RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Persistent complex bereavement disorder (PCBD) is a protracted form of grief included in DSM Section 3 indicating a need for more research. Two other criteria sets [prolonged grief disorder (PGD) and complicated grief (CG) disorder] are also currently in use by researchers. This study evaluates rates of diagnosis of each proposed criteria set in a clinical sample of bereaved individuals participating in clinical research. METHOD: Two groups in which persistent grief was judged to be present or absent completed an assessment instrument that included items needed to diagnose PCBD as well as PGD and CG. One group included grief treatment-seeking participants in our multicenter National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)-sponsored study who scored ⩾30 on the Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG) and the other comprised bereaved adults enrolled in clinical research studies who scored <20 on the ICG. Rates of diagnosis were determined for proposed PCBD, PGD and CG criteria. RESULTS: PCBD criteria diagnosed 70 [95% confidence interval (CI) 64.2-75.8] % of the grief treatment-seeking group, PGD criteria identified 59.6 (95% CI 53.4-65.8) % of these individuals and CG criteria identified 99.6 (95% CI 98.8-100.0) %. None of the three proposed criteria identified any cases in the bereaved comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: Both proposed DSM-5 criteria for PCBD and criteria for PGD appear to be too restrictive as they failed to identify substantial numbers of treatment-seeking individuals with clinically significant levels of grief-related distress and impairment. Use of CG criteria or a similar algorithm appears to be warranted.
Assuntos
Luto , Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Trauma Psicológico/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , SíndromeRESUMO
The authors describe the development of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) protocol for Alzheimer disease (AD), a trial developed in collaboration with the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), assessing the effectiveness of atypical antipsychotics for psychosis and agitation occurring in AD outpatients. They provide an overview of the methodology utilized in the trial as well as the clinical-outcomes and effectiveness measures that were implemented.
Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/psicologia , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Citalopram/uso terapêutico , Pirenzepina/análogos & derivados , Pirenzepina/uso terapêutico , Agitação Psicomotora/tratamento farmacológico , Agitação Psicomotora/etiologia , Transtornos Psicóticos/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Psicóticos/etiologia , Risperidona/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Algoritmos , Doença de Alzheimer/economia , Antipsicóticos/administração & dosagem , Antipsicóticos/economia , Benzodiazepinas , Citalopram/administração & dosagem , Citalopram/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Olanzapina , Cooperação do Paciente , Pirenzepina/administração & dosagem , Pirenzepina/economia , Agitação Psicomotora/economia , Transtornos Psicóticos/economia , Risperidona/administração & dosagem , Risperidona/economia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Depression in old age frequently follows a chronic and/or relapsing course, related to medical comorbidity, cognitive impairment and depletion of psychosocial resources. As endorsed by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Conference on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Late Life Depression, a major goal of treatment is to prevent relapse, recurrence and chronicity. We believe that most, if not all, elderly patients with major depressive episodes are appropriate candidates for maintenance therapy, because of the vulnerability to relapse and recurrence and because of the favourable benefit to risk ratio of available treatments. Antidepressant pharmacotherapy is the mainstay of this therapeutic goal, but psychosocial approaches (especially interpersonal psychotherapy) have also been shown to contribute significantly to prevention of a chronic depressive illness and to prevention of the disability that attends depression. Studies published to date have established the long term or maintenance efficacy of the tricyclic antidepressant nortriptyline. Current, ongoing studies are addressing the maintenance efficacy of paroxetine and citalopram to prolong recovery in depression associated with old age. These studies are focusing particularly on patients aged 70 years and above, who are at high risk of recurrence, and on patients in primary care settings, where under-recognition and under-treatment of depression in the elderly have been costly from a public health perspective in terms of increased medical utilisation, burden to patients and families, and high rates of suicide. Depression in old age is a major contributor to the global burden of illness-related disability, but it is extremely treatable if appropriate pharmacotherapy is prescribed and accepted by patients and their caregivers.
Assuntos
Depressão/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Depressão/terapia , Humanos , Saúde PúblicaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine verbal fluency in a group of patients with bipolar disorder (BPD) during an acute episode of mania, and to determine whether performance was related to disease chronicity. We hypothesized that manic patients with BPD would be impaired on verbal fluency, and that this impairment would be greatest in those individuals who had experienced a greater number of manic episodes. METHOD: Forty-five manic inpatients with bipolar disorder, and 30 healthy volunteers completed tests of phonemic and semantic verbal fluency. The patients were dichotomized into those experiencing their first episode of mania (FE) and those who had experienced multiple episodes (ME). RESULTS: On the phonemic fluency task, ME patients produced significantly fewer words than both healthy volunteers and FE patients, and they made a greater number of errors. No significant group differences in overall output were found on the semantic fluency task, although the ME group was more error-prone than were the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that verbal fluency is more impaired in ME patients than in patients who have experienced only a single manic episode.
Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar/psicologia , Transtornos da Linguagem/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Linguagem/etiologia , Comportamento Verbal , Adulto , Transtornos Cognitivos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Cognitivos/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Testes de Linguagem , Masculino , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
Prevention trials have not been a central focus in mental health research in general and in the psychoses in particular. In this article we provide the basis for development of a model for prevention trials, define the parameters of the model, and provide some illustrative examples. The article expands upon traditional approaches to prevention by incorporating perspectives from the fields of treatment and services research. Approaches to prevention are based upon models of etiology, pathophysiology, and risk. A number of barriers to the development of a major emphasis on prevention are identified, and those that are embedded in the infrastructure of the field are highlighted.
Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde Mental/organização & administração , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/organização & administração , Transtornos Psicóticos/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/normas , Humanos , Serviços de Saúde Mental/normas , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/normas , Transtornos Psicóticos/etiologiaRESUMO
The mental health field is transforming the culture of treatment research by moving from a narrow regulatory model geared to drug approval and registration to a more inclusive public health model. Thus, whereas regulatory antidementia trials will exclude patients with psychiatric or neurologic symptoms or substance abuse and require them to be physically healthy and living with a caregiver, ie, 90% of the presenting Alzheimer population, the public health model promises to improve patient care by addressing the types of practical questions and functional outcomes typically the concern of clinicians: Does treatment enhance function? How can we keep people well once they have been made well? Why do treatments not work as well in practice as in clinical trials? Public health studies are conducted in the world of actual practice with time-pressured clinicians taking care of large numbers of patients with uncertain clinical presentations, complex comorbidities, and varying degrees of interference with ideal levels of compliance. The exclusive focus on symptoms is expanded to include outcomes related to issues of function, disability, morbidity, mortality, resource use, and quality of life. Highly controlled efficacy research is still needed to establish treatment merit, but efficacy now marks only the beginning of the process of inquiry.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The prevalence and incidence of the major mental disorders of late life that are common in the community and in primary health care are reviewed. METHODS: Community-based studies in English that included older adults were identified through MEDLINE searches and were reviewed. RESULTS: As the population ages, dementia, depression, and other mental conditions of the aged will demand more attention from clinicians and investigators to minimize their effects on disability, the use of health care services, and the quality of life for older adults and caregivers. Up to 15 to 20 percent of older adults have significant depressive symptoms, and it is estimated that as many as 45 percent of persons age 85 years and older have significant cognitive impairment and dementia. Other mental-health-related conditions, such as anxiety disorders, alcohol abuse, and prescription medicine misuse, are also important considerations but have not been as well studied as depression and dementia. Because an increasing proportion of older adults are members of minority groups, clinicians need to increase their awareness of how cultural factors relate to risk for mental disorders in late life. CONCLUSIONS: Attention to three themes may help clinicians and investigators meet the challenge of treating the common mental disorders of later life: the effect of these disorders on functioning, prevention of the consequences of mental disorders, and integration of mental health care and primary health care services.
Assuntos
Envelhecimento/fisiologia , Serviços Comunitários de Saúde Mental/provisão & distribuição , Serviços Comunitários de Saúde Mental/tendências , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transtornos Cognitivos/terapia , Cultura , Feminino , Previsões , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is widely used in clinical practice, few norms exist for healthy populations covering a broad range of ages. OBJECTIVE: To obtain MMSE norms specific for age, gender, and education in healthy adults. METHODS: From the population registers of seven communities across Italy, we selected a proportionate random sample of residents age 20 to 79 years to evaluate their health status with respect to conditions affecting cognitive performance. This sample yielded 908 persons who were deemed to be without cognitive impairment and who were then given the MMSE. We calculated fifth percentile norms and presented them as step functions. We then validated the norms as a screening tool for dementia in persons age 65 to 79 years. The validation was based on unpublished data from a separate study and involved estimates of sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: The norms declined with advancing age, especially for less educated women. Given any age and sex, the norms were higher for individuals with higher educational levels. In screening for dementia, the norms had a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 89%. CONCLUSIONS: When using MMSE scores, it is important to account for age, gender, and education, especially in populations where the educational level is low. Expressing MMSE norms as step functions provides an easy-to-use tool for neurologists and other clinicians.
Assuntos
Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica/normas , Padrões de Referência , Adulto , Idoso , Coleta de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valores de Referência , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
A workshop on "Antipsychotics: Past and Future" was convened by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Division of Services and Intervention Research (DSIR), on July 14, 1998, to review the results of recent antipsychotic drug research, discuss current standards of treatment, and identify areas needing further study. There has been a proliferation of new antipsychotic medications and a rapid increase in their clinical utilization. The new atypicals are beginning to supplant the older typical neuroleptic antipsychotics, and the scientific and ethical issues raised by this transition prompted the workshop. Given the apparent, albeit not fully defined, advantages of atypical drugs, particularly their safety profiles, the question is whether more comparisons with typical antipsychotics are warranted and whether clinical trial designs warrant (or would be justified in) the inclusion of typical drugs as standard active comparators. Workshop participants--including clinical researchers, patient advocates, bioethicists, and NIMH staff--discussed the conclusions drawn from current data, ethical issues for subjects in clinical trials, funding for ongoing studies using typical agents, and appropriate comparators for trials using atypical agents.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos , Esquizofrenia , Previsões , Humanos , National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.) , Estados UnidosRESUMO
It is anticipated that the number of people older than 65 years with psychiatric disorders in the United States will increase from about 4 million in 1970 to15 million in 2030. The current health care system serves mentally ill older adults poorly and is unprepared to meet the upcoming crisis in geriatric mental health. We recommend the formulation of a 15- to 25-year plan for research on mental disorders in elderly persons. It should include studies of prevention, translation of findings from bench to bedside, large-scale intervention trials with meaningful outcome measures, and health services research. Innovative strategies are needed to formulate new conceptualizations of psychiatric disorders, especially those given scant attention in the past. New methods of clinical and research training involving specialists, primary care clinicians, and the lay public are warranted.
Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Pesquisa/normas , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Previsões , Avaliação Geriátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Psiquiatria Geriátrica/educação , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Prevalência , Projetos de Pesquisa/estatística & dados numéricos , Projetos de Pesquisa/tendências , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To reexamine the conclusions of the 1991 National Institutes of Health Consensus Panel on Diagnosis and Treatment of Depression in Late Life in light of current scientific evidence. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included National Institutes of Health staff and experts drawn from the Planning Committee and presenters of the 1991 Consensus Development Conference. EVIDENCE: Participants summarized relevant data from the world scientific literature on the original questions posed for the conference. PROCESS: Participants reviewed the original consensus statement and identified areas for update. The list of issues was circulated to all participants and amended to reflect group agreement. Selected participants prepared first drafts of the consensus update for each issue. All drafts were read by all participants and were amended and edited to reflect group consensus. CONCLUSIONS: The review concluded that, although the initial consensus statement still holds, there is important new information in a number of areas. These areas include the onset and course of late-life depression; comorbidity and disability; sex and hormonal issues; newer medications, psychotherapies, and approaches to long-term treatment; impact of depression on health services and health care resource use; late-life depression as a risk factor for suicide; and the importance of the heterogeneous forms of depression. Depression in older people remains a significant public health problem. The burden of unrecognized or inadequately treated depression is substantial. Efficacious treatments are available. Aggressive approaches to recognition, diagnosis, and treatment are warranted to minimize suffering, improve overall functioning and quality of life, and limit inappropriate use of health care resources.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo/terapia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Comorbidade , Contraindicações , Transtorno Depressivo/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Psicoterapia , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: A consensus conference on the diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer disease (AD) and related disorders was organized by the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, the Alzheimer's Association, and the American Geriatrics Society on January 4 and 5, 1997. The target audience was primary care physicians, and the following questions were addressed: (1) How prevalent is AD and what are its risk factors? What is its impact on society? (2) What are the different forms of dementia and how can they be recognized? (3) What constitutes safe and effective treatment for AD? What are the indications and contraindications for specific treatments? (4) What management strategies are available to the primary care practitioner? (5) What are the available medical specialty and community resources? (6) What are the important policy issues and how can policymakers improve access to care for dementia patients? (7) What are the most promising questions for future research? PARTICIPANTS: Consensus panel members and expert presenters were drawn from psychiatry, neurology, geriatrics, primary care, psychology, nursing, social work, occupational therapy, epidemiology, and public health and policy. EVIDENCE: The expert presenters summarized data from the world scientific literature on the questions posed to the panel. CONSENSUS PROCESS: The panelists listened to the experts' presentations, reviewed their background papers, and then provided responses to the questions based on these materials. The panel chairs prepared the initial drafts of the consensus statement, and these drafts were read by all panelists and edited until consensus was reached. CONCLUSIONS: Alzheimer disease is the most common disorder causing cognitive decline in old age and exacts a substantial cost on society. Although the diagnosis of AD is often missed or delayed, it is primarily one of inclusion, not exclusion, and usually can be made using standardized clinical criteria. Most cases can be diagnosed and managed in primary care settings, yet some patients with atypical presentations, severe impairment, or complex comorbidity benefit from specialist referral. Alzheimer disease is progressive and irreversible, but pharmacologic therapies for cognitive impairment and nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatments for the behavioral problems associated with dementia can enhance quality of life. Psychotherapeutic intervention with family members is often indicated, as nearly half of all caregivers become depressed. Health care delivery to these patients is fragmented and inadequate, and changes in disease management models are adding stresses to the system. New approaches are needed to ensure patients' access to essential resources, and future research should aim to improve diagnostic and therapeutic effectiveness.