Minocycline treatment for pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex disease based on pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and Bayesian framework mathematical models.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to identify the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters of minocycline in the hollow-fibre system (HFS) model of pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and to identify the optimal clinical dose. METHODS: Minocycline MICs for 55 MAC clinical isolates from the Netherlands were determined. We also co-incubated primary isolated macrophages infected with MAC with minocycline. Next, we performed a 28 day HFS-MAC model dose-response study in which we mimicked pulmonary concentration-time profiles achieved in patients. The HFS-MAC model was sampled at intervals to determine the minocycline pharmacokinetics and MAC burden. We identified the AUC0-24/MIC ratios associated with 1.0 log10 cfu/mL kill below day 0 (stasis), defined as a bactericidal effect. We then performed 10000 Monte Carlo experiments to identify the optimal dose for a bactericidal effect in patients. RESULTS: The MIC for 50% and 90% of cumulative clinical isolates was 8 and 64 mg/L, respectively. Minocycline decreased MAC bacterial burden below stasis in primary isolated macrophages. In the HFS-MAC model, minocycline achieved a microbial kill of 3.6 log10 cfu/mL below stasis. The AUC0-24/MIC exposure associated with a bactericidal effect was 59. Monte Carlo experiments identified a minocycline susceptibility MIC breakpoint of 16 mg/L. At this proposed breakpoint, the clinical dose of 200 mg/day achieved the bactericidal effect exposure target in ∼50% of patients, while 400 mg/day achieved this in 73.6% of patients, in Monte Carlo experiments. CONCLUSIONS: Minocycline at a dose of 400 mg/day is expected to be bactericidal. We propose a clinical trial for validation.

Once-a-week tigecycline for the treatment of drug-resistant TB.

BACKGROUND: MDR-TB and XDR-TB have poor outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy of tigecycline monotherapy in the hollow fibre system model of TB. METHODS: We performed pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies using tigecycline human-like concentration-time profiles in the hollow fibre system model of TB in five separate experiments using Mycobacterium tuberculosis in log-phase growth or as semi-dormant or intracellular bacilli, as monotherapy. We also compared efficacy with the isoniazid/rifampicin/pyrazinamide combination (standard therapy). We then applied extinction mathematics, morphisms and Latin hypercube sampling to identify duration of therapy with tigecycline monotherapy. RESULTS: The median tigecycline MIC for 30 M. tuberculosis clinical and laboratory isolates (67% MDR/XDR) was 2 mg/L. Tigecycline monotherapy was highly effective in killing M. tuberculosis in log-phase-growth and semi-dormant and intracellular M. tuberculosis. Once-a-week dosing had the same efficacy as daily therapy for the same cumulative dose; thus, tigecycline efficacy was linked to the AUC0-24/MIC ratio. Tigecycline replacement by daily minocycline after 4 weeks of therapy was effective in sterilizing bacilli. The AUC0-24/MIC ratio associated with optimal kill was 42.3. Tigecycline monotherapy had a maximum sterilizing effect (day 0 minus day 28) of 3.06 ±âŸ0.20 log10 cfu/mL (r2 = 0.92) compared with 3.92 ±âŸ0.45 log10 cfu/mL (r2 = 0.80) with optimized standard therapy. In our modelling, at a tigecycline monotherapy duration of 12 months, the proportion of patients with XDR-TB who reached bacterial population extinction was 64.51%. CONCLUSIONS: Tigecycline could cure patients with XDR-TB or MDR-TB who have failed recommended therapy. Once-a-week tigecycline could also replace second-line injectables in MDR-TB regimens.

Minocycline Immunomodulates via Sonic Hedgehog Signaling and Apoptosis and Has Direct Potency Against Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.

Drug-resistant tuberculosis represents a global emergency, requiring new drugs. We found that minocycline was highly potent in laboratory strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and that 30 drug-susceptible and multidrug/extensively drug-resistant clinical strains were susceptible to clinically achievable concentrations. In the hollow fiber system model, lung concentration-time profiles of 7 mg/kg/day human-equivalent minocycline dose achieved bacterial kill rates equivalent to those of first-line antituberculosis agents. Minocycline killed extracellular bacilli directly. Minocycline also killed intracellular bacilli indirectly, via concentration-dependent granzyme A-driven apoptosis. Moreover, minocycline demonstrated dose-dependent antiinflammatory activity and downregulation of extracellular matrix-based remodeling pathways and, thus, could protect patients from tuberculosis immunopathology. In RNA sequencing of repetitive samples from the hollow fiber system and in independent protein abundance experiments, minocycline demonstrated dose-dependent inhibition of sonic hedgehog-patched-gli signaling. These findings have implications for improved lung remodeling and for dual immunomodulation and direct microbial kill-based treatment shortening regimens for drug-susceptible and drug-resistant latent and active M. tuberculosis infection.

Multiparameter Responses to Tedizolid Monotherapy and Moxifloxacin Combination Therapy Models of Children With Intracellular Tuberculosis.

Background: Children are often neglected during early development of antituberculosis agents, and most receive treatment after it is first tested in adults. However, very young children have tuberculosis that differs in many respects from adult cavitary pneumonia and could have different toxicity profiles to drugs. Linezolid is effective against intracellular tuberculosis, a common manifestation in young children. However, linezolid has considerable toxicity due to inhibition of mitochondrial enzymes. Tedizolid could be a replacement if it shows equal efficacy and reduced toxicity. Methods: We performed tedizolid dose-effect studies in the hollow fiber system model of intracellular tuberculosis. We measured linezolid concentrations, colony-forming units (CFU), time-to-positivity, and monocyte viability and performed RNA sequencing on infected cells collected from repetitive sampling of each system. We also compared efficacy of tedizolid vs linezolid and vs tedizolid-moxifloxacin combination. Results: There was no downregulation of mitochondrial enzyme genes, with a tedizolid 0-24 hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) of up to 90 mg*h/L. Instead, high exposures led to increased mitochondrial gene expression and monocyte survival. The AUC0-24 to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio associated with 80% of maximal bacterial kill (EC80) was 184 by CFU/mL (r2 = 0.96) and 189 by time-to-positivity (r2 = 0.99). Tedizolid EC80 killed 4.0 log10 CFU/mL higher than linezolid EC80. The tedizolid-moxifloxacin combination had a bacterial burden elimination rate constant of 0.27 ± 0.05 per day. Conclusions: Tedizolid demonstrated better efficacy than linezolid, without the mitochondrial toxicity gene or cytotoxicity signatures encountered with linezolid. Tedizolid-moxifloxacin combination had a high bacterial elimination rate.

Ethionamide Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics-derived Dose, the Role of MICs in Clinical Outcome, and the Resistance Arrow of Time in Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis.

Background: Ethionamide is used to treat multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). The antimicrobial pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, the contribution of ethionamide to the multidrug regimen, and events that lead to acquired drug resistance (ADR) are unclear. Methods: We performed a multidose hollow fiber system model of tuberculosis (HFS-TB) study to identify the 0-24 hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratios that achieved maximal kill and ADR suppression, defined as target exposures. Ethionamide-resistant isolates underwent whole-genome and targeted Sanger sequencing. We utilized Monte Carlo experiments (MCEs) to identify ethionamide doses that would achieve the target exposures in 10000 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. We also identified predictors of time-to-sputum conversion in Tanzanian patients on ethionamide- and levofloxacin-based regimens using multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS). Results: An AUC0-24/MIC >56.2 was identified as the target exposure in the HFS-TB. Early efflux pump induction to ethionamide monotherapy led to simultaneous ethambutol and isoniazid ADR, which abrogated microbial kill of an isoniazid-ethambutol-ethionamide regimen. Genome sequencing of isolates that arose during ethionamide monotherapy revealed mutations in both ethA and embA. In MCEs, 20 mg/kg/day achieved the AUC0-24/MIC >56.2 in >95% of patients, provided the Sensititre assay MIC was <2.5 mg/L. In the clinic, MARS revealed that ethionamide Sensititre MIC had linear negative relationships with time-to-sputum conversion until an MIC of 2.5 mg/L, above which patients with MDR-TB failed combination therapy. Conclusions: Ethionamide is an important contributor to MDR-TB treatment regimens, at Sensititre MIC <2.5 mg/L. Suboptimal ethionamide exposures led to efflux pump-mediated ADR.

d-Cycloserine Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics, Susceptibility, and Dosing Implications in Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis: A Faustian Deal.

Background: d-cycloserine is used to treat multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Its efficacy, contribution in combination therapy, and best clinical dose are unclear, also data on the d-cycloserine minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions is scant. Methods: We performed a systematic search to identify pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies performed with d-cycloserine. We then performed a combined exposure-effect and dose fractionation study of d-cycloserine in the hollow fiber system model of tuberculosis (HFS-TB). In parallel, we identified d-cycloserine MICs in 415 clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) isolates from patients. We utilized these results, including intracavitary concentrations, to identify the clinical dose that would be able to achieve or exceed target exposures in 10000 patients using Monte Carlo experiments (MCEs). Results: There were no published d-cycloserine pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics studies identified. Therefore, we performed new HFS-TB experiments. Cyloserine killed 6.3 log10 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL extracellular bacilli over 28 days. Efficacy was driven by the percentage of time concentration persisted above MIC (%TMIC), with 1.0 log10 CFU/mL kill achieved by %TMIC = 30% (target exposure). The tentative epidemiological cutoff value with the Sensititre MYCOTB assay was 64 mg/L. In MCEs, 750 mg twice daily achieved target exposure in lung cavities of 92% of patients whereas 500 mg twice daily achieved target exposure in 85% of patients with meningitis. The proposed MCE-derived clinical susceptibility breakpoint at the proposed doses was 64 mg/L. Conclusions: Cycloserine is cidal against Mtb. The susceptibility breakpoint is 64 mg/L. However, the doses likely to achieve the cidality in patients are high, and could be neurotoxic.

The Sterilizing Effect of Intermittent Tedizolid for Pulmonary Tuberculosis.

Background: Linezolid exhibits remarkable sterilizing effect in tuberculosis; however, a large proportion of patients develop serious adverse events. The congener tedizolid could have a better side-effect profile, but its sterilizing effect potential is unknown. Methods: We performed a 42-day tedizolid exposure-effect and dose-fractionation study in the hollow fiber system model of tuberculosis for sterilizing effect, using human-like intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics. Bacterial burden was examined using time to positivity (TTP) and colony-forming units (CFUs). Exposure-effect was examined using the inhibitory sigmoid maximal kill model. The exposure mediating 80% of maximal kill (EC80) was defined as the target exposure, and the lowest dose to achieve EC80 was identified in 10000-patient Monte Carlo experiments. The dose was also examined for probability of attaining concentrations associated with mitochondrial enzyme inhibition. Results: At maximal effect, tedizolid monotherapy totally eliminated 7.1 log10 CFU/mL Mycobacterium tuberculosis over 42 days; however, TTP still demonstrated some growth. Once-weekly tedizolid regimens killed as effectively as daily regimens, with an EC80 free drug 0- to 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve-to-minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio of 200. An oral tedizolid of 200 mg/day achieved the EC80 in 92% of 10000 patients. The susceptibility breakpoint was an MIC of 0.5 mg/L. The 200 mg/day dose did not achieve concentrations associated with mitochondrial enzyme inhibition. Conclusions: Tedizolid exhibits dramatic sterilizing effect and should be examined for pulmonary tuberculosis. A tedizolid dose of 200 mg/day or 700 mg twice a week is recommended for testing in patients; the intermittent tedizolid dosing schedule could be much safer than daily linezolid.

Levofloxacin Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics, Dosing, Susceptibility Breakpoints, and Artificial Intelligence in the Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis.

Background: Levofloxacin is used for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis; however the optimal dose is unknown. Methods: We used the hollow fiber system model of tuberculosis (HFS-TB) to identify 0-24 hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratios associated with maximal microbial kill and suppression of acquired drug resistance (ADR) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). Levofloxacin-resistant isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing. Ten thousands patient Monte Carlo experiments (MCEs) were used to identify doses best able to achieve the HFS-TB-derived target exposures in cavitary tuberculosis and tuberculous meningitis. Next, we used an ensemble of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to identify the most important predictors of sputum conversion, ADR, and death in Tanzanian patients with pulmonary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treated with a levofloxacin-containing regimen. We also performed probit regression to identify optimal levofloxacin doses in Vietnamese tuberculous meningitis patients. Results: In the HFS-TB, the AUC0-24/MIC associated with maximal Mtb kill was 146, while that associated with suppression of resistance was 360. The most common gyrA mutations in resistant Mtb were Asp94Gly, Asp94Asn, and Asp94Tyr. The minimum dose to achieve target exposures in MCEs was 1500 mg/day. AI algorithms identified an AUC0-24/MIC of 160 as predictive of microbiologic cure, followed by levofloxacin 2-hour peak concentration and body weight. Probit regression identified an optimal dose of 25 mg/kg as associated with >90% favorable response in adults with pulmonary tuberculosis. Conclusions: The levofloxacin dose of 25 mg/kg or 1500 mg/day was adequate for replacement of high-dose moxifloxacin in treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Antibacterial and Sterilizing Effect of Benzylpenicillin in Tuberculosis.

The modern chemotherapy era started with Fleming's discovery of benzylpenicillin. He demonstrated that benzylpenicillin did not kill Mycobacterium tuberculosis In this study, we found that >64 mg/liter of static benzylpenicillin concentrations killed 1.16 to 1.43 log10 CFU/ml below starting inoculum of extracellular and intracellular M. tuberculosis over 7 days. When we added the ß-lactamase inhibitor avibactam, benzylpenicillin maximal kill (Emax) of extracellular log-phase-growth M. tuberculosis was 6.80 ± 0.45 log10 CFU/ml at a 50% effective concentration (EC50) of 15.11 ± 2.31 mg/liter, while for intracellular M. tuberculosis it was 2.42 ± 0.14 log10 CFU/ml at an EC50 of 6.70 ± 0.56 mg/liter. The median penicillin (plus avibactam) MIC against South African clinical M. tuberculosis strains (80% either multidrug or extensively drug resistant) was 2 mg/liter. We mimicked human-like benzylpenicillin and avibactam concentration-time profiles in the hollow-fiber model of tuberculosis (HFS-TB). The percent time above the MIC was linked to effect, with an optimal exposure of ≥65%. At optimal exposure in the HFS-TB, the bactericidal activity in log-phase-growth M. tuberculosis was 1.44 log10 CFU/ml/day, while 3.28 log10 CFU/ml of intracellular M. tuberculosis was killed over 3 weeks. In an 8-week HFS-TB study of nonreplicating persistent M. tuberculosis, penicillin-avibactam alone and the drug combination of isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide both killed >7.0 log10 CFU/ml. Monte Carlo simulations of 10,000 preterm infants with disseminated disease identified an optimal dose of 10,000 U/kg (of body weight)/h, while for pregnant women or nonpregnant adults with pulmonary tuberculosis the optimal dose was 25,000 U/kg/h, by continuous intravenous infusion. Penicillin-avibactam should be examined for effect in pregnant women and infants with drug-resistant tuberculosis, to replace injectable ototoxic and teratogenic second-line drugs.

Ceftazidime-avibactam has potent sterilizing activity against highly drug-resistant tuberculosis.

There are currently many patients with multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Ongoing transmission of the highly drug-resistant strains and high mortality despite treatment remain problematic. The current strategy of drug discovery and development takes up to a decade to bring a new drug to clinical use. We embarked on a strategy to screen all antibiotics in current use and examined them for use in tuberculosis. We found that ceftazidime-avibactam, which is already used in the clinic for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacillary infections, markedly killed rapidly growing, intracellular, and semidormant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the hollow fiber system model. Moreover, multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant clinical isolates demonstrated good ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility profiles and were inhibited by clinically achievable concentrations. Resistance arose because of mutations in the transpeptidase domain of the penicillin-binding protein PonA1, suggesting that the drug kills M. tuberculosis bacilli via interference with cell wall remodeling. We identified concentrations (exposure targets) for optimal effect in tuberculosis, which we used with susceptibility results in computer-aided clinical trial simulations to identify doses for immediate clinical use as salvage therapy for adults and young children. Moreover, this work provides a roadmap for efficient and timely evaluation of antibiotics and optimization of clinically relevant dosing regimens.

Tedizolid is highly bactericidal in the treatment of pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex disease.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if tedizolid is effective for pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) disease, and to use pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics to design optimal doses. METHODS: We performed an exposure-response experiment in the hollow-fibre system model of intracellular MAC (HFS-MAC). We mimicked the tedizolid concentration-time profiles achieved in the lungs of patients treated once daily for 28 days. The HFS-MAC was sampled at intervals to determine the tedizolid pharmacokinetics and MAC intracellular burden. We identified the 0-24 h area under the concentration-time curves to MIC (AUC0-24/MIC) ratios associated with the following targets: 80% of maximal kill (EC80), bacteriostasis, and 1.0 and 2.0 log10 cfu/mL kill. We then performed 10 000 patient Monte Carlo simulations to identify the optimal dose for each of the exposure targets. RESULTS: Tedizolid achieved the feat of 2.0 log10 cfu/mL kill below initial bacterial burden, an effect not seen before in this model with other antibiotics. The tedizolid exposure associated with 1.0 log10 cfu/mL kill was a non-protein bound AUC0-24/MIC ratio of 23.46, while that associated with 2.0 log10 cfu/mL kill was 37.50, and the EC80 was 21.71. The clinical dose of 200 mg achieved each of these targets in ∼100% of the 10 000 patients, except the 2.0 log10 cfu/mL kill which required 300 mg/day. A tedizolid susceptibility MIC breakpoint of 1 mg/L is proposed. CONCLUSIONS: Tedizolid, at standard clinical doses, is expected to be bactericidal, and even achieved an unprecedented 2.0 log10 cfu/mL kill of MAC as monotherapy. We propose it as the backbone of short-course anti-MAC chemotherapy.

The discovery of ceftazidime/avibactam as an anti-Mycobacterium avium agent.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if ceftaroline and ceftazidime combined with avibactam are efficacious against pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) disease. METHODS: First, we performed a concentration-effect study of ceftaroline and ceftaroline/avibactam against extracellular MAC in test tubes. Given the difficulty of obtaining avibactam at the time of experimentation, we used a single concentration of commercial ceftazidime/avibactam, and two sets of non-treated controls, one with ceftazidime/avibactam and the other without. After finding antimicrobial activity with the ceftazidime/avibactam 'control', we performed ceftazidime/avibactam dose-effect studies in test tubes against extracellular MAC and in 24-well plates against intracellular MAC. We then performed a ceftazidime/avibactam exposure-effect and dose-fractionation studies in the hollow-fibre system model of intracellular pulmonary MAC (HFS-MAC). In each experiment, we repetitively sampled each HFS-MAC at specified times to validate ceftazidime/avibactam pharmacokinetics and to quantify bacterial burden. RESULTS: Ceftaroline killed extracellular MAC with maximal microbial kill (Emax) of 4.87 ±âŸ0.26 log10 cfu/mL. However, the ceftazidime/avibactam 'control' also killed MAC compared with the non-treated control. Ceftazidime/avibactam Emax was 3.8 log10 cfu/mL against extracellular bacilli and 3.6 log10 cfu/mL against intracellular MAC. In the HFS-MAC, ceftazidime/avibactam achieved a half-life of 2.5-3.3 h and killed MAC 0.61-2.40 log10 cfu/mL below the starting bacterial burden. The ceftazidime/avibactam efficacy was linked to the proportion of the dosing interval for which the concentration persists above the MIC (fT>MIC), with optimal efficacy at free-drug fT>MIC of 52% (r2 = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Ceftazidime/avibactam effectively kills MAC at exposures easily achieved in the lung by clinical doses. Efficacy was higher than with clinically achievable doses of azithromycin and ethambutol.

A novel ceftazidime/avibactam, rifabutin, tedizolid and moxifloxacin (CARTM) regimen for pulmonary Mycobacterium avium disease.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam plus tedizolid-based combination regimens with the standard therapy of azithromycin, ethambutol and rifabutin for the treatment of pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) disease. METHODS: We mimicked the human pulmonary concentration-time profiles of ceftazidime/avibactam and tedizolid in combination, ceftazidime/avibactam, rifabutin, tedizolid and moxifloxacin (CARTM), and the standard regimen and examined microbial kill in triplicate hollow-fibre system model of intracellular pulmonary MAC (HFS-MAC) units. The tedizolid and moxifloxacin doses used were non-optimized; the tedizolid dose was that associated with bacteriostasis. Drugs were administered daily for 28 days. Each HFS-MAC was sampled in the central and peripheral compartment to ascertain that the intended drug exposures had been achieved. The peripheral compartments were sampled at regular intervals over the 28 days to quantify the burden of MAC. RESULTS: MAC-infected macrophages in the HFS-MAC achieved multi-fold higher intracellular versus extracellular concentrations of rifabutin, moxifloxacin, ceftazidime/avibactam. The non-optimized ceftazidime/avibactam plus tedizolid dual therapy held the bacterial burden at the same level as day 0 (stasis) throughout the 28 days. The standard therapy reduced the bacterial load 2 log10 cfu/mL below stasis on day 14 but started failing after that. The CARTM regimen achieved 3.2 log10 cfu/mL kill below stasis on day 21, but had started to fail by day 28. CONCLUSIONS: The CARTM regimen promises to have kill rates better than standard therapy. Experiments to identify exposures of each of the four drugs associated with optimal effect in the CARTM combination are needed in order to design a short-course chemotherapy regimen.