Artificial intelligence-based quantitative coronary angiography of major vessels using deep-learning.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) offers objective and reproducible measures of coronary lesions. However, significant inter- and intra-observer variability and time-consuming processes hinder the practical application of on-site QCA in the current clinical setting. This study proposes a novel method for artificial intelligence-based QCA (AI-QCA) analysis of the major vessels and evaluates its performance. METHODS: AI-QCA was developed using three deep-learning models trained on 7658 angiographic images from 3129 patients for the precise delineation of lumen boundaries. An automated quantification method, employing refined matching for accurate diameter calculation and iterative updates of diameter trend lines, was embedded in the AI-QCA. A separate dataset of 676 coronary angiography images from 370 patients was retrospectively analyzed to compare AI-QCA with manual QCA performed by expert analysts. A match was considered between manual and AI-QCA lesions when the minimum lumen diameter (MLD) location identified manually coincided with the location identified by AI-QCA. Matched lesions were evaluated in terms of diameter stenosis (DS), MLD, reference lumen diameter (RLD), and lesion length (LL). RESULTS: AI-QCA exhibited a sensitivity of 89% in lesion detection and strong correlations with manual QCA for DS, MLD, RLD, and LL. Among 995 matched lesions, most cases (892 cases, 80%) exhibited DS differences ≤10%. Multiple lesions of the major vessels were accurately identified and quantitatively analyzed without manual corrections. CONCLUSION: AI-QCA demonstrates promise as an automated tool for analysis in coronary angiography, offering potential advantages for the quantitative assessment of coronary lesions and clinical decision-making.

Quantitative Coronary Angiography vs Intravascular Ultrasonography to Guide Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Although intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) guidance promotes favorable outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), many catheterization laboratories worldwide lack access. Objective: To investigate whether systematic implementation of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) to assist angiography-guided PCI could be an alternative strategy to IVUS guidance during stent implantation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, open-label, noninferiority clinical trial enrolled adults (aged ≥18 years) with chronic or acute coronary syndrome and angiographically confirmed native coronary artery stenosis requiring PCI. Patients were enrolled in 6 cardiac centers in Korea from February 23, 2017, to August 23, 2021, and follow-up occurred through August 25, 2022. All principal analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Interventions: After successful guidewire crossing of the first target lesion, patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either QCA- or IVUS-guided PCI. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was target lesion failure at 12 months, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The trial was designed assuming an event rate of 8%, with the upper limit of the 1-sided 97.5% CI of the absolute difference in 12-month target lesion failure (QCA-guided PCI minus IVUS-guided PCI) to be less than 3.5 percentage points for noninferiority. Results: The trial included 1528 patients who underwent PCI with QCA guidance (763; mean [SD] age, 64.1 [9.9] years; 574 males [75.2%]) or IVUS guidance (765; mean [SD] age, 64.6 [9.5] years; 622 males [81.3%]). The post-PCI mean (SD) minimum lumen diameter was similar between the QCA- and IVUS-guided PCI groups (2.57 [0.55] vs 2.60 [0.58] mm, P = .26). Target lesion failure at 12 months occurred in 29 of 763 patients (3.81%) in the QCA-guided PCI group and 29 of 765 patients (3.80%) in the IVUS-guided PCI group (absolute risk difference, 0.01 percentage points [95% CI, -1.91 to 1.93 percentage points]; hazard ratio, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.60-1.68]; P = .99). There was no difference in the rates of stent edge dissection (1.2% vs 0.7%, P = .25), coronary perforation (0.2% vs 0.4%, P = .41), or stent thrombosis (0.53% vs 0.66%, P = .74) between the QCA- and IVUS-guided PCI groups. The risk of the primary end point was consistent regardless of subgroup, with no significant interaction. Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this randomized clinical trial indicate that QCA and IVUS guidance during PCI showed similar rates of target lesion failure at 12 months. However, due to the lower-than-expected rates of target lesion failure in this trial, the findings should be interpreted with caution. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02978456.

Impact of Target Lesion Revascularization on Long-Term Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Disease.

BACKGROUND: Although target lesion revascularization (TLR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease is not rare, its timing of occurrence and prognostic impact on long-term mortality is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate TLR incidence over time and its impact on mortality after PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES) for LMCA disease. METHODS: Using a pooled data from 4 multicenter observational registries (IRIS-DES [Interventional Cardiology Research Incorporation Society-Drug-Eluting Stents], IRIS-MAIN [Interventional Cardiology Research Incorporation Society-Left MAIN Revascularization], MAIN-COMPARE [Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Versus Surgical Revascularization], and PRECOMBAT [PREmier of Randomized COMparison of Bypass Surgery versus AngioplasTy Using Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease]), we evaluated 1,397 patients with LMCA disease treated with DES and available long-term mortality data. The association between TLR and the 10-year risk of mortality was examined by multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, with TLR as a time-varying covariate. RESULTS: During maximum follow-up of 10 years (median 6.8 years), TLR occurred in 118 patients and its 10-year cumulative incidence was 10.8%. TLR mostly occurred within 2 years after initial PCI and decreased over time: early-stage TLR (within 2 years) in 73 (61.9%) patients and late-stage TLR (beyond 2 years) in 45 (38.1%) patients. Among all TLR patients, 23 patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and 95 underwent repeat PCI. In the time-varying multivariable Cox model, the presence of TLR was not significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality (adjusted HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.50-1.63; P = 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Although the incidence of ischemia-driven TLR was mostly common within 2 years after left main PCI, TLR occurred steadily during the 10-year follow-up period. However, given that such patients were optimally revascularized, the prognostic impact of TLR on mortality was not substantial. (Evaluation of the First, Second, and New Drug-Eluting Stents in Routine Clinical Practice [IRIS-DES]; NCT01186133; Observational Study for Left Main Disease Treatment [IRIS-MAIN]; NCT01341327; Ten-Year Outcomes of Stents Versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease [MAIN COMPARE]; NCT02791412; Bypass Surgery Versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease [PRECOMBAT]; NCT00422968).

Age- and Sex-Specific Disparities in Outcomes After Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in East Asian Patients.

It is unknown whether there are age- and gender-related differences in the safety and efficacy of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in East Asian populations with a different bleeding or ischemic propensity. Using data from the TICAKOREA (Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Asian/Korean Patients with ACS Intended for Invasive Management) trial comparing ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for 800 Korean patients with acute coronary syndrome, the safety and efficacy outcomes were compared according to age (<75 vs ≥75 years) and gender (men vs women). The primary bleeding end point was clinically significant bleeding, and the primary ischemic end point was a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) at 12 months. The incidences of clinically significant bleeding were significantly higher after ticagrelor than after clopidogrel in patients aged <75 years (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40 to 4.67) but not in patients aged ≥75 years (adjusted HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.40 to 3.38). The incidences of MACEs were significantly higher after ticagrelor than after clopidogrel in patients aged ≥75 years (adjusted HR 6.14, 95% CI 1.40 to 26.90) but not in patients aged <75 years (adjusted HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.73). The incidences of clinically significant bleeding were significantly higher after ticagrelor than after clopidogrel in men (adjusted HR 2.69, 95% CI 1.38 to 5.24) but not in women (adjusted HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.64 to 3.46). The adjusted risks of MACEs after ticagrelor or clopidogrel were not significantly different between men and women. In conclusion, there were substantial age- and gender-related differences in bleeding and ischemic outcomes after ticagrelor or clopidogrel in Korean patients with acute coronary syndrome. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT02094963.

Valor pronóstico a 10 años de la angiografía coronaria por TAC en pacientes asintomáticos con diabetes tipo 2 / Ten-year prognostic value of coronary CT angiography in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes

Introducción y objetivos: La escala UKPDS (acrónimo inglés de «Estudio Prospectivo de Diabetes del Reino Unido») tiene un valor limitado para la predicción de eventos de enfermedad arterial coronaria (EAC). El estudio pretende investigar el valor añadido de la angiografía coronaria por tomografía computarizada (ACTC) sobre la escala de riesgo UKPDS para la predicción a 10 años de eventos cardiacos adversos en pacientes asintomáticos con diabetes tipo 2. Métodos: Se evaluó a 589 pacientes diabéticos asintomáticos sin historia de EAC a quienes se les realizó una ACTC. El objetivo principal estaba compuesto por muerte cardiaca, infarto de miocardio no mortal, angina inestable que requiere hospitalización y revascularización. Se estimó la habilidad de discriminación y reclasificación para modelos de predicción que incluían combinaciones de la categoría UKPDS, gravedad de estenosis y puntuación de calcio arterial coronario por ACTC. Resultados: La incidencia del objetivo primario fue del 12,4%. A lo largo de 10 años de seguimiento, los pacientes sin placa ateroesclerótica por ACTC tendieron a tener un bajo ratio de eventos coronarios en tanto que aquellos con EAC obstructiva tuvieron una mayor ratio de eventos, independientemente de la categoría de riesgo de la escala UKPDS. EL modelo que solo incluyó la categoría UKPDS tuvo un índice C de Harrell de 0,658; añadiendo el grado de estenosis coronaria al modelo se incrementó significativamente el índice C en 0,066 (p=0,004), en tanto que la adición del CSC incrementó el índice C en solo 0,039 (p=0,056). Globalmente, la información de la ACTC añadida a la categoría de riesgo UKPDS mejoró el ratio de reclasificación para la predicción del objetivo primario. Conclusiones: En pacientes asintomáticos con diabetes tipo 2, la información de la ACTC para EAC...(AU)

Introduction and objectives: The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) risk score has limited value for predicting coronary artery disease (CAD) events. We investigated the additive value of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) on top of the UKPDS risk score in predicting 10-year adverse cardiac events in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: We evaluated 589 asymptomatic diabetic patients without a history of CAD who underwent CCTA. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring hospitalization, and revascularization. We estimated the discrimination and reclassification ability for the prediction models, which included combinations of the UKPDS category, severity of stenosis, and coronary artery calcium score by CCTA. Results: The incidence of the primary outcome was 12.4%. During 10 years of follow-up, patients without plaque by CCTA tended to have a low CAD event rate, while those with obstructive CAD tended to have a high event rate, irrespective of the baseline UKPDS risk category. The model that included only the UKPDS category had a Harrell's c-index of 0.658; adding the degree of stenosis to the model significantly increased the c-index by 0.066 (P=.004), while adding coronary artery calcium score increased the c-index by only 0.039 (P=.056). Overall, CCTA information in addition to the UKPDS risk category improved the reclassification rate for predicting the primary outcome. Conclusions: In asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes, CCTA information for CAD provided significant incremental discriminatory power beyond the UKPDS risk score category for predicting 10-year adverse coronary events.(AU)

Early left atrial venting versus conventional treatment for left ventricular decompression during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: The EVOLVE-ECMO randomized clinical trial.

AIMS: Few studies have reported data on the optimal timing of left ventricular (LV) unloading during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for cardiac arrest or shock. This study evaluated the feasibility of an early LV unloading strategy compared with a conventional strategy in VA-ECMO. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between December 2018 and August 2022, 60 patients at two institutions were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive early (n = 30) or conventional (n = 30) LV unloading strategies. The early LV unloading strategy was defined as LV unloading performed at the time of VA-ECMO insertion. LV unloading was performed using a percutaneous transseptal left atrial cannulation via the femoral vein incorporated into the ECMO venous circuit. The early and conventional LV unloading groups included 29 (96.7%) and 23 (76.7%) patients, respectively (median time from VA-ECMO insertion to LV unloading: 48.4 h, interquartile range 47.8-96.5 h). The groups showed no significant differences in the rate of VA-ECMO weaning as the primary endpoint (70.0% vs. 76.7%; relative risk 0.91; 95% confidence interval 0.67-1.24; p = 0.386) and survival to discharge (53.3% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.796). However, the pulmonary congestion score index at 48 h after LV unloading was significantly improved only in the early LV unloading group (2.0 ± 0.7 vs. 1.7 ± 0.6 at baseline vs. at 48 h; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the conventional approach, early LV unloading did not improve the VA-ECMO weaning rate, despite the rapid improvement in pulmonary congestion. Therefore, the results of this study do not support the application of this strategy after VA-ECMO insertion.

Selective ensemble methods for deep learning segmentation of major vessels in invasive coronary angiography.

BACKGROUND: Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is a primary imaging modality that visualizes the lumen area of coronary arteries for diagnosis and interventional guidance. In the current practice of quantitative coronary analysis (QCA), semi-automatic segmentation tools require labor-intensive and time-consuming manual correction, limiting their application in the catheterization room. PURPOSE: This study aims to propose rank-based selective ensemble methods that improve the segmentation performance and reduce morphological errors that limit fully automated quantification of coronary artery using deep-learning segmentation of ICA. METHODS: Two selective ensemble methods proposed in this work integrated the weighted ensemble approach with per-image quality estimation. The segmentation outcomes from five base models with different loss functions were ranked either by mask morphology or estimated dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The final output was determined by imposing different weights according to the ranks. The ranking criteria based on mask morphology were formulated from empirical insight to avoid frequent types of segmentation errors (MSEN), while the estimation of DSCs was performed by comparing the pseudo-ground truth generated from a meta-learner (ESEN). Five-fold cross-validation was performed with the internal dataset of 7426 coronary angiograms from 2924 patients, and prediction model was externally validated with 556 images of 226 patients. RESULTS: The selective ensemble methods improved the segmentation performance with DSCs up to 93.07% and provided a better delineation of coronary lesion with local DSCs of up to 93.93%, outperforming all individual models. Proposed methods also minimized the chances of mask disconnection in the most narrowed regions to 2.10%. The robustness of the proposed methods was also evident in the external validation. Inference time for major vessel segmentation was approximately one-sixth of a second. CONCLUSION: Proposed methods successfully reduced morphological errors in the predicted masks and were able to enhance the robustness of the automatic segmentation. The results suggest better applicability of real-time QCA-based diagnostic methods in routine clinical settings.

Preventive PCI or medical therapy alone for vulnerable atherosclerotic coronary plaque: Rationale and design of the randomized, controlled PREVENT trial.

BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndromes are commonly caused by the rupture of vulnerable plaque, which often appear angiographically not severe. Although pharmacologic management is considered standard therapy for stabilizing plaque vulnerability, the potential role of preventive local treatment for vulnerable plaque has not yet been determined. The PREVENT trial was designed to compare preventive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) with OMT alone in patients with functionally nonsignificant high-risk vulnerable plaques. METHODS: The PREVENT trial is a multinational, multicenter, prospective, open-label, active-treatment-controlled randomized trial. Eligible patients have at least 1 angiographically significant stenosis (diameter stenosis >50% by visual estimation) without functional significance (fractional flow reserve [FFR] >0.80). Target lesions are assessed by intracoronary imaging and must meet at least 2 imaging criteria for vulnerable plaque; (1) minimal lumen area <4.0 mm2; (2) plaque burden >70%; (3) maximal lipid core burden index in a 4 mm segment >315 by near infrared spectroscopy; and (4) thin cap fibroatheroma as determined by virtual histology or optical coherence tomography. Enrolled patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either preventive PCI with either bioabsorbable vascular scaffolds or metallic everolimus-eluting stents plus OMT or OMT alone. The primary endpoint is target-vessel failure, defined as the composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, ischemic-driven target-vessel revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable or progressive angina, at 2 years after randomization. RESULTS: Enrollment of a total of 1,608 patients has been completed. Follow-up of the last enrolled patient will be completed in September 2023 and primary results are expected to be available in early 2024. CONCLUSIONS: The PREVENT trial is the first large-scale, randomized trial to evaluate the effect of preventive PCI on non-flow-limiting vulnerable plaques containing multiple high-risk features that is appropriately powered for clinical outcomes. PREVENT will provide compelling evidence as to whether preventive PCI of vulnerable plaques plus OMT improves patient outcomes compared with OMT alone. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov. Unique identifier: NCT02316886. KEY POINTS: The PREVENT trial is the first, large-scale randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of preventive PCI on non-flow-limiting vulnerable plaque with high-risk features. It will provide compelling evidence to determine whether PCI of focal vulnerable plaques on top of OMT improves patient outcomes.

Validation of Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk Definition in East-Asian Patients.

Background: Clinical applicability of the Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria in East-Asian patients receiving potent antiplatelet therapy for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is still undetermined. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to validate the ARC definition for HBR in East-Asian patients with ACS for invasive management. Methods: We analyzed data from the TICAKOREA (Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Asian/Korean Patients With ACS Intended for Invasive Management) trial and randomly assigned 800 Korean ACS subjects to receive, in a 1:1 ratio, ticagrelor or clopidogrel. Patients were considered HBR if they met at least 1 major or 2 minor ARC-HBR criteria. The primary bleeding endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5 bleeding and the primary ischemic endpoint was a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) (a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) at 12 months. Results: Among 800 randomized patients, 129 (16.3%) were categorized HBR patients. HBR patients, compared with non-HBR patients, had a higher incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5 bleeding (10.0% vs 3.7%; HR: 2.98; 95% CI: 1.52-5.86; P < 0.001) and MACE (14.3% vs 6.1%; HR: 2.35; 95% CI: 1.35-4.10; P = 0.002). The relative treatment effect of ticagrelor or clopidogrel on primary bleeding and ischemic outcomes were different between each group. Conclusions: This study validates the ARC-HBR definition in Korean ACS patients. Approximately 15% of patients qualified as HBR patients who were at increased risk not only for bleeding but also for thrombotic events. The clinical application of ARC-HBR to determine the relative effect of different antiplatelet regiments should be further investigated. (Safety and Efficacy of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Asian/KOREAn Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Intended for Invasive Management [TICA KOREA]; NCT02094963).

Machine Learning-Based prediction of Post-Treatment ambulatory blood pressure in patients with hypertension.

Purpose. Pre-treatment prediction of individual blood pressure (BP) response to anti-hypertensive medication is important to determine the specific regimen for promptly and safely achieving a target BP. This study aimed to develop supervised machine learning (ML) models for predicting patient-specific treatment effects using 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) data.Materials and Methods. A total of 1,129 patients who had both baseline and follow-up ABPM data were randomly assigned into training, validation and test sets in a 3:1:1 ratio. Utilising the features including clinical and laboratory findings, initial ABPM data, and anti-hypertensive medication at baseline and at follow-up, ML models were developed to predict post-treatment individual BP response. Each case was labelled by the mean 24-hour and daytime BPs derived from the follow-up ABPM.Results. At baseline, 616 (55%) patients had been treated using mono or combination therapy with 45 anti-hypertensive drugs and the remaining 513 (45%) patients had been untreated (drug-naïve). By using CatBoost, the difference between predicted vs. measured mean 24-hour systolic BP at follow-up was 8.4 ± 7.0 mm Hg (% difference of 6.6% ± 5.7%). The difference between predicted vs. measured mean 24-hour diastolic BP was 5.3 ± 4.3 mm Hg (% difference of 6.8% ± 5.5%). There were significant correlations between the CatBoost-predicted vs. the ABPM-measured changes in the mean 24-hour Systolic (r = 0.74) and diastolic (r = 0.68) BPs from baseline to follow-up. Even in the patients with renal insufficiency or diabetes, the correlations between CatBoost-predicted vs. ABPM-measured BP changes were significant.Conclusion. ML algorithms accurately predict the post-treatment ambulatory BP levels, which may assist clinicians in personalising anti-hypertensive treatment.

The prediction of post-treatment BP response is essential to plan the appropriate optimal treatment strategy for achieving the target BP level.The poor predictability of the post-treatment BP level is due to the complex pathophysiology of individual BP response, which can partly explain the poor rate to achieve the target systolic BP.In this current study including both treated and untreated patients with hypertension, machine leaning models predicted the post-treatment mean BP levels on 24-hr ABPM even in high-risk patients and patients with a high BP variability.Model-derived selection and optimisation of anti-hypertension drugs may facilitate prompt achievement of adequate BP control without drug-related complications and avoiding repeating 24-hour ABPM or multiple visits for drug readjustment.

Impact of Complete or Incomplete Revascularization for Left Main Coronary Disease: The Extended PRECOMBAT Study.

Background: Whether complete revascularization (CR) or incomplete revascularization (IR) may affect long-term outcomes after PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease is unclear. Objectives: The authors sought to assess the impact of CR or IR on 10-year outcomes after PCI or CABG for LMCA disease. Methods: In the PRECOMBAT (Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease) 10-year extended study, the authors evaluated the effect of PCI and CABG on long-term outcomes according to completeness of revascularization. The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (composite of mortality from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization). Results: Among 600 randomized patients (PCI, n = 300 and CABG, n = 300), 416 patients (69.3%) had CR and 184 (30.7%) had IR; 68.3% of PCI patients and 70.3% of CABG patients underwent CR, respectively. The 10-year MACCE rates were not significantly different between PCI and CABG among patients with CR (27.8% vs 25.1%, respectively; adjusted HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.81-1.73) and among those with IR (31.6% vs 21.3%, respectively; adjusted HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 0.92-2.92) (P for interaction = 0.35). There was also no significant interaction between the status of CR and the relative effect of PCI and CABG on all-cause mortality, serious composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and repeat revascularization. Conclusions: In this 10-year follow-up of PRECOMBAT, the authors found no significant difference between PCI and CABG in the rates of MACCE and all-cause mortality according to CR or IR status. (Ten-Year Outcomes of PRE-COMBAT Trial [PRECOMBAT], NCT03871127; PREmier of Randomized COMparison of Bypass Surgery Versus AngioplasTy Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease [PRECOMBAT], NCT00422968).

Effect of rosuvastatin 20 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg plus ezetimibe on statin side-effects in elderly patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Rationale and design of a randomized, controlled SaveSAMS trial.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend that patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) use high-intensity statin therapy to lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels by at least 50%, irrespective of age. However, in real-world practice, there is reluctance to maintain statin use in response to side-effects, particularly statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS). Moreover, no randomized trial has been conducted on the safety of statin therapy in elderly patients. TRIAL DESIGN: This investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized clinical trial aimed to investigate the incidence of SAMS and its effect on LDL-cholesterol levels in elderly patients with established ASCVD. Eligible patients were aged 70 years or older with established ASCVD. Consecutive patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either intensive statin monotherapy (rosuvastatin 20 mg) or combination therapy (rosuvastatin/ezetimibe, 5/10 mg). The primary endpoint of the study is SAMS at 6 months with regard to treatment strategy. Positive SAMS results are defined as patients with a proposed statin myalgia index score of 7 or higher. The key secondary end-points are target LDL-cholesterol achievement (LDL < 70 mg/dL), incidence of myopathy, rhabdomyolysis, frequency of drug discontinuation, and creatinine kinase, aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, triglyceride, and highly sensitive C-reactive protein levels at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The SaveSAMS study is a multicenter, randomized trial that will compare the incidence of SAMS in patients with established ASCVD who are 70 years or older on intensive statin monotherapy to that combination therapy.

Myocardial Scar and Revascularization on Mortality in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (from the Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Study).

Myocardial viability test to guide revascularization remains uncertain in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. We evaluated the different impacts of revascularization on cardiac mortality according to the extent of myocardial scar assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. A total of 404 consecutive patients with significant coronary artery disease and an ejection fraction ≤35% were assessed by LGE-CMR before revascularization. Of them, 306 patients underwent revascularization and 98 patients received medical treatment alone. The primary outcome was cardiac death. During a median follow-up of 6.3 years, cardiac death occurred in 158 patients (39.1%). Revascularization was associated with a significantly lower risk of cardiac death than medical treatment alone in the overall population (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 0.45, p <0.001). There was a significant interaction between the number of segments with >75% transmural LGE and revascularization on the risk of cardiac death (p = 0.037 for interaction). In patients with limited myocardial scar (<6 segments with >75% transmural LGE, n = 354), revascularization had a significantly lower risk of cardiac death than medical treatment alone (aHR 0.24, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.37, p <0.001); in patients with extensive myocardial scar (≥6 segments with >75% transmural LGE, n = 50), there was no significant difference between revascularization and medical treatment alone regarding the risk of cardiac death (aHR 1.33, 95% CI 0.46 to 3.80, p = 0.60). In conclusion, the assessment of myocardial scar by LGE-CMR may be helpful in the decision-making process for revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Use of Recanalized Vessels for Diabetic Foot Reconstruction: Pushing the Boundaries of Reconstruction in a Vasculopathic Lower Extremity.

BACKGROUND: Free flap after lower extremity revascularization may enable limb salvage in defects after critical limb ischemia. This study examined the outcomes of reconstruction of ischemic diabetic foot according to the severity of the vessel occlusion and assessed whether recanalized vessels may serve as a reliable recipient vessel. METHODS: A total of 62 patients who underwent diabetic foot reconstruction with free flaps after successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) from February of 2010 to February of 2016 were identified and divided into three groups: group 1, nonoccluded vessels as recipient ( n = 11); group 2, recanalized artery after PTA for partially occluded artery ( n = 30); and group 3, recanalized artery after PTA for completely occluded artery ( n = 21). RESULTS: Flap survival was statistically higher in group 2 (90%) compared with group 3 (67%) ( P < 0.05). Subsequent major amputation was significantly lower in groups 1 and 2 [0/7 and 1/30 (3.3%)] compared with group 3 [5/21 (23.8%)] ( P < 0.05). The patient survival and limb salvage rate was 90.9% at 1 and 3 years in group 1, 89.8% at 1 year and 86.3% at 3 and 5 years in group 2, and 76.2% at 1, 3, and 5 years in group 3. This difference was not statistically significant ( P = 0.485). CONCLUSIONS: The use of recanalized vessels after PTA can be safe for partially occluded arteries but requires caution for completely occluded arteries. Using completely occluded vessels after PTA can be attempted when other options are not available and achieves a 76% chance of limb salvage. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Ten-year prognostic value of coronary CT angiography in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) risk score has limited value for predicting coronary artery disease (CAD) events. We investigated the additive value of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) on top of the UKPDS risk score in predicting 10-year adverse cardiac events in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We evaluated 589 asymptomatic diabetic patients without a history of CAD who underwent CCTA. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring hospitalization, and revascularization. We estimated the discrimination and reclassification ability for the prediction models, which included combinations of the UKPDS category, severity of stenosis, and coronary artery calcium score by CCTA. RESULTS: The incidence of the primary outcome was 12.4%. During 10 years of follow-up, patients without plaque by CCTA tended to have a low CAD event rate, while those with obstructive CAD tended to have a high event rate, irrespective of the baseline UKPDS risk category. The model that included only the UKPDS category had a Harrell's c-index of 0.658; adding the degree of stenosis to the model significantly increased the c-index by 0.066 (P=.004), while adding coronary artery calcium score increased the c-index by only 0.039 (P=.056). Overall, CCTA information in addition to the UKPDS risk category improved the reclassification rate for predicting the primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes, CCTA information for CAD provided significant incremental discriminatory power beyond the UKPDS risk score category for predicting 10-year adverse coronary events.

Relationship between sexual differences and cardiovascular risk factors in the prevalence of asymptomatic coronary disease.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the sexual differences of coronary artery disease (CAD) prevalence and its association with cardiovascular risk factors in the asymptomatic population. METHODS: In total 6434 asymptomatic participants without known CAD (1740 women and 4694 men) underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). The prevalence of significant CAD (diameter stenosis ≥50%) and other CCTA findings were compared by sex, and its influence on CAD was investigated in groups stratified by the number of cardiovascular risk factors, including age (>55 years), hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and current smoking. RESULTS: The prevalence of current smokers, hypertension, and diabetes were higher in men than women. The mean coronary artery calcium score was 13.1 ± 58.4 for women and 51.1 ± 158.2 for men; the coronary atherosclerosis burden indices were significantly higher in men than women. Significant CAD was identified in 65 women (3.7%) and 429 men (9.1%), showing a significant association (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.38, P < 0.001). The relatively higher risk for significant CAD in men was observed in patients with fewer risk factors, and the risk difference was not significant in patients with many risk factors (adjusted ORs: 7.69, 3.37, 1.71, 1.31, and 0.88 in patients with 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4-5 risk factors, respectively). The association between sex and risk factor groups was significant (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the asymptomatic population, a significantly higher CAD prevalence was noted in men than women. However, women with a high number of cardiovascular risk factors showed a CAD prevalence similar to that of men.

Dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: There are scarce data on the optimal duration and prognostic impact of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with second-generation drug-eluting stents for left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the practice pattern and long-term prognostic effect of DAPT duration in patients undergoing PCI with second-generation drug-eluting stents for LMCA disease. METHODS: Using individual patient-level data from the IRIS-MAIN and KOMATE registries, 1827 patients undergoing PCI with second-generation drug-eluting stents for LMCA disease with valid information on DAPT duration were included. The efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis) and the safety outcome was TIMI major bleeding. RESULTS: DAPT duration was <6 months (n=273), 6 to 12 months (n=477), 12 to 24 months (n=637), and ≥ 24 months (n=440). The median follow-up duration was 3.9 [interquartile range, 3.01-5.00] years. Prolonged DAPT duration was associated with lower incidences of MACE. In multigroup propensity score analysis, adjusted HR for MACE were significantly higher for DAPT <6 months and DAPT 6 to 12 months than for DAPT 12 to 24 months (HR, 4.51; 95%CI, 2.96-6.88 and HR 1.92; 95%CI, 1.23-3.00). There was no difference in HR for major bleeding among the assessed groups. CONCLUSIONS: DAPT duration following PCI for LMCA disease is highly variable. Although the duration of DAPT should be considered in the context of the clinical situation of each patient, <12 months of DAPT was associated with higher incidence of MACE. Registration identifiers: NCT01341327; NCT03908463.

Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in East Asian Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Diabetes Mellitus.

Background: It is still unknown whether diabetes mellitus (DM) affects the relative safety and efficacy of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Objectives: The authors sought to assess the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel according to the diabetic status of East Asian patients with ACS undergoing invasive management. Methods: This prespecified analysis of the TICA KOREA (Clinically Significant Bleeding With Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Korean Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Intended for Invasive Management) trial included 800 Korean patients. The primary safety endpoint was clinically significant bleeding (PLATO [Platelet Inhibition and Clinical Outcomes] major or minor bleeding) at 12 months; the efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke). Results: Of 800 patients, 216 (27.0%) had DM. The incidence of clinically significant bleeding within 12 months was significantly higher with ticagrelor than clopidogrel in the nondiabetic group (10.2% vs 4.3%; HR: 2.45; 95% CI: 1.27-4.70; P = 0.007) and tended to be higher in the diabetic group (13.8% vs 8.0%; HR: 1.87; 95% CI: 0.54-4.36; P = 0.15); there was no significant interaction between treatment-arm and DM (P for interaction = 0.64). The incidences of major adverse cardiovascular events were not significantly different after ticagrelor or clopidogrel both in the diabetic group (10.8% vs 6.0%; HR: 1.90; 95% CI: 0.71-5.07; P = 0.20) and in the nondiabetic group (8.5% vs 5.7%; HR: 1.51; 95% CI: 0.81-2.81; P = 0.19) without significant interaction (P-for-interaction = 0.71). Conclusions: In Korean ACS patients undergoing early invasive management, diabetes status did not affect the relative safety and efficacy of ticagrelor and clopidogrel. (Safety and Efficacy of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Asian/Korean Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Intended for Invasive Management [TICA KOREA]; NCT02094963).

Comparison of Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Complex High-Risk Indicated Procedures.

Background: Limited data are available on the relative performances of diverse contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients undergoing complex high-risk indicated procedures (CHIP). Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of contemporary second-generation DES for CHIP patients in "real-world" settings. Methods: Of 28,843 patients enrolled in the IRIS-DES registry, a total of 6,645 patients with CHIP characteristics who received 5 different types of contemporary DES were finally included: 3,752 with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES), 1,258 with Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (Re-ZES), 864 with platinum-chromium EES (PtCr-EES), 437 with ultrathin strut biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (UT-SES), and 334 with bioresorbable polymer SES (BP-SES). The primary outcome was target-vessel failure (a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization) at 12 months. Results: At 12 months, the rate of target-vessel failure was highest in the CoCr-EES (7.1%) group; intermediate in the Re-ZES (5.0%), PtCr-EES (4.6%), and BP-SES (4.2%) groups; and lowest in the UT-SES (3.8%) group (overall long-rank P = 0.001). In multiple-treatment propensity-score analysis, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for target-vessel failure were significantly lower in the Re-ZES (HR: 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-0.97), the UT-SES (HR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.29-0.95), and BP-SES (HR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.16-0.70) groups than in the CoCr-EES group (referent). Conclusions: In this contemporary PCI registry, we observed the differential risks of target-vessel failure according to various types of contemporary DES in patients with CHIP characteristics. However, owing to inherent selection bias, the results should be considered hypothesis-generating, highlighting the need for further randomized trials. (Evaluation of the First, Second, and New Drug-Eluting Stents in Routine Clinical Practice [IRIS-DES]; NCT01186133).

Comparison of Different Types of Drug-Eluting Stents for De Novo Long Coronary Artery Lesions.

Background: Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for diffuse long lesions remain relatively unfavorable. Prior clinical trials investigated the relative efficacy and safety of different types of drug-eluting stents (DES) in long lesions. Objectives: This study sought to compare the relative performance of different types of DES for de novo long (≥25 mm) coronary artery lesions. Methods: Using a pooled analysis of individual data of 1,450 patients from 3 randomized clinical trials, we compared angiographic and clinical outcomes of 5 different types of DES: 224 patients with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (EES), 255 with platinum-chromium EES, 250 with Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents, 245 with biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents, and 476 with first-generation sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). The primary endpoint was in-segment late lumen loss at 9 months. Results: The primary endpoint was not significantly different between 4 second-generation DES and 1 first-generation SES (0.17 ± 0.41 mm in cobalt-chromium EES; 0.11 ± 0.37 in platinum-chromium EES: 0.14 ± 0.38 in Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents; 0.14 ± 0.38 in biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents; or 0.10 ± 0.37 in SES, respectively, overall P = 0.38). Also, there were no significant between-group differences with respect to death, myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization, or stent thrombosis at 12 months. In the multiple treatment propensity-score analysis, the risk of angiographic and clinical outcomes was also similar among several types of DES. Conclusions: In this patient-level pooled analysis, several second-generation DES showed similar angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with de novo long coronary lesions. (Percutaneous Treatment of LONG Native Coronary Lesions With Drug-Eluting Stent-III [LONG-DES-III]; NCT01078038; Percutaneous Treatment of LONG Native Coronary Lesions With Drug-Eluting Stent-IV [LONG-DES-IV]; NCT01186094; and Everolimus-eluting [PROMUS-ELEMENT] vs. Biolimus A9-Eluting [NOBORI] Stents for Long-Coronary Lesions [LONG-DES-V]; NCT01186120).