Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38357778

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic skin disease that affects 20% of children worldwide and is associated with low patient-reported quality of life (QoL). Crisaborole (CRIS) and tacrolimus 0.03% (TAC) are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved topical treatments for mild to moderate AD with similar clinical efficacy. Utilization of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may provide meaningful data on the impact of AD treatments on patients and caregivers. This study used PROs to monitor the impact of crisaborole (CRIS) and tacrolimus 0.03% (TAC) on children with mild/moderate atopic dermatitis (AD) and caregiver burden. METHODS: This open-label study randomized 47 child-caregiver dyads to CRIS or TAC for 12 weeks. Disease severity, child quality of life (QoL), itch, pain interference, anxiety, depression, sleep, caregiver burden and caregiver QoL were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 36 dyads completed the study. Children (mean age = 8.0 ± 3.9 years) had mild baseline AD and were diverse by race (39% white; 36% Black) and gender (53% males). Caregivers were mostly female (78%; mean age = 37 ± 7.6 years). Both arms improved disease severity (Eczema Area and Severity Index) from baseline to 12 weeks (CRIS = -2.4 vs. TAC = -1.9). Within-arm analyses comparing baseline to 12 weeks revealed TAC, but not CRIS, improved all child and caregiver PROs except sleep (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that topical treatment for 12 weeks was more beneficial than 6 weeks, with TAC improving more PROs than CRIS. Future trials should implement PROs to fully understand the impact of AD treatments.

2.
Cutis ; 110(1): 44-47, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36179224

RESUMO

The requirements of the iPLEDGE program place burdens on both patients with severe recalcitrant nodular acne and prescribers of isotretinoin. We sought to investigate the changes in dermatologists' acne treatment patterns due to the administrative burden of iPLEDGE by assessing whether dermatologists chose not to prescribe isotretinoin to appropriate patients because of the labor of iPLEDGE requirements. Additionally, we investigated the medications that were substituted for isotretinoin. An anonymous online survey was created and posted on a dermatology group on social media. The survey respondents (N=510) consisted of board-certified dermatologists across the United States and comprised a wide variety of ages and practice types. This survey ultimately highlighted the burden of iPLEDGE for American clinicians and the need for a more streamlined risk-management program. This program is deterring some US clinicians, especially those younger than 46 years, from prescribing isotretinoin and limiting patient access to an effective medication.


Assuntos
Acne Vulgar , Fármacos Dermatológicos , Acne Vulgar/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Dermatologistas , Humanos , Isotretinoína/efeitos adversos , Prescrições , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
4.
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol ; 15: 2943-2947, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36605451

RESUMO

We present the first case of a patient with indolent polyarteritis nodosa who suffered severe exacerbations following significant emotional stressors. This report highlights the close relationship between emotions and autoimmune diseases mediated by the deleterious effects of stressors presumptively by skewing immunity from Type 1 to Type 2.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...