Comparison of antral follicle count and serum anti Müllerian hormone level for determination of gonadotropin dosing in in-vitro fertilization: randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the proportion of women achieving a desired ovarian response following ovarian stimulation when gonadotropin dosing was determined based on antral follicle count (AFC) vs serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level, in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) using the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. METHODS: This was a randomized double-blind trial carried out in a university-affiliated assisted reproduction unit. A total of 200 women undergoing their first IVF cycle using the GnRH-antagonist protocol between April 2016 and February 2018 were randomized to determination of gonadotropin dosing based on either AFC or serum AMH level measured in the pretreatment cycle 1 month before the IVF cycle. Patients underwent IVF as per our center's standard protocol. The proportion of subjects achieving a desired ovarian response, defined as retrieval of six to 14 oocytes, was compared between the two study arms. Subgroup analysis of patients with baseline AFC > 5 and those with baseline AFC ≤ 5 was performed. Concordance in AFC and AMH categorization between the pretreatment cycle and the ovarian-stimulation cycle was assessed using Cohen's kappa (κ). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving a desired ovarian response between the AFC (54%) and AMH (49%) groups (P = 0.479). The median number of oocytes retrieved was nine vs seven (P = 0.070), and the median follicular output rate was 0.54 vs 0.55 (P = 0.764) in the AFC and AMH groups, respectively. Similar findings were observed on subgroup analysis of subjects with AFC ≤ 5 and AFC > 5 at the start of ovarian stimulation (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). There was moderate concordance between AFC and AMH measured in the pretreatment cycle and the stimulation cycle (κ = 0.478 and 0.587, respectively). CONCLUSION: The proportion of women achieving a desired ovarian response following ovarian stimulation using the GnRH-antagonist protocol is similar when the gonadotropin-dosing algorithm used is based on AFC or serum AMH level. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Comparación del recuento de folículos sinusales y el nivel de la hormona antimulleriana en el suero para la determinación de la dosis de gonadotrofina en la fecundación in vitro: ensayo aleatorizado OBJETIVO: Comparar la proporción de mujeres que logran una respuesta ovárica deseada tras la estimulación del ovario cuando se determinó la dosis de gonadotrofina en función del recuento de folículos sinusales (AFC, por sus siglas en inglés) frente al nivel de la hormona antimulleriana (HAM) en el suero, en mujeres que se sometieron a una fecundación in vitro (FIV) mediante el protocolo de antagonistas de la hormona liberadora de gonadotropina (GnRH, por sus siglas en inglés). MÉTODOS: Se trata de un ensayo aleatorizado doble ciego realizado en una unidad de reproducción asistida afiliada a una universidad. Un total de 200 mujeres que se sometieron a su primer ciclo de FIV y utilizaron el protocolo de antagonistas de la GnRH entre abril de 2016 y febrero de 2018 fueron asignadas al azar a la determinación de la dosis de gonadotrofina basada en el nivel de AFC o de HAM en suero, medidos en el ciclo de pretratamiento un mes antes del ciclo de FIV. Las pacientes se sometieron a una FIV según el protocolo estándar de nuestro centro. La proporción de mujeres que lograron una respuesta ovárica deseada, definida como la recuperación de seis a 14 ovocitos, se comparó entre las dos ramas del estudio. Se realizó un análisis de subgrupos de las pacientes con AFC de base >5 y de aquellas con AFC de base ≤5. La concordancia en la categorización del AFC y la HAM entre el ciclo de pretratamiento y el ciclo de estimulación ovárica se evaluó utilizando la medida estadística kappa de Cohen (κ). RESULTADOS: No hubo diferencias significativas en la proporción de pacientes que lograron una respuesta ovárica deseada entre los grupos de AFC (54%) y HAM (49%) (P=0,479). La mediana del número de ovocitos recuperados fue de nueve frente a siete (P=0,070), y la mediana de la tasa de producción folicular fue de 0,54 frente a 0,55 (P=0,764) en los grupos AFC y HAM, respectivamente. Se observaron hallazgos similares en el análisis de subgrupos de pacientes con AFC ≤5 y AFC >5 al comienzo de la estimulación ovárica (P>0,05 para todas las comparaciones). Se observó una concordancia moderada entre el AFC y la HAM medidos en el ciclo de pretratamiento y el ciclo de estimulación (κ=0,478 y 0,587, respectivamente). CONCLUSIÓN: La proporción de mujeres que logran una respuesta ovárica deseada después de la estimulación ovárica utilizando el protocolo de antagonistas de la GnRH es similar cuando el algoritmo de dosificación de gonadotrofina utilizado se basa en el nivel del AFC o de la HAM en suero.

Randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of topical lidocaine gel and intrauterine lidocaine infusion for pain relief during saline contrast sonohysterography.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of topical lidocaine gel and intrauterine lidocaine infusion administered prior to saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH) in reducing pain level during the procedure. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. We recruited 120 women scheduled to undergo SCSH and randomized them into one of three groups according to administration of gel and intrauterine infusion immediately prior to the procedure: (1) the 'lidocaine gel' group received 3 mL 2% lidocaine gel applied to the cervix and intrauterine infusion, using an infant feeding tube without balloon, of 5 mL normal saline; (2) the 'lidocaine infusion' group received 3 mL gel lubricant applied to the cervix and intrauterine infusion of 5 mL 2% lidocaine; (3) the placebo group received 3 mL gel lubricant applied to the cervix and intrauterine infusion of 5 mL normal saline. The tube was left in place for the SCSH procedure. The primary outcome measure was the overall pain level (on a scale of 0-100) reported by the women during the SCSH procedure. Women also rated their pain levels at various other time points and an observer assessed visible signs of the women's discomfort during the procedure, producing a distress score. RESULTS: There were no significant differences among the three groups in baseline characteristics, volume of saline solution infused, tenaculum use and duration and difficulty level of the SCSH procedure. The median (range) pain scores during normal saline infusion for the SCSH procedure were 0 (0-65) in the placebo group, 2.5 (0-80) in the lidocaine gel group, and 0 (0-70) in the lidocaine infusion group. The pain scores at other time points, the overall pain score and the distress score were also comparable for the three groups. No significant adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: SCSH performed with an infant feeding tube without balloon is associated with very low pain levels. Topical lidocaine gel application and intrauterine lidocaine infusion do not further reduce pain levels during SCSH.

Screening for dysglycaemia by oral glucose tolerance test should be recommended in all women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

STUDY QUESTION: Should fasting glucose (FG) or an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) be used to screen for dysglycaemia in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)? SUMMARY ANSWER: A full OGTT should be recommended as the screening method for dysglycaemia in women with PCOS, regardless of BMI or family history of diabetes mellitus (DM). STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A cross-sectional study on 467 Chinese women diagnosed with PCOS by the Rotterdam criteria between January 2010 to December 2013. PARTICIPANTS, SETTING, METHODS: The study was done at a university hospital in Hong Kong. All subjects underwent a 75 g OGTT after overnight fasting. We evaluated the performance of FG alone, when compared with the full OGTT, in identifying subjects with dysglycaemia (prediabetes or DM, according to the 2010 diagnostic criteria of the American Diabetes Association). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Of the 467 subjects, 58 (12.4%) had dysglycaemia, among which 46 (9.8%) had prediabetes and 12 (2.6%) had DM, including 4 with known DM. Of the 46 subjects with prediabetes, 25 (54.3%) had normal FG and of the 8 subjects with screened DM in this study, 1 (12.5%) had normal FG. The sensitivity of FG alone in screening for prediabetes, DM and overall dysglycaemia were 45.7, 87.5 and 48.1%, respectively, i.e. missing 54.3% of prediabetes and 12.5% of DM cases as defined by the OGTT. Among the 54 subjects with screened dysglycaemia, 20 (37.0%) had BMI < 25 kg/m(2) and 35 (64.8%) had no family history of DM. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: We only reported on the biochemical diagnosis of DM based on a single time point. In clinical practice, confirmatory results at another time point is required for definitive diagnosis in asymptomatic subjects. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: There is an ongoing debate as to whether FG or an OGTT should be used as a screening method for dysglycaemia in women with PCOS. Some guidelines also recommend glucose screening only in those who are overweight and/or having family history of diabetes (DM). There have been scarce data on this issue in the Chinese population, which the current study aims at addressing. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The study was supported by a research grant from the Hong Kong Obstetrical and Gynaecological Trust Fund, as well as internal research funding of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong. All authors have no competing interests.

Effect of letrozole on uterine artery Doppler flow indices prior to first-trimester termination of pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: We previously demonstrated that a sequential regimen of letrozole and misoprostol resulted in a marked reduction in the serum estradiol concentration and in a higher efficacy of first-trimester termination of pregnancy than misoprostol alone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of letrozole on uterine artery Doppler flow indices during early pregnancy. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial. Thirty women requesting termination of pregnancy up to 63 days' gestation were randomized into two groups: a letrozole group receiving 10 mg of letrozole, daily, for 3 days, and a control group receiving a placebo for 3 days. Serum estradiol, progesterone and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) concentrations were measured before drug administration and then daily for 6 days. Ultrasound scanning for fetal viability and measurement of the pulsatility (PI) and resistance (RI) indices of the uterine arteries was performed before drug administration, and then on day 3 and day 7 after starting letrozole or placebo. All pregnancies were terminated by surgical evacuation on day 7 or day 8. RESULTS: Uterine artery PI and RI decreased significantly in the letrozole group, but not in the control group. Serum estradiol concentrations were significantly lower in the letrozole group than in the control group from day 2 onwards. Serum progesterone and hCG concentrations were comparable for the two groups throughout the 7 days. There were significantly more women in the letrozole group with vaginal bleeding. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that the use of letrozole in the first trimester of pregnancy suppresses serum estradiol levels but results in an increase in blood flow to the uterus. Further studies should be carried out to elucidate the mechanism of letrozole pretreatment in medical abortion.