Community Pharmacy-Based Blood Pressure Screening in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada for World Hypertension Day 2022: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: High blood pressure (BP) is a leading cause of cardiovascular and stroke-related events. Office-based BP measurement has declined in recent years due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have resulted in higher rates of undetected and uncontrolled hypertension. To gain a better idea of adult BP levels in Newfoundland and Labrador, we engaged community pharmacists in BP screening on World Hypertension Day. Methods: Data collection and BP screening occurred on May 17, 2022. Pharmacists and pharmacy students collected 3 seated BP readings from participants, using an automated device. The average of readings 2 and 3 was used to estimate BP, with elevated BP defined as ≥ 140/90 mm Hg, or ≥ 130/80 mm Hg for individuals with diabetes. Data on participant demographics, access to primary care, medical history, and antihypertensive use were also collected. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and logistic regression techniques. Results: A total of 460 participants were included in the analysis. The mean age was 56.3 years (standard deviation: 16.95); 63.3% (n = 291) were female; and 43.7% (n = 201) reported having hypertension. Elevated BP was identified in 27% (n = 123). Of those with elevated BP, 41.5% (n = 51) had no history of diagnosed hypertension. Age, sex, and diabetes were statistically significant predictors of elevated BP in the multivariable model. Conclusions: A large proportion of participants in our study had elevated BP. Targeted measures are needed to improve the detection, treatment, and control of high BP in Newfoundland and Labrador. Community pharmacists can support BP care.

Contexte: L'hypertension artérielle est une cause majeure d'événements cardiovasculaires et d'AVC. Or, la mesure de la pression artérielle (PA) en clinique a connu un déclin ces dernières années en raison de la pandémie de COVID-19, de sorte que les taux d'hypertension artérielle non détectée et non maîtrisée pourraient avoir augmenté. Afin de nous faire une idée plus précise de l'état de la PA des adultes de Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador, nous avons organisé une campagne de mesure de la PA dans les pharmacies de détail à l'occasion de la Journée mondiale de l'hypertension artérielle. Méthodologie: La collecte des données et les mesures ont eu lieu le 17 mai 2022. Les pharmaciens aidés par des étudiants en pharmacie ont pris 3 relevés en position assise par participant à l'aide d'un dispositif de mesure automatisé. La moyenne des 2 derniers relevés a été utilisée pour obtenir la PA estimative. La PA était considérée comme élevée si les valeurs étaient égales ou supérieures à 140/90 mmHg, ou à 130/80 mmHg chez les personnes diabétiques. D'autres renseignements ont été recueillis, notamment les caractéristiques démographiques des participants, leur accès aux soins primaires, leurs antécédents médicaux et leur prise d'antihypertenseurs. Les données ont ensuite été analysées à l'aide de statistiques descriptives et de techniques de régression logistique. Résultats: Au total, 460 participants ont été inclus dans l'analyse. L'âge moyen était de 56,3 ans (écart-type : 16,95); 63,3 % (n = 291) étaient de sexe féminin et 43,7 % (n = 201) ont indiqué être atteints d'hypertension. Une PA élevée a été observée chez 27 % des participants (n = 123), dont 41,5 % (n = 51) qui n'avaient jamais reçu un diagnostic d'hypertension artérielle. L'âge, le sexe et le diabète se sont avérés des facteurs de prédiction de PA élevée statistiquement significatifs dans un modèle multivarié. Conclusions: Un pourcentage important des participants à notre étude présentait une PA élevée. Des mesures ciblées s'imposent pour mieux dépister, traiter et maîtriser l'hypertension artérielle à Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador. Les pharmaciens de proximité pourraient également jouer un rôle dans la surveillance de la PA.

Analysis of Clinical Criteria for Discharge Among Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model.

BACKGROUND: Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 can clinically deteriorate after a period of initial stability, making optimal timing of discharge a clinical and operational challenge. OBJECTIVE: To determine risks for post-discharge readmission and death among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective observational cohort study, 2020-2021, with 30-day follow-up. PARTICIPANTS: Adults admitted for care of COVID-19 respiratory disease between March 2, 2020, and February 11, 2021, to one of 180 US hospitals affiliated with the HCA Healthcare system. MAIN MEASURES: Readmission to or death at an HCA hospital within 30 days of discharge was assessed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated using an internal validation set (33% of the HCA cohort), and external validation was performed using similar data from six academic centers associated with a hospital medicine research network (HOMERuN). KEY RESULTS: The final HCA cohort included 62,195 patients (mean age 61.9 years, 51.9% male), of whom 4704 (7.6%) were readmitted or died within 30 days of discharge. Independent risk factors for death or readmission included fever within 72 h of discharge; tachypnea, tachycardia, or lack of improvement in oxygen requirement in the last 24 h; lymphopenia or thrombocytopenia at the time of discharge; being ≤ 7 days since first positive test for SARS-CoV-2; HOSPITAL readmission risk score ≥ 5; and several comorbidities. Inpatient treatment with remdesivir or anticoagulation were associated with lower odds. The model's AUC for the internal validation set was 0.73 (95% CI 0.71-0.74) and 0.66 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.67) for the external validation set. CONCLUSIONS: This large retrospective study identified several factors associated with post-discharge readmission or death in models which performed with good discrimination. Patients 7 or fewer days since test positivity and who demonstrate potentially reversible risk factors may benefit from delaying discharge until those risk factors resolve.

Percent Final Height Is a Novel Method That Identifies Differences Between the Rate of Development in American Children of Different Races.

INTRODUCTION: The Greulich & Pyle (G&P) Radiographic Atlas of Skeletal Development uses hand x-rays obtained between 1926 and 1942 on children of Caucasian ancestry. Our study uses modern Caucasian, Black, Hispanic, and Asian children to investigate patterns of development as a function of percent final height (PFH). METHODS: A retrospective review, at a single institution, was conducted using children who received a hand x-ray, a height measurement taken within 60 days of that x-ray, and a final height. BA and CA were compared between races. PFH was calculated by dividing height at the time of the x-ray by their final height. To further evaluate differences between races in CA or BA, PFH was then modeled as a function of CA or BA using a fifth-degree polynomial regression, and mean ages at the 85th PFH were compared. Patients were then divided into Sanders stages 1, 2-4, and 5-8 and the mean PFH, CA, and BA of the Asian, Black, and Hispanic children were compared with the White children using Student t test. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: We studied 498 patients, including 53 Asian, 83 Black, 190 Hispanic, and 172 White patients. Mean BA was significantly greater than CA in Black males (1.27 y) and females (1.36 y), Hispanic males (1.12 y) and females (1.29 y), and White females (0.74 y). Hispanic and Black patients were significantly more advanced in BA than White patients (P<0.001). At the 85th PFH, White and Hispanic males were older than Black males by at least 7 months (P<0.001), and White females were significantly older than Hispanic females by 6.4 months (P<0.001). At 85th PFH for males, Hispanic and Black males had greater BA than White males by at least 5 months (P<0.001), and Asian females had a greater BA than Black females by at least 5 months (P<0.001). Compared with White children, Hispanic children were significantly younger at Sanders 2-4 than White children, and Black children were skeletally older at Sanders 5-8. CONCLUSIONS: BA was greater than CA by ≥1 year in Black and Hispanic children, and that these children had a significantly greater BA than their White counterparts. Black males and Hispanic females reached their 85th PFH at younger ages, and Hispanic males and Asian females were the most skeletally mature at their 85th PFH. Our results suggest that BA and CA may vary as a function of race, and further studies evaluating growth via the 85th PFH may be necessary. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Study - Level IV.

GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Discontinuation Among Patients With Obesity and/or Type 2 Diabetes.

This cohort study examines the prevalence of and factors associated with glucagon-like peptide 1 agonist discontinuation among new users.

Cardiovascular Disease in Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Hospital Outcomes, Complications, and Mortality.

Background: Cardiovascular comorbidities have been identified as a significant risk factor for adverse outcomes following surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate its prevalence and impact on postoperative outcomes, hospital metrics, and mortality in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our hypothesis was that patients with cardiovascular comorbidities would have worse outcomes, greater postoperative complication rates, and increased mortality compared to patients without cardiovascular disease. Methods: In this retrospective study, data from the National Inpatient Sample database from 2011 to 2020 were queried for patients who underwent TKA with preexisting cardiac comorbidities, including congestive heart failure (CHF), coronary artery disease (CAD), valvular dysfunction, and arrhythmia. Multivariate logistic regression analyses compared hospital metrics (length of stay, costs, and adverse discharge disposition), postoperative complications, and mortality rates while adjusting for demographic and clinical variables. All statistical analyses were performed using R studio 4.2.2 and Stata MP 17 and 18 with Python package. Results: A total of 385,585 patients were identified. Those with preexisting CHF, CAD, valvular dysfunction, or arrhythmias were found to be older and at higher risk of adverse outcomes, including prolonged length of stay, increased hospital charges, and increased mortality (p < 0.001). Additionally, all preexisting cardiac diagnoses led to an increased risk of postoperative myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury (AKI), and need for transfusion (p < 0.001). The presence of valvular dysfunction, arrhythmia, or CHF was associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events (p < 0.001). The presence of CAD and valvular dysfunction was associated with an increased risk of urologic infection (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that CHF, CAD, valvular dysfunction, and arrhythmia are prevalent among TKA patients and associated with worse hospital metrics, higher risk of perioperative complications, and increased mortality. As our use of TKA rises, a lower threshold for preoperative cardiology referral in older individuals and early preoperative counseling/intervention in those with known cardiac disease may be necessary to reduce adverse outcomes.

A cross-sectional study of breastfed infants referred for tongue tie assessment and frenotomy in one Canadian health region.

Importance: Tongue tie (TT) is a condition that can cause infant feeding difficulties due to restricted tongue movement. When TT presents as a significant barrier to breastfeeding, a frenotomy may be recommended. Universally accepted diagnostic criteria for TT are lacking and wide prevalence estimates are reported. New referral processes and a Frenotomy Assessment Tool were implemented in one Canadian health region to connect breastfeeding dyads with a provider for TT evaluation and frenotomy. Objective: To determine the proportion of babies with TT as well as the frequency of frenotomy. Methods: This cross-sectional study included infants who initiated breastfeeding at birth and were referred for TT evaluation over a 14-month period. Data were collected retrospectively by chart review and analyzed using SPSS. Factors associated with frenotomy were examined using logistic regression. Results: Two hundred and forty-one babies were referred. Ninety-two percent (n = 222) were diagnosed with TT and 66.0% (n = 159) underwent frenotomy. In the multivariate model, nipple pain/trauma, inability to latch, inability to elevate tongue, and dimpling of tongue on extension were associated with frenotomy (P < 0.05). Most referrals in our region resulted in a diagnosis of TT; however, the number of referrals was lower than expected, and of these two-thirds underwent frenotomy. Interpretation: TT is a relatively common finding among breastfed infants. Future research should examine whether a simplified assessment tool containing the four items associated with frenotomy in our multivariate model can identify breastfed infants with TT who require frenotomy.

Multi-Institution Survey of Accepting Physicians' Perception of Appropriate Reasons for Interhospital Transfer: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: There is a lack of evidence-based guidelines to direct best practices in interhospital transfers (IHTs). We aimed to identify frontline physicians' current and ideal reasons for accepting IHT patients to inform future IHT research and guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of hospitalist physicians across 11 geographically diverse hospitals. The survey asked respondents how frequently they currently consider and should consider various factors when triaging IHT requests. Responses were dichotomized into "highly considered" and "less considered" factors. Frequencies of the "highly considered" factors (current and ideal) were analyzed. Write-in responses were coded into themes within a priori domains in a qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Of the 666 hospitalists surveyed, 238 (36%) responded. Respondents most frequently identified the need for specialty procedural and nonprocedural care and bed capacity as factors that should be considered when triaging IHT patients in current and ideal practice, whereas the least frequently considered factors were COVID-related care, insurance/financial considerations, and patient/family preference. More experienced respondents considered patient/family preference more frequently in current and ideal practice compared with less experienced respondents (33% versus 11% [ P = 0.0001] and 26% versus 9% [ P = 0.01], respectively). Qualitative analysis identified several themes in the domains of Criteria for Acceptance, Threshold for Acceptance, and Indications for Physician-to-Physician Communication. CONCLUSIONS: This geographically diverse sample of hospitalist physicians responsible for accepting IHT patients showed general agreement between primary factors that are currently and that should be considered for IHT acceptance, with greatest weight placed on patients' need for specialty care.

Increasing Trainee Engagement in Surgery Societies: The Society of Asian Academic Surgeons Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical societies provide a plethora of resources for trainees; however, these opportunities are often underused due to suboptimal guidance, sponsorship, or mentorship. Here, we present the Society of Asian Academic Surgeons (SAAS) experience in enhancing the trainee experience and engagement in a surgical society focused on professional development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an interactive idea-generating session during the 2022 SAAS Conference with all Associate Members (trainees) present in Honolulu, HI. Recurrent themes, concepts, and ideas/suggestions were carefully considered when planning the next SAAS Conference in Baltimore, MD. We employed a more targeted approach to trainee engagement at the 2023 SAAS Conference, with breakout sessions geared toward various levels of trainees, in addition to increased social events and networking opportunities. We obtained feedback from trainees in attendance through an electronic survey and informal conversations with faculty and Associate Members. RESULTS: Opportunities for surgical subspecialty networking was the most well-received portion of our formal Career Development program. The majority of trainees in attendance were medical students or junior residents who valued the exposure to junior faculty and those in leadership positions at academic institutions. The addition of a group text for easy communication among trainees and informal social activities for Associate Member networking among themselves were crucial in improving the overall conference experience. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities to maximize trainee engagement in surgical societies are heightened during in-person conferences. Targeted session topics, guided networking opportunities, and creating channels for easier communication along with more social events have enhanced the overall experience for aspiring and current surgical trainees.

Diagnostic Errors in Hospitalized Adults Who Died or Were Transferred to Intensive Care.

Importance: Diagnostic errors contribute to patient harm, though few data exist to describe their prevalence or underlying causes among medical inpatients. Objective: To determine the prevalence, underlying cause, and harms of diagnostic errors among hospitalized adults transferred to an intensive care unit (ICU) or who died. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study conducted at 29 academic medical centers in the US in a random sample of adults hospitalized with general medical conditions and who were transferred to an ICU, died, or both from January 1 to December 31, 2019. Each record was reviewed by 2 trained clinicians to determine whether a diagnostic error occurred (ie, missed or delayed diagnosis), identify diagnostic process faults, and classify harms. Multivariable models estimated association between process faults and diagnostic error. Opportunity for diagnostic error reduction associated with each fault was estimated using the adjusted proportion attributable fraction (aPAF). Data analysis was performed from April through September 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Whether or not a diagnostic error took place, the frequency of underlying causes of errors, and harms associated with those errors. Results: Of 2428 patient records at 29 hospitals that underwent review (mean [SD] patient age, 63.9 [17.0] years; 1107 [45.6%] female and 1321 male individuals [54.4%]), 550 patients (23.0%; 95% CI, 20.9%-25.3%) had experienced a diagnostic error. Errors were judged to have contributed to temporary harm, permanent harm, or death in 436 patients (17.8%; 95% CI, 15.9%-19.8%); among the 1863 patients who died, diagnostic error was judged to have contributed to death in 121 (6.6%; 95% CI, 5.3%-8.2%). In multivariable models examining process faults associated with any diagnostic error, patient assessment problems (aPAF, 21.4%; 95% CI, 16.4%-26.4%) and problems with test ordering and interpretation (aPAF, 19.9%; 95% CI, 14.7%-25.1%) had the highest opportunity to reduce diagnostic errors; similar ranking was seen in multivariable models examining harmful diagnostic errors. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, diagnostic errors in hospitalized adults who died or were transferred to the ICU were common and associated with patient harm. Problems with choosing and interpreting tests and the processes involved with clinician assessment are high-priority areas for improvement efforts.

Prenatal vs postnatal diagnosis of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: cardiac and noncardiac outcomes through 1 year of age.

BACKGROUND: The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome is the most common microdeletion syndrome and is frequently associated with congenital heart disease. Prenatal diagnosis of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome is increasingly offered. It is unknown whether there is a clinical benefit to prenatal detection as compared with postnatal diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine differences in perinatal and infant outcomes between patients with prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study across multiple international centers (30 sites, 4 continents) from 2006 to 2019. Participants were fetuses, neonates, or infants with a genetic diagnosis of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome by 1 year of age with or without congenital heart disease; those with prenatal diagnosis or suspicion (suggestive ultrasound findings and/or high-risk cell-free fetal DNA screen for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome with postnatal confirmation) were compared with those with postnatal diagnosis. Perinatal management, cardiac and noncardiac morbidity, and mortality by 1 year were assessed. Outcomes were adjusted for presence of critical congenital heart disease, gestational age at birth, and site. RESULTS: A total of 625 fetuses, neonates, or infants with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (53.4% male) were included: 259 fetuses were prenatally diagnosed (156 [60.2%] were live-born) and 122 neonates were prenatally suspected with postnatal confirmation, whereas 244 infants were postnatally diagnosed. In the live-born cohort (n=522), 1-year mortality was 5.9%, which did not differ between groups but differed by the presence of critical congenital heart disease (hazard ratio, 4.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.56-11.18; P<.001) and gestational age at birth (hazard ratio, 0.78 per week; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.89; P<.001). Adjusting for critical congenital heart disease and gestational age at birth, the prenatal cohort was less likely to deliver at a local community hospital (5.1% vs 38.2%; odds ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.23; P<.001), experience neonatal cardiac decompensation (1.3% vs 5.0%; odds ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.49; P=.004), or have failure to thrive by 1 year (43.4% vs 50.3%; odds ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.91; P=.019). CONCLUSION: Prenatal detection of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome was associated with improved delivery management and less cardiac and noncardiac morbidity, but not mortality, compared with postnatal detection.

Prevalence and Predictors of Multimodal Treatment Among U.S. Adults Newly Diagnosed With ADHD.

INTRODUCTION: Although a combined treatment of prescription medication and psychotherapy provides long-term benefits for adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), little is known about the prevalence of receiving such multimodal treatment. This study investigated trends in the prevalence and correlates of multimodal treatment among U.S.-insured adults newly diagnosed with ADHD. METHODS: 495,180 U.S. adults from the Komodo Healthcare Map with newly diagnosed ADHD in 2017-2021 were included. Descriptive statistics were used to estimate trends in the prevalence of treatment (no treatment, prescription-only, psychotherapy-only, or both) within 3 months from the index ADHD diagnosis. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine patient and provider characteristics associated with ADHD treatment. Analysis was conducted in May 2023. RESULTS: From 2017 to 2021, the prevalence of newly diagnosed ADHD adults receiving multimodal, prescription-only, and psychotherapy-only treatment within 3 months following their first diagnosis increased from 12.9% to 21.4%, 30.2% to 33.3%, and 18.4% to 20.4%, respectively. Over the same period, the prevalence of newly diagnosed ADHD adults receiving no treatment declined from 38.5% to 25%. Relative to their counterparts, the odds of receiving multimodal ADHD treatment were significantly lower (p<0.05) for men, older adults, adults with multiple co-existing conditions, Medicaid and Medicare beneficiaries, and those living in socially disadvantaged areas. Furthermore, the odds of receiving multimodal treatment were higher (p<0.05) for adults who saw a nurse practitioner, physician assistant, or behavioral care (non-physician) provider on their first visit with an ADHD diagnosis, compared to those who saw a physician. CONCLUSIONS: 25% of newly diagnosed ADHD adults received no treatment in 2021 and 53.7% only received a single-modality treatment-raising concerns about the potential implications of untreated ADHD or insufficient treatment on the persistence of ADHD-related impairments, morbidity, productivity, and downstream healthcare cost. The study also highlighted potential sociodemographic, clinical, and provider disparities in ADHD treatment.

Post-Hospitalization Home Monitoring Programs During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey Results from the Hospital Medicine Re-engineering Network (HOMERuN).

BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, hospitals and healthcare systems launched innovative responses to emerging needs. The creation and use of programs to remotely follow patient clinical status and recovery after COVID-19 hospitalization has not been thoroughly described. OBJECTIVE: To characterize deployment of remote post-hospital discharge monitoring programs during the COVID-19 pandemic METHODS: Electronic surveys were administered to leaders of 83 US academic hospitals in the Hospital Medicine Re-engineering Network (HOMERuN). An initial survey was completed in March 2021 with follow-up survey completed in July 2022. RESULTS: There were 35 responses to the initial survey (42%) and 15 responses to the follow-up survey (43%). Twenty-two (63%) sites reported a post-discharge monitoring program, 16 of which were newly developed for COVID-19. Physiologic monitoring devices such as pulse oximeters were often provided. Communication with medical teams was often via telephone, with moderate use of apps or electronic medical record integration. Programs launched most commonly between January and June 2020. Only three programs were still active at the time of follow-up survey. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate rapid, ad hoc development of post-hospital discharge monitoring programs during the COVID-19 pandemic but with little standardization or evaluation. Additional study could identify the benefits of these programs, instruct their potential application to other disease processes, and inform further development as part of emergency preparedness for upcoming crises.

Analysis of Research Productivity of Orthopedic Surgery Residency Applicants.

Background Orthopedic surgery has become an increasingly competitive specialty. With a pass-fail Step 1, an even greater emphasis on research has been placed to allow candidates to better distinguish themselves. This study analyzes the scholarly activity of accepted orthopedic residency applicants during medical school, assessing what factors, including the novel altmetric attention score, may be associated with greater research productivity. Methods A list of orthopedic residency programs was obtained from the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS). A total of 688 orthopedic residents from 180 programs who matriculated in 2020 from allopathic medical schools were identified. Resident demographic information and bibliometric data (total publications, orthopedic-related publications, h-index, and altmetric score) of publications published from July 1, 2016, to September 1, 2020, were collected. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Kruskal-Wallis tests analyzed the association between medical school characteristics and research productivity using Stata® 17.0 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas). Results Postgraduate-Year-3 orthopedic residents (N=688) published 2,600 articles during medical school, averaging 3.8 articles per resident. The residents from a top 25 medical school for research had publication counts, altmetric scores, and h-indices, on average, that were higher than those from non-top 25 medical schools for research. Over 150 residents had no publications, and ~10 residents had more than 30 publications. Conclusions The results illustrate that medical school research status influences the research productivity of applicants. Also, given the average number of publications, most research listed on applications are abstracts and presentations. Utilization of the altmetric score may not yet be the best way of examining research experience because orthopedic applicants do not appear to use social networks for academic research.

Achieving diagnostic excellence through prevention and teamwork (ADEPT) study protocol: A multicenter, prospective quality and safety program to improve diagnostic processes in medical inpatients.

BACKGROUND: Few hospitals have built surveillance for diagnostic errors into usual care or used comparative quantitative and qualitative data to understand their diagnostic processes and implement interventions designed to reduce these errors. OBJECTIVES: To build surveillance for diagnostic errors into usual care, benchmark diagnostic performance across sites, pilot test interventions, and evaluate the program's impact on diagnostic error rates. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Achieving diagnostic excellence through prevention and teamwork (ADEPT) is a multicenter, real-world quality and safety program utilizing interrupted time-series techniques to evaluate outcomes. Study subjects will be a randomly sampled population of medical patients hospitalized at 16 US hospitals who died, were transferred to intensive care, or had a rapid response during the hospitalization. Surveillance for diagnostic errors will occur on 10 events per month per site using a previously established two-person adjudication process. Concurrent reviews of patients who had a qualifying event in the previous week will allow for surveys of clinicians to better understand contributors to diagnostic error, or conversely, examples of diagnostic excellence, which cannot be gleaned from medical record review alone. With guidance from national experts in quality and safety, sites will report and benchmark diagnostic error rates, share lessons regarding underlying causes, and design, implement, and pilot test interventions using both Safety I and Safety II approaches aimed at patients, providers, and health systems. Safety II approaches will focus on cases where diagnostic error did not occur, applying theories of how people and systems are able to succeed under varying conditions. The primary outcome will be the number of diagnostic errors per patient, using segmented multivariable regression to evaluate change in y-intercept and change in slope after initiation of the program. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review Board (IRB), which is serving as the single IRB. Intervention toolkits and study findings will be disseminated through partners including Vizient, The Joint Commission, and Press-Ganey, and through national meetings, scientific journals, and publications aimed at the general public.

Outcomes of Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in the Past Decade.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) that represent approximately 1 to 2 percent of primary gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Owing to their rarity, very little is known about their overall epidemiology, and the prognostic factors of their pathology. The current study aimed to evaluate the independent determinants of mortality in patients diagnosed with GISTs over the past decade. METHODS: Our study comprised 2374 patients diagnosed with GISTs from 2000 to 2017 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We analyzed the baseline characteristics, and overall mortality (OM), as well as the cancer-specific mortality (CSM) of GISTs. Variables with a p value < 0.01 in the univariate Cox regression were incorporated into the multivariate Cox model, to determine the independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses of factors affecting the all-cause mortality and GIST-related mortality among US patients between 2010 and 2017 revealed a higher overall mortality in non-Hispanic Black patients (HR = 1.516, 95% CI 1.172-1.961, p = 0.002), patients aged 80+ (HR = 9.783, 95% CI 4.185-22.868, p = 0), followed by those aged 60-79 (HR = 3.408, 95% CI 1.488-7.807, p = 0.004); male patients (HR = 1.795, 95% CI 1.461-2.206, p < 0.001); patients with advanced disease with distant metastasis (HR = 3.865, 95% CI 2.977-5.019, p < 0.001), followed by cases with regional involvement via both direct extension and lymph node involvement (HR = 3.853, 95% CI 1.551-9.57, p = 0.004); and widowed patients (HR = 1.975, 95% CI 1.494-2.61, p < 0.001), followed by single patients (HR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.154-2.028, p = 0.003). The highest CSM was observed in the same groups, except widowed patients and patients aged 60-79. The highest CSM was also observed among patients that underwent chemotherapy (HR = 1.687, 95% CI 1.19-2.392, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: In this updated study on the outcomes of patients with GISTs, we found that non-Hispanic Black patients, male patients, and patients older than 60 years have a higher mortality with GISTs. Furthermore, patients who have received chemotherapy have a higher GIST-specific mortality, and married patients have a lower mortality. However, we do not know to what extent these independent prognostic factors interact with each other to influence mortality. This study paves the way for future studies addressing these interactions. The results of this study may help treating clinicians to identify patient populations associated with a dismal prognosis, as those may require closer follow-up and more intensive therapy; furthermore, with married patients having a better survival rate, we hope to encourage clinicians to involve family members of the affected patients early in the disease course, as the social support might impact the prognosis.

Postoperative Rehabilitation to Improve Outcomes After Cervical Spine Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Spondylosis: A Systematic Review.

Postoperative rehabilitation has recently been identified as a high-priority research topic for improving surgical outcomes for degenerative cervical spondylosis (DCS). However, there remains no consensus on specific rehabilitation strategies. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of postoperative rehabilitation strategies for short-term and long-term outcomes after cervical spine fusion for DCS. A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines using the PubMed, Scopus, and Ovid Medline databases. All level I-IV therapeutic studies in the English language investigating the outcomes of postoperative rehabilitation strategies after cervical spine fusion for DCS were included. Nine studies with 895 patients with DCS (747 anterior-only fusion, 55 patients with posterior-only fusion, 93 patients with physiotherapy alone) were included in this analysis, with 446 (49.8%) patients receiving physiotherapy alone or standard postoperative therapy and 449 (50.2%) patients receiving standard postoperative therapy with additional intervention or augmentation. These interventions included pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation, telephone-supported home exercise program (HEP), early cervical spine stabilizer training, structured postoperative therapy, and a postoperative cervical collar. One level II study demonstrated that PEMF led to increased fusion rates at six months postoperatively compared to standard therapy alone, one level II study demonstrated that postoperative cervical therapy in addition to standard therapy was better than standard therapy alone in the improvement of neck pain intensity, one level IV study demonstrated home exercise therapy led to an improvement in neck pain, arm pain, and disability, and six level II studies reported no difference in clinical outcome measures between augmented or targeted therapy and standard postoperative therapy for DCS. In conclusion, there is moderate evidence to suggest that there is no significant difference in clinical and surgical outcomes between standard postoperative therapy and augmented or targeted postoperative therapy for cervical fusion in the setting of cervical spondylosis. However, there is some evidence to support that certain therapeutic modalities, such as PEMF stimulation, may lead to improved fusion rates, clinical outcomes, and patient satisfaction when compared to standard postoperative therapy protocols. There is no evidence to support a difference in effectiveness with different types of postoperative rehabilitation strategies between anterior and posterior fusions for DCS.

Half-pin Breakage in Multiplanar External Fixators Used for Pediatric Deformity Correction.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients with leg length discrepancies and complex deformities may require multiplanar external fixators for correction. We have encountered 4 cases of half-pin breakage with the Orthex hexapod frame. The purpose of this study is to report factors associated with half-pin breakage and compare various deformity correction characteristics between 2 hexapod frames - Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) and Orthex. METHODS: Pediatric patients with lower extremity deformities treated with an Orthex or TSF at a single tertiary children's hospital between 2012 and 2022 were included for retrospective review. Variables compared between frame groups include frame configuration, half-pin/wire fixation, length achieved, angular correction, and frame time. RESULTS: There were 23 Orthex frames (23 patients) and 36 TSF (33 patients) included. Four Orthex and zero TSF had proximal half-pin breakage. The Orthex group was younger on average (10 vs. 12 y, P =.04*) at the time of frame placement. The majority (52%) of Orthex frames were used for simultaneous lengthening and angular correction, while the majority (61%) of TSF was used for only angular correction. Orthex had more half-pins used for proximal fixation (median 3 vs. 2, P <0.0001*) and more frames with nonstandard configuration (7 (30%) vs. 1 (3%), P =0.004*). Orthex group had a longer total frame time (median 189 vs. 146 days, P =0.012*) and longer time required for regenerate healing (117 vs. 89 d, P =0.02*). There were no significant differences in length gained, angular correction, or healing index between Orthex and TSF. Nonstandard configuration, increased number of proximal half-pins, younger age at index surgery, and increased lengthening were associated with pin breakage. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to report half-pin breakage while using multiplanar frames in pediatric lower extremity deformity correction. The Orthex and TSF groups consisted of significantly different patients and frame configurations, making it difficult to identify any specific cause for pin breakage. This study shows that pin breakage is likely caused by multiple factors and is associated with the increased complexity of deformity correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-Retrospective Comparison Study.

Comparison of Female Ovarian Reserve Before vs After COVID-19 Vaccination.

This cohort study examines the association of COVID-19 vaccination with levels of anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle count in women seeking fertility treatment.

Prevalence and Causes of Diagnostic Errors in Hospitalized Patients Under Investigation for COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic required clinicians to care for a disease with evolving characteristics while also adhering to care changes (e.g., physical distancing practices) that might lead to diagnostic errors (DEs). OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of DEs and their causes among patients hospitalized under investigation (PUI) for COVID-19. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Eight medical centers affiliated with the Hospital Medicine ReEngineering Network (HOMERuN). TARGET POPULATION: Adults hospitalized under investigation (PUI) for COVID-19 infection between February and July 2020. MEASUREMENTS: We randomly selected up to 8 cases per site per month for review, with each case reviewed by two clinicians to determine whether a DE (defined as a missed or delayed diagnosis) occurred, and whether any diagnostic process faults took place. We used bivariable statistics to compare patients with and without DE and multivariable models to determine which process faults or patient factors were associated with DEs. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-seven patient charts underwent review, of which 36 (14%) had a diagnostic error. Patients with and without DE were statistically similar in terms of socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, risk factors for COVID-19, and COVID-19 test turnaround time and eventual positivity. Most common diagnostic process faults contributing to DE were problems with clinical assessment, testing choices, history taking, and physical examination (all p < 0.01). Diagnostic process faults associated with policies and procedures related to COVID-19 were not associated with DE risk. Fourteen patients (35.9% of patients with errors and 5.4% overall) suffered harm or death due to diagnostic error. LIMITATIONS: Results are limited by available documentation and do not capture communication between providers and patients. CONCLUSION: Among PUI patients, DEs were common and not associated with pandemic-related care changes, suggesting the importance of more general diagnostic process gaps in error propagation.