Adequacy and safety of an infant formula with a protein/energy ratio of 1.8 g/100 kcal and enhanced protein efficiency for term infants during the first 4 months of life.

OBJECTIVE: Excess protein in infant formula may lead to renal overload and play a role in later obesity. The objective of this controlled, prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to assess the suitability and safety of a modified protein content infant formula and its noninferiority as compared to a conventional formula. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Healthy term infants age < 7 days were either breast-fed or randomized to be fed exclusively with a conventional casein-predominant formula (protein/energy ratio: 2.6 g/100 kcal) or the isocaloric whey-predominant study formula (protein/energy ratio: 1.8 g/100 kcal) for 120 days. Primary outcome was daily weight gain between D0 and D120 (noninferiority criterion: difference in daily weight gain < or = 4 g). Secondary outcomes were daily gain in weight, length, head circumference and body mass index at monthly intervals. Tolerance and safety were assessed at each visit. RESULTS: 162 infants were enrolled, 84% of the formula-fed infants and 36% of the breast-fed infants completing the study. Mean daily weight gain from D0 to D120 in the formula-fed groups differed by 0.38 g/day [95% CI: -2.59; 1.83] signifying the noninferiority of the study formula. Secondary outcomes did not differ between the 2 groups at any time and were comparable to outcomes in the breast-fed group. Tolerance was good and adverse events were not different between study groups. CONCLUSIONS: The whey-predominant study infant formula with a protein/energy ratio of 1.8 g/100 kcal and enhanced protein efficiency is safe and not inferior to a conventional formula in ensuring normal growth during the first four months of life.

[Tips and advice for twins' parents]. / Conseils et aides pour les parents des enfants jumeaux.

The number of twins has been increasing for 20 years. The specific difficulties associated with raising twins have been well identified. As from the preparation for labor, it is essential to advise families on the help that is available to them (specialists, associations etc.) to anticipate the material and psychological difficulties families, and especially mothers, will face. These children and their families should be monitored so than they can be best advised at the various steps in providing care to and raising twins.

Macropremies: underprivileged newborns.

The focus of neonatal intensive care has been on very low birthweight infants, who comprise only 1.4% of neonates. Too little attention is paid to moderately preterm infants that we call macropremies or moderately low birthweight infants (MLBW, with birthweights 1500-2500 grams). Admitting over half MLBW infants to normal nurseries presumes that they have few needs and an excellent prognosis similar to fullterm newborns. It does not take into account the macropremie's vulnerability to complications of prematurity due to immature organ systems. Obstetricians are increasingly willing to deliver these infants prematurely for signs of fetal distress. As many as 25% of children with cerebral palsy referred to a disability clinic in Paris were MLBW, with hypoxic-ischemic-inflammatory associated disorders in one-third. The majority of MLBW infants who required neonatal intensive care at a tertiary care center in Baltimore had complications of prematurity: 47% had respiratory problems, 20% had feeding intolerance and 9% had hypoglycemia. MLBW infants comprise 5-7% of the neonatal population but account for 14% of neonatal deaths, 18-37% of children with cerebral palsy and 7-12% of children with mental retardation. Increasing the level of neonatal care for the macropremie's transition to extrauterine life would be economically feasible if it prevented as few as 30% of cases of major disability. A change in attitude towards this low risk (but not risk free) group of MLBW infants will both reduce morbidity and improve their health and neurodevelopmental outcome. It includes: 1) Providing an intermediate level of neonatal care for a short duration, with close monitoring and prompt intervention as needed, and 2) Neonatal neurodevelopmental screening to allow focused neurodevelopmental followup of MLBW infants with abnormalities.