Extravesical vs. intravesical ureteric reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Purpose: This study aims to compare the outcomes of extravesical (EVUR) and intravesical (IVUR) ureteric reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) via systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Literature review from Medline, Embase, and Cochrane since inception to March 2022 was performed. Meta-analysis was conducted on eligible randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational cohort studies (OCS) comparing outcomes between EVUR and IVUR. Results: Twelve studies were included, comprising 577 patients (778 ureters) operated by EVUR and 395 patients (635 ureters) by IVUR. Pre-operative VUR grade, postoperative VUR persistence and hydronephrosis was not statistically significant. EVUR had shorter operative time [mean differences (MD) -22.91 min; 95% confidence interval (CI), -44.53 to -1.30, P = 0.04] and hospital stay (MD -2.09 days; 95% CI, -2.82 to -1.36, P < 0.00001) compared to IVUR. Bilateral EVUR had higher risk of postoperative acute urinary retention (ARU) (8.1%) compared to bilateral IVUR (1.7%) (OR = 4.40; 95% CI, 1.33-14.58, P = 0.02). No patient undergoing unilateral EVUR or IVUR experienced ARU. Conclusion: Both EVUR and IVUR are equally effective in correcting primary VUR. Operative time and hospital stay are shorter after EVUR compared to IVUR. However, bilateral EVUR is associated with higher risk of postoperative ARU.

Peak stent discomfort occurs early and ureteral stent with distal loop design has less pain-A pilot prospective randomised single-blinded trial over 2 weeks.

OBJECTIVES: The Polaris™ loop ureteric stent reduces the severity of stent discomfort by minimising stent material in the bladder. Early impact of ureteral stenting on quality of life (QoL) within 1 week remains unclear. The usefulness of the patient-administered ureteral stent symptoms questionnaire (USSQ) during this period of stent insertion was assessed. In this pilot single-blinded prospective randomised study, we investigate 1) the presence of early (within the 1st week) stent discomfort via the visual analog scale (VAS); 2) determine the QoL of the loop stent against conventional stent. METHODS: Forty adults requiring retrograde unilateral ureteral stent placements were enrolled. Patients with single ureteric stone or benign stricture were selected. Patients were randomised in 1:1 ratio to the loop and pigtail arm. The USSQ was administered before placement (baseline), USSQ and VAS were administered on Day 3, 7, and 14. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the USSQ scores. Median pain scores on Day 3 were lower in the loop stent group (2.9 vs. 4.0, p=0.047). There was a significant reduction in pain from Day 3-7 (0 vs. -1, p=0.016) in the pigtail group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that peak stent discomfort occurs but resolves quickly within 1 week of post-stent insertion. The loop stent offers a better pain profile compared with conventional stents at Day 3 but no difference in QoL. The loop stent reduces early pain experience post-stent insertion and may have a role in the care of patients who experience significant stent discomfort previously.