Effects of right low atrial septal vs. right atrial appendage pacing on atrial mechanical function and dyssynchrony in patients with sinus node dysfunction and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: To study the effects of right low atrial septum (AS) and right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing on atrial mechanical function and dyssynchrony in patients with sinus node disease (SND) and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Detailed echocardiographic examination was performed on 30 patients with SND and paroxysmal AF and a dual-chamber, dual sensing, dual response pacemaker with atrial lead implantation at AS(n= 15) or RAA(n= 15). Peak atrial velocities were recorded by pulsed tissue Doppler spectrum. The timing of atrial contractions (Ta) was measured at the middle of the left atrial (LA) and right atrial (RA) free wall. Intra-[standard deviation (SD) of time of Ta (Ta-SD)] and inter-atrial delay(Ta-RL) was measured as the SD of time interval among LA six segments and time difference between the LA and RA wall, respectively. The baseline clinical statuses were similar between groups. Indexes of LA function, and intra- or inter-atrial dyssynchrony were also similar during intrinsic sinus rhythm in both groups (all P> 0.05). During atrial pacing, LA ejection fraction (52 ± 16 vs. 39 ± 14%, P= 0.029) and LA active emptying fraction (34 ± 7 vs. 23 ± 15%, P= 0.012) were higher in patients with AS than RAA pacing. Atrial velocity was also higher at the RA free wall (14.3 ± 3.1 vs. 10.3 ± 4.4 cm/s, P= 0.009), LA septal (7.5 ± 2.1 vs. 5.2 ± 1.7 cm/s, P= 0.004) and lateral wall (8.6 ± 2.4 vs. 6.3 ± 3.0 cm/s, P= 0.024) during AS compared with RAA pacing. There was no difference in Ts-SD during atrial pacing, nevertheless Ta-RL was significantly prolonged in patients with RAA compared with those with AS pacing (42 ± 36 vs. 27 ± 25 ms, P= 0.011). CONCLUSION: In patients with SND and paroxysmal AF, right low AS pacing significantly improved global and regional atrial mechanical function and synchronized inter-atrial electromechanical contraction compared with RAA pacing.

A prospective randomized study to assess the efficacy of rate and site of atrial pacing on long-term development of atrial fibrillation.

The Septal Pacing for Atrial Fibrillation Suppression Evaluation (SAFE) study is a single-blinded, parallel randomized designed multicenter study in pacemaker indicated patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). The objective is to evaluate whether the site of atrial pacing--conventional right atrial appendage versus low atrial septal--with or without atrial overdrive pacing will influence the development of persistent AF. The study will provide a definitive answer to whether a different atrial pacing site or the use of AF suppression pacing or both can give incremental antiarrhythmic benefit when one is implanting a device for a patient with a history of paroxysmal AF.

Area of left ventricular regional conduction delay and preserved myocardium predict responses to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

UNLABELLED: Cardiac resynchronization therapy. BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block (LBBB) do not respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the electromechanical properties of the myocardium would predict acute hemodynamic improvement during left ventricular (LV) pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 10 patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and LBBB (ejection fraction (EF): 27%+/-7%; QRS duration: 166+/-16 msec) using three-dimensional electromechanical endocardial mapping technique to assess endocardial activation time (Endo-AT), unipolar voltage, and local linear shortening during sinus rhythm. LV stimulation was performed in VDD mode at five different sites and three atrioventricular delays within the coronary sinus. LV+dP/dtmax changes from baseline were measured during LV stimulation at each site (%DeltadP/dtmax). There was no significant relationship between maximum %DeltadP/dtmax during LV stimulation at the best coronary sinus site and LV EF, baseline LV+dP/dtmax, total LV Endo-AT, baseline QRS duration nor changes in QRS duration during LV pacing. However, the maximum %DeltadP/dtmax was significantly positively correlated with percentage area of late Endo-AT (r=0.97, P<0.001) and preserved LV myocardium (r=0.81, P=0.005), respectively. Patients with >20% of LV area with late Endo-AT and >30% of preserved LV myocardium had five times better acute hemodynamic response with LV stimulation. Multivariate analysis showed that only percentage area of late Endo-AT was independently correlated with %DeltadP/dtmax (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The presence of a larger amount of LV area with late Endo-AT and preserved LV myocardium measured by electromechanical mapping could identify patients who have better acute improvement in systolic performance during LV stimulation.