Consenso Colombiano para la prevención, diagnóstico y manejo de condiciones trombóticas en pacientes adultos con COVID-19: aplicando el Marco de la Evidencia a la Decisión (EtD) GRADE / Colombian consensus for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of thrombotic conditions in adult patients with COVID-19: applying GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) Frameworks

resumen está disponible en el texto completo

Abstract Recent studies have reported the occurrence of thrombotic phenomena or coagulopathy in patients with COVID-19. There are divergent positions regarding the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of these phenomena, and current clinical practice is based solely on deductions by extension from retrospective studies, case series, observational studies, and international guidelines developed prior to the pandemic. In this context, the aim was to generate a group of recommendations on the prevention, diagnosis and management of thrombotic complications associated with COVID-19. Methods: A rapid guidance was carried out applying the GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks and an iterative participation system, with statistical and qualitative analysis. Results: 31 clinical recommendations were generated focused on: a) Coagulation tests in symptomatic adults with suspected infection or confirmed SARS CoV-2 infection; b) Thromboprophylaxis in adults diagnosed with COVID-19 (Risk scales, thromboprophylaxis for outpatient, in-hospital management, and duration of thromboprophylaxis after discharge from hospitalization), c) Diagnosis and treatment of thrombotic complications, and d) Management of people with previous indication of anticoagulant agents. Conclusions: Recommendations of this consensus guide clinical decision-making regarding the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of thrombotic phenomena in patients with COVID-19, and represent an agreement that will help decrease the dispersion in clinical practices according to the challenge imposed by the pandemic.

Guidelines for prophylaxis and anti-thrombotic treatment for patients with COVID-19. Consensus of the Latin American Cooperative Group on Hemostasis and Thrombosis (CLAHT) / Guía de profilaxia y tratamiento antitrombótico para pacientes con COVID-19. Consenso del Grupo Cooperativo Latinoamericano en Hemostasia y Trombosis (CLAHT)

Coagulopathy and thrombosis associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) represent a major issue in the management of this disease. In the past months, clinical studies have demonstrated that COVID-19 patients present with a particular hypercoagulable state, in which a markedly increased D-dimer concomitant with increased levels of fibrinogen are observed. This hypercoagulable state leads to an increased risk of thrombosis, which seems to be higher among those patients with critical symptoms of COVID-19. The best therapeutic approach to prevent thrombotic events in COVID-19 has not been determined yet and several questions regarding thromboprophylaxis therapy, such as the time to initiate anticoagulation, type of anticoagulant and dose regimen, have emerged among physicians. To address these concerns, several medical societies have published position papers to provide the opinion of thrombosis experts on the management of coagulopathy and thrombosis associated with COVID-19. In line with this, the Latin America Cooperative Group of Hemostasis and Thrombosis (Grupo CLAHT) has constituted a panel of experts in thrombosis and hemostasis to discuss the available data on this topic. The aim of this review is to summarize the current evidence regarding hemostatic impairment and thrombotic risk in COVID-19 and to provide a carefully revised opinion of Latin American experts on the thromboprophylaxis and management of thrombotic events and coagulopathy in patients with suspected COVID-19.

La coagulopatía y la trombosis asociadas a la enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) representan un problema importante en el manejo de esta enfermedad. Los estudios clínicos de los últimos meses han demostrado que los pacientes con COVID-19 presentan un estado de hipercoagulabilidad particular, en el que se observa un aumento notable del dímero D concomitante con niveles elevados de fibrinógeno. El estado de hipercoagulabilidad conduce a un mayor riesgo de trombosis, que parece ser mayor entre aquellos pacientes con síntomas críticos de COVID-19. El mejor enfoque terapéutico para prevenir los eventos trombóticos en esta nueva enfermedad aún no se ha determinado y han surgido varias preguntas con respecto a la tromboprofilaxia, como el momento adecuado para iniciar la anticoagulación, el tipo de anticoagulante y el régimen de dosis. Para abordar estas preocupaciones, varias sociedades médicas han publicado artículos de posición para brindar la opinión de expertos en trombosis sobre el manejo de la coagulopatía y trombosis asociadas a COVID-19. Grupo Cooperativo Latinoamericano de Hemostasia y Trombosis (Grupo CLAHT) ha convocado a un panel de expertos en trombosis y hemostasia para discutir los datos disponibles sobre este tema. El objetivo de esta revisión es resumir la evidencia actual con respecto al deterioro hemostático y el riesgo trombótico en el COVID-19 y proporcionar una opinión cuidadosamente revisada de los expertos latinoamericanos sobre la tromboprofilaxis y el manejo de eventos trombóticos y coagulopatía en pacientes con sospecha de COVID-19.

Calidad de vida en pacientes con neoplasias mieloproliferativas crónicas Filadélfia negativas / Quality of life in patients with Philadelphia negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms

Resumen Introducción: la carga sintomática de pacientes con neoplasias mieloproliferativas crónicas Filadélfia negativas (NMC-PhN) afecta la calidad de vida (CV). Existen escalas para evaluar la magnitud de los síntomas, una de ellas, MPN-SAF-10. En nuestra región existe escasa información sobre CV de pacientes con NMC-PhN. Objetivos: estimar el puntaje de calidad de vida con la escala MPN-SAF-10 en pacientes con NMC-PhN atendidos en el Hospital de San José (Bogotá, Colombia) y explorar asociaciones entre el tiempo de tratamiento, carga de complicaciones y el efecto en la CV. Material y métodos: estudio de corte transversal analítico para evaluar CV basada en carga sintomática de pacientes con NMC-PhN del Hospital de San José (Bogotá, Colombia). Se realizó análisis descriptivo y estratificado de calidad de vida, tratamiento citorreductor y de diferentes complicaciones, así como pruebas de asociación de los puntajes de riesgo de cada enfermedad con sus respectivos puntajes de CV. Resultados: en 64 pacientes la escala MPN-SAF-10 documentó medianas de puntajes globales de CV de 3 (RIC 1-6), MPN-SAF-10 de 20 (RIC 8-32). Un 49% de los pacientes tuvo algún grado de alteración (30% moderada y 19% severa), sin diferencias entre las tres enfermedades. Los puntajes de CV no variaron entre las NMC-PhN. El tratamiento y duración del mismo no se correlacionaron con la escala de MPN-SAF-10 (hidroxiúrea r: - 0.27; ruxolitinib r: 0.12). Conclusiones: en pacientes con NMC-PhN, la evaluación de CV con la escala MPN-SAF-10 evidencia algún grado de afectación a pesar del tratamiento; ésta es útil para objetivar dicha afectación y debe implementarse en la práctica clínica. (Acta Med Colomb 2019; 44: 82-90).

Abstract Introduction: the symptomatic burden of patients with Philadelphia negative chronic myelopro liferative neoplasms (NMC-PhN) affects the quality of life (QL). There are scales to evaluate the magnitude of the symptoms; one of them, MPN-SAF-10. In our region there is scarce information on QL of patients with NMC-PhN. Objectives: To estimate the quality of life score with the MPN-SAF-10 scale in patients with NMC-PhN treated at Hospital de San José (Bogotá, Colombia) and to explore associations between treatment time, complication load and the effect on the QL. Material and methods: Analytical cross-sectional study to evaluate QL based on symptomatic load of patients with NMC-PhN from Hospital de San José (Bogotá, Colombia). A descriptive and stratified analysis of quality of life, cytoreductive treatment and different complications was carried out, as well as association tests of the risk scores of each disease with their respective QL scores. Results: in 64 patients the MPN-SAF-10 scale documented medians of global QL scores of 3 (RIC 1-6), MPN-SAF-10 of 20 (RIC 8-32). 49% of the patients had some degree of alteration (30% moderate and 19% severe), without differences between the three diseases. The QL scores did not vary between the NMC-PhN. The treatment and its duration did not correlate with the MPN-SAF-10 scale (Hydroxyurea r: - 0.27, Ruxolitinib r: 0.12). Conclusions: in patients with NMC-PhN, the evaluation of QL with the MPN-SAF-10 scale shows some degree of affectation despite the treatment; this is useful to objectify this affectation and should be implemented in clinical practice. (Acta Med Colomb 2019; 44: 82-90).

Accuracy of endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing for oropharyngeal dysphagia.

OBJECTIVES: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was conducted to compare the accuracy with which flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) assessed oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, and the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) database. METHODS: A review of published studies was conducted in parallel by two groups of researchers. We evaluated the methodological quality, homogeneity, threshold effect, and publication bias. The results are presented as originally published, then with each test compared against the other as a reference and both compared against a composite reference standard, and then pooled using a random effects model. Software use consisted of Meta-DiSc and SPSS. RESULTS: The search yielded 5,697 articles. Fifty-two articles were reviewed in full text, and six articles were included in the meta-analysis. FEES showed greater sensitivity than VFSS for aspiration (0.88 vs. 0.77; P = .03), penetration (0.97 vs. 0.83; P = .0002), and laryngopharyngeal residues (0.97 vs. 0.80; P < .0001). Sensitivity to detect pharyngeal premature spillage was similar for both tests (VFSS: 0.80; FEES: 0.69; P = .28). The specificities of both tests were similar (range, 0.93-0.98). In the sensitivity analysis there were statistically significant differences between the tests regarding residues but only marginally significant differences regarding aspiration and penetration. CONCLUSIONS: FEES had a slight advantage over VFSS to detect aspiration, penetration, and residues. Prospective studies comparing both tests against an appropriate reference standard are needed to define which test has greater accuracy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2a Laryngoscope, 127:2002-2010, 2017.