Reduced COVID-19 vaccine response in patient treated with dupilumab for IgG4-related disease.

Dupilumab is a novel anti-IL-4 receptor-α mAb that targets the signaling pathways of IL-4 and IL-13. Thus far, the data about adequate humoral immune response after vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in patients who are taking dupilumab have been limited.

Long-term follow-up of patients treated with dupilumab for chronic spontaneous urticaria: A case report.

Several therapeutic strategies have been established to achieve maximal remission and improve quality of life in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. We previously reported dupilumab as a novel therapy for antihistamine-refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria patients who failed to respond to administration of omalizumab at increased doses for longer durations. This is the first case series to report data on the long-term duration of chronic spontaneous urticaria remission after discontinuation of dupilumab in patients who were able to obtain controlled chronic spontaneous urticaria. Six patients diagnosed with chronic spontaneous urticaria, who failed to respond to antihistamines and prolonged therapy with omalizumab at increased doses, were followed in this study for up to 34 months following initiation of dupilumab therapy. By demonstrating the maintenance of chronic spontaneous urticaria remission with dupilumab following discontinuation of therapy, in 67% of the patients, over an observation period up to 22 months, this case series highlights dupilumab's potential disease-modifying efficacy in patients affected by this disease.

REALITI-A Study: Real-World Oral Corticosteroid-Sparing Effect of Mepolizumab in Severe Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe asthma may require maintenance oral corticosteroids (mOCS) for disease control as well as systemic corticosteroid (SCS) bursts for clinically significant exacerbations. However, mOCS and SCS use are associated with adverse effects, which increases patient disease burden. OBJECTIVE: To assess the real-world corticosteroid-sparing effect of mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma. METHODS: REALITI-A was a 24-month international, prospective, observational cohort study involving 84 centers across Europe, Canada, and the United States, with a 1-year pre-post mepolizumab treatment preplanned interim analysis. A total of 822 adults with a clinical diagnosis of asthma and a physician decision to initiate mepolizumab treatment (100 mg subcutaneously) were included. End points included daily mOCS dose at baseline (penultimate 28 days of pretreatment) and 1 year after treatment; percent reduction from baseline in mOCS dose; patients discontinuing mOCS 1 year after treatment; and the rate of clinically significant exacerbations (those requiring OCS for 3 days or more [or parenteral administration], emergency room visit, and/or hospital admission) before and after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 319 patients received mOCS at baseline (median [interquartile range]: 10.0 [5.0-15.0] mg/d). At 1 year after treatment, median mOCS dose was reduced by 75% (2.5 [0.0-5.0] mg/d); 64% of patients had a reduction in mOCS dose of 50% or greater compared with baseline and 43% discontinued mOCS. Clinically significant exacerbations decreased between pretreatment and posttreatment (rate ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.29 [0.26-0.32]; P < .001). CONCLUSION: This 1-year analysis demonstrates that real-world mepolizumab treatment is clinically effective in patients with severe asthma, providing disease control while reducing the need for mOCS and SCS bursts.

Impact of baseline clinical asthma characteristics on the response to mepolizumab: a post hoc meta-analysis of two Phase III trials.

BACKGROUND: Severe asthma is associated with a broad range of phenotypes and clinical characteristics. This analysis assessed whether select baseline patient characteristics could prognosticate mepolizumab efficacy in severe eosinophilic asthma. METHODS: This was a post hoc meta-analysis of data from the Phase III MENSA (NCT01691521/MEA115588) and MUSCA (NCT02281318/200862) studies. Patients aged ≥ 12 years with severe eosinophilic asthma and a history of exacerbations were randomised to receive placebo (MENSA/MUSCA), mepolizumab 75 mg intravenously (MENSA) or 100 mg subcutaneously (SC) (MENSA/MUSCA) every 4 weeks for 32 (MENSA) or 24 (MUSCA) weeks. The primary endpoint was the annual rate of clinically significant exacerbations; other outcomes included the proportion of patients with no exacerbations and changes from baseline in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-5 score. Analyses were performed by baseline age of asthma onset (< 18 years; 18-40 years; ≥ 40 years); lung function (% predicted FEV1 ≤ 60; 60-80; > 80); airway reversibility (reversible [≥ 12% change in FEV1]; non-reversible [< 12% change in FEV1]); perennial and/or seasonal allergen sensitivity (yes/no); asthma control (uncontrolled [ACQ-5 score ≥ 1.5]; partial/complete control [ACQ-5 score < 1.5]). RESULTS: Overall, 936 patients received mepolizumab 100 mg SC or placebo. Across age at asthma onset, lung function and airway reversibility subgroups, mepolizumab reduced the rate of clinically significant exacerbations by 49-63% versus placebo. Improvements in lung function, SGRQ total score and ACQ-5 score were also seen with mepolizumab versus placebo across most age and lung function subgroups. Clinically significant exacerbations were reduced with mepolizumab versus placebo irrespective of season or allergen sensitivity; SGRQ total and ACQ-5 scores were generally improved across seasons. CONCLUSIONS: Mepolizumab efficacy was consistent for patients with varying age at asthma onset, lung function, airway reversibility and allergen sensitivities at baseline. Our results indicate that mepolizumab is likely to be beneficial for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma with a broad range of baseline clinical characteristics; large-scale real-world studies are needed to confirm the external validity of these findings. Trial registration Post hoc meta-analysis of data from MENSA (NCT01691521/MEA115588) and MUSCA (NCT02281318/200862).

Mepolizumab for the treatment of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.

INTRODUCTION: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a rare antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis characterized by asthma, hypereosinophilia, and progressive multiorgan involvement. Although not fully elucidated, advancement in our understanding of the pathophysiology of EGPA has led to the development of multiple new treatment targets. AREAS COVERED: Herein we review the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, pathophysiology, treatments, and ongoing research in the management of EGPA. The central role of Interleukin-5 (IL-5) in the development and maintenance of hypereosinophilia will be discussed. The value of mepolizumab, an anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of EGPA is reviewed in detail. EXPERT OPINION: The available literature supports the use of mepolizumab for the induction and maintenance of remission of refractory, relapsing, or glucocorticoid-dependent EGPA with potentially greater benefit in those who are ANCA-positive or those with greater eosinophilia ( ≥ 150 cells/ µ L). Despite these positive results, relapses remain frequent, and the need for both short- and long-term glucocorticoid use remains common. More research is needed to address these needs and determine the precise role of mepolizumab.

A case of the first documented fire ant anaphylaxis in Canada.

The first documented confirmed case of an imported fire ant causing anaphylaxis in Canada is herein reported. In a patient with anaphylaxis to ants a physician in Canada should be aware that an allergic reaction to fire ant is a possibility.

Review of idiopathic pancreatitis.

Recent advances in understanding of pancreatitis and advances in technology have uncovered the veils of idiopathic pancreatitis to a point where a thorough history and judicious use of diagnostic techniques elucidate the cause in over 80% of cases. This review examines the multitude of etiologies of what were once labeled idiopathic pancreatitis and provides the current evidence on each. This review begins with a background review of the current epidemiology of idiopathic pancreatitis prior to discussion of various etiologies. Etiologies of medications, infections, toxins, autoimmune disorders, vascular causes, and anatomic and functional causes are explored in detail. We conclude with management of true idiopathic pancreatitis and a summary of the various etiologic agents. Throughout this review, areas of controversies are highlighted.