Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Trials ; 20(1): 54, 2019 Jan 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30646923

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Social isolation potentiates the risk of death by cancer in the older cancer patient population. The PREDOMOS study investigates the impact of establishing a Program of Social intervention associated with techniques of Domotic and Remote assistance on the improvement of quality of life of older isolated patients, treated for locally advanced or metastatic cancer. This paper updates the pilot trial protocol. METHODS/DESIGN: The original protocol was published in Trials, accessible at https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-017-1894-7 . This update reports on the eligibility criteria expansion and on the adjunction of a cost-utility analysis. We widened the eligible population to patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer including malignant hemopathies (except acute myeloid leukemia) and to patients in the first and second lines of oncologic treatment. We restricted the inclusion to patients with a Mini Mental State Examination score strictly over 24. In addition to the secondary outcomes outlined in the protocol, a medico-economic analysis has been added to evaluate both the health benefits and costs of the two strategies and calculate the incremental cost-utility ratio of the innovative program assessed, compared to the standard practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02829762 . Registered on 29 June 2016.


Assuntos
Envelhecimento/psicologia , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Neoplasias/terapia , Isolamento Social , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , França , Avaliação Geriátrica , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/economia , Visita Domiciliar , Humanos , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Testes de Estado Mental e Demência , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Tecnologia de Sensoriamento Remoto , Assistentes Sociais , Telefone , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Trials ; 18(1): 174, 2017 04 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28403911

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cancer incidence and social isolation increase along with advanced age, and social isolation potentiates the relative risk of death by cancer. Once spotted, social isolation can be averted with the intervention of a multidisciplinary team. Techniques of automation and remote assistance have already demonstrated their positive impact on falls prevention and quality of life (QoL), though little is known about their impact on socially isolated elderly patients supported for cancer. The primary objective of the PREDOMOS study is to evaluate the impact of establishing a Program of Social intervention associated with techniques of Domotic and Remote assistance (PS-DR) on the improvement of QoL of elderly isolated patients, treated for locally advanced or metastatic cancer. The secondary objectives include treatment failure, tolerance, survival, and autonomy. METHODS/DESIGN: This trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, open-label, two-parallel group study. The setting is 10 French oncogeriatric centers. Inclusion criteria are patients aged at least 70 years with a social isolation risk and a histological diagnosis of cancer, locally advanced or metastatic disease. The groups are (1) the control group, receiving usual care; (2) the experimental group, receiving usual care associating with monthly social assistance, domotic, and remote assistance. Participants are randomized in a 1:1 allocation ratio. Evaluation times involve inclusion (randomization) and follow-up (12 months). The primary endpoint is QoL at 3 months (via European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30); secondary endpoints are social isolation, time to treatment failure, toxicity, dose response-intensity, survival, autonomy, and QoL at 6 months. For the sample size, 320 individuals are required to obtain 90% power to detect a 10-point difference (standard deviation 25) in QoL score between the two groups (20% loss to follow-up patients expected). DISCUSSION: The randomized controlled design is the most appropriate design to demonstrate the efficacy of a new experimental strategy (Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group classification). National and international recommendations could be updated based on the findings of this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02829762 . Registered on 29 June 2016.


Assuntos
Envelhecimento/psicologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Isolamento Social , Assistentes Sociais , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Protocolos Clínicos , Feminino , França , Nível de Saúde , Visita Domiciliar , Humanos , Solidão , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/psicologia , Autonomia Pessoal , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Tecnologia de Sensoriamento Remoto , Projetos de Pesquisa , Inquéritos e Questionários , Telefone , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...