Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Gastrointest Oncol ; 14(5): 2097-2110, 2023 Oct 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37969818

RESUMO

Background: In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the prognostic relevance of the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) remains controversial. We evaluated the impact of HER2 overexpression on outcomes of standard chemotherapy in patients with mCRC. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with mCRC who received standard chemotherapy for mCRC and were tested for HER2 expression at Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between January 15, 2017, and February 05, 2022. The HER2 test was performed using immunohistochemistry. We assessed the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) according to HER2 status. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS® version 25 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Results: In total, 108 patients were included; 10 (9.3%) had HER2-positive tumors. The ORR for patients with mCRC receiving standard chemotherapy did not differ for HER2-positive and HER2-negative tumors. The median PFS for patients with mCRC with HER2-positive or HER2-tumors after receiving first-line chemotherapy was 18.52 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.355-32.695] or 10.95 months (95% CI: 9.317-12.585; P=0.417), respectively, and that after second-line chemotherapy was 7.08 months (95% CI: 6.801-7.363) or 5.34 months (95% CI: 4.433-6.255; P=0.837), respectively. Likewise, OS did not differ according to HER2 expression (median OS: HER2-positive tumors, 49.1 months (95% CI: 0.000-98.365); HER2-negative tumors, 37.7 months (95% CI: 27.111-48.366; P=0.410). Conclusions: The tumor response and survival of patients with mCRC after standard chemotherapy did not differ by HER2 expression. These findings suggest that the status of HER2 expression need not be considered when choosing regimens as the current first- and second-line treatments.

2.
Biomedicines ; 11(11)2023 Nov 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38002099

RESUMO

With the advances in chemotherapy and immunotherapy, a small subset of patients may be eligible for conversion surgery after achieving tumor regression with chemotherapy. This is a retrospective cohort study of 118 patients with stage IV gastric cancer who received palliative chemotherapy and conversion surgery with a negative resection margin at Samsung Medical Center. Baseline features included comorbidities, body mass index (BMI), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, primary tumor size, biopsy histology, distant metastatic sites, and molecular markers-HER2, MSI/MMR, PD-L1, and EBV. Post-chemotherapy features included BMI, CEA level, chemotherapy regimen, objective response to chemotherapy, and number of preoperative chemotherapy cycles. Post-operational features included tumor size, histologic differentiation and Lauren's classification, pathologic tumor and nodal stages, invasion of lymphatics/vessels/nerves, peritoneal cytology, and the receipt of postoperative chemotherapy. Of 118 patients, 60 patients received total gastrectomy and 58 patients received subtotal gastrectomy. In all, 21 patients achieved a pathologic complete response, and 97 patients achieved downstaging to yp stage I, II, or III. Before conversion surgery, patients received first-line capecitabine/oxaliplatin (62%), HER2 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy (18%), immune checkpoint inhibitors (15%), and inhibitors of MET or VEGFR2 (5%). In the multivariable analysis, BMI at the time of diagnosis, either HER2 positive, high MSI, or deficient MMR, and the use of targeted agents were significant prognostic factors. Conversion surgery could be considered in patients with stage IV gastric cancer regardless of the initial disease burden. BMI and molecular markers are important prognostic factors that can be used to select candidates.

3.
Cancer Res ; 76(9): 2573-86, 2016 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27197264

RESUMO

Treatment of metastatic gastric cancer typically involves chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies targeting HER2 (ERBB2) and VEGFR2 (KDR). However, reliable methods to identify patients who would benefit most from a combination of treatment modalities targeting the tumor stroma, including new immunotherapy approaches, are still lacking. Therefore, we integrated a mouse model of stromal activation and gastric cancer genomic information to identify gene expression signatures that may inform treatment strategies. We generated a mouse model in which VEGF-A is expressed via adenovirus, enabling a stromal response marked by immune infiltration and angiogenesis at the injection site, and identified distinct stromal gene expression signatures. With these data, we designed multiplexed IHC assays that were applied to human primary gastric tumors and classified each tumor to a dominant stromal phenotype representative of the vascular and immune diversity found in gastric cancer. We also refined the stromal gene signatures and explored their relation to the dominant patient phenotypes identified by recent large-scale studies of gastric cancer genomics (The Cancer Genome Atlas and Asian Cancer Research Group), revealing four distinct stromal phenotypes. Collectively, these findings suggest that a genomics-based systems approach focused on the tumor stroma can be used to discover putative predictive biomarkers of treatment response, especially to antiangiogenesis agents and immunotherapy, thus offering an opportunity to improve patient stratification. Cancer Res; 76(9); 2573-86. ©2016 AACR.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Gástricas/classificação , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Transcriptoma/genética , Microambiente Tumoral/genética , Animais , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Biologia Computacional/métodos , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/métodos , Xenoenxertos , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Imuno-Histoquímica , Camundongos , Neovascularização Patológica/genética , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos , Análise Serial de Tecidos , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/metabolismo
4.
Oncology ; 74 Suppl 1: 4-6, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18758190

RESUMO

Cancer pain management had received relatively little attention until the late 1990s, when approximately 100,000 new cancer cases and 60,000 cancer deaths occurred each year in Korea. In 2001, a Cancer Pain Management Guideline was prepared for the first time by the Korean Society of Hospice and Palliative Care. This guideline facilitated cancer pain management by health professionals since then. In addition, cancer pain management has been included in the regular curriculum of all medical schools in Korea. The Korean Cancer Pain Assessment Tool, which was developed in 2003, has been accepted as a reliable and valid instrument for assessing cancer pain in Korea. The Korean version of quality of life assessment tools has also been accepted as a useful method. Oral short-acting opioids became available, along with other effective and convenient opioid drugs. The Korean government first published the Cancer Pain Management Guideline for health care professionals in 2004 and expanded the medical reimbursement criteria for cancer pain management, which reflect the government's support and interest in cancer pain care. The cancer pain surveys conducted in 2001 and 2006 demonstrated a significantly increased patient satisfaction on pain control (37% in 2001, n = 3,006 vs. 42% in 2006, n = 3,737, p = 0.003). Therefore, cancer pain management has been systematically approached both by health professionals as well as the government and resulted in a vast improvement in cancer pain control.


Assuntos
Neoplasias/complicações , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Coreia (Geográfico) , Neoplasias/fisiopatologia , Dor/etiologia , Medição da Dor/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos , Satisfação do Paciente , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Qualidade de Vida
5.
Cancer Res Treat ; 38(4): 234-9, 2006 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19771249

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to investigate in detail the xenograft mouse orthotopic lung cancer model induced by PC14PE6 adenocarcinoma cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three cell doses (0.5x10(6); 1x10(6); 2x10(6)) of PC14PE6 cells were injected into the lungs of male BALB/c nude mice by the intrathoracic injection method. The lung and other organs, including brain, liver, spleen, kidney, muscle, adrenal gland, and lymph node on knee, were removed and stained with H/E to detect the presence of tumor cells. RESULTS: The reliable tumorigenicity time in the PC14PE6 adenocarcinoma cell-inoculated BALB/c nude mouse was 10 days after intrathoracic injection. The average life span of the three groups after inoculation was 14 days in the 2x10(6) cells inoculum group; 25 days in the 1x10(6) cells inoculum group; and 32 days in the 0.5x10(6) cells inoculum group. The PC14PE6 adenocarcinoma cells induced orthotopic lung cancer limited within the thorax. CONCLUSIONS: This orthotopic lung cancer model is an efficient cancer model with easy inoculation methods, rapid and high tumorigenicity, and simple monitoring methods for metastasis.

6.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 25(4): 354-7, 2002 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12151964

RESUMO

A phase II study was performed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin combined with uracil and tegafur (UFT) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer previously treated with a fluoropyrimidine-based regimen. From January to December 1999, 34 patients were enrolled in this study. Patients received intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 and daily oral UFT 350 mg/m2 in 3 divided doses for 21 days and repeated every 21 days. Thirty-one of 34 patients were assessable for response and 32 patients for toxicity. Partial response was observed in four patients and stable disease in six patients. The response rate was 12.9% (95% CI, 3.6-29.8%) and median duration of response was 17 weeks. The median overall survival and progression-free survival of all patients were 26 weeks (range, 3-90+ weeks) and 9 weeks (range, 3-56 weeks), respectively. Sensory neuropathy was the most common toxicity, but there was no severe toxicity (>grade II) except for a case of grade III neutropenia. We conclude that oxaliplatin and UFT combination chemotherapy was well tolerated without significant toxicities. The results of this trial will serve as the basis for designing new clinical trials with a different dose or schedule.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/secundário , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Compostos Organoplatínicos/administração & dosagem , Oxaliplatina , Análise de Sobrevida , Tegafur/administração & dosagem , Uracila/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...