Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Environ Toxicol Chem ; 23(7): 1617-28, 2004 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15230313

RESUMO

We performed 20-d, flow-through exposures of lipid-containing semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) and Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas) to three concentrations (nominally 10, 100, and 250 ng/L) of a diverse mixture of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Exposure water was seawater free of particulates larger than 0.1 microm. The results of these controlled laboratory studies demonstrated that SPMDs and oysters concentrate the same chemicals but that the relative amounts accumulated are different. For oysters, the 20-d mean (across treatments) concentration factors (CFs) of test compounds with log Kow < or = 4.8 were much lower (4.0- to 20-fold lower) than those of the same compounds in SPMDs. In contrast, the 20-d CFs of PAHs with log Kow > or = 5.6 in oysters from the low-level treatment were higher than the corresponding CFs for SPMDs. The CFs of these compounds in oysters from the low-level treatment ranged from approximately 3.0- to 13-fold higher than those in oysters from the high-level treatment. This physiologically mediated difference in oyster CFs appears to be linked to active feeding in the low-level treatment and to apparent toxicity-induced cessation of feeding (i.e., valve closure) in the high-level treatment. Because CFs for these compounds in oysters were not independent of exposure concentrations, it follows that tissue levels were not proportional to exposure concentration. However, both sampling approaches have advantages and disadvantages, and the appropriateness of their use depends on the goals of a given study.


Assuntos
Exposição Ambiental , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Lipídeos/química , Membranas Artificiais , Compostos Orgânicos/análise , Ostreidae/metabolismo , Animais , Comportamento Alimentar , Cinética , Hidrocarbonetos Policíclicos Aromáticos/análise , Manejo de Espécimes , Poluentes Químicos da Água/toxicidade
2.
Chemosphere ; 49(7): 703-15, 2002 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12431007

RESUMO

High performance liquid chromatography coupled with programmable fluorescence detection was employed for the determination of 15 priority pollutant polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PPPAHs) in water, sediment, and semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs). Chromatographic separation using this analytical method facilitates selectivity, sensitivity (ppt levels), and can serve as a non-destructive technique for subsequent analysis by other chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques. Extraction and sample cleanup procedures were also developed for water, sediment, and SPMDs using various chromatographic and wet chemical methods. The focus of this publication is to examine the enrichment techniques and the analytical methodologies used in the isolation, characterization, and quantitation of 15 PPPAHs in different sample matrices.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Química Analítica/instrumentação , Poluentes Ambientais/análise , Sedimentos Geológicos/química , Membranas Artificiais , Hidrocarbonetos Policíclicos Aromáticos/análise , Água/química , Técnicas de Química Analítica/métodos , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Desenho de Equipamento , Espectrometria de Fluorescência
3.
Chemosphere ; 49(7): 717-29, 2002 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12431008

RESUMO

Semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) were employed to sample sediment pore water in static exposure studies under controlled laboratory conditions using (control pond and formulated) sediments fortified with 15 priority pollutant polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PPPAHs). The sediment fortification level of 750 ng/g was selected on the basis of what might be detected in a sediment sample from a contaminated area. The sampling interval consisted of 0, 4, 7, 14, and 28 days for each study. The analytical methodologies, as well as the extraction and sample cleanup procedures used in the isolation, characterization, and quantitation of 15 PPPAHs at different fortification levels in SPMDs, water, and sediment were reported previously (Williamson, M.S. Thesis, University of Missouri-Columbia, USA; Williamson et al., Chemosphere (This issue--PII: S0045-6535(02)00394-6)) and used for this project. Average (mean) extraction recoveries for each PPPAH congener in each matrix are reported and discussed. No procedural blank extracts (controls) were found to contain any PPPAH residues above the method quantitation limit, therefore, no matrix interferences were detected. The focus of this publication is to demonstrate the ability to sequester environmental contaminants, specifically PPPAHs, from sediment pore water using SPMDs and two different types of fortified sediment.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Química Analítica/instrumentação , Sedimentos Geológicos/química , Membranas Artificiais , Hidrocarbonetos Policíclicos Aromáticos/análise , Poluentes Químicos da Água/análise , Desenho de Equipamento
4.
Environ Sci Technol ; 36(1): 85-91, 2002 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11811495

RESUMO

Permeability/performance reference compounds (PRCs) are analytically noninterfering organic compounds with moderate to high fugacity from semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) that are added to the lipid prior to membrane enclosure. Assuming that isotropic exchange kinetics (IEK) apply and that SPMD-water partition coefficients are known, measurement of PRC dissipation rate constants during SPMD field exposures and laboratory calibration studies permits the calculation of an exposure adjustment factor (EAF). In theory, PRC-derived EAF ratios reflect changes in SPMD sampling rates (relative to laboratory data) due to differences in exposure temperature, membrane biofouling, and flow velocity-turbulence at the membrane surface. Thus, the PRC approach should allow for more accurate estimates of target solute/vapor concentrations in an exposure medium. Undersome exposure conditions, the impact of environmental variables on SPMD sampling rates may approach an order of magnitude. The results of this study suggest that most of the effects of temperature, facial velocity-turbulence, and biofouling on the uptake rates of analytes with a wide range of hydrophobicities can be deduced from PRCs with a much narrower range of hydrophobicities. Finally, our findings indicate that the use of PRCs permits prediction of in situ SPMD sampling rates within 2-fold of directly measured values.


Assuntos
Monitoramento Ambiental/instrumentação , Poluentes Ambientais/análise , Membranas Artificiais , Calibragem , Compostos Orgânicos/análise , Permeabilidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...