Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection and Apnea Risk As Criteria for Hospitalization in Full Term Healthy Infants.

Introduction Apnea is recognized as a serious and potentially life-threatening complication associated with Respiratory Syncope Virus (RSV). The literature reports a wide range of apnea rates for infants with comorbid factors. Prematurity and young chronological age have been historically associated with the risk of apnea in hospitalized infants. Few studies have specifically examined the risk of apnea in healthy infants presenting to the emergency department. Methods This is a retrospective review of infants diagnosed with RSV using a PCR assay. Patients were divided into "mild" and "severe" cohorts based on symptoms at presentation. This study occurred in the NYU Langone Long Island (NYULI) pediatric emergency department (ED), a midsize academic hospital in the Northeast United States. The study included infants <6 months of age, born full term without comorbid conditions such as chronic lung or cardiac conditions, seen in NYULI ED over three consecutive RSV seasons (2017-2020). The primary outcome was the risk of apneic events. Secondary outcomes included hospital admission, ICU admission, length of stay, and supplemental oxygen support. Results The risk of apnea was <2%, regardless of disease severity. There were no significant differences in demographics between mild and severe disease. Cohorts differed significantly in the number of hospitalizations (41 milds vs. 132 severe), ICU admissions (2 milds vs. 27 severe), need for oxygen support (17 milds vs. 92 severe), hospital readmissions (2 milds vs. 42 severe), and length of stay (2 days milds vs. 3 days severe). Conclusions Apnea does not pose a significant risk for healthy full-term infants with RSV disease of any severity. The decision to admit this population to the hospital should be based on clinical presentation and not solely on the perceived risk of apnea.

Utilization of Family as Faculty: A Patient Directed Simulation Education to Improve Patient and Family Communication during Patient-Family Centered Rounds (PFCR).

Introduction: Patient-family-centered care (PFCC) is based on the understanding that the family is the child's source of strength and support. Effective communication between families and providers is an essential component of PFCC. Our interprofessional team designed an initiative to improve medical providers' communication in partnership with the Patient and Family Advisory Council (PFAC). Strategies included the creation of a competency rubric and simulation curriculum using the family as faculty. The SMART aim was to improve the percentage of respondents who answered "Always" to doctor communication domains from 72% to 75.6% in Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) by December 2020. Methods: Pediatric residents, medical students, faculty, nurses, and PFAC members formed a Quality Improvement (QI) team to address PFCR competency. The team created a PFCC checklist to address competency. PFAC volunteers served as standardized parents in an in situ simulation of PFCR scenarios involving interprofessional in-patient teams. Evaluators observed rounds for the pre and postintervention assessment using the checklist. The outcome measure was the percentage of respondents who answered "Always" in the HCAPHS domain for physician communication. The process measure was the PFCR pre and postintervention, using Fisher's exact test for analysis. Results: Using a statistical process chart (SPC), HCAHPS data from 2018 to 2020 showed that we exceeded our aim of >5% increase in the physician communication performance. Pre-post intervention data showed improvement in PFCR competency. Conclusion: Family as faculty simulation led to improved physician communication, translating to improved performance in the HCAHPS score and PFCR competency communication domains.

Impact of Maternal Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Detection on Breastfeeding Due to Infant Separation at Birth.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of separation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive mother-newborn dyads on breastfeeding outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This observational longitudinal cohort study of mothers with SARS-CoV-2 PCR-and their infants at 3 NYU Langone Health hospitals was conducted between March 25, 2020, and May 30, 2020. Mothers were surveyed by telephone regarding predelivery feeding plans, in-hospital feeding, and home feeding of their neonates. Any change prompted an additional question to determine whether this change was due to coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). RESULTS: Of the 160 mother-newborn dyads, 103 mothers were reached by telephone, and 85 consented to participate. There was no significant difference in the predelivery feeding plan between the separated and unseparated dyads (P = .268). Higher rates of breastfeeding were observed in the unseparated dyads compared with the separated dyads both in the hospital (P < .001) and at home (P = .012). Only 2 mothers in each group reported expressed breast milk as the hospital feeding source (5.6% of unseparated vs 4.1% of separated). COVID-19 was more commonly cited as the reason for change in the separated group (49.0% vs 16.7%; P < .001). When the dyads were further stratified by symptom status into 4 groups-asymptomatic separated, asymptomatic unseparated, symptomatic separated, and symptomatic unseparated-the results remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of COVID-19, separation of mother-newborn dyads impacts breastfeeding outcomes, with lower rates of breastfeeding both during hospitalization and at home following discharge compared with unseparated mothers and infants. No evidence of vertical transmission was observed; 1 case of postnatal transmission occurred from an unmasked symptomatic mother who held her infant at birth.