Assessment of Hindfoot Alignment: Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Versus Standing Radiograph.

Few intraoperative assessments are available for hindfoot alignment. In the current study, we demonstrated the feasibility of hindfoot alignment via intraoperative fluoroscopy. We retrospectively compared measurements of heel alignment obtained via intraoperative fluoroscopy with those acquired using standard radiographs. Two observers compared the heel alignment ratios and angles derived from 100 pairs of images. The effects of age, sex, laterality, and body mass index on the discrepancy between fluoroscopic images and radiographs were analyzed. The heel alignment ratio revealed a strong correlation between standing radiograph and intraoperative fluoroscopy, based on a correlation coefficient of 0.844 (p < .001). The heel alignment angle also showed significant correlation based on a correlation coefficient value of 0.667 (p < .001). None of the demographic factors showed any significant effect on the discrepancy between the 2 sets of images. Our study showed that the heel alignment determined via intraoperative fluoroscopy was comparable to that of a standard standing radiograph without any significant association with demographic factors.

Is subtle cavus foot a risk factor for chronic ankle instability? Comparison of prevalence of subtle cavus foot between chronic ankle instability and control group on the standing lateral radiograph.

BACKGROUND: Subtle cavus foot (SCF) is an entity characterized by mild cavus. However, few studies have examined whether a SCF may be a risk factor for chronic ankle instability (CAI). METHODS: This study included 116 patients who underwent lateral ankle ligament repair (modified Broström operation) for CAI and 105 controls. We used the standing lateral radiograph, so compared calcaneal pitch angle, Meary's angle, heights of the first and fifth metatarsal bases, and fibular positions between groups. Additionally, two observers subjectively rated the standing lateral radiographs for the presence of SCF. RESULTS: There were no significant intergroup differences in any of the radiographic angles. The prevalence of SCF was 20.7% in the CAI group and 18.1% in the control group according to observer 1 versus 21.6% and 28.6% (CAI group and control group, respectively) according to observer 2. There were no significant intergroup differences in the proportion of SCF between the two observers (p=0.105 and 0.211, respectively). CONCLUSION: SCF was not a significant risk factor for CAI when judging by standing lateral radiograph, and the detection of SCF seems to require considerable experience. Thus, care should be taken when determining whether to perform corrective osteotomies when treating CAI patients with SCF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, case control.

Survey on radiation safety management (RSM) among Korean radiation workers who operate radiation generators or handle radioactive isotopes.

This study examined the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of radiation workers to radiation safety management (RSM) using survey questionnaires. Radiation workers are those who handle radiation generators, radioactive isotopes, and other radioactive materials for industrial uses. The survey was distributed to 861 radiation workers between 1 August to 5 September 2011. A knowledge of, awareness of, attitude toward, and behaviors related to RSM were analyzed by comparing the means and standard deviations. Both the knowledge and awareness of RSM among radiation workers were high. Although all questions about the awareness of RSM were answered correctly, there were also many negative responses. All questions regarding the attitude of radiation workers toward RSM were answered correctly, and their attitude toward and awareness of RSM were high. Overall, the results demonstrated that safety management is not taken seriously in many cases, highlighting the need for proper education in the future to raise awareness among radiation workers. Furthermore, it is important to establish a foundation for the efficient use of radiation based on the continuous management of radiation workers.

Evaluation of image quality and radiation dose by adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique level for chest CT examination.

The purpose of this research is to determine the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) level that enables optimal image quality and dose reduction in the chest computed tomography (CT) protocol with ASIR. A chest phantom with 0-50 % ASIR levels was scanned and then noise power spectrum (NPS), signal and noise and the degree of distortion of peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and the root-mean-square error (RMSE) were measured. In addition, the objectivity of the experiment was measured using the American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom. Moreover, on a qualitative basis, five lesions' resolution, latitude and distortion degree of chest phantom and their compiled statistics were evaluated. The NPS value decreased as the frequency increased. The lowest noise and deviation were at the 20 % ASIR level, mean 126.15 ± 22.21. As a result of the degree of distortion, signal-to-noise ratio and PSNR at 20 % ASIR level were at the highest value as 31.0 and 41.52. However, maximum absolute error and RMSE showed the lowest deviation value as 11.2 and 16. In the ACR phantom study, all ASIR levels were within acceptable allowance of guidelines. The 20 % ASIR level performed best in qualitative evaluation at five lesions of chest phantom as resolution score 4.3, latitude 3.47 and the degree of distortion 4.25. The 20 % ASIR level was proved to be the best in all experiments, noise, distortion evaluation using ImageJ and qualitative evaluation of five lesions of a chest phantom. Therefore, optimal images as well as reduce radiation dose would be acquired when 20 % ASIR level in thoracic CT is applied.