Marcadores genéticos y séricos relacionados con una rápida progresión clínica de la arteriosclerosis coronaria / Serum and genetic markers related to rapid clinical progression of coronary artery disease

Introducción y objetivos: La progresión de la enfermedad coronaria una vez se hace evidente a la clínica tiene una gran variabilidad interindividual. El objetivo es determinar marcadores séricos y genéticos en pacientes con rápida progresión clínica (RPC) de la enfermedad coronaria frente a pacientes con estabilidad clínica mantenida (ECM). Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de casos (RPC) y controles (ECM) (1:2). Se consideró RPC a los pacientes que precisaron al menos 2 revascularizaciones por progresión de la ateroesclerosis en los 10 años posteriores a una primera angioplastia y ECM a aquellos sin eventos durante el mismo periodo tras la primera angioplastia. Una vez seleccionados, se determinaron los valores séricos, la expresión de ácido ribonucleico mensajero (ARNm) y polimorfismos genéticos de interleucina 6, proteína C reactiva y factor de necrosis tumoral alfa (TNFα) como marcadores de inflamación y proproteína convertasa subtilisina/kexina tipo 9 (PCSK9), receptor de lipoproteínas de baja densidad, proteína 2 de unión a elementos reguladores de esteroles y apolipoproteína B como marcadores aterogénicos. Resultados: Se incluyó a 180 pacientes (58 en RPC y 122 en ECM). Las características basales demográficas, del perfil de riesgo clásico y de la extensión de la enfermedad coronaria fueron comparables. El grupo de RPC presentó valores séricos más altos de interleucina 6 y PCSK9 y mayor expresión de ARNm de TNF. Los alelos de Interleucina-6 rs180075C, de TNF rs3093664 non-G y de PCSK9 rs2483205 T confieren riesgo de RPC (p<0,05 en todos los casos). Un 51,7% de los pacientes del grupo RPC presentaron los tres alelos de riesgo frente al 18% de los pacientes del grupo en ECM (p<0,001). Conclusiones: Se propone la existencia de marcadores genotípicos y fenotípicos asociados con la RPC de enfermedad coronaria y que podrían servir para individualizar la intensidad y el tipo de tratamiento.(AU)

Introduction and objectives: Patients with clinically evident coronary artery disease differ in their rate of progression, which impacts prognosis. We aimed to characterize serum and genetic markers in patients with rapid clinical progression (RCP) of coronary artery disease vs those with long standing stable (LSS) disease. Methods: Retrospective study of cases (RCP) and controls (LSS) (1:2). Patients requiring ≥ 2 revascularizations due to atherosclerotic progression in the 10 years after a first angioplasty were considered to be RCP and those without events during the same period after the first angioplasty were considered to have LSS disease. After patient selection, we analyzed serum values, mRNA expression and genetic polymorphisms of inflammatory markers, including interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a, and atherogenic markers consisted of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), low-density lipoprotein receptor, sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 2, and apolipoprotein-B. Results: The study included 180 patients (58 RCP and 122 LSS). Demographic characteristics, classic risk factors and the extent of coronary disease were similar in the 2 groups. Patients with RCP showed higher serum levels of interleukin-6 and PCSK9 and higher TNF mRNA expression. Interleukin-6 rs180075C, TNF rs3093664 non-G and PCSK9 rs2483205 T alleles conferred a risk of RCP (P<.05 in all cases). Among patients with RCP, 51.7% had all 3 risk alleles vs 18% of those with LSS (P<.001). Conclusions: We suggest the existence of specific phenotypic and genotypic markers associated with RCP of coronary artery disease that could help to individualize the type and intensity of treatment.(AU)

Serum and genetic markers related to rapid clinical progression of coronary artery disease.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with clinically evident coronary artery disease differ in their rate of progression, which impacts prognosis. We aimed to characterize serum and genetic markers in patients with rapid clinical progression (RCP) of coronary artery disease vs those with long standing stable (LSS) disease. METHODS: Retrospective study of cases (RCP) and controls (LSS) (1:2). Patients requiring ≥ 2 revascularizations due to atherosclerotic progression in the 10 years after a first angioplasty were considered to be RCP and those without events during the same period after the first angioplasty were considered to have LSS disease. After patient selection, we analyzed serum values, mRNA expression and genetic polymorphisms of inflammatory markers, including interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a, and atherogenic markers consisted of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), low-density lipoprotein receptor, sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 2, and apolipoprotein-B. RESULTS: The study included 180 patients (58 RCP and 122 LSS). Demographic characteristics, classic risk factors and the extent of coronary disease were similar in the 2 groups. Patients with RCP showed higher serum levels of interleukin-6 and PCSK9 and higher TNF mRNA expression. Interleukin-6 rs180075C, TNF rs3093664 non-G and PCSK9 rs2483205 T alleles conferred a risk of RCP (P<.05 in all cases). Among patients with RCP, 51.7% had all 3 risk alleles vs 18% of those with LSS (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: We suggest the existence of specific phenotypic and genotypic markers associated with RCP of coronary artery disease that could help to individualize the type and intensity of treatment.

Outcomes of predefined optimisation criteria for intravascular ultrasound guidance of left main stenting.

AIMS: This study sought to investigate the prognostic effect of a protocol with optimisation targets for intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided left main (LM) revascularisation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A protocol was prospectively applied for IVUS-guided LM revascularisation (IVUS-PRO group) including predefined optimisation targets. Using propensity score matching, we selected as control groups patients with angiography-guided PCI (ANGIO group) and IVUS-guided PCI (IVUS group) from a large multicentre registry. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, LM-related infarction and LM revascularisation at 12 months. In each group, 124 patients with comparable characteristics were included. The incidence of the primary outcome was significantly higher in the ANGIO group compared to the IVUS-PRO group (12.9% vs 4.8%, HR 0.35, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.82, p=0.02), but not with respect to the IVUS group (12.9% vs 8%, HR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.20 to 1.22, p=0.1), driven by a lower rate of LM revascularisation (8% in the ANGIO group, 6.4% in the IVUS group and 3.2% in the IVUS-PRO group). IVUS-PRO resulted in being an independent risk predictor (HR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.98; p=0.041). CONCLUSIONS: IVUS guidance of LM stenting provides prognostic benefit with respect to the use of angiography alone, particularly when following a protocol with these predefined optimisation criteria.