Glucose Deprivation Induces ATF4-Mediated Apoptosis through TRAIL Death Receptors.

Metabolic stress occurs frequently in tumors and in normal tissues undergoing transient ischemia. Nutrient deprivation triggers, among many potential cell death-inducing pathways, an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response with the induction of the integrated stress response transcription factor ATF4. However, how this results in cell death remains unknown. Here we show that glucose deprivation triggered ER stress and induced the unfolded protein response transcription factors ATF4 and CHOP. This was associated with the nontranscriptional accumulation of TRAIL receptor 1 (TRAIL-R1) (DR4) and with the ATF4-mediated, CHOP-independent induction of TRAIL-R2 (DR5), suggesting that cell death in this context may involve death receptor signaling. Consistent with this, the ablation of TRAIL-R1, TRAIL-R2, FADD, Bid, and caspase-8 attenuated cell death, although the downregulation of TRAIL did not, suggesting ligand-independent activation of TRAIL receptors. These data indicate that stress triggered by glucose deprivation promotes the ATF4-dependent upregulation of TRAIL-R2/DR5 and TRAIL receptor-mediated cell death.

Combining 2-deoxy-D-glucose with fenofibrate leads to tumor cell death mediated by simultaneous induction of energy and ER stress.

Unregulated growth and replication as well as an abnormal microenvironment, leads to elevated levels of stress which is a common trait of cancer. By inducing both energy and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, 2-Deoxy-glucose (2-DG) is particularly well-suited to take advantage of the therapeutic window that heightened stress in tumors provides. Under hypoxia, blocking glycolysis with 2-DG leads to significant lowering of ATP resulting in energy stress and cell death in numerous carcinoma cell types. In contrast, under normoxia, 2-DG at a low-concentration is not toxic in most carcinomas tested, but induces growth inhibition, which is primarily due to ER stress. Here we find a synergistic toxic effect in several tumor cell lines in vitro combining 2-DG with fenofibrate (FF), a drug that has been safely used for over 40 years to lower cholesterol in patients. This combination induces much greater energy stress than either agent alone, as measured by ATP reduction, increased p-AMPK and downregulation of mTOR. Inhibition of mTOR results in blockage of GRP78 a critical component of the unfolded protein response which we speculate leads to greater ER stress as observed by increased p-eIF2α. Moreover, to avoid an insulin response and adsorption by the liver, 2-DG is delivered by slow-release pump yielding significant anti-tumor control when combined with FF. Our results provide promise for developing this combination clinically and others that combine 2-DG with agents that act synergistically to selectively increase energy and ER stress to a level that is toxic to numerous tumor cell types.

ATF4 mediates necrosis induced by glucose deprivation and apoptosis induced by 2-deoxyglucose in the same cells.

Altered metabolism is a hallmark of cancer that opens new therapeutic possibilities. 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) is a non-metabolizable glucose analog tested in clinical trials and is frequently used in experimental settings to mimic glucose starvation. However, in the present study, conducted in a rhabdomyosarcoma cell line, we find that 2-DG induces classical nuclear apoptotic morphology and caspase-dependent cell death, whereas glucose deprivation drives cells toward necrotic cell death. Necrosis induced by glucose deprivation did not resemble necroptosis or ferroptosis and was not prevented by antioxidants. Both stimuli promote endoplasmic reticulum stress. Moreover, the transcription factor ATF4 is found to mediate both the apoptosis induced by 2-DG and the glycosylation inhibitor tunicamycin, as well as the necrosis provoked by glucose withdrawal. Several hexoses partially prevented glucose deprivation-induced necrosis in rhabdomyosarcoma, although only mannose prevented apoptosis induced by 2-DG. In both cases, a reduction of cell death was associated with decreased levels of ATF4. Our results confirm previous data indicating the differential effects of these two forms with respect to inhibiting glucose metabolism, and they place endoplasmic reticulum stress as the critical mediator of glucose starvation-induced cell death.

Regulation of cancer metabolism by oncogenes and tumor suppressors.

Cell proliferation requires the coordination of multiple signaling pathways as well as the provision of metabolic substrates. Nutrients are required to generate such building blocks and their form of utilization differs to significant extents between malignant tissues and their nontransformed counterparts. Thus, oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes regulate the proliferation of cancer cells also by controlling their metabolism. Here, we discuss the central anabolic functions of the signaling pathways emanating from mammalian target of rapamycin, MYC, and hypoxia-inducible factor-1. Moreover, we analyze how oncogenic proteins like phosphoinositide-3-kinase, AKT, and RAS, tumor suppressors such as phosphatase and tensin homolog, retinoblastoma, and p53, as well as other factors associated with the proliferation or survival of cancer cells, such as NF-κB, regulate cellular metabolism.

Glucose-starved cells do not engage in prosurvival autophagy.

In response to nutrient shortage or organelle damage, cells undergo macroautophagy. Starvation of glucose, an essential nutrient, is thought to promote autophagy in mammalian cells. We thus aimed to determine the role of autophagy in cell death induced by glucose deprivation. Glucose withdrawal induces cell death that can occur by apoptosis (in Bax, Bak-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts or HeLa cells) or by necrosis (in Rh4 rhabdomyosarcoma cells). Inhibition of autophagy by chemical or genetic means by using 3-methyladenine, chloroquine, a dominant negative form of ATG4B or silencing Beclin-1, Atg7, or p62 indicated that macroautophagy does not protect cells undergoing necrosis or apoptosis upon glucose deprivation. Moreover, glucose deprivation did not induce autophagic flux in any of the four cell lines analyzed, even though mTOR was inhibited. Indeed, glucose deprivation inhibited basal autophagic flux. In contrast, the glycolytic inhibitor 2-deoxyglucose induced prosurvival autophagy. Further analyses indicated that in the absence of glucose, autophagic flux induced by other stimuli is inhibited. These data suggest that the role of autophagy in response to nutrient starvation should be reconsidered.