Validating a Curvature-Based Marker of Cervical Carotid Tortuosity for Risk Assessment in Heritable Aortopathies.

BACKGROUND: Cervical arterial tortuosity is associated with adverse outcomes in Loeys-Dietz syndrome and other heritable aortopathies. METHODS AND RESULTS: A method to assess tortuosity based on curvature of the vessel centerline in 3-dimensional space was developed. We measured cervical carotid tortuosity in 65 patients with Loeys-Dietz syndrome from baseline computed tomography angiogram/magnetic resonance angiogram and all serial images during follow-up. Relations between baseline carotid tortuosity, age, aortic root diameter, and its change over time were compared. Patients with unoperated aortic roots were assessed for clinical end point (type A aortic dissection or aortic root surgery during 4 years of follow-up). Logistic regression was performed to assess the likelihood of clinical end point according to baseline carotid tortuosity. Total absolute curvature at baseline was 11.13±5.76 and was relatively unchanged at 8 to 10 years (fold change: 0.026±0.298, P=1.00), whereas tortuosity index at baseline was 0.262±0.131, with greater variability at 8 to 10 years (fold change: 0.302±0.656, P=0.818). Baseline total absolute curvature correlated with aortic root diameter (r=0.456, P=0.004) and was independently associated with aortic events during the 4-year follow-up (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.64 [95% CI, 1.02-6.85]). Baseline tortuosity index correlated with age (r=0.532, P<0.001) and was not associated with events (adjusted OR, 1.88 [95% CI, 0.79-4.51]). Finally, baseline total absolute curvature had good discrimination of 4-year outcomes (area under the curve=0.724, P=0.014), which may be prognostic or predictive. CONCLUSIONS: Here we introduce cervical carotid tortuosity as a promising quantitative biomarker with validated, standardized characteristics. Specifically, we recommend the adoption of a curvature-based measure, total absolute curvature, for early detection or monitoring of disease progression in Loeys-Dietz syndrome.

Stability of navigation in catheter-based endovascular procedures.

Endovascular procedures provide surgeons and other interventionalists with minimally invasive methods to treat vascular diseases by passing guidewires, catheters, sheaths and treatment devices into the vasculature to and navigate toward a treatment site. The efficiency of this navigation affects patient outcomes, but is frequently compromised by catheter "herniation", in which the catheter-guidewire system bulges out from the intended endovascular pathway so that the interventionalist can no longer advance it. Here, we showed herniation to be a bifurcation phenomenon that can be predicted and controlled using mechanical characterizations of catheter-guidewire systems and patientspecific clinical imaging. We demonstrated our approach in laboratory models and, retrospectively, in patients who underwent procedures involving transradial neurovascular procedures with an endovascular pathway from the wrist, up in the arm, around the aortic arch, and into the neurovasculature. Our analyses identified a mathematical navigation stability criterion that predicted herniation in all of these settings. Results show that herniation can be predicted through bifurcation analysis, and provide a framework for selecting catheter-guidewire systems to avoid herniation in specific patient anatomy.

Impact of N-Acetyl-Cysteine on Ischemic Stumps Following Major Lower Extremity Amputation: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) on amputation stump perfusion and healing in patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). BACKGROUND: Patients with CLTI are at increased risk of poor amputation site healing leading to increased procedure-associated morbidity. METHODS: In a pilot, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trial, patients with CLTI undergoing major elective lower extremity amputation were randomized 1:1 to intravenous NAC (1200 mg twice-daily) or placebo for up to 5 days postoperatively. Primary outcomes were change in stump perfusion at postoperative day 3 (POD3) and POD5, and healing at POD30. Stumps were serially evaluated for wound healing, and tissue perfusion was evaluated using noninvasive laser-assisted fluorescent angiography. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were randomized to NAC (n = 16) or placebo (n = 17). Thirty-one patients were eligible for intent-to-treat analysis (NAC14; placebo17). Twenty patients (NAC7; placebo13) had amputation stump perfusion defects at POD0 and were considered high-risk for poor healing. Intent-to-treat analysis revealed no significant differences between treatment groups. Subgroup analysis of high-risk patients revealed differences in stump perfusion defect size (NAC-0.53-fold, placebo +0.71-fold; 95% confidence interval -2.11 to-0.35; P < 0.05) and healing (NAC [100%], placebo [46%]; P < 0.01) between study treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative NAC administration may improve amputation stump perfusion and healing in patients with CLTI and tissue perfusion defects at the time of amputation. Intraoperative laser-assisted fluorescent angiogra-phy may help surgeons identify high-risk patients with stump perfusion defects and provide early adjunctive interventions. Future studies can further explore the therapeutic benefits of NAC in the healing and perfusion of other surgical operative sites in high-risk individuals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier: NCT03253328.

Impact of Stroke Call on Career Satisfaction and Burnout for Academic Neurointerventionalists: A Grounded Theory Model.

BACKGROUND: The demand of thrombectomy treatment for acute ischemic stroke increased dramatically in the United States after the publication of 5 pivotal trials in 2015. The impact of call burden on career satisfaction and burnout in neurointerventionalists has not been explored. METHODS: A qualitative approach was chosen to obtain rich, detailed accounts of physician experiences. From July 2018 to July 2019, we conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews (mean duration, 43 minutes) with 16 academic neurointerventionalists from various institutions in the United States. Participants were chosen from the Society of Neurointerventional Surgery to include multiple specialties, career stages, and geographic locations. Key themes/subthemes were organized into a conceptual model and shown by exemplary quotes. RESULTS: Participants report a diverse range of previously uncharacterized ways in which stroke call responsibilities affect their lives. Unrealistic performance expectations, discipline-based inequalities, poor organizational workflow, limited opportunities for growth and advancement, and lack of control over call conditions are some of the key themes identified. Participants describe a need for interventions that address both the issues of workload stress (i.e., resources for stroke call and administrative work) and their ability to accomplish professional goals (i.e., flexible work arrangements, leadership autonomy support, and organizational value congruence). CONCLUSIONS: The burden of stroke call has strong implications for career satisfaction and burnout in neurointerventionalists. This model can be used by hospitals, departments, and physician groups to better conceptualize conditions that facilitate burnout and attrition. Changes to hospital management practices and culture may be the most productive focal areas for intervention.

Estimating Implicit and Explicit Gender Bias Among Health Care Professionals and Surgeons.

Importance: The Implicit Association Test (IAT) is a validated tool used to measure implicit biases, which are mental associations shaped by one's environment that influence interactions with others. Direct evidence of implicit gender biases about women in medicine has yet not been reported, but existing evidence is suggestive of subtle or hidden biases that affect women in medicine. Objectives: To use data from IATs to assess (1) how health care professionals associate men and women with career and family and (2) how surgeons associate men and women with surgery and family medicine. Design, Setting, and Participants: This data review and cross-sectional study collected data from January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2017, from self-identified health care professionals taking the Gender-Career IAT hosted by Project Implicit to explore bias among self-identified health care professionals. A novel Gender-Specialty IAT was also tested at a national surgical meeting in October 2017. All health care professionals who completed the Gender-Career IAT were eligible for the first analysis. Surgeons of any age, gender, title, and country of origin at the meeting were eligible to participate in the second analysis. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2018, through March 31, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Measure of implicit bias derived from reaction times on the IATs and a measure of explicit bias asked directly to participants. Results: Almost 1 million IAT records from Project Implicit were reviewed, and 131 surgeons (64.9% men; mean [SD] age, 42.3 [11.5] years) were recruited to complete the Gender-Specialty IAT. Healthcare professionals (n = 42 991; 82.0% women; mean [SD] age, 32.7 [11.8] years) held implicit (mean [SD] D score, 0.41 [0.36]; Cohen d = 1.14) and explicit (mean [SD], 1.43 [1.85]; Cohen d = 0.77) biases associating men with career and women with family. Similarly, surgeons implicitly (mean [SD] D score, 0.28 [0.37]; Cohen d = 0.76) and explicitly (men: mean [SD], 1.27 [0.39]; Cohen d = 0.93; women: mean [SD], 0.73 [0.35]; Cohen d = 0.53) associated men with surgery and women with family medicine. There was broad evidence of consensus across social groups in implicit and explicit biases with one exception. Women in healthcare (mean [SD], 1.43 [1.86]; Cohen d = 0.77) and surgery (mean [SD], 0.73 [0.35]; Cohen d = 0.53) were less likely than men to explicitly associate men with career (B coefficient, -0.10; 95% CI, -0.15 to -0.04; P < .001) and surgery (B coefficient, -0.67; 95% CI, -1.21 to -0.13; P = .001) and women with family and family medicine. Conclusions and Relevance: The main contribution of this work is an estimate of the extent of implicit gender bias within surgery. On both the Gender-Career IAT and the novel Gender-Specialty IAT, respondents had a tendency to associate men with career and surgery and women with family and family medicine. Awareness of the existence of implicit biases is an important first step toward minimizing their potential effect.