Redefining the Classification for Bertolotti Syndrome: Anatomical Findings in Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae Guide Treatment Selection.

OBJECTIVE: We present the Jenkins classification for Bertolotti syndrome or symptomatic lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) and compare this with the existing Castellvi classification for patients presenting for treatment. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 150 new patients presenting for treatment of back, hip, groin, and/or leg pain from July 2012 through February 2022. Using magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and radiography, the patients with a radiographic finding of LSTV, an appropriate clinical presentation, and identification of LSTV as the primary pain generator via diagnostic injections were diagnosed with Bertolotti syndrome. Patients for whom conservative treatment had failed and who underwent surgery to address their LSTV were included in the present study. RESULTS: The Castellvi classification excludes 2 types of anatomic variants: the prominent anatomic side and the potential transverse process and iliac crest contact. Of 150 patients with transitional anatomy, 103 (69%) were identified with Bertolotti syndrome using the Jenkins classification and received surgery (46 men [45%] and 57 women [55%]). Of the 103 patients, 90 (87%) underwent minimally invasive surgery. The patients presented with pain localized to the back (n = 101; 98%), leg (n = 79; 77%), hip (n = 51; 49%), and buttock (n = 52; 50%). Only 84 of the Jenkins classification patients (82%) met any of the Castellvi criteria. All 19 patients for whom the Castellvi classification failed had had type 1 anatomy using the Jenkins system and underwent surgery (decompression, n = 16 [84%]; fusion, n = 1 [5%]; fusion plus decompression, n = 2 [11%]). Of these 19 patients, 17 (89%) had improved pain scores. The 19 patients exclusively diagnosed via the Jenkins classification had no significant differences in improved pain compared with those diagnosed using the Castellvi classification. CONCLUSIONS: The Jenkins classification improves on the prior Castellvi classification to more comprehensively describe the functional anatomy, identify uncaptured anatomy, and better predict optimal surgical procedures to treat those with Bertolotti syndrome.

Redefining the Treatment of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae for Bertolotti Syndrome: Long-Term Outcomes Utilizing the Jenkins Classification to Determine Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Using the Jenkins classification, we propose a strategy of shaving down hypertrophic bone, unilateral fusion, or bilateral fusion procedures to achieve pain reduction and improve quality of life for patients with Bertolotti syndrome. METHODS: We reviewed 103 patients from 2012 through 2021 who had surgically treated Bertolotti syndrome. We identified 56 patients with Bertolotti syndrome and at least 6 months of follow-up. Patients with iliac contact preoperatively were presumed to be more likely to have hip pain that could respond to surgical treatment, and those patients were tracked for those outcomes as well. RESULTS: Type 1 patients (n = 13) underwent resection. Eleven (85%) had improvement, 7 (54%) had good outcome, 1 (7%) had subsequent surgery, 1 (7%) was suggested additional surgery, and 2 (14%) were lost to follow-up. In Type 2 patients (n = 36), 18 underwent decompressions and 18 underwent fusions as a first line. Of the 18 patients treated with resection an interim analysis saw 10 (55%) with failure and needing subsequent procedures. With subsequent procedure, 14 (78%) saw improvement. For fusion surgical patients, 16 (88%) saw some improvement and 13 (72%) had a good outcome. In Type 4 patients (n = 7), 6 (86%) did well with unilateral fusion, with durable benefit at 2 years. In patients who had hip pain preoperatively (n = 27), 21 (78%) had improvement of hip pain postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The Jenkins classification system provides a strategy for patients with Bertolotti syndrome who fail conservative therapy. Patients with Type 1 anatomy respond well to resection procedures. Patients with Type 2 and Type 4 anatomy respond well to fusion procedures. These patients respond well in regard to hip pain.

Intramedullary spinal cord metastasis treated with prophylactic laminoplasty prior to radiation to the spinal cord: a case report.

Background: A cervical laminoplasty is a surgical procedure used to treat moderate-to-severe cervical stenosis resulting in cervical myelopathy. It is performed to widen the spinal canal and reduce compression on the spinal cord and surrounding nerves. Though often performed electively on patients presenting with varying degrees of neurologic dysfunction including weakness and imbalance, it may also be used prophylactically when spinal cord inflammation or edema is anticipated. Radiotherapy in the spinal cord is known to produce radiation-induced damage leading to radiation myelopathy. Case Description: We present the case of a 62-year-old male diagnosed with both cervical stenosis and an intramedullary cervical spinal cord metastatic tumor. This patient presented with significant symptoms including limited mobility, numbness, lower back pain, paresthesia, and spasms in both legs as well as worsening sexual function. Given that the patient was to undergo radiotherapy, a cervical laminoplasty was performed to eliminate ongoing spinal cord compression as well to prevent future neurologic decline resulting from post-radiation inflammation and edema. Conclusions: This case highlights that cervical laminoplasty can be performed safely and effectively with significant improvement in patients with metastatic disease. By treating the underlying symptomatic stenosis, and protect the patient from the potential for spinal cord edema from radiation to a spinal cord lesion in an already narrow spinal canal.

A novel two-layer, intradural and extradural patch graft approach to treating dural defects and tears: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Dural tears must be quickly addressed to avoid the development of positional headaches and pseudomeningoceles, among other complications. However, sizeable areas of friable or absent dura create unique challenges when attempting to achieve a watertight seal. We have developed a two-layer subdural and epidural fibrous patch technique to treat expansive or challenging dural tears as a result of our experience treating spinal fluid leaks. OBSERVATIONS: The authors present the treatment of a large necrotic (5 × 1.5 cm) dural defect refractory to initial attempts at standard primary repair with dural patch grafting and requiring a revision with a dual-layer patch to manage persistent cerebrospinal fluid leakage. LESSONS: The use of a two-layer (subdural and epidural) patch is both a safe and effective dural repair technique for creating a watertight seal in challenging large areas in which the dura may be damaged, scarred, or absent. We also propose that this technique may be able to be used for smaller challenging tears, as well as potentially for repairs of large blood vessels or other fluid-filled structures in the body.