Adaptations within Palliative Care Delivery Models Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic at a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Background: Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, all facets of palliative care provision for patients with serious illness have faced unparalleled challenges. Methods: We describe our palliative care program's response to the increased clinical volume associated with the pandemic by adapting workflows for inpatient and outpatient palliative care teams caring for oncology and nononcology populations. Results: During the initial surge, the demand for palliative care consultation for patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 was high, accounting for 75% of all inpatient palliative care referral requests for oncology and nononcology patients. Furthermore, our ambulatory clinic experienced a 40% increase in visits for complex oncology patients between February and December of 2020. Discussion: This article highlights transformations in palliative care delivery implemented in response to the pandemic and reflects on how these transformations have shaped our current care delivery models. We further delineate our intentional reliance on key population health principles to drive ongoing innovation in palliative care provision across our clinical teams.

Are Opioid Infusions Used Inappropriately at End of Life? Results From a Quality/Safety Project.

CONTEXT: Opioid continuous infusions are commonly used for end-of-life (EOL) symptoms in hospital settings. However, prescribing practices vary, and even the recent literature contains conflicting protocols and guidelines for best practice. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate opioid infusion use for EOL comfort care at an academic medical center, and determine if inappropriate use is associated with distress. METHODS: Through literature review and iterative interdisciplinary discussion, we defined three criteria for "potentially inappropriate" infusion use. We conducted a retrospective, observational study of inpatients who died over six months, abstracting demographics, opioid use patterns, survival time, palliative care (PC) involvement, and evidence of patient/caregiver/staff distress from the electronic medical record. RESULTS: We identified 193 decedents who received opioid infusions for EOL comfort care. Forty-four percent received opioid infusions that were classified as "potentially inappropriate." Insufficient use of as-needed intravenous opioid boluses and use of opioid infusions in opioid-naïve patients were the most common problems observed. Potentially inappropriate infusions were associated with more frequent patient (24% vs. 2%; P < 0.001) and staff distress (10% vs. 2%; P = 0.02) and were less common when PC provided medication recommendations (20% vs. 50%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Potentially inappropriate opioid infusions are prevalent at our hospital, an academic medical center with an active PC team and existing contracts for in-hospital hospice care. Furthermore, potentially inappropriate opioid infusions are associated with increased patient and staff distress. We are developing an interdisciplinary intervention to address this safety issue.

Different Associations Between Inpatient or Outpatient Palliative Care and End-of-Life Outcomes for Hospitalized Patients With Cancer.

PURPOSE: Palliative care (PC) improves outcomes in advanced cancer, and guidelines recommend early outpatient referral. However, many PC teams see more inpatient than outpatient consults. We conducted a retrospective study of hospitalized patients with cancer to quantify exposure to inpatient and outpatient PC and describe associations between PC and end-of-life (EOL) quality measures. METHODS: We identified all decedents admitted to an inpatient oncology unit in 1 year (October 1, 2017-September 30, 2018) and abstracted hospitalization statistics, inpatient and outpatient PC visits, and EOL outcomes. Descriptive statistics, univariate tests, and multivariate analysis evaluated associations between PC and patient outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 522 decedents were identified. 50% saw PC; only 21% had an outpatient PC visit. Decedents seen by PC were more likely to enroll in hospice (78% v 44%; P < .001), have do-not-resuscitate status (87% v 55%; P < .001), have advance care planning documents (53% v 31%; P < .001), and die at home or inpatient hospice instead of in hospital (67% v 40%; P < .01). Decedents seen by PC had longer hospital length-of-stay (LOS; 8.4 v 7.0 days; P = .03), but this association reversed for decedents seen by outpatient PC (6.3 v 8.3 days; P < .001), who also had longer hospice LOS (46.5 v 27.1 days; P < .01) and less EOL intensive care (6% v 15%; P < .05). CONCLUSION: PC was associated with significantly more hospice utilization and advance care planning. Patients seen specifically by outpatient PC had shorter hospital LOS and longer hospice LOS. These findings suggest different effects of inpatient and outpatient PC, underscoring the importance of robust outpatient PC.

Development of a Palliative Care Toolkit for the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to high numbers of critically ill and dying patients in need of expert management of dyspnea, delirium, and serious illness communication. The rapid spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome-Coronavirus-2 creates surges of infected patients requiring hospitalization and puts palliative care programs at risk of being overwhelmed by patients, families, and clinicians seeking help. In response to this unprecedented need for palliative care, our program sought to create a collection of palliative care resources for nonpalliative care clinicians. A workgroup of interdisciplinary palliative care clinicians developed the Palliative Care Toolkit, consisting of a detailed chapter in a COVID-19 online resource, a mobile and desktop Web application, one-page guides, pocket cards, and communication skills training videos. The suite of resources provides expert and evidence-based guidance on symptom management including dyspnea, pain, and delirium, as well as on serious illness communication, including conversations about goals of care, code status, and end of life. We also created a nurse resource hotline staffed by palliative care nurse practitioners and virtual office hours staffed by a palliative care attending physician. Since its development, the Toolkit has helped us disseminate best practices to nonpalliative care clinicians delivering primary palliative care, allowing our team to focus on the highest-need consults and increasing acceptance of palliative care across hospital settings.

Racial disparities in supportive medication use among older patients with brain metastases: a population-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BM) cause symptoms that supportive medications can alleviate. We assessed whether racial disparities exist in supportive medication utilization after BM diagnosis. METHODS: Medicare-enrolled patients linked with the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (SEER) who had diagnoses of BM between 2007 and 2016 were identified. Fourteen supportive medication classes were studied: non-opioid analgesics, opioids, anti-emetics, anti-epileptics, headache-targeting medications, steroids, cognitive aids, antidepressants, anxiolytics, antidelirium/antipsychotic agents, muscle relaxants, psychostimulants, sleep aids, and appetite stimulants. Drug administration ≤30 days following BM diagnosis was compared by race using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 17,957 patients, headache aids, antidepressants, and anxiolytics were prescribed less frequently to African Americans (odds ratio [95% CI] = 0.81 [0.73-0.90], P < 0.001; OR = 0.68 [0.57-0.80], P < 0.001; and OR = 0.68 [0.56-0.82], P < 0.001, respectively), Hispanics (OR = 0.83 [0.73-0.94], P = 0.004 OR = 0.78 [0.64-0.97], P = 0.02; and OR = 0.63 [0.49-0.81], P < 0.001, respectively), and Asians (OR = 0.81 [0.72-0.92], P = 0.001, OR = 0.67 [0.53-0.85], P = 0.001, and OR = 0.62 [0.48-0.80], P < 0.001, respectively) compared with non-Hispanic Whites. African Americans also received fewer anti-emetics (OR = 0.75 [0.68-0.83], P < 0.001), steroids (OR = 0.84 [0.76-0.93], P < 0.001), psychostimulants (OR = 0.14 [0.03-0.59], P = 0.007), sleep aids (OR = 0.71 [0.61-0.83], P < 0.001), and appetite stimulants (OR = 0.85 [0.77-0.94], P = 0.002) than Whites. Hispanic patients less frequently received antidelirium/antipsychotic drugs (OR = 0.57 [0.38-0.86], P = 0.008), sleep aids (OR = 0.78 [0.64-0.94, P = 0.01), and appetite stimulants (OR = 0.87 [0.76-0.99], P = 0.04). Asian patients received fewer opioids (OR = 0.86 [0.75-0.99], P = 0.04), anti-emetics (OR = 0.83 [0.73-0.94], P = 0.004), anti-epileptics (OR = 0.83 [0.71-0.97], P = 0.02), steroids (OR = 0.81 [0.72-0.92], P = 0.001), muscle relaxants (OR = 0.60 [0.41-0.89], P = 0.01), and appetite stimulants (OR = 0.87 [0.76-0.99], P = 0.03). No medication class was prescribed significantly less frequently to Whites. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in supportive medication prescription for non-White/Hispanic groups with BM exist; improved provider communication and engagement with at-risk patients is needed. KEY POINTS: 1. Patients with BM commonly experience neurologic symptoms.2. Supportive medications improve quality of life among patients with BM.3. Non-White patients with BM receive fewer supportive medications than White patients.

Assessment and Management of Patients With Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: A Multidisciplinary Review.

PURPOSE: Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) can be a catastrophic manifestation of advanced cancer that causes immobilizing pain and significant neurologic impairment. Oncologists can protect their patients by having a high index of suspicion for MSCC when patients present with new or worsening back pain before motor, sensory, bowel, or bladder deficits develop. We provide an updated, evidence-based narrative review of the presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of MSCC. METHODS: This narrative review was conducted by searching MEDLINE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for relevant literature on the presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with MSCC. The article addresses the key elements of MSCC management germane to the medical oncologist, with special attention given to pain and symptom management, decision making with regard to surgery and radiation therapy, the importance of rehabilitative care, and the value of a multidisciplinary approach. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance imaging of the entire spine is recommended for the diagnosis of MSCC. Treatment includes glucocorticoid therapy, pain management, radiation therapy with or without surgery, and specialized rehabilitation. When formulating a treatment plan, clinicians should consider the patient's care goals and psychosocial needs. CONCLUSION: Prompt diagnosis and treatment of MSCC can reduce pain and prevent irreversible functional loss. Regular collaboration among multidisciplinary providers may streamline care and enhance achievement of treatment goals.

"Remembrance": A Self-Care Tool for Clinicians.

Despite increasing attention in the medical and nursing literature about the importance of self-care for clinicians and the prevention of burnout, coping with the deaths of patients is an often-neglected component of clinical training. In this article, we describe the development of "Remembrance," an interdisciplinary approach to acknowledge and process the deaths of patients on our inpatient palliative care service, paying particular attention to how patients and their families affect us as clinicians. We believe that such a practice is an important component of both quality end-of-life care and clinician self-care, which should be routinely taught and incorporated into clinical services. We provide a template that summarizes our approach, which can be easily adapted by other hospitals to use.

Evidence for Neurotoxicity Due to Morphine or Hydromorphone Use in Renal Impairment: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Opioids are the mainstay of pain control for patients with chronic pain. Often, opioids with reported active metabolites, such as morphine and hydromorphone, are thought to increase the risk of neurotoxicity in renal impairment. OBJECTIVES: To identify and assess the quality of evidence for neurotoxic effects in patients with renal impairment receiving morphine or hydromorphone. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted of the following databases from inception to December 2015: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, in addition to hand-searching relevant review articles' citations. Studies were included if they reported neurotoxic effects of either morphine or hydromorphone for chronic or malignant pain in patients with renal impairment. Review articles and case reports were excluded. Narrative review was undertaken. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to assess study quality. RESULTS: Six original articles, three prospective and three retrospective studies were identified and assessed. No relevant randomized clinical trials were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Although morphine and hydromorphone use may be associated with neurotoxic effects in patients with renal impairment, current evidence consists of very low-quality studies with conflicting findings. Clinicians may consider using either morphine or hydromorphone in mild-to-moderate renal impairment, while closely monitoring for neurotoxic effects, particularly when used in high doses and for extended duration.

Pre-B-cell colony-enhancing factor and its clinical correlates with acute lung injury and sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Pre-B-cell colony-enhancing factor (PBEF) is a potential biomarker for acute lung injury (ALI) in sepsis. We aimed to determine the clinical correlates for elevated plasma PBEF upon ICU admission for severe sepsis and the usefulness of PBEF to predict ALI development and sepsis mortality. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort of patients admitted to the medical ICU with severe sepsis. Patients without available blood samples or who were not enrolled within 24 h of admission were excluded. Plasma collected within 24 h of ICU admission was measured for PBEF concentrations by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Patients were followed for ALI development as defined by the American-European Consensus Conference and for all-cause hospital mortality. RESULTS: Between September 30, 2008, and March 10, 2009, 113 patients were enrolled, and 50 (44%) developed ALI. Elevated PBEF levels significantly correlated with higher APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) III scores (R(2) = 0.08, P = .003) and failure to reach early sepsis goals within 6 h of severe sepsis (P = .003). PBEF did not differ by ALI status (P = .58). The mortality rate was 46%. Nonsurvivors had higher PBEF levels than survivors (2.53 ng/mL; interquartile range [IQR], 1.07-8.16 vs 1.44 ng/mL; IQR, 0.84-2.81; P = .02). After adjusting for severity of illness, PBEF levels were no longer significantly associated with mortality (OR, 1.44 per 10-fold increase; 95% CI, 0.69-3.03, P = .34). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, elevated PBEF did not correlate with lung injury in sepsis. However, it was associated with sepsis mortality mainly due to its association with greater severity of illness on ICU admission.