Is an assay for simultaneous detection of hepatitis C virus core antigen and antibody a valuable alternative to nucleic acid testing?

BACKGROUND: A new enzyme immunoassay based on the simultaneous detection of nucleocapsid proteins of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and anti-HCV (Monolisa HCV antigen-antibody Ultra, Bio-Rad) was evaluated as an alternative to nucleic acid testing (NAT) for the diagnosis of HCV infection during the window period in blood donations. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study included 107 sequential samples from 10 HCV seroconversion commercial panels; 81 samples were in the preseroconversion phase, and 26 were collected after seroconversion. All samples were tested with HCV antigen-antibody assay and the two minipool (MP) NAT procedures that are routinely used in France (transcription-mediated amplification in pools of 8 and COBAS AmpliScreen HCV test [Roche Diagnostic] in pools of 24 donations). RESULTS: From the 44 samples collected during window period that were MP-NAT-positive, 31 (70.5%) were also positive with the Monolisa HCV antigen-antibody assay. The mean delay in detecting HCV infection between these two methods was 5.1 days (range, 0-24 days). The Monolisa HCV antigen-antibody assay led to a reduction in the window period of 26.8 days (range, 0-72 days). All samples collected after seroconversion were detected with the HCV antigen-antibody assay. The specificity analyzed in 2503 consecutive blood donations was estimated at 99.88 percent. CONCLUSION: This new developed assay presents an improvement for the detection of HCV infection, especially in the early phase of infection when antibodies are undetectable. Although less sensitive than NAT, this assay could be a suitable solution for blood screening in developing countries where NAT (or HCV core antigen-specific assay) is not affordable or its implementation is not feasible.

Simultaneous detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen and anti-HCV antibodies improves the early detection of HCV infection.

To evaluate whether a new enzyme immunoassay developed for the simultaneous detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (Ag) and anti-HCV antibodies (anti-HCV Ab) (Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab ULTRA; Bio-Rad) could improve the early detection of HCV infection, we compared its sensitivity to that of anti-HCV, HCV core Ag, and HCV RNA assays. The populations studied included 12 blood donor samples positive for HCV RNA and HCV core Ag but negative for anti-HCV antibodies and 23 hemodialysis patients who developed anti-HCV Ab (seroconversion) during the follow-up. From these 23 individuals, 83 samples sequentially collected prior to seroconversion and 108 samples collected after seroconversion were tested. Six of 12 blood donations were positive by the HCV Ag/Ab assay. In the hemodialysis cohort, the 24 HCV RNA-negative samples were negative by the HCV Ag/Ab assay and 23 of the 59 HCV RNA-positive samples (39%) were positive. The HCV Ag/Ab assay detected HCV infection on average 21.6 days before the most sensitive antibody assay. The HCV Ag/Ab assay did not detect HCV infection as early as the HCV RNA assay (mean delay, 30.3 days) or HCV Ag assay (mean delays, 27.9, and 16.3 days by the HCV core Ag quantification assay and the HCV Ag blood screening assay, respectively). This new assay provides a notable improvement for the early detection of HCV infection during the so-called window period compared with anti-HCV Ab assays and could be a useful alternative to HCV RNA detection or HCV core Ag assays for diagnosis or blood screening when nucleic acid technologies or HCV core Ag detection are not implemented.

Complete or partial seroreversion in immunocompetent individuals after self-limited HCV infection: consequences for transfusion.

BACKGROUND: The disappearance of anti-HCV antibodies over time, after a self-limited infection, also referenced seroreversion, has been observed. The frequency of this phenomenon remains controversial, especially in immunocompetent subjects. However, it has important implications in the context of transfusion inquiries, in particular in case of a blood donor suspected to have transmitted HCV through a past blood donation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Our findings are presented of a longitudinal study, including 16 patients from a cohort of 78 immunocompetent, multitransfused individuals who were positive for anti-HCV (EIA and confirmatory assay [RIBA]) and followed over a long period of time without having received any antiviral therapy. The aim was to establish whether a past and self-resolved HCV infection could evolve toward a negative serology. RESULTS: The 16 patients were classified in three groups: 1) 12 patients who remained anti-HCV positive with no evolution in their RIBA pattern after a mean follow-up of 7.6 years; 2) one patient who presented a complete seroreversion 6 years after enrollment; and 3) three patients with a partial seroreversion over a mean follow-up of 16 years. CONCLUSION: HCV infection is not always characterized by a persistent antibody response, even in immunocompetent individuals. This should be taken into consideration when transfusion inquiries are conducted.

A new HCV core antigen assay based on disassociation of immune complexes: an alternative to molecular biology in the diagnosis of early HCV infection.

BACKGROUND: An EIA based on immune complex disassociation of nucleocapsid proteins of HCV has been developed to detect and quantify HCV core antigen. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To evaluate whether this new assay (trak-C, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics) could be an alternative to NAT during the window period, its sensitivity in this context was assessed, and its performance was compared with that of a first-generation HCV core antigen assay dedicated to the blood screening (HCV core antigen ELISA). Studied populations included nine HCV RNA-positive, HCV antibody-negative blood donors and 23 hemodialysis patients who underwent an HCV seroconversion. From these individuals, 81 samples (23 HCV RNA-negative and 58 HCV RNA-positive) sequentially collected during the phase before seroconversion were tested. RESULTS: The nine blood donor samples were positive for the presence of HCV core antigen by the trak-C, and 6 of 8 tested were positive for the presence of HCV core antigen by blood screening ELISA. In the hemodialysis cohort, the 23 HCV RNA-negative samples were negative with the two HCV core antigen assays. Among the 58 HCV RNA-positive samples, 46 of 57 (80.7%) tested were positive for the presence of HCV core antigen with the blood screening assay, and 57 of 58 (98.2%) were positive for the presence of HCV core antigen with the trak-C. The mean delays in detecting HCV infection between trak-C and the appearance of HCV antibodies, between HCV RNA testing and trak-C, and between trak-C and HCV core antigen ELISA were 58.2, 0.24, and 3.33 days, respectively. CONCLUSION: Trak-C was more sensitive than the blood screening assay and had similar performance to HCV RNA assay in the window period. Trak-C could constitute an alternative to NAT for the diagnosis of HCV infection during the window period, especially when molecular biology procedures cannot be implemented.