg/m(2) PLD on Days 1, 8 and 15, plus 70 mg/m(2) paclitaxel weekly in patients with untreated metastatic breast cancer and a high risk of cardiotoxicity. The study included 35 patients, with 31 (88.5%) evaluable for efficacy and 35 (100%) for toxicity. A total of 28 patients (80%) had two or more sites of disease. Overall, 4 complete and 16 partial responses were noted with an overall response rate of 64.5%, with 6 cases of stable and 5 cases of progressive disease. Toxicity was found to be manageable in that the only grade 3-4 side effects recorded were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, 8.5%; mucositis, 2.8%; leucopenia, 12.5%; anemia, 2.8% and AST/ALT, 2.8%. No cardiotoxicity was observed. In conclusion, weekly PLD plus paclitaxel appears to be a well-tolerated and effective approach for metastatic breast cancer patients with a high risk of cardiotoxicity.

Docetaxel and gemcitabine in the treatment of metastatic breast carcinoma: a dose finding study.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines for advanced disease are usually refractory to any further treatment with anthracyclines and have a poor prognosis. Therefore, new drugs or new combinations of drugs are needed. One approach has been to focus on the type of chemotherapy with low toxicity that preserves quality of life during treatment, such as weekly drug administration. STUDY DESIGN: We designed a dose-finding study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine plus docetaxel, given on a weekly schedule in metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines. Three escalating doses of gemcitabine (900, 1000 and 1100 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 in combination with a fixed dose of docetaxel, 35 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 were planned. Dose-limiting toxicity included grade > 3 hematologic toxicity, grade > 2 stomatitis, asthenia, diarrhea or organ-specific toxicity (except alopecia). Dose escalation was stopped if 1 out of 3 patients at any dose level experienced dose-limiting toxicity. RESULTS: Nine patients received a mean of 5.1 (range, 1-9) cycles. Gastrointestinal and leukopenia were the main dose-limiting toxicity. No patient experienced dose-limiting toxicity at dose level 1; at dose level 2, 2 out of 3 patients had dose-limiting toxicity and 3 additional patients treated at dose level 2 confirmed that the maximum tolerated dose had been reached. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended gemcitabine dose in combination with docetaxel (35 mg/m2 for a phase II study) was established at 900 mg/m2.

Treatment of metastatic breast cancer with vinorelbine and docetaxel.

OBJECTIVE: A phase II study was performed to evaluate efficacy and safety of the combination vinorelbine and docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline-based regimens. Overall 41 patients were included in the study. METHODS: Treatment consisted of vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2, both administered on day 1 every 3 weeks for a maximum of 9 cycles. Most patients (92%) were postmenopausal with a median age of 57 years, and median ECOG performance of 1. Sites of disease were viscera in 42% of patients, bones in 30%, soft-tissues in 32%. Sixty-five percent of patients had >2 metastatic sites. Previous treatments included neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in 7.3% of cases, adjuvant chemotherapy in 71%, and front-line chemotherapy for advanced disease in 50% of cases. RESULTS: A total of 273 cycles of chemotherapy were delivered (mean 6 cycles/patient). All patients were assessable for toxicity: alopecia was recorded in all patients, grade 2-3 neutropenia in 34% and grade 4 in 9.7%; grade 2-3 nausea/vomiting in 29%, grade 2-3 mucositis in 24.3%. Out of 39 patients evaluable for response, 7 (18%) complete responses and 13 (33%) partial responses have been recorded with an overall response rate of 51%. Six patients (15%) experienced stable disease and 13 patients (33%) progressed. Mean duration of responses was 15.2 months. Median time to progression and median overall survival were 6.2 and 14 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines the combination vinorelbine-docetaxel is very active and well tolerated representing a valid therapeutic option for the management of this patient population.

Activity and toxicity of oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed in 5-fluorouracil refractory metastatic colorectal adeno-carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the antitumor efficacy and safety of a novel oxaliplatin/raltitrexed combination in pretreated advanced colorectal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with 5-fluorouracil-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer received raltitrexed 3.0 mg/m2 as a 15-minute intravenous (i.v.) infusion, followed 45 min later by l-OHP 130 mg/m2 i.v. as 2-h venous infusion on 1 day every 3 weeks. All patients had histologically proven metastatic colorectal cancer, age 18-75, measurable disease and normal baseline biological values. Most patients (60%) had >2 disease sites. All patients were assessed for safety and also for response according to an intent-to-treat fashion. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 29% (95% CL 16%-44%) including one CR (2%) and 12 PR (27%). Six patients (16%) showed a stabilization of disease for a tumor growth control rate of 45%. The median time to progression was 4 months (range 1-12+) and median overall survival was 9 months (range 1-29+). CONCLUSION: These data confirm that this oxaliplatin/raltitrexed combination is effective against metastatic colorectal carcinoma, well tolerated with low grade toxicity and easy to administer. Further evaluation of this regimen seems warranted as an alternative to fluoropyrimidine-based combinations.

Paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

The purpose of this phase II trial was to investigate the use of paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), to evaluate tumor response, time to progression, survival, and toxicity of this regimen. Patients with recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC received 175 mg/mq paclitaxel (PTX) administered as a 3-h intravenous infusion on day 1 and 75 mg/mq cisplatin (CDDP) as a 30(') intravenous infusion on day 2; cycles were repeated every 21 days. From February 1997 to February 2000, 36 patients (18 with locoregionally recurrent disease, 8 with deemed inoperable locally advanced disease, and 8 with metastatic disease) with a median age of 60 years (range 38-73 years) were enrolled. The patients evaluable were 34 for toxic effects, length of survival, and tumor response. The overall response was 41.1%, with two (5.8%) complete responders (CR) and 12 (35.3%) partial responders (PR), 10 (29.4%) patients had stable disease and 10 (29.4%) progressed. The median time to progression (TTP) was 5 months (range 1-49 months), and the median overall survival was 11 months (range 1-53 months). The 1-year-, the 2-year-, and the 3-year-survival rate were 38.2, 17.6 and 14.6, respectively. Up to date of the statistical evaluation four patients were still alive. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, transient G3 neutropenia and anaemia occurred in seven (20.5%) and four (11.7%) patients, respectively. The predominant non-haematologic toxicities were alopecia and fatigue: Twenty-three (67.6%) patients had G3 alopecia, two patients (5.8%) G3 fatigue and 10 (29.4%) G2, eight (23.5%) G2 myalgia, eight (23.5%) G2 nausea/vomiting, and two (5.8%) G2 mucositis. There were no G4 toxicity and any treatment-related death. Paclitaxel plus cisplatin combination is an active regimen with an acceptable safety profile in recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. This regimen, according to our opinion, is a valid alternative to infusional fluorouracil (5FU)/cisplatin. In fact up to date we can confirm, in taxane era, that paclitaxel, as single agent or in combination, produce response rates similar to cisplatin/5FU regimen, but with more manageable toxicity, especially in the subset of patients with 0-1 ECOG-PS and incurable or locoregional recurrent HNSCC, with short outpatient administration too.

Renal cancer treatment: a review of the literature.

Renal carcinoma represents about 3% of all adult tumors, with an estimate of 31,900 new cases diagnosed in 2003 in the United States. In the early phase of its natural history, renal cancer is potentially curable by surgery, but if the disease presents any signs of metastasis, the chances of survival are remote, even though anecdotal cases characterized by long survival have been reported. In fact, the treatment of metastatic renal cancer remains unsatisfactory. Systemic treatment with single agents and with polychemotherapy, with or without cytokine-based immunotherapy, has not been successful, obtaining very low response rates without a significant benefit in overall survival. This review highlights the most interesting issues regarding conventional therapeutic strategies, in localized and in advanced disease. New approaches such as monoclonal antibodies, vaccines, gene therapy, angiogenesis inhibitors and allogeneic cell transplantation and their possible clinical applications are also discussed.