Angioleiomyoma: An Update with a 142-Case Series.

Angioleiomyomas are uncommon, noncancerous, smooth muscle tumors that primarily arise from blood vessels. Previous studies have yielded limited data due to the lack of interdisciplinary approaches or restricted patient pools. This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of angioleiomyomas, including the demographic, clinical, radiological, and histopathological features, with a large number of patients. Conducted as a retrospective investigation at a single center from January 2005 to June 2023, this study involved 142 patients. Relevant information was extracted from electronic medical records, covering clinical, radiological, histological, and demographic details. Angioleiomyomas mostly occurred at age 59 (1-87), predominately affect females (53%) and commonly arise in subcutaneous tissue (85%) and the lower limbs (76%). MRI findings revealed characteristic signals, with a high prevalence of the solid histologic type (65%), often displaying a reticular sign. Smooth muscle Actin was universally present (n = 95/95), while Desmin and Caldesmon showed positive expression in 83% (n = 71/85) and 98% (n = 92/94) of cases, respectively. This study presents an updated and comprehensive analysis of angioleiomyomas. Typically appearing as well-defined nodules in the extremities, these tumors can be effectively diagnosed using MRI, though histopathological analysis is generally essential for confirmation. Treatment primarily involves straightforward excision, with notable low complication and recurrence rates.

Enhanced accuracy and reduced delay in diagnosing bone tumors within an expert sarcoma network: A nationwide study.

INTRODUCTION: Primary bone tumors encompass a range of rare and diverse lesions. Pathological diagnosis poses significant challenges, with histological discrepancies extensively studied in soft tissue sarcomas but lacking specific investigation in bone lesions. This study aimed to determine the rate of major diagnostic discrepancies in primary bone tumors, assessing whether initial histological analysis within an expert referral center network reduces this rate and final diagnostic delay. Additionally, we examined the impact of mandatory systematic re-reading by expert pathologists on diagnostic variation and readjustment. METHODS: Our study cohort comprised patients with primary bone tumors, drawn from the national prospective French sarcoma network database. A total of 1075 patients were included from 2018 to 2019. RESULTS: The cohort exhibited a major discrepancy rate of 24%. Within the expert referral centers network, 49 cases (7%) showed major diagnostic discrepancies in the initial analysis, compared to 207 cases (57%) outside the network (p < 0.001). Regarding the final diagnostic delay, a mean of 2.8 weeks (±4.9) was observed within the network, contrasting with 6.5 weeks (±9.1) outside the network (p < 0.001). Systematic re-reading by an expert pathologist facilitated diagnosis readjustment in 75% of the 256 cases, with 68% of all diagnostic variations occurring preoperatively. CONCLUSION: Early management within the expert network significantly reduced major diagnostic discrepancies and shortened the diagnosis delay by approximately a month. Expert pathologist systematic re-readings were responsible for diagnosis readjustments in three-quarters of cases, with two-thirds of all diagnostic variations occurring preoperatively, thereby mitigating the consequences of mistreatment.

Cobalt-chromium toxicity following revision of total hip replacement.

Systemic cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) toxicity following a total hip replacement is a rare complication that may sometimes lead to fatal consequences. We report a case of a 64-year-old woman, who presented with Co-Cr toxicity after revision of fractured ceramic components with metal-on-polyethylene. Systemic toxicity occurred a year after surgery and was expressed brutally with mostly central neurological symptoms. Revision surgery allowed rapid regression of all symptoms. Prosthetic revision with a metal bearing surface after a history of fracture of the ceramic bearing component should be avoided. Orthopedic surgeons and the different medical actors should be aware of this rare but serious complication to allow earlier management. Above all, multidisciplinary management is primordial to allow correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment.

A Simple Intraoperative Technique for Restoring Rotational and Length Alignment After Distal Femur Resection and Endoprosthesis Reconstruction: A Technical Note.

Restoring femoral rotation alignment and limb length after distal femur resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction is crucial to avoid poor outcomes. This technical note presents a simple and reliable intraoperative technique for restoring femoral rotation and length during distal femur resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction without the need for extensive preoperative planning or complex perioperative modalities. The method utilizes an external fixator frame as a guiding device to assess and restore the native alignment. This approach provides a practical alternative to relying solely on the position of the linea aspera, which has been shown to be an unreliable landmark for rotational alignment. Implementing this technique can contribute to improved functional outcomes in patients undergoing distal femur endoprosthetic reconstruction.

Impact of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) and pathological vertebral compression fracture (pVCF) in neurological and survival prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) and pathological vertebral compression fractures (pVCF) are the most serious debilitating morbidities of spine metastases (SpMs) causing devastating neurological damages. The respective impact of these two metastasis-spreading entities on survival and on neurological damage is debated. METHODS: A French prospective cohort study collected 279 consecutive patients presenting with SpMs between January 2017 and 2021. We compared 174 patients with MESCC and 105 patients with pVCF. RESULTS: The median Overall Survival (OS) for the MESCC group was 13.4 months (SD 1.5) vs 19.2 months (SD 2.3) for pVCF patients (p = 0.085). Sixty-five patients (23.3 %) were operated on: 49/65 (75.4 %) in the MESCC group and 16/65 (15.2 %) in the pVCF group, p < 0.0001. At 6 months FU, in the MESCC group, 21/44 (45.4 %) of non-ambulatory patients at onset improved to ambulatory status (Frankel D-E) vs 10/13 (76.9 %) in the pVCF group (p = 0.007). In multivariable analysis with the Cox proportional hazard model, good ECOG-PS and SINS Score 7-12 [HR: 6.755, 95 % CI 2.40-19.00; p = 0.001] were good prognostic factors for preserved ambulatory neurological status. However, SpMs diagnosed synchronously with the primary tumor [HR: 0.397, 95 % CI 0.185-0.853; p = 0.018] and MESCC [HR: 0.058, 95 % CI 0.107-0.456; p = 0.007] were independent risk factors for impaired neurological function. CONCLUSION: Contrary to pVCF, MESCC causes neurological damage. Nevertheless, neurological recovery remains possible. MESCC and pVCF have no impact on survival. The management of MESCC remains to be clarified and optimized to reduce neurological damage.

Efficacy of Percutaneous Treatment of Primary Aneurysmal Bone Cysts (ABCs): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous treatment for primary aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) has been widely accepted. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of various sclerotherapy agents on patients with primary ABCs. METHODS: A meta-analysis of relevant studies. A systematic search was conducted on five databases, resulting in the inclusion of 25 studies with different percutaneous agents. RESULTS: A total of 729 patients with primary ABCs were included. Patients were administered with Ethibloc, doxycycline, embolization, alcohol, polidocanol, and calcitonin with methylprednisolone, respectively. Overall, 542 (74.3%) patients with ABCs had complete healing, 120 (16.4%) had partial healing, 44 (6%) had no-ossification or failure, and 26 (3.5%) had a recurrence. However, there was a total of 45 (6.1%) patients who had surgical curettage after sclerotherapy. Among the sclerotherapy agents, doxycycline showed highly effective results with minimal complications and recurrence, but it required multiple injections per patient. Ethibloc and embolization also proved to be highly effective with fewer injections required but had a higher rate of complications. Absolute alcohol, polidocanol, and calcitonin with methylprednisolone had similar efficacity and favorable success with fewer complications and fewer injections. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous treatment showed promising results in treating primary ABCs. However, more robust research is needed to establish the best approach for sclerotherapy in clinical practice and to address the limitations of the current literature.

Buried de-epithelialized flap: An original solution to fill dead space after sarcoma resection in the thigh. Surgical technique and results of 12 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are often treated with wide excision in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant radiotherapy. This is currently the gold standard procedure for the treatment of STS that arise in the extremities. Wound healing complications frequently occur and negatively affect the prognosis. One of the options is to use a buried de-epithelialized flap as it can increase the lymphatic flow, fill the dead space, and cover neurovascular structures and implants. This aim of this retrospective study were two-fold. 1) Describe the surgical technique for this buried de-epithelialized flap after STS removal in the thigh. 2)Evaluate the efficacy of the buried de-epithelialized flap for decreasing wound complications based on a small case series and compare it with previous publications. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that the complication rate of this flap is not higher than the published complication rate for traditional flaps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients (7 women and 5 men) with a mean age of 62±12years (38-76), who underwent surgical removal of an STS in the thigh with coverage by a buried de-epithelialized flap were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 15.8months (range 8-24). RESULTS: Two patients presented with a postoperative wound infection (17%): one superficial and one deep at the surgical site. Neither required an additional plastic surgery procedure. Another patient had a dislocation of their total hip arthroplasty that was managed by closed reduction. One patient died from metastatic progression. There was no skin necrosis of the superficial skin edges, no hematoma or seroma in the other 10 patients. The flap was still visible on cross-sectional imaging at 1 month postoperative with no fluid between the tissue planes or signs of necrosis. The rate of wound healing complications that required surgical treatment was 17% in our case series, versus 16 to 56% in previous publications reporting the results of suture closure only. CONCLUSION: A buried de-epithelialized flap reduces the risk of skin complications by filling dead space, improving lymphatic flow and covering critical structures. It is a reliable and reproducible option after wide local excision of STS in the thigh, with no additional morbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study.

Chordoma concurrent with benign notochordal cell tumor of the mobile spine. Should the chordoma part be biopsied? - A stepwise approach for management.

Some evidence suggests that benign notochordal tumors (BNCTs) could be a potential precursor of chordoma. We present an educational rare case of lumbar vertebral BNCTs concomitant with a destructive lesion not reachable on biopsy but thought to be chordoma. We present a stepwise approach for management of these difficult entities based on radiological features.

Comparison of bleeding during trochanteric fracture fixation with mini-invasive or conventional side plate fixation: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Trochanteric fractures are a public health issue due to the aging of the population. Treatment aims to reduce their related morbidity and mortality and to allow an early return to independence. Postoperative anemia is associated with poorer functional recovery and an increased mortality rate. The aim of this study was to assess whether minimally invasive side plate fixation (Minimal Invasive Screw System, MISS™) resulted in reduced perioperative bleeding compared with conventional fixation (Pertrochanteric Hip Screw, PHS™). HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that minimally invasive side plate fixation (MISS) would result in reduced perioperative bleeding compared with conventional fixation (PHS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted an open randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment of the primary outcome. Inclusion criteria were patients aged over 65 years with isolated reducible trochanteric fracture. The 2 surgical implants were of the same shape, the only difference between them being the locking mode of the femoral neck screw on the plate of the MISS device, allowing a percutaneous approach. Primary outcome was perioperative bleeding evaluated with Mercuriali's formula. Secondary outcomes included operating time, scar length, length of hospital stay, radiological criteria such as quality of fracture reduction, implant positioning, bone healing, complications and functional recovery compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients met the inclusion criteria and were randomized to receive either PHS (n=54) or MISS (n=54). Osteosynthesis with MISS significatively reduced perioperative bleeding (median 243mL, interquartile range [152-410] vs. 334mL [247-430] [p=0.0299]), operating time (65min [57-73] vs. 79min [66-89] [p=0.0002]) and scar length after 45 days (7cm [5-8] vs. 14cm [12-15] [p<0.0001]). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in postoperative complications, revision surgery or serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Compared with PHS, MISS reduced operating time, perioperative bleeding and scar length with no observed functional difference. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Multiple Myeloma Spinal Lesion Care: Management of a Primary Bone Malignancy Rather Than a Spinal Metastasis.

OBJECTIVE: Multiple myeloma (MM) is too often wrongly categorized as a spinal metastasis (SpM), although it is distinguishable from SpM in many aspects, such as its earlier natural history at the time of diagnosis, its increased overall survival (OS), and its response to therapeutic modalities. The characterization of these 2 different spine lesions remains a main challenge. METHODS: This study compares 2 consecutive prospective oncologic populations of patients with spine lesions: 361 patients treated for MM spine lesions and 660 patients treated for SpM between January 2014 and 2017. RESULTS: The mean time between the tumor/MM diagnosis and spine lesions was respectively 0.3 (standard deviation [SD] 4.1) and 35.1 months (SD 21.2) for the MM and SpM groups. The median OS for the MM group was 59.6 months (SD 6.0) versus 13.5 months (SD 1.3) for the SpM group (P < 0.0001). Regardless of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, patients with MM always have a significantly better median OS than do patients with SpM: ECOG 0, 75.3 versus 38.7 months; ECOG 1, 74.3 versus 24.7 months; ECOG 2, 34.6 versus 8.1 months; ECOG 3, 13.5 versus 3.2 months and ECOG 4, 7.3 versus 1.3 months (P < 0.0001). The patients with MM had more diffuse spinal involvement (mean, 7.8 lesions; SD 4.7) than did patients with SpM (mean, 3.9; SD 3.5) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: MM must be considered as a primary bone tumor, not as SpM. The strategic position of the spine in the natural course of cancer (i.e., nurturing cradle of birth for MM vs. systemic metastases spreading for SpM) explains the differences in OS and outcome.

Teaching Potential of Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Meetings for Orthopedic Residents: Insights From a French Sarcoma Reference Center.

Multidisciplinary tumor board meetings (MTBMs) have been established in oncology to improve patient care. While their benefits for patients have been well-documented, there are no previous studies on the teaching opportunities they provide for residents and medical students. This study aimed to examine the teaching provided to residents during MTBM and identify areas for improvement. The study hypothesized that although the primary objective of MTBM is not teaching, they could still contribute to residents' learning. The study focused on the tumors board meeting for bone metastasis and musculoskeletal tumors/sarcoma in a French reference center for musculoskeletal oncology. The composition of the MTBM included specialists from various disciplines, and it convened on a weekly basis to discuss cases. The orthopedic oncology residents (OORs) actively participated in the MTBM as part of their training. A questionnaire was distributed to OORs who had served between 2014 and 2021, and their responses were analyzed. The results showed that the OOR perceived MTBM as interesting, beneficial for their training, and challenging. While opinions were divided on whether MTBM was a suitable place for education, the majority believed it improved their knowledge of different specialties and provided valuable elements applicable to daily practice. They also felt it facilitated future access to MTBs if needed. OORs recommended the rotation as an orthopedic oncology resident to younger residents. Recommendations for improvement included incorporating more dedicated teaching time, active involvement of residents in the learning process, availability of learning materials, and post-MTBM debriefing sessions. The study highlighted the importance of case presentations, public speaking skills, interdisciplinary collaboration, and clinical reasoning observed during MTBM. In conclusion, while not primarily designed for teaching, MTBM offers valuable learning opportunities for residents. Enhancing the teaching experience through dedicated debriefing sessions, resident involvement, and improved support can further optimize their educational impact. Future evaluations are needed to assess the effectiveness of these improvements. This study provides insights into the teaching potential within MTBM and can guide educational initiatives in the field of oncology.

A Simple Technique to Prevent Screw Stripping During Hardware Removal Using Bone Wax.

Hardware removal is a common procedure in orthopedics, but it can be challenging and time-consuming. Difficulties in screw removal may arise due to bone growth or cement covering the screw heads, leading to screw damage, and increased surgical time. In this article, we describe a simple and inexpensive technique utilizing bone wax to protect screw heads from bone growth or cement, facilitating future implant removal. The application of bone wax over screw heads acts as a barrier, preventing bone growth or cement from engaging with the screw heads.

Cauda Equina Syndrome Secondary to Incidental Hemorrhagic Ependymoma Following Spinal Anesthesia: A Case Report and Comprehensive Review.

Spinal ependymomas are rare primary central nervous system tumors that often exhibit vague symptoms before being identified. In extremely rare situations, it can be identified after a neurological decline following a history of spinal anesthesia, indicating intraspinal hemorrhages from an incidental lumbar ependymoma that was not previously diagnosed. Spinal anesthesia is widely utilized in numerous orthopedic surgical procedures, as it is a well-tolerated invasive procedure with a low risk of complications. The patient in this case study underwent elective orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia following two unsuccessful trials with spinal anesthesia. Subsequently, the patient developed paraplegia as a result of an incidental hemorrhagic spinal ependymoma. The patient had an L3 laminectomy for decompression of the dural sheath, and an ependymoma was confirmed based on the histopathological assessment. This case report aims to raise awareness regarding the potential complication of spinal anesthesia arising from incidental tumors of the spinal cord, thereby emphasizing the imperative of early recognition and management in order to mitigate adverse outcomes.

Intraosseous Hibernoma: A Rare Entity in Orthopedics With Peculiar Radiological Features.

Intraosseous hibernoma is a rare benign bone tumor derived from brown fat. It is typically found in the axial skeleton and is more commonly observed in women. It can manifest as a painful lesion or may be incidentally discovered. Intraosseous hibernoma often presents as a sclerotic lesion, although it can also manifest as a lytic lesion. Due to its varied radiographic appearance, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis of bone lesions as it can mimic metastatic lesions as well as other sclerotic and lytic bone lesions. Therefore, obtaining a biopsy of the lesion is crucial for an accurate diagnosis. In this report, we present the clinical, radiological, and histopathological findings of two cases of intraosseous hibernoma and provide a concise overview based on a review of the literature.

French translation and validation of the cross-cultural adaptation of the MSTS functional assessment questionnaire completed after tumor surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Malignant tumors of the extremities are uncommon. Their surgical treatment, whether conservative or not, may cause sequelae. Functional assessment of patients is essential for research purposes, but also follow-ups and adaptation of treatments. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Rating Scale (MSTS) is a disease-specific functional scoring system often used in English literature. Currently, no studies have been published on a valid French translation of the MSTS, whether for the lower or upper extremities. We, therefore, conducted a prospective study to answer the following questions: (1) Are the proposed adapted French versions of the MSTS valid? (2) Do the psychometric properties of the two versions obtained make their use relevant? MATERIALS AND METHODS: The translation and cross-cultural adaptation were carried out following the recommendations of Beaton and Guillemin to obtain two versions: one for patients who had undergone upper extremity surgery (MSTS-UE) and one for those who had undergone lower extremity surgery (MSTS-LE). A prospective multicenter cohort study was then carried out to analyze the psychometric properties of these two versions. RESULTS: A total of 250 patients from 3 referral centers were enrolled in this study. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) demonstrated that the two French versions of the MSTS (MSTS-LE and MSTS-UE) were a good fit with a root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)<0.08 and a comparative fit index (CFI)>0.90. The psychometric properties of the two versions were validated with internal consistency (Cronbach alpha>0.7), convergent validity of each item with its score (> 0.4), and sufficient criterion validity (Pearson correlation coefficient>0.4). The discriminant validity analysis showed that there was a significant correlation between each version and the performance status (PS) (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: This study produced a French version of the MSTS scoring system and validated the psychometric properties of the two versions obtained (MSTS-UE and MSTS-LE). Therefore, the French MSTS scoring system is a valid measurement that can be used in international studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Spine Metastasis: Patients With Poor Performance Status (ECOG) Could benefit From Palliative Surgical Care! A Prospective Cohort Study.

STUDY DESIGN: This study used a French prospective national multi-center database of patients with spine metastasis (SpM). OBJECTIVE: The main challenge was to clarify if SpM patients presenting poor ECOG-PS could benefit from a surgical intervention. BACKGROUND: Spine metastases (SpM) are debilitating lesions commonly found in the evolution of cancer. At present, patients with poor ECOG-PS do not benefit from surgical care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2014 and 2017, 176 SpM patients with poor initial ECOG-PS (3 or 4) were identified. RESULTS: The median overall survival of patients was 2.1 months (SD 0.2). Seventy-one patients (40.3%) underwent surgery: for 49 patients (27.8%) the intervention consisted of a simple decompression and for 22 patients (12.5%) the previous was associated with an osteosynthesis. Patients who underwent surgery demonstrated significantly longer median overall survival than those who did not: 3.5 months (SD 0.4) versus 1.6 (SD 0.2) ( P <0.0001). No significant differences between operated/nonoperated patients were noted concerning median age (66.4 vs. 64.2 y, P =0.897), the median number of SpM (4.1 vs. 4.2, P =0.374), ECOG-PS 4 ratio (41.6 vs. 39.3%, P =0.616), or for primary tumors ( P =0.103). Patients who underwent surgery statistically improved their neurological impairment according to the Frankel score: 5/11 (45.4%) from A to C, 5/17 (29.4%) from B to C or D, 6/11 (54.5%) from C to D and 2/4 (50%). Twelve patients (16.9%) presented a postoperative complication. CONCLUSION: Patients with poor ECOG-PS could benefit from surgery. Even though survival gain is small, it permits the preservation of their neurological function. By making ambulation possible, pain is decreased during the last months of their lives.

Management and outcomes of adolescent and young adult sarcoma patients: results from the French nationwide database NETSARC.

BACKGROUND: The initial management of patients with sarcoma is a critical issue. We used the nationwide French National Cancer Institute-funded prospective sarcoma database NETSARC to report the management and oncologic outcomes in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) patients with sarcoma at the national level. PATIENTS AND METHODS: NETSARC database gathers regularly monitored and updated data from patients with sarcoma. NETSARC was queried for patients (15-30 years) with sarcoma diagnosed from 2010 to 2017 for whom tumor resection had been performed. We reported management, locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in AYA treated in French reference sarcoma centers (RSC) and outside RSC (non-RSC) and conducted multivariable survival analyses adjusted for classical prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among 3,227 patients aged 15-30 years with sarcoma diagnosed between 2010 and 2017, the study included 2,227 patients with surgery data available, among whom 1,290 AYAs had been operated in RSC, and 937 AYAs in non-RSC. Significant differences in compliance to guidelines were observed including pre-treatment biopsy (RSC: 85.9%; non-RSC 48.1%), pre-treatment imaging (RSC: 86.8%; non-RSC: 56.5%) and R0 margins (RSC 57.6%; non-RSC: 20.2%) (p < 0.001). 3y-OS rates were 81.1% (95%CI 78.3-83.6) in AYA in RSC and 82.7% (95%CI 79.4-85.5) in AYA in non-RSC, respectively. Whereas no significant differences in OS was observed in AYAs treated in RSC and in non-RSC, LRFS and PFS were improved in AYAs treated in RSC compared to AYAs treated in non-RSC (Hazard Ratios (HR): 0.58 and 0.83, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance for AYA patients with sarcoma to be managed in national sarcoma reference centers involving multidisciplinary medical teams with paediatric and adult oncologists.

Impact of preoperative varus on ankle replacement survival.

INTRODUCTION: The severity of a foot or ankle deformity is a major prognostic factor for the success of ankle replacement. Varus deformity is at once the most arthrogenic and the most frequent. HYPOTHESIS: The severity of preoperative varus is a negative factor for ankle replacement survival. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective study compared results in a continuous series of 57 Salto-Talaris® ankle replacements according to preoperative varus: 31 moderate (5-15̊) and 26 severe (> 15̊). Radiological and clinical assessment at a minimum 1 year focused on complications, revision and implant exchange and on AOFAS score, range of motion and tibiotalar angle at last follow-up. RESULTS: At a mean 2.4 years' follow-up, implant survival in the moderate and severe varus groups was respectively 83% and 92%. Postoperative AOFA score and range of motion improved significantly in both groups, without significant difference. Analysis of cumulative survival showed no significant intergroup difference. DISCUSSION: Severity of preoperative varus did not impact implant survival. Only postoperative alignment and stability emerged as survival factors. These results were related to the quality of associated procedures aiming to reduce deformity and to achieve ligament balance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective comparative study.

Mid and long-term overall survival after carcinologic resections of thyroid cancer bone metastases.

Background: Bone metastases in thyroid cancer impair the patient's quality of life and prognosis. Interestingly, wide margins resection as the surgical treatment of bone metastases might improve the overall survival (OS). Nonetheless, data are lacking regarding the potential benefits of this strategy. Methods: In order to assess the OS of patients with thyroid cancer after a bone metastases carcinologic resection, a retrospective multicentric study was performed, evaluating the 1, 5, 10 and 15 years-OS along with the potential prognosis associated factors. Results: 40 patients have been included in this multicentric study, with a mean follow-up after surgery of 46.6 ± 58 months. We observed 25 (62.5%) unimestastatic patients and 15 multimetastatic patients (37.5%). The median overall survival after resection was 48 ± 57.3 months. OS at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years was respectively 76.2%, 63.6%, 63.6%, and 31.8%. Survival for patients with a single bone metastasis at 15 year was 82.3%, compared with 0.0% (Log Rank, p = 0.022) for multi-metastatic bone patients. Conclusions: This study advocates for an increased long term 10-year OS in patients with thyroid cancer, after resection of a single bone metastasis, suggesting the benefits of this strategy in this population.

No Geographical Inequalities in Survival for Sarcoma Patients in France: A Reference Networks' Outcome?

The national reference network NETSARC+ provides remote access to specialized diagnosis and the Multidisciplinary Tumour Board (MTB) to improve the management and survival of sarcoma patients in France. The IGéAS research program aims to assess the potential of this innovative organization to address geographical inequalities in cancer management. Using the IGéAS cohort built from the nationwide NETSARC+ database, the individual, clinical, and geographical determinants of the 3-year overall survival of sarcoma patients in France were analyzed. The survival analysis was focused on patients diagnosed in 2013 (n = 2281) to ensure sufficient hindsight to collect patient follow-up. Our study included patients with bone (16.8%), soft-tissue (69%), and visceral (14.2%) sarcomas, with a median age of 61.8 years. The overall survival was not associated with geographical variables after adjustment for individual and clinical factors. The lower survival in precarious population districts [HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.48] in comparison to wealthy metropolitan areas (HR = 1) found in univariable analysis was due to the worst clinical presentation at diagnosis of patients. The place of residence had no impact on sarcoma patients' survival, in the context of the national organization driven by the reference network. Following previous findings, this suggests the ability of this organization to go through geographical barriers usually impeding the optimal management of cancer patients.