RESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the quality and readability of online health information on vasectomy using validated readability and quality assessment tools. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The top 50 search results for "vasectomy" on Google, Bing, and Yahoo were selected. Duplicate links, advertisements, blog posts, paid webpages, and information intended for healthcare providers were excluded. Flesch Reading Ease score, Flesch-Kincaid Grade level, Gunning Fog Index, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) index were used to assess readability, with optimal readability level for online health information established as being at sixth grade reading level. DISCERN Instrument and JAMA Benchmark were used to assess the quality of selected webpages. Inter-assessment score correlation and results by webpage type were analyzed. RESULTS: We analyzed 44 webpages, including 16 academic, 5 hospital-affiliated, 6 commercial, 13 non-profit health advocacy, and 4 uncategorized sources. The average readability of the evaluated webpages was at a 10th grade reading level as measured by the Flesch Kincaid Assessment tool, and an undergraduate reading level per the SMOG and Gunning Fog indices. Non-profit health advocacy webpages had the best reading level but still was not at the recommended level of grade 6 to 7. The overall DISCERN quality of the webpages was "fair", with non-profit health advocacy pages performing best. CONCLUSIONS: The assessed webpages offer education on vasectomy in a language that is too complex for the general population to understand. Furthermore, several sources for online health information, such as non-profits, outperformed webpages by academic institutions. Increased healthcare collaboration and dedication to producing quality online patient resources is necessary to address these shortcomings and build trust among patients to increase utilization of vasectomy and decrease decisional regret.
RESUMO
The surgical management of prostate cancer through radical prostatectomy has the potential to impact patients' sexual function, including erectile dysfunction and Peyronie's disease (PD). Historical data suggests the incidence of PD in post-prostatectomy patients is higher than in the general population at 15.9%. Our study objective was to measure the rate of the development of PD among patients that receive penile rehabilitation (PR) regimen prior to and immediately after radical prostatectomy. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of 581 patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer, treated with radical prostatectomy, and engaged in a PR program. Patients with the diagnosis of PD prior to prostatectomy were excluded from this study. The PR program consists of daily tadalafil, L-citrulline, and weekly vacuum erectile device with the option of intracavernosal injections if patients fail to respond to the regular regimen. We found the incidence of PD to be 2.9%, suggesting that PR regimens programs may be associated with a reduced incidence of PD in post-prostatectomy patients. Ten (out of 17) patients were diagnosed with PD after 2 years of follow up. The return of erections was not statistically different among patients who developed PD and the rest of the patients. Prospective, multi-institutional trials will be required to elucidate whether PR can prevent the development of PD in this patient population.
