Risk of VMAT2 inhibitors on suicidality and parkinsonism: report utilizing the United States Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system.

Prescription of vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitors, valbenazine, deutetrabenazine, and tetrabenazine, is becoming increasingly common in persons treated with antipsychotics. Reported suicidality and parkinsonism are safety concerns with VMAT2 inhibitors. Herein, we aim to evaluate the aforementioned safety outcomes using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) and lower limits of 95% confidence intervals of information components (IC025) were calculated to quantify VMAT2 inhibitor-associated adverse events. Acetaminophen was the reference agent. Suicidal ideation was significantly associated with VMAT2 inhibitors, with RORs ranging from 2.38 to 10.67 and IC025 ranging from 0.73 to 2.39. Increased odds of suicidal behavior was observed with tetrabenazine (ROR 3.011, IC025 0.0087), but not deutetrabenazine or valbenazine. Decreased odds of suicide attempts and completed suicide were observed with VMAT2 inhibitors, with RORs ranging from 0.011 to 0.10 (all IC025 < 0). Increased odds of parkinsonism were reported for all VMAT2 inhibitors, with RORs and IC025 ranging from 19.49 to 25.37 and 1.66 to 2.93, respectively. The mixed results with VMAT2 inhibitor-associated suicidality and parkinsonism do not establish causal relationships. The parameters of suicidality may be explained by underlying psychiatric disorders.

Effects of cannabidiol and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol on cytochrome P450 enzymes: a systematic review.

Due to legal, political, and cultural changes, the use of cannabis has rapidly increased in recent years. Research has demonstrated that the cannabinoids cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) inhibit and induce cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes. The objective of this review is to evaluate the effect of CBD and THC on the activity of CYP450 enzymes and the implications for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with psychotropic agents that are CYP substrates. A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) and PsychINFO. Search terms included 'cannabidiol', 'tetrahydrocannabinol', and 'cytochrome P450'. A total of seven studies evaluating the interaction of THC and CBD with CYP450 enzymes and psychotropic drugs were included. Both preclinical and clinical studies were included. Results from the included studies indicate that both CBD and THC inhibit several CYP450 enzymes including, but not limited to, CYP1A2, CYP3C19, and CYP2B6. While there are a few known CYP450 enzymes that are induced by THC and CBD, the induction of CYP450 enzymes is an understudied area of research and lacks clinical data. The inhibitory effects observed by CBD and THC on CYP450 enzymes vary in magnitude and may decrease the metabolism of psychotropic agents, cause changes in plasma levels of psychotropic medications, and increase adverse effects. Our findings clearly present interactions between THC and CBD and several CYP450 enzymes, providing clinicians evidence of a high risk of DDIs for patients who consume both cannabis and psychotropic medication. However, more clinical research is necessary before results are applied to clinical settings.

Effects of anhedonia on health-related quality of life and functional outcomes in major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a heterogeneous group of mood disorders. A prominent symptom domain is anhedonia narrowly defined as a loss of interest and ability to experience pleasure. Anhedonia is associated with depressive symptom severity, MDD prognosis, and suicidality. We perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of extant literature investigating the effects of anhedonia on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and functional outcomes in persons with MDD. METHODS: A literature search was conducted on PubMed, OVID databases, and SCOPUS for published articles from inception to November 2023, reporting on anhedonia and patient-reported outcomes in persons with MDD. The reported correlation coefficients between anhedonia and self-reported measures of both HRQoL and functional outcomes were pooled using a random effects model. RESULTS: We identified 20 studies that investigated anhedonia with HRQoL and/or functional outcomes in MDD. Anhedonia as measured by the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) scores had a statistically significant correlation with patient-reported HRQoL (r = -0.41 [95 % CI = -0.60, -0.18]) and functional impairment (r = 0.39 [95 % CI = 0.22, 0.54]). LIMITATIONS: These preliminary results primarily investigate correlations with consummatory anhedonia and do not distinguish differences in anticipatory anhedonia, reward valuation or reward learning; therefore, these results require replication. CONCLUSIONS: Persons with MDD experiencing symptoms of anhedonia are more likely to have worse prognosis including physical, psychological, and social functioning deficits. Anhedonia serves as an important predictor and target for future therapeutic and preventative tools in persons with MDD.

Impact of elevated body mass index (BMI) on cognitive functioning and inflammation in persons with post-COVID-19 condition: a secondary analysis.

BACKGROUND: Individuals who have recovered from the acute stage of SARS-CoV-2 infection may be at risk of developing post-COVID-19 condition (PCC), characterised by a spectrum of persisting, non-specific, and functionally impairing symptoms across multiple organ systems. Obesity has been implicated as a risk factor for PCC, mediated by chronic systemic inflammation. The foregoing has also been separately reported to mediate cognitive dysfunction in PCC. METHODS: This is a post-hoc analysis of a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating vortioxetine treatment for cognitive impairments in persons with PCC who received vortioxetine or placebo for eight weeks. This analysis comprises baseline data, examining the impact of BMI on cognitive functioning measured by the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and Trails Making Tests (TMT)-A/B, as well as inflammation, via serum c-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). RESULTS: Complete data from 70 participants were statistically analysed and adjusted for age and sex. BMI was negatively correlated with performance on the DSST (ß = -0.003, p = 0.047), TMT-A (ß = -0.006, p = 0.025), and TMT-B (ß = -0.006, p = 0.002). BMI was positively correlated with serum CRP (unstandardized ß = 0.193, standardized ß = 0.612, p < 0.001) and ESR (ß = 0.039, p < 0.001) levels. CONCLUSION: We observed a significant negative correlation between BMI and cognitive functioning, and a significant positive correlation between BMI and inflammation in persons with PCC, suggesting a bidirectional interplay between BMI, PCC, and cognitive function; individuals with an elevated BMI may be at a greater risk of developing PCC and/or presenting with greater cognitive deficits mediated by chronic systemic inflammation.

Spectral signatures of psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and ketamine in healthy volunteers and persons with major depressive disorder and treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Electrophysiologic measures provide an opportunity to inform mechanistic models and possibly biomarker prediction of response. Serotonergic psychedelics (SPs) (i.e., psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)) and ketamine represent new investigational and established treatments in mood disorders respectively. There is a need to better characterize the mechanism of action of these agents. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review investigating the spectral signatures of psilocybin, LSD, and ketamine in persons with major depressive disorder (MDD), treatment-resistant depression (TRD), and healthy controls. RESULTS: Ketamine and SPs are associated with increased theta power in persons with depression. Ketamine and SPs are also associated with decreased spectral power in the alpha, beta and delta bands in healthy controls and persons with depression. When administered with SPs, theta power was increased in persons with MDD when administered with SPs. Ketamine is associated with increased gamma band power in both healthy controls and persons with MDD. LIMITATIONS: The studies included in our review were heterogeneous in their patient population, exposure, dosing of treatment and devices used to evaluate EEG and MEG signatures. Our results were extracted entirely from persons who were either healthy volunteers or persons with MDD or TRD. CONCLUSIONS: Extant literature evaluating EEG and MEG spectral signatures indicate that ketamine and SPs have reproducible effects in keeping with disease models of network connectivity. Future research vistas should evaluate whether observed spectral signatures can guide further discovery of therapeutics within the psychedelic and dissociative classes of agents, and its prediction capability in persons treated for depression.

Subjective and Objective Measures of Cognitive Function are Correlated in Persons with Post-COVID-19 Condition: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: It remains unclear whether subjective and objective measures of cognitive function in Post COVID-19 Condition (PCC) are correlated. The extent of correlation has mechanistic and clinical implications. Methods: This post-hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial contains baseline data of subjective and objective measures of cognition in a rigorously characterized cohort living with PCC. Herein, we evaluated the association between subjective and objective condition function, as measured by the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire, 20-item (PDQ-20) and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and Trails Making Test (TMT)-A/B, respectively. Results: A total of 152 participants comprised the baseline sample. Due to missing data, our statistical analyses included 150 for self-reported PDQ-20, 147 individuals for combined DSST-measured cognitive function (composite z-score of the Pen/Paper plus Online CogState Version, N combinedDSST ), 71 for in-person DSST-measured cognitive function (Pen/Paper Version), 70 for TMT-A-measured cognitive function, and 70 for TMT-B-measured cognitive function. After adjusting for age, sex, and education, PDQ-20 was significantly correlated with pen-and-paper DSST (ß = -0.003, p = 0.002) and TMT-B (ß = 0.003, p = 0.008) scores, but not with TMT-A scores (ß = -0.001, p = 0.751). Conclusions: Overall, a statistically significant correlation was observed between subjective and objective cognitive functions. Clinicians providing care for individuals with PCC who have subjective cognitive function complaints may consider taking a measurement-based approach to cognition at the point of care that focuses exclusively on patient-reported measures.

Greater Role of Cognitive Impairment Over Fatigue in Post-COVID-19 Quality of Life: A Post-Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Post COVID-19 Condition (PCC) is a common and debilitating condition with significant reports of fatigue and psychosocial impairment globally. The extent to which cognitive symptoms and fatigue contribute to reduced quality of life in affected individuals remains clear. Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial that evaluated the effect of vortioxetine on cognitive function in adults with PCC. The post-hoc analysis herein aimed to determine the overall effect of baseline cognitive function [as measured by the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)] and baseline fatigue severity [as measured by the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)] on baseline health-related quality of life (HRQoL) [as measured by the 5-item World Health Organisation Well-Being Index (WHO-5)]. Results: A total of 200 participants were enrolled in the primary trial. Due to missing baseline data, our statistical analysis included baseline measures of 147 individuals. Our generalized linear model analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between DSST-measured objective cognitive function and self-reported WHO-5-measured HRQoL (ß = 0.069, 95% CI [0.006, 0.131], p = 0.032). In contrast, our analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between FSS and WHO-5 scores (ß = -0.016, 95% CI [-0.021, -0.011], p < 0.001). The beta-coefficient ratio (ß DSST / ß FSS = 0.069 / 0.016) is calculated as 4.313. Conclusions: Overall, we observed that increased cognitive function was associated with increased HRQoL at baseline in adults with PCC. Moreover, we observed that increased severity of fatigue symptoms was associated with decreased HRQoL at baseline in adults with PCC. Furthermore, we observed that an improvement in cognitive function would have a four-fold greater impact on HRQoL than the effect generated by improvement in fatigue.

Associations between somatic symptoms and remission of major depressive disorder: A longitudinal study in China.

Previous studies have documented negative associations between somatic symptoms and remission of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the correlations of specific somatic symptoms with remission remain uncertain. We aimed to explore the associations between specific somatic symptoms and remission focusing on sex differences among patients with MDD. We used data from patients with MDD in the Depression Cohort in China. At baseline, total somatic symptoms were evaluated using the 28-item Somatic Symptoms Inventory and were categorized into pain, autonomic, energy, and central nervous system (CNS) symptoms. To measure remission of MDD, depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 after 3 months of treatment. We ultimately included 634 patients. Compared with quartile 1 of total somatic symptom scores, the full-adjusted ORs (95% CIs) for remission from quartile 2 to quartile 4 were 0.52 (0.30, 0.90), 0.44 (0.23, 0.83), and 0.36 (0.17, 0.75), respectively (P-value for trend = 0.005). The restricted cubic spline showed no non-linear associations between total somatic symptoms with remission (P-value for non-linear = 0.238). Pain, autonomic, and CNS symptoms showed similar results. Sex-stratified analysis showed that total somatic symptoms, pain symptoms, and autonomic symptoms were negatively correlated with remission in females, whereas CNS symptoms were negatively associated with remission in males. Our findings indicate that specific somatic symptoms exert differential effects on remission of MDD. Therapeutic interventions that target pain, autonomic, and CNS symptoms may increase the probability of remission. Furthermore, interventions for somatic symptoms should be tailored by sex, and females deserve more attention.

Impact of Baseline Anxiety on Well-being in People with Post-COVID-19 Condition: A Secondary Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) is associated with a host of psychopathological conditions including prominent anxiety symptoms. However, it is not known what effect anxious symptoms have on measures of well-being in individuals living with PCC. This study aims to evaluate anxiety's association with measures of well-being in people with PCC. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis utilizing data from a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind clinical trial assessing the effect of vortioxetine on cognitive impairment in individuals with PCC (NCT05047952). Baseline data with respect to anxiety and well-being were collected using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, 7-Item (GAD-7), and the World Health Organization (WHO) Well-Being Index, 5-Item (WHO-5), respectively. A generalized linear model (GLM) analysis on baseline GAD-7 and WHO-5 scores was conducted with age, sex, employment status, education level, previous major depressive disorder (MDD) diagnosis, and confirmed COVID-19 cases as covariates. RESULTS: Data was analyzed in a sample of 144 participants (N = 144). After controlling for the aforementioned covariates, the results found that GAD-7 and WHO-5 scores had a significant negative correlation (ß = -0.053, p = <0.001), signifying that increased anxiety had adverse effects on the overall well-being of individuals with PCC. CONCLUSION: Herein, we observed a clinically meaningful level of anxiety in individuals with PCC. We also identified a robust correlation between anxiety in PCC and measures of general well-being. Our results require replication, providing the impetus for recommending screening and targeting anxious symptoms as a tactic to improve general well-being and outcomes in individuals with PCC.

Assessing the Effects of Metabolic Disruption, Body Mass Index and Inflammation on Depressive Symptoms in Post-COVID-19 Condition: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Vortioxetine.

INTRODUCTION: To date, there are no therapeutics that have gained regulatory approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of post-COVID-19 condition (PCC), a debilitating condition characterized by cognitive impairment and mood symptoms. Additionally, persistent inflammation, metabolic dysfunction, and risks associated with an elevated body mass index (BMI) have been observed. Herein, we aimed to assess the efficacy of vortioxetine in improving depressive symptoms among individuals with PCC,  as modulated by inflammation, metabolic dysfunction, and BMI. METHODS: In this post-hoc analysis, we present preliminary data obtained from an 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants included  adults aged 18 years and older residing in Canada who were experiencing symptoms of World Health Organization (WHO)-defined PCC. Recruitment began November 2021 and ended January 2023. Of the 200 participants enrolled, 147 were randomized (1:1) to receive vortioxetine (5-20 mg, n = 73) or placebo (n = 74) for daily treatment under double-blind conditions. The primary outcome measure was the change from baseline to endpoint in the 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report Questionnaire (QIDS-SR-16). RESULTS: Our findings revealed significant effects for time (χ2 = 9.601, p = 0.002), treatment (χ2 = 9.135, p = 0.003), and the treatment × time × CRP × TG-HDL × BMI interaction (χ2 = 26.092, p < 0.001) on PCC-related depressive symptoms in the adjusted model. Moreover, the between-group analysis showed a significant improvement with vortioxetine at endpoint as compared to placebo (mean difference = - 5.41, SEM = 1.335, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Overall, vortioxetine significantly improved depressive symptoms among participants with PCC in the adjusted model. Notably, individuals with baseline markers of increased inflammation, metabolic disruption, and elevated BMI exhibited a more pronounced antidepressant effect at endpoint. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05047952 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of xanomeline for schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: We systematically reviewed extant studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of xanomeline and xanomeline-trospium (KarXT) for treatment of adults with schizophrenia. METHODS: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, articles were systematically searched for in databases and clinical trial registries. RESULTS: A total of 4 preclinical trials and 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this review. A 4-week RCT observed a difference of 24.0 points (SD 21.0) in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score between xanomeline and placebo groups (p = 0.039). A 5-week RCT observed PANSS total score changes from baseline to week 5, including -17.4 and -5.9 points in KarXT and placebo groups, respectively (LSMD -11.6 points; 95% CI -16.1 to -7.1; p < 0.001; d = 0.75). Another 5-week RCT observed PANSS total score changes from baseline to week 5, including -21.2 (SE 1.7) and -11.6 (SE 1.6) points in KarXT and placebo groups, respectively (LSMD -9.6; 95% CI -13.9 to -5.2; p < 0.0001; d = 0.61). Side effects include constipation, nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, and dry mouth. CONCLUSION: KarXT offers an innovative non-D2 blocking approach, representing a promising treatment avenue for schizophrenia.

Impact of vortioxetine on psychosocial functioning moderated by symptoms of fatigue in post-COVID-19 condition: a secondary analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Fatigue is a prominent symptom in post-COVID condition (PCC) sequelae, termed "long COVID." Herein, we aim to ascertain the effect of fatigue on psychosocial function in persons living with PCC. METHODS: This post hoc analysis evaluated the effects of vortioxetine on measures of fatigue as assessed by the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) in psychosocial function as measured by the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) in persons with PCC. We also evaluated the change in FSS on psychosocial functioning as measured by the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). This post hoc analysis obtained data from a recently published placebo-controlled study evaluating vortioxetine's effect on objective cognitive functions in persons living with PCC. RESULTS: One hundred forty-four participants meeting World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for PCC were included in this analysis. At the end of 8 weeks of vortioxetine treatment, significant improvement of all domains was observed for psychosocial functioning. There was a significant between-group difference at treatment endpoint in the family, social, and work SDS subcategories (p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant interaction effect between the treatment condition time point and FSS effect on the SDS social (χ2 = 10.640, p = 0.014) and work (χ2 = 9.342, p = 0.025) categories but a statistically insignificant effect on the family categories ((χ2 = 5.201, p = 0.158)). DISCUSSION: This post hoc analysis suggests that vortioxetine treatment significantly improves psychosocial function in persons with PCC. Our results also indicate that the improvement in psychosocial function was significantly mediated by improvement in measures of fatigue. Our results provide empirical support for recommendations to identify therapeutics for fatigue in persons living with PCC with a broader aim to improve psychosocial function in this common and severely impaired population.

Impacts of metabolic disruption, body mass index and inflammation on cognitive function in post-COVID-19 condition: a randomized controlled trial on vortioxetine.

BACKGROUND: Post-COVID-19 Condition (PCC), as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), currently lacks any regulatory-approved treatments and is characterized by persistent and debilitating cognitive impairment and mood symptoms. Additionally, metabolic dysfunction, chronic inflammation and the associated risks of elevated body mass index (BMI) have been reported. In this study, we aim to investigate the efficacy of vortioxetine in improving cognitive deficits in individuals with PCC, accounting for the interaction of metabolic dysfunction, elevated inflammation and BMI. METHODS: This is a post-hoc analysis of an 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that was conducted among adults aged 18 years and older living in Canada who were experiencing WHO-defined PCC symptoms. The recruitment of participants began in November 2021 and concluded in January 2023. A total of 200 individuals were enrolled, where 147 were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either vortioxetine (5-20 mg, n = 73) or placebo (n = 74) for daily treatment under double-blind conditions. The primary outcome measure was the change in the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) score from baseline to endpoint. RESULTS: Our findings showed significant effects for time (χ2 = 7.771, p = 0.005), treatment (χ2 = 7.583, p = 0.006) and the treatment x time x CRP x TG-HDL x BMI interaction (χ2 = 11.967, p = 0.018) on cognitive function. Moreover, the between-group analysis showed a significant improvement with vortioxetine at endpoint (mean difference = 0.621, SEM = 0.313, p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Overall, vortioxetine demonstrated significant improvements in cognitive deficits among individuals with baseline markers of metabolic dysfunction, elevated inflammation and higher BMI at endpoint as compared to placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05047952 (ClinicalTrials.gov; Registration Date: September 17, 2021).

A comparison between psilocybin and esketamine in treatment-resistant depression using number needed to treat (NNT): A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate outcomes with monoamine-based treatments in depressive disorders are common and provide the impetus for mechanistically-novel treatments. Esketamine is a proven treatment recently approved for adults with Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD) while psilocybin is an investigational treatment. Translation of the clinical meaningfulness for these foregoing agents in adults with TRD is required. Herein we evaluate the Number Needed to Treat (NNT) and Harm (NNH) of esketamine and psilocybin in adults with TRD. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials, comparing the clinical efficacy of oral psilocybin to the co-commencement of intranasal esketamine with an oral antidepressant in adults with TRD. RESULTS: 25 mg psilocybin had a significant reduction in depressive symptoms at 21-days post-dose, the NNT was 5 [95 % CI = 3.1, 18.5]. Psilocybin-induced nausea had a significant NNH = 5. Fixed-dosed esketamine at 56 mg and 84 mg had a significant effect at 28-days post-dose, (NNT of 7 [95 % CI56mg = 3.5, 46.7], [95 % CI84mg = 3.6, 142.2]). Esketamine-induced headache, nausea, dizziness, and dissociation had NNHs <10. LIMITATIONS: The preliminary results may only reflect a small portion of the patient population. These results require replication and longer term studies investigating maintenance therapy. CONCLUSION: Relatively few pharmacologic agents are proven safe and effective in adults with TRD. NNT estimates for investigational psilocybin and esketamine in TRD indicate clinical meaningfulness. The NNH profile for both aforementioned agents is clinically acceptable. Our results underscore the clinical relevance of these treatment options in adults with TRD.

The efficacy of zuranolone in postpartum depression and major depressive disorder: a review & number needed to treat (NNT) analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common and debilitating mental illness. Postpartum depression (PPD) impacts women globally and is one of the most common complications of childbirth that is underdiagnosed and undertreated, adversely impacting the mental health of women, children, and partners.Available antidepressant medications require weeks to months before showing effect. In this setting, zuranolone, an oral neuroactive steroid and a positive allosteric modulator of GABAA receptors, is an attractive alternative as a rapid-acting antidepressant treatment. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews zuranolone (SAGE217), focusing on available clinical studies in individuals with PPD and MDD. This paper adds to the extant literature by presenting the efficacy data as Number Needed to Treat (NNT) to facilitate indirect comparisons with other antidepressants. EXPERT OPINION: Zuranolone is a novel rapid-acting (i.e. two week course) oral antidepressant for the treatment of adults with PPD with ongoing clinical trials evaluating its efficacy in adults with MDD. Zuranolone is well tolerated with no significant safety concerns in any clinical trials completed to date. Zuranolone will be scheduled by the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA).

Vortioxetine for the treatment of post-COVID-19 condition: a randomized controlled trial.

Hitherto no therapeutic has received regulatory approval for the treatment of post-COVID-19 condition (PCC). Cognitive deficits, mood symptoms and significant reduction in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are highly replicated and debilitating aspects of PCC. We sought to determine the impact of vortioxetine on the foregoing symptoms and HRQoL in persons living with PCC. An 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of adults ≥ 18 years of age residing in Canada and who are experiencing symptoms of World Health Organization (WHO)-defined PCC, with a history of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, was conducted. Recruitment began November 2021 and ended January 2023. Of the 200 participants enrolled (487 invited: 121 ineligible and 59 eligible but declined participation; 307 cleared pre-screening stage), a total of 149 participants were randomized (1:1) to receive either vortioxetine (5-20 mg, n = 75) or placebo (n = 74) daily for 8 weeks of double-blind treatment (i.e. end point). The primary outcome was the change from baseline-to-end point in the Digit Symbol Substitution Test. Secondary outcomes included the effect on depressive symptoms and HRQoL, as measured by changes from baseline-to-end point on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology 16-item and WHO Wellbeing Scale 5-item, respectively. A total of 68 (90.7%) participants randomized to vortioxetine and 73 (98.6%) participants randomized to placebo completed all 8 weeks. Between-group analysis did not show a significant difference in the overall change in cognitive function [P = 0.361, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-0.179, 0.492)]. However, in the fully adjusted model, a significant treatment × time interaction was observed in favour of vortioxetine treatment with baseline c-reactive protein (CRP) as a moderator (P = 0.012). In addition, a significant improvement in Digit Symbol Substitution Test scores were observed in vortioxetine versus placebo treated participants in those whose baseline CRP was above the mean (P = 0.045). Moreover, significant improvement was obtained in measures of depressive symptoms [P < 0.001, 95% CI (-4.378, -2.323)] and HRQoL [P < 0.001, 95% CI (2.297, 4.647)] in vortioxetine-treated participants and between the treatment groups [depressive symptoms: P = 0.026, 95% CI (-2.847, -0.185); HRQoL: P = 0.004, 95% CI (0.774, 3.938)]. Although vortioxetine did not improve cognitive function in the unadjusted model, when adjusting for CRP, a significant pro-cognitive effect was observed; antidepressant effects and improvement in HRQoL in this debilitating disorder were also noted.

Impact of Elevated Body Mass Index (BMI) on Hedonic Tone in Persons with Post-COVID-19 Condition: A Secondary Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) is characterized by persistent, distressing symptoms following an acute COVID-19 infection. These symptoms encompass various domains, including hedonic tone, which is critical for overall well-being. Furthermore, obesity is both a risk factor for COVID-19 and PCC and associated with impaired hedonic tone. This study aims to investigate whether elevated body mass index (BMI) is associated with hedonic tone in persons with PCC. METHODS: We perform a post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating the impact of vortioxetine on cognitive impairment in persons with PCC. Statistical analysis of baseline data using a generalized linear model was undertaken to determine the relationship of BMI to hedonic tone measured by Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) scores. The model was adjusted for covariates including age, sex, race, suspected versus confirmed COVID-19 cases, alcohol amount consumed per week, and annual household income. RESULTS: The baseline data of 147 participants were available for analysis. BMI had a statistically significant positive association with baseline SHAPS total scores (ß = 0.003, 95% CI [6.251E-5, 0.006], p = 0.045), indicating elevated BMI is associated with deficits in self-reported reward system functioning. CONCLUSION: Higher BMI is associated with greater deficits in hedonic tone in persons with PCC, which may impact reward functioning processes such as reward prediction and processing. The mediatory effect of BMI on reward function underscores the need to investigate the neurobiologic interactions to elucidate preventative and therapeutic interventions for persons with PCC. Therapeutic development targeting debilitating features of PCC (e.g., motivation, cognitive dysfunction) could consider stratification on the basis of baseline BMI. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05047952.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists as a protective factor for incident depression in patients with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are widely used for glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and are primarily indicated for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). GLP-1 receptor agonists have also been shown to have neuroprotective and antidepressant properties. Replicated evidence suggests that individuals with DM are significantly more likely to develop depression. Herein, we aim to investigate whether GLP-1 receptor agonists can be used prophylactically on patients with DM to lower the risk of incident depression. We conducted a systematic search for English-language articles published on the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, APA, PsycInfo, Ovid and Google Scholar databases from inception to June 6, 2022. Four retrospective observational studies were identified that evaluated the neuroprotective effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists on incident depression in patients with DM. We found mixed results with regards to lowering the risk of incident depression, with two studies demonstrating a significant reduction in risk and two studies showing no such effect. A single study found that dulaglutide may lower susceptibility to depression. Our results were limited by high interstudy heterogeneity, paucity of literature, and lack of controlled trials. While we did not find evidence of GLP-1 receptor agonists significantly lowering risk of incident depression in patients with DM, promising neuroprotective data presented in two of the included papers, specifically on dulaglutide where information is scarce, provide the impetus for further investigation. Future research should focus on better elucidating the neuroprotective potential of different classes and doses of GLP-1 receptor agonists using controlled trials.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ulotaront (SEP-363856, a trace amine-associated receptor 1 agonist) for the treatment of schizophrenia and other mental disorders: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: Schizophrenia is a mental illness that can disrupt emotions, perceptions, and cognition and reduce quality of life. The classical approach to treat schizophrenia is to use typical and atypical antipsychotics; however, limitations include low efficacy in mitigating negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunctions and a range of adverse effects. Evidence has accumulated on trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) as a novel therapeutic target for treating schizophrenia. This systematic review investigates the available evidence on a TAAR1 agonist, ulotaront, as a treatment for schizophrenia. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE and Ovid databases for English-published articles from inception to 18 December 2022. The literature focusing on the association between ulotaront and schizophrenia was evaluated based on an inclusion/exclusion criterion. Selected studies were assessed for the risk of bias, using the Cochrane Collaboration tool, and summarized in a table to generate discussion topics. RESULTS: Three clinical, two comparative, and five preclinical studies examining ulotaront's pharmacology, tolerability and safety, and/or efficacy were identified. Results indicate that ulotaront has a differing adverse effect profile from other antipsychotics, may mitigate metabolic-related adverse effects commonly associated with antipsychotics, and may be effective for treating positive and negative symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from the available literature present ulotaront as a potential and promising alternative treatment method for schizophrenia. Despite this, our results were limited due to the lack of clinical trials on ulotaront's long-term efficacy and mechanisms of action. Future research should focus on these limitations to elucidate ulotaront's efficacy and safety for the treatment of schizophrenia and other mental disorders with similar pathophysiology.

Evaluating Anhedonia as a risk factor in suicidality: A meta-analysis.

Previous studies have evaluated the relationship between anhedonia and suicidality; however, to our knowledge, there has been no quantitative synthesis evaluating the foregoing association to date. Herein, this meta-analysis aims to provide a quantitative synthesis of the extant literature reporting on the association between levels of anhedonia across all dimensions (e.g., anticipatory, consummatory) amongst individuals endorsing suicidality. Online databases (i.e., PubMed, PsycINFO, Google Scholar) were searched from inception to 13 June 2022. Studies which assessed an aspect of suicidality (i.e., ideation, attempts) and a validated anhedonia scale were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-1 tool, and the quality of the sources was evaluated using GRADE criteria. The results of the studies were quantitatively synthesized using Pearson's r effect sizes via a random-effects meta-analysis. A total of 20 studies and 11,212 individuals were included in the final quantitative synthesis. Overall, results indicate that anhedonia has a significant and moderate correlation with suicidality in general and psychiatric populations (r = 0.31, p < 0.001 and r = 0.32, p < 0.001 respectively). Sub-analysis suggests a larger effect of anticipatory and consummatory interpersonal anhedonia (r = 0.40, p < 0.001). The identification of increased levels of anhedonia in individuals with suicidality indicates that anhedonia may be a core risk factor for suicidal ideation and behaviours. Future studies should endeavour to develop a comprehensive risk assessment encompassing all domains of anhedonia which can be utilized in a primary care setting as a potential prevention strategy for suicidal behaviours and outcomes.