Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 7(4): 244-52, 1999 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10423050

RESUMO

Use of the low-energy helium-neon laser (LEL) appears to be a simple atraumatic technique for the prevention and treatment of mucositis of various origins. Preliminary findings, and significant results obtained for chemotherapy-induced mucositis in a previous phase III study, prompted a randomized multicenter double-blind trial to evaluate LEL in the prevention of acute radiation-induced stomatitis. Irradiation by LEL corresponds to local application of a high-photon-density monochromatic light source. Activation of epithelial healing for LEL-treated surfaces, the most commonly recognized effect, has been confirmed by numerous in vitro studies. The mechanism of action at a molecular and enzymatic level is presently being studied. From September 1994 to March 1998, 30 patients were randomized. Technical specification: 60 mW (25 mW at Reims, 1 patient), He-Ne, wavelength 632.8 nm. The trial was open to patients with carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx and oral cavity, treated by radiotherapy alone (65 Gy at a rate of 2 Gy/fraction, 5 fractions per week) without prior surgery or concomitant chemotherapy. The malignant tumor had to be located outside the tested laser application areas (9 points): posterior third of the internal surfaces of the cheeks, soft palate and anterior tonsillar pillars. Patients were randomized to LEL or placebo light treatment, starting on the first day of radiotherapy and before each session. The treatment time (t) for each application point was given by the equation : t(s)= energy (J/cm2) x surface (cm2)/Power (W). Objective assessment of the degree of mucositis was recorded weekly by a physician blinded to the type of treatment, using the WHO scale for grading of mucositis and a segmented visual analogue scale for pain evaluation. Protocol feasibility and compliance were excellent. Grade 3 mucositis occured with a frequency of 35.2% without LEL and of 7.6% with LEL (P<0.01). The frequency of "severe pain" (grade 3) was 23.8% without LEL, falling to 1.9% with LEL (P<0.05). Pain relief was significantly reduced throughout the treatment period (weeks 2-7). LEL therapy is capable of reducing the severity and duration of oral mucositis associated with radiation therapy. In addition, there is a tremendous potential for using LEL in combined treatment protocols utilizing concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Terapia a Laser , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Estomatite/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mucosa Bucal/patologia , Mucosa Bucal/efeitos da radiação , Dor/prevenção & controle , Medição da Dor , Doses de Radiação , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estomatite/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Head Neck ; 20(7): 623-9, 1998 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9744463

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pedicled myocutaneous flaps remain important tools in head and neck reconstruction. Evaluation of their complications are necessary to judge their merits. METHODS: From 1985 to 1995, 44 patients underwent a myocutaneous platysma flap reconstruction of the oral cavity or oropharynx. The following potential risk factors for complications were analyzed: age, sex, site of primary tumor, TNM stage, previous treatment, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and type of operation. RESULTS: Flap-related complications occurred in 18 patients. Only one patient required reoperation for flap failure. Nineteen minor complications occurred in 17 patients. A significant increase in complications was seen in patients in which neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given. CONCLUSIONS: One flap failure was observed in our series. As the platysma flap has several advantages, it should be considered in the reconstruction of small intraoral defects. Contraindications are previous radiotherapy and surgery in the head and neck, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, nodal disease, and large defects.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...