Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block for Non-cardiac Thoracic and Upper Abdominal Surgery: A Single Institute Comparative Retrospective Case Series.

Introduction Erector spinae plane (ESP) block was first introduced for the management of thoracic pain but has become increasingly popular for the treatment of abdominal surgical pain. Previous studies have shown the ESP block can be easily adapted to abdominal procedures at the corresponding dermatome level and provide postoperative analgesia. Though the versatility, simplicity, and safety of the ESP block have been demonstrated, there is a gap in the literature regarding its comparison between thoracic and abdominal surgeries. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the ESP block in treating acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing thoracic and abdominal surgeries. Methods This retrospective study included 50 patients in the non-cardiac thoracic surgery group (bilateral breast mastectomy with reconstruction) and 50 patients in the abdominal surgery group (robotic or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy). Data was obtained via the acute pain service records at a tertiary care center from 2018 to 2022. All patients received bilateral ESP blocks, performed under ultrasound guidance. Various parameters were evaluated including oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores during post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), 6, 12, and 24 hours postop. The use of abortive antiemetic medications within 24 hours was also measured to evaluate the incidence of nausea and vomiting. The results were analyzed and compared. No control group is included, as all patients at our institution receive a peripheral nerve block as a part of the institution's enhanced recovery pathway (ERP). Results This retrospective study included 50 patients in the non-cardiac thoracic surgery group (bilateral breast mastectomy with reconstruction) and 50 patients in the abdominal surgery group (robotic or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy). Compared to the thoracic group, the abdominal group had a statistically higher VAS score in PACU with mean difference (MD) 1.3 VAS, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03-2.56, p-value 0.0443, statistically higher OME consumption in the PACU (difference 13.35 OME, 95% CI 4.97-21.73, p-value 0.0003), and required significantly more antiemetic pharmacotherapy (mean 1.4 antiemetics administered, 95% CI 0.84-2.04, p-value <0.0001). Despite the abdominal group having more OME utilization in the PACU, there was no difference in cumulative OME use in the first 24 hours (95% CI -9.745-24.10, p-value 0.4021). Conclusion In this study, we demonstrated that ESP blocks are an effective regional anesthesia technique to reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption. The ESP block can serve as a useful and safe alternative to either thoracic epidural or paravertebral block techniques in thoracic and upper abdominal surgeries for perioperative pain management.

Abnormal immune system response in the brain of women with Fibromyalgia after experimental endotoxin challenge.

Background: The pathophysiology of fibromyalgia (FM) is thought to include an overactive immune system, leading to central nervous system sensitization, allodynia, and hyperalgesia. We aimed to test this theory using an experimental immune system activation procedure and neuroimaging with magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI). Methods: Twelve women with FM and 13 healthy women (healthy controls; HC) received 0.3 or 0.4 ng/kg endotoxin and underwent MRSI before and after the infusion. Changes in brain levels of choline (CHO), myo-inositol (MI), N-Acetylaspartate (NAA), and MRSI-derived brain temperature were compared between groups and dosage levels using mixed analyses of variance. Results: Significant group-by-time interactions in brain temperature were found in the right thalamus. Post-hoc testing revealed that brain temperature increased by 0.55 °C in the right thalamus in FM (t(10) = -3.483, p = 0.006), but not in HCs (p > 0.05). Dose-by-time interactions revealed brain temperature increases in the right insula after 0.4 ng/kg (t(12) = -4.074, p = 0.002), but not after 0.3 ng/kg (p > 0.05). Dose-by-time interactions revealed decreased CHO in the right Rolandic operculum after 0.4 ng/kg endotoxin (t(13) = 3.242, p = 0.006) but not 0.3 ng/kg. In the left paracentral lobule, CHO decreased after 0.3 ng/kg (t(9) = 2.574, p = 0.030) but not 0.4 ng/kg. Dose-by-time interactions affected MI in several brain regions. MI increased after 0.3 ng/kg in the right Rolandic operculum (t(10) = -2.374, p = 0.039), left supplementary motor area (t(9) = -2.303, p = 0.047), and left occipital lobe (t(10) = -3.757, p = 0.004), with no changes after 0.4 ng/kg (p > 0.05). Group-by time interactions revealed decreased NAA in the left Rolandic operculum in FM (t(13) = 2.664, p = 0.019), but not in HCs (p > 0.05). A dose-by-time interaction showed decreased NAA in the left paracentral lobule after 0.3 ng/kg (t(9) = 3.071, p = 0.013) but not after 0.4 ng/kg (p > 0.05). In the combined sample, there was a main effect of time whereby NAA decreased in the left anterior cingulate (F[1,21] = 4.458, p = 0.047) and right parietal lobe (F[1,21] = 5.457, p = 0.029). Conclusion: We found temperature increases and NAA decreases in FM that were not seen in HCs, suggesting that FM patients may have abnormal immune responses in the brain. The 0.3 and 0.4 ng/kg had differential effects on brain temperature and metabolites, with neither dose effecting a stronger response overall. There is insufficient evidence provided by the study to determine whether FM involves abnormal central responses to low-level immune challenges.

Comparison of Genicular Nerve Block in Combination With Adductor Canal Block in Both Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case Series.

The management of pain in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for chronic knee osteoarthritis (OA) has remained a challenge for the anesthesiologist regarding regional anesthesia as no single regional technique is adequate with regard to balancing effective analgesia with minimal muscle weakness. Severe postoperative pain following TKA has been shown to negatively impact patient outcomes and mortality. The genicular nerve block has recently been demonstrated to provide effective analgesia to the anterior and posterior knee capsule in recent studies. In this retrospective case series, we compare the efficacy of combined genicular nerve block (GNB) and adductor canal block (ACB) to only ACB in both primary and revision TKA patients. This combined novel approach for TKA patients can be utilized to improve patient pain scores and early ambulation, limiting the use of opioids and early discharge.

Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on gastrointestinal function in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on postoperative gastrointestinal function in gynecologic oncology patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared gynecology oncology patients undergoing non-emergent laparotomy from 10/2016 to 6/2017 managed on an ERAS protocol to a control cohort from the year prior to ERAS implementation. Major changes to postoperative care after ERAS implementation included multimodal analgesia, early feeding, goal-directed fluid resuscitation, and early ambulation. The primary outcome was rate of postoperative ileus, defined as nausea and vomiting requiring nothing-per-mouth status or nasogastric tube (NGT) placement. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmission. RESULTS: 376 patients met inclusion criteria; 197 in the control group and 179 in the ERAS group. Patient demographics were similar between groups. Ileus rate was significantly lower in the ERAS group (2.8% vs. 15.7%; p < 0.001), and fewer patients in the ERAS group required NGT placement (2.2% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.06). ERAS remained independently associated with decreased ileus rates when controlling for other patient and surgical factors (OR 0.2; p = 0.01). Epidural use was correlated with a significant increase in ileus risk (OR 2.6; p = 0.03), as was increased Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR 1.2; p < 0.01). LOS was significantly decreased in the ERAS group (2.9 vs. 4.0 days; p = 0.04), while 30-day readmission rates were similar (10.1% vs. 10.7%; p = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an ERAS protocol significantly decreases the risk of postoperative ileus in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy. ERAS also reduced LOS compared to pre-ERAS controls.