Giant cell arteritis-related aortitis with positive or negative temporal artery biopsy: a French multicentre study.

Objective: To compare the clinical presentation and outcome of giant cell arteritis (GCA)-related aortitis according to the results of temporal artery biopsy (TAB).Method: Patients with GCA-related aortitis diagnosed between 2000 and 2017, who underwent TAB, were retrospectively included from a French multicentre database. They all met at least three American College of Rheumatology criteria for the diagnosis of GCA. Aortitis was defined by aortic wall thickening > 2 mm on computed tomography scan and/or an aortic aneurysm, associated with an inflammatory syndrome. Patients were divided into two groups [positive and negative TAB (TAB+, TAB-)], which were compared regarding aortic imaging characteristics and aortic events, at aortitis diagnosis and during follow-up.Results: We included 56 patients with TAB+ (70%) and 24 with TAB- (30%). At aortitis diagnosis, patients with TAB- were significantly younger than those with TAB+ (67.7 ± 9 vs 72.3 ± 7 years, p = 0.022). Initial clinical signs of GCA, inflammatory parameters, and glucocorticoid therapy were similar in both groups. Coronary artery disease and/or lower limb peripheral arterial disease was more frequent in TAB- patients (25% vs 5.3%, p = 0.018). Aortic wall thickness and type of aortic involvement were not significantly different between groups. Diffuse arterial involvement from the aortic arch was more frequent in TAB- patients (29.1 vs 8.9%, p = 0.03). There were no differences between the groups regarding overall, aneurism-free, relapse-free, and aortic event-free survival.Conclusion: Among patients with GCA-related aortitis, those with TAB- are characterized by younger age and increased frequency of diffuse arterial involvement from the aortic arch compared to those with TAB+, without significant differences in terms of prognosis.

Concomitant association of giant cell arteritis and malignancy: a multicenter retrospective case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: Some studies suggest that there is an increased risk of malignancies in giant cell arteritis (GCA). We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of GCA patients with concomitant malignancy and compare them to a GCA control group. METHOD: Patients with a diagnosis of GCA and malignancy and with a maximal delay of 12 months between both diagnoses were retrospectively included in this study and compared to a control group of age-matched (3:1) patients from a multicenter cohort of GCA patients. RESULTS: Forty-nine observations were collected (median age 76 years). Malignancies comprised 33 (67%) solid neoplasms and 16 (33%) clonal hematologic disorders. No over-representation of a particular type of malignancy was observed. Diagnosis of GCA and malignancy was synchronous in 7 (14%) patients, while malignancy succeeded GCA in 29 (59%) patients. Malignancy was fortuitously diagnosed based on abnormalities observed in laboratory tests in 26 patients, based on imaging in 14 patients, and based on symptoms or clinical examination in the nine remaining patients. Two patients had a concomitant relapse of both conditions. When compared to the control group, patients with concomitant GCA and malignancy were more frequently male (p < 0.001), with an altered general state (p < 0.001), and polymyalgia rheumatica (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study does not indicate an over-representation of any particular type of malignancy in GCA patients. Initial follow-up dictated by vasculitis may have led to an early identification of malignancy. Nevertheless, GCA male patients with an altered general state and polymyalgia rheumatica might more frequently show concomitant malignancies.

[Hereditary thrombophilia testing and its therapeutic impact on venous thromboembolism disease: Results from a retrospective single-center study of 162 patients]. / La recherche de thrombophilie héréditaire et son impact thérapeutique dans la maladie thromboembolique veineuse : résultats d'une étude monocentrique rétrospective sur 162 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolic disease is a multifactorial, frequently recurrent pathology, whose treatment is based on anticoagulation. As part of the etiological investigation, screening for an inherited thrombophilia is framed by French guidelines published in 2009. The aim of the study is to assess the contribution of inherited thrombophilias testing in common practice. METHOD: This is a retrospective single-center observational study. Over a period of a year, all records of patients who were screened for a hereditary thrombophilia were analyzed. The conformity of the indication of hereditary thrombophilia workup in balance with the guidelines, its completeness and therapeutic impact were studied. RESULTS: Of the 494 records analyzed, 225 were related to venous thromboembolism. Among them, there were 162 pulmonary embolisms or deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs. In this subgroup, 57 % of records complied with guidelines and 69 % were complete. Thirty-four thrombophilias were highlighted: 4 protein S deficiencies, 1 protein C deficiency, 4 combined deficiencies, 17 factor V Leiden mutations and 8 factor II G20210A mutations. For one patient, hereditary thrombophilia diagnosis had profoundly changed the curative therapeutic approach. CONCLUSION: Adherence to French guidelines remains limited. In clinical practice, diagnosis of hereditary thrombophilia has little impact on the curative therapeutic approach in venous thromboembolic disease.

[Shifting cellulitis in a patient with X-linked hypogammaglobulinemia]. / Dermo-hypodermite bactérienne « à bascule ¼ chez un patient atteint d'hypogammaglobulinémie liée à l'X.

BACKGROUND: In cases of immunodeficiency, a systemic infection may be revealed by atypical symptoms, particularly those involving the skin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present case describes a 19-year-old male with X-linked hypogammaglobulinemia, or Bruton agammaglobulinemia, treated with intravenous immunoglobulin G antibodies. Over a 6-week period, the patient developed recurrent plaques in both legs, first on one and then on the other, without fever. Blood cultures were repeated and the fifth pair proved positive for Campylobacter jejuni. An abdominal scan showed appendicitis without intestinal signs. The patient was treated with azithromycin for 2 weeks, which resulted in full recovery from the skin lesions. DISCUSSION: Campylobacter bacteremia infections are severe and carry a 15% mortality rate at 30 days. The majority of affected patients present humoral immunodeficiency. The literature contains reports of 10 patients with C. jejuni-associated cellulitis, of whom 6 presented hypogammaglobulinemia. We postulate that the cutaneous manifestations were caused by septic metastases. The immunoglobulin replacement therapy mainly comprised IgG antibodies; IgA and IgM antibodies appear to play a key role in the response to C. jejuni infection, which could explain the susceptibility observed. The American guidelines recommend blood and skin cultures in patients with cellular immune defects. We suggest that this recommendation be extended to patients with humoral immunodeficiency.