An artificial intelligence algorithm for co-clustering to help in pharmacovigilance before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

AIMS: Monitoring drug safety in real-world settings is the primary aim of pharmacovigilance. Frequent adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are usually identified during drug development. Rare ones are mostly characterized through post-marketing scrutiny, increasingly with the use of data mining and disproportionality approaches, which lead to new drug safety signals. Nonetheless, waves of excessive numbers of reports, often stirred up by social media, may overwhelm and distort this process, as observed recently with levothyroxine or COVID-19 vaccines. As human resources become rarer in the field of pharmacovigilance, we aimed to evaluate the performance of an unsupervised co-clustering method to help the monitoring of drug safety. METHODS: A dynamic latent block model (dLBM), based on a time-dependent co-clustering generative method, was used to summarize all regional ADR reports (n = 45 269) issued between 1 January 2012 and 28 February 2022. After analysis of their intra and extra interrelationships, all reports were grouped into different cluster types (time, drug, ADR). RESULTS: Our model clustered all reports in 10 time, 10 ADR and 9 drug collections. Based on such clustering, three prominent societal problems were detected, subsequent to public health concerns about drug safety, including a prominent media hype about the perceived safety of COVID-19 vaccines. The dLBM also highlighted some specific drug-ADR relationships, such as the association between antiplatelets, anticoagulants and bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Co-clustering and dLBM appear as promising tools to explore large pharmacovigilance databases. They allow, 'unsupervisedly', the detection, exploration and strengthening of safety signals, facilitating the analysis of massive upsurges of reports.

Drug-induced cardiac toxicity and adverse drug reactions, a narrative review.

Drug-induced cardiotoxicity is a primary concern in both drug development and clinical practice. Although the heart is not a common target for adverse drug reactions, some drugs still cause various adverse cardiac events, with sometimes severe consequences. Direct cardiac toxicity encompasses functional and structural changes of the cardiovascular system due to possible exposure to medicines. This phenomenon extends beyond cardiovascular drugs to include non-cardiovascular drugs including anticancer drugs such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, anthracyclines and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as well as various antipsychotics, venlafaxine, and even some antibiotics (such as macrolides). Cardiac ADRs comprise an array of effects, ranging from heart failure and myocardial ischemia to valvular disease, thrombosis, myocarditis, pericarditis, arrhythmias, and conduction abnormalities. The underlying mechanisms may include disturbances of ionic processes, induction of cellular damage via impaired mitochondrial function, and even hypercoagulability. To mitigate the impact of drug-induced cardiotoxicity, multi-stage evaluation guidelines have been established, following the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) guidelines for in vitro and in vivo testing. Despite preclinical safeguards, post-marketing surveillance remains critical, as certain cardiotoxic drugs may escape initial scrutiny. Indeed, historical data show that cardiovascular ADRs contribute to almost 10% of market withdrawals. The impact of drug-induced cardiotoxicity on cardiac issues, particularly heart failure, is often underestimated, with incidence rates ranging from 11.0% to over 20.0%. We here comprehensively examine different patterns of drug-induced cardiotoxicity, highlighting current concerns and emerging pharmacovigilance signals. Understanding the underlying mechanisms and the associated risk factors is critical in order to promptly identify, effectively manage, and proactively prevent drug-induced cardiac adverse events. Collaborative efforts between physicians and cardiologists, coupled with thorough assessment and close monitoring, are essential to ensuring patient safety in the face of potential drug-induced cardiotoxicity.

Drug-related catatonia in youths: real-world insights from the WHO Safety Database.

Catatonia is characterized by psychomotor alterations and reduced contact with the environment. Initially linked to schizophrenia, it also occurs in mood disorders or organic conditions. In children, catatonia remains poorly delineated, despite dramatically increasing the risk of premature death. As data on pediatric drug-induced catatonia bears many uncertainties, we aimed to characterize its age-dependent patterns, using real-world data from the WHO safety database (VigiBase®).VigiBase® was queried for all reports of catatonia registered up to December 8th 2022. Reports involving patients <18 years were classified into 3 groups: ≤23 months, 2-11 years, and 12-17 years. Disproportionality analyses relied on the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), and the positivity of the lower end of the 95% confidence interval of the Information Component (IC) was required to suspect a signal. Catatonia was evoked in 421 pediatric reports. In infants, vaccines were leading. In children, the main signals involved haloperidol (ROR 104.3; 95% CI 45.6-238.5), ondansetron (ROR 40.5; 95% CI 16.5-99.5), and ciclosporin (ROR 27.4; 95% CI 13.8-54.1). In adolescents, chlorpromazine (ROR 199.1; 95% CI 134.8-294.1), benzatropine (ROR 193; 95% CI 104.1-361.6), and olanzapine (ROR 135.7; 95% CI 104.6-175.9) reached the highest RORs. In infants, catatonia was related to vaccines, it was ascribed to multiple drugs in children, and mainly to psychotropic drugs in adolescents. Less suspected drugs, such as ondansetron, were highlighted. Despite limitations inherent in spontaneous reporting systems, this study supports that a careful anamnesis is warranted to separate catatonia associated with medical conditions from drug-induced catatonia in pediatric patients.

A HPLC-DAD method to facilitate large-scale therapeutic drug monitoring of dalbavancin.

Dalbavancin, a long-acting lipoglycopeptide antibiotic targeting susceptible Gram-positive bacteria, is WHO critically important antibiotic, increasingly used in critical situations such as osteoarticular infections. To ensure its effectiveness and its safety, the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of dalbavancin is strongly recommended. In the absence of an available minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recommends a breakpoint of 0.125 mg/L for Staphylococcus aureus, corresponding to a trough target concentration of 25 mg/L. Nowadays, the TDM is usually performed using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method coupled with a tandem mass spectrometry. However, this expensive and specialized equipment and reagents may be difficult to acquire for non-specialized laboratories. The use of HPLC coupled with diode array detector (DAD) facilitates TDM with a lower cost, while preserving the reliability of the results. Our aim was to provide a sensitive and specific method, relying on HPLC-DAD for extending the TDM of dalbavancin beyond non-specialized labs, therefore maximizing its efficiency and Benefit/risk ratio. Our method complied with the European Medicines Agency guidelines of bioanalytical validation. Irrespective of the concentrations of dalbavancin, the coefficient of variation < 10% confirmed the reliability of this analytical method, with a calibration curve ranging from 5 to 100 mg/L. No interferences nor carryover was observed. Our HPLC-DAD method, combined with a simple extraction, provides a widely usable, inexpensive and easy-to-implement new asset for the TDM of Dalbavancin.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Direct Oral Anticoagulants May Increase Their Benefit-Risk Ratio.

The attractiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over vitamin K antagonists, in addition to a better benefit-risk ratio, stems from the fact that no therapeutic drug monitoring is deemed necessary. This has been recently mitigated by the fact that increased dabigatran (D) plasma levels have been associated with hemorrhages, and is currently under scrutiny of the European Medicines Agency. We aimed to evaluate, in real conditions of use, whether patients with out-of-range DOAC blood concentrations (too high or too low) were associated with bleeding or thrombosis. Patients treated with D or rivaroxaban (R) were prospectively included in a hospital cohort. D and R plasma levels were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-at the physician's demand. We defined concentration range as "expected" within the 95% confidence interval of the mean concentration obtained from pivotal trials, and "out of range" when concentrations were outside of that interval. A blind assessment of concentrations versus occurrence of bleeding or thrombosis was performed by means of univariate and multivariate analysis. Three hundred and twenty-two patients (mean age 78.5 years ± 13.1), treated with D or R were included consecutively. They had a mean CHA2DS2-VASc at 4.4 ± 1.7 and a mean HAS-BLED score at 1.7 ± 0.9. Irrespective of the DOAC prescribed, patients presenting with out-of-range concentrations had significantly more bleeding or thrombosis than patients with expected concentrations (P < 0.001). Patients with bleeding were more prone to have concentrations beyond the 95 percentile (N = 62, P < 0.001), whereas patients with thrombosis were more likely to have concentrations below the fifth percentile (N = 26, P < 0.05). The main risks associated with hemorrhages were abnormal concentrations, a high HAS-BLED score, the patient's age, and the creatinine blood level. For thrombosis, a concentration below the fifth percentile was the only risk factor that was significant in our cohort. While D and R under current recommendation have a better benefit-risk ratio than warfarin, their safe usage could be further optimized by some degree of therapeutic monitoring.

A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Continuous Infusion of Cloxacillin during Staphylococcus aureus Bone and Joint Infections.

Intravenous administration of antibiotics is recommended during the early phase of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) bone and joint infection (BJI). We sought to compare the plasma concentrations of cloxacillin administered alternately by continuous and intermittent infusion (CI and ItI) in patients with MSSA BJI. In this prospective crossover trial, patients were randomly assigned to receive either 3 days of CI (two 75-mg/kg 12-h cloxacillin infusions per day) and then 3 days of ItI (four 37.5-mg/kg 1-h cloxacillin infusions per day) or vice versa. The drug concentration measurement was performed on day 3 of each type of administration at 1, 6, and 11 h and at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 h after the beginning of CI and ItI, respectively. We used the nonparametric algorithm NPAG to estimate population pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. The final model was used to perform pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) simulations and calculate the probabilities of target attainment (PTA) for several ItI and CI dosing regimens. We considered two PK/PD targets of time spent above the MIC for free cloxacillin concentrations (fT>MIC): 50 and 100%. Eighty-four concentrations from 11 patients were analyzed. A two-compartment model adequately described the data. ItI with q6h regimens and short 1-h infusions of 2,000 or 3,000 mg were associated with low PTA, even for the low target (50% fT>MIC) while 3-h infusions and continuous infusions (6 to 12 g/day) were associated with a PTA of >90% for an MIC up to 0.5 mg/liter. These results support the use of prolonged or continuous infusion of cloxacillin in patients with BJI.

Major bleeding events in octagenarians associated with drug interactions between dabigatran and P-gp inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: The direct oral anticoagulant dabigatran does not require any routine therapeutic drug monitoring. Yet, concerns about possible drug interactions susceptible to increase its inherent bleeding risk, especially in very elderly patients, have been raised recently. The aim of our study was to evaluate to what extent the co-prescription of P-gp inhibitors with dabigatran may increase its plasma levels and lead to bleeding complications, in usual conditions of care of the very elderly. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients over 85 years old with non valvular atrial fibrillation receiving dabigatran were included in a prospective cohort. Prescriptions were screened for the presence of P-gp inhibitors (Group A) or not (Group B). RESULTS: Patients from Group A had increased dabigatran mean plasma concentrations as compared with patients from Group B (A vs. B: 182.2 ± 147.3 vs. 93.7 ± 64.9 ng/mL). One third of the patients from Group A had dabigatran concentrations that were deemed "out of range" versus none in Group B (P = 0.05). This was associated with more frequent bleeding complications in Group A (A: 30.4%, B: 8.6%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: In our cohort of very elderly patients, at least, the co-prescription of dabigatran with P-gp inhibitors in usual conditions of care resulted in higher dabigatran plasma concentrations and more frequent bleeding occurrences.

Is anti-factor Xa chromogenic assay for Rivaroxaban appropriate in clinical practice? Advantages and comparative drawbacks.

INTRODUCTION: No routine monitoring is required with factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban. Yet, its titration must be adapted, and its misuse may lead to increased risk of bleeding; therefore, therapeutic rivaroxaban monitoring might help in specific situations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: As asked by clinicians of our medical center, we measured rivaroxaban plasma concentrations in real conditions of use and checked their corresponding prescriptions. Measurement of 112 samples from 94 consecutive patients was performed with a Biophen LRT® anti-Xa chromogenic assay and compared blindly to the HPLC-MSMS "gold standard" method. Rivaroxaban was effectively given to 80 out of 94 patients but a mere 57% through an adequate prescription (within the scope of indications/titration). All chromogenic measurements were over the pre-specified 30ng/ml LOQ, whereas only 98 /114 samples had quantifiable rivaroxaban with HPLC-MSMS (LOQ 1ng/ml). Correlation between the two methods and linear regression were highly significant (p<0.0001). However, chromogenic values (mean 141.6ng/ml[96.6]) overestimated HPLC-MSMS values (119.7ng/ml[79.5]) by 22ng/ml according to Bland-Altman analysis (p<0.001). After re-assessing the chromogenic LOQ at 52ng/ml, 83 quantifiable samples had a mean concentration of 176.9ng/ml as compared to 158.5ng/ml with HPLC-MSMS, with no false positive anymore. CONCLUSIONS: In our medical center, rivaroxaban concentrations could be assessed by a rapid chromogenic method. Its pre-specified LOQ proved too high after being checked "on site" against HPLC-MSMS. Prescriptions for rivaroxaban were not optimal. An overestimated LOQ may impair observance monitoring or predispose patients to either risky thrombolysis or otherwise adjournable surgery in clinical practice.

Continuous versus intermittent infusions of ceftazidime for treating exacerbation of cystic fibrosis.

The present multicenter, randomized crossover study compared the safety and efficacy of continuous infusion with those of short infusions of ceftazidime in patients with cystic fibrosis. Patients with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization received two successive courses of intravenous tobramycin and ceftazidime (200 mg/kg of body weight/day) for pulmonary exacerbation administered as thrice-daily short infusions or as a continuous infusion. The primary endpoint was the variation in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) during the course of antibiotic treatment. Sixty-nine of the 70 patients enrolled in the study received at least one course of antibiotic treatment. The improvement in FEV1 at the end of therapy was not statistically different between the two treatment procedures (+7.6% after continuous infusion and +5.5% after short infusions) but was better after continuous ceftazidime treatment in patients harboring resistant isolates (P < 0.05). The interval between the course of antibiotic treatments was longer after the continuous infusion than after the short infusion of ceftazidime (P = 0.04). The mean serum ceftazidime concentration during the continuous infusion was 56.2 +/- 23.2 microg/ml; the mean peak and trough concentrations during the short infusions were 216.3 +/- 71.5 and 12.1 +/- 8.7 microg/ml, respectively. The susceptibility profiles of the P. aeruginosa isolates remained unchanged and were similar for both regimens. Quality-of-life scores were similar whatever the treatment procedure, but 82% of the patients preferred the continuous-infusion regimen. Adverse events were not significantly different between the two regimens. In conclusion, the continuous infusion of ceftazidime did not increase its toxicity and appeared to be as efficient as short infusions in patients with cystic fibrosis as a whole, but it gave better results in patients harboring resistant isolates of P. aeruginosa.

Long-term treatment with lopinavir-ritonavir induces a reduction in peripheral adipose depots in mice.

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients is associated with adverse effects, such as lipodystrophy and hyperlipidemia. The lipodystrophic syndrome is characterized by a peripheral lipoatrophy and/or fat accumulation in the abdomen and neck. In order to get insights into the physiopathological mechanisms underlying this syndrome, we treated mice with protease inhibitors (PIs) over a long period of time. Although atazanavir-treated mice presented the same circulating triglyceride concentration as control mice, lopinavir-ritonavir-treated mice rapidly became hypertriglyceridemic, with triglyceride levels of 200 mg/dl, whereas control and atazanavir-treated animals had triglyceride levels of 80 mg/dl. These results obtained with mice reproduce the metabolic disorder observed in humans. White adipose tissue (WAT) was analyzed after 8 weeks of treatment. Compared to the control or atazanavir treatment, lopinavir-ritonavir treatment induced a significant 25% weight reduction in the peripheral inguinal WAT depot. By contrast, the profound epididymal WAT depot was not affected. This effect was associated with a 5.5-fold increase in SREBP-1c gene expression only in the inguinal depot. Our results demonstrate that the long-term treatment of mice with PIs constitutes an interesting experimental model with which some aspects of the lipoatrophy induced by HAART in humans may be studied.

Lopinavir/ritonavir combination and total/HDL cholesterol ratio.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the evolution of the lipidic profile among LPV/r treated patients in a 'real life' situation. METHODS: Lipids measurements at LPV/r initiation time and every 3 months, and pharmacological measurements at M3 and M6 were collected retrospectively in 142 patients attending our clinic. Dyslipidaemia was defined as total cholesterol > or =6.2 mmol/l, HDL-cholesterol > or =1 mmol/l, total/HDL-cholesterol ratio > or =6.5 and triglycerides > or =2.3 mmol/l. RESULTS: Eighty-nine percent of patients had previously received a regimen with protease inhibitors, 4% were treatment naive. At baseline, 17% of patients had high total cholesterol, 49% high triglycerides, 63% low HDL-cholesterol, 25% a high total/HDL-cholesterol ratio. At M12, the mean HDL-cholesterol increase per patient was 21%. Lipids levels significantly increased over the study period, as early as the 3rd month (6th month for ratio) and continuously until the 12th month. Among the patients with available LPV/r plasma determinations at M3, a higher lopinavir residual concentration was observed in those with high triglycerides (6.78 vs 3.02 mg/l, p = 0.05) as, at M6, in those with an elevated ratio (9.19 vs 0.96 mg/l, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Those results suggest that LPV/r may induce a significant rise in the total/HDL-cholesterol ratio, despite an increase in HDL-cholesterol levels. The association between triglycerides and total/HDL-cholesterol ratio elevated levels and high residual concentrations of lopinavir may also argue for systematic drug monitoring.

In vivo comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in human neutrophils.

OBJECTIVE: Most of the newer fluoroquinolones are active against bacteria such as Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus, which are able to multiply inside polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs). The aim of this study was to determine moxifloxacin and levofloxacin intracellular behaviour with their usual dosage regimen. METHODS: We determined the pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin at steady state in the PMNs of ten healthy volunteers receiving moxifloxacin 400mg and levofloxacin 500mg as a once-daily dosing regimen for 3 days. RESULTS: Both antibacterials showed a high level of intracellular penetration exhibiting PMNs/plasma ratios of 17.34 +/- 8.29 for moxifloxacin versus 8.15 +/- 5.23 for levofloxacin for maximum concentrations (C(max)) and 14.72 +/- 8.29 for moxifloxacin versus 8.15 +/- 5.23 for levofloxacin for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve. Estimation of the most predictive pharmacodynamic surrogate markers for concentration-dependent bactericidal antibacterials in the intracellular milieu by taking into account the susceptibility of S. pneumoniae and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus demonstrated consistently higher values with moxifloxacin than with levofloxacin, even though with both drugs the levels obtained are well above the recommended targets values. Indeed, C(max)/MIC ratios calculated in PMNs for moxifloxacin were 287.3 and 718.2 for S. pneumoniae and S. aureus, respectively, and for levofloxacin were 25.6 and 205.1, respectively. CONCLUSION: Moxifloxacin and levofloxacin seem to be well adapted for the treatment of infections due to susceptible intracellular bacteria, and moxifloxacin provides a greater margin of safety than levofloxacin.