Percutaneous closure of the patent foramen ovale using the HELEX® Septal Occluder: acute and long-term results in 405 patients.

AIMS: Although routinely used, limited data are available regarding the long-term outcome after patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure using the HELEX® Occluder system. The aim of this study was therefore the examination of the acute and long-term outcome after transcatheter PFO closure using this system. METHODS AND RESULTS: All (n=407) patients included had undergone PFO closure with the HELEX® Occluder system for secondary prevention of stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or peripheral embolism at a single centre. Primary endpoints were residual shunts at six or 12 months (assessed by transoesophageal echocardiography) and the number of neurological and other adverse events during follow-up. Device implantation was successful in 99% of patients. Complete closure at six months was achieved in 81%. During follow-up of 1,695 patient-years, 10 neurologic events occurred (four TIA, six strokes). The annual incidence of stroke was 1.2%. Other adverse events were wire frame fractures requiring no further intervention in five (1%), device-associated thrombus formation in one (0.25%), and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in nine patients (2%). CONCLUSIONS: PFO closure using the HELEX® Occluder system is feasible and safe. Complications and adverse events during long-term follow-up are rare. The safety profile and efficacy in prevention of recurrent events compare well to that reported with other closure devices.

PLAATO (Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Transcatheter Occlusion) for prevention of cardioembolic stroke in non-anticoagulation eligible atrial fibrillation patients: results from the European PLAATO study.

AIMS: The European PLAATO (Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Transcatheter Occlusion) study was performed to determine the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion by catheter technique. Embolic stroke due to atrial fibrillation is a common observation, especially in the elderly. Most thrombi in atrial fibrillation form in the left atrial appendage (LAA), its occlusion may therefore reduce the incidence of stroke in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and eighty patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation and contraindication to warfarin therapy were enrolled in the PLAATO study. Patients were eligible if they had a?history of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or stroke or at least two independent risk factors for stroke such as age > or =75 years, hypertension, congestive heart failure or diabetes. The primary endpoint was LAA closure as determined by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) two months after the procedure and stroke rate at 150 patient years. Left atrial appendage occlusion was successful in 162/180 patients (90%, 95% CI 83.1% to 92.9%). Two patients died within 24 hours of the procedure (1.1%, 95% CI 0.3% to 4%). Six cardiac tamponades were observed (3.3%, 95% CI 1.5% to 7.1%). In two cases, surgical drainage of the tamponade was necessary (1.1%, 95% CI 0.3% to 4%). In one patient, the device that was chosen was too small and embolised into the aorta after its release (0.6%, 95% CI 0.1% to 3.1%). It was snared and replaced without further complications. Successful occlusion of the LAA was achieved in 126/ 140 (90%, 95% CI 83.5% to 94.2%) of patients as noted by TEE at the two months follow-up. In a follow-up time of 129 documented patient years, three strokes occurred (2.3% per year). The expected incidence of stroke according to the CHADS2-Score was 6.6% per year. The trial was halted prematurely during the follow-up phase for financial considerations. CONCLUSIONS: Left atrial appendage closure is relatively safe and effective. However, severe complications can occur. It might become an alternative for atrial fibrillation patients who are ineligible for long-term anticoagulation therapy.

Comparison of three patent foramen ovale closure devices in a randomized trial (Amplatzer versus CardioSEAL-STARflex versus Helex occluder).

This randomized trial compared procedural complications and 30-day clinical outcomes of 3 patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure devices (Amplatzer, Helex, and CardioSEAL-STARflex). It examined 660 patients (361 men, 299 women, mean age 49.3+/-1.9 years), with 220 patients per group. All patients had a history of paradoxical embolism. All PFO closures were successful technically. Exchange of devices for others was most frequently required for the Helex occluder (7 of 220) and 2 of 220 in either of the other groups. Three device embolizations in the Helex group were retrieved and replaced successfully. One patient with a Helex occluder developed a transient ischemic attack and recovered without treatment. A hemopericardium in that group was punctured without affecting the device. One tamponade in the Amplatzer group required surgical device explantation. In 8 of 660 patients in the CardioSEAL-STARflex group, thrombi resolved after anticoagulation. Sixteen patients (11 in the CardioSEAL-STARflex group, 3 in the Amplatzer group, and 2 in the Helex group) had episodes of atrial fibrillation. PFOs were closed completely in 143 of 220 patients (65%) in the Amplatzer group, 116 of 220 patients (52.7%) in the Helex group, and 137 of 220 patients (62.3%) in the CardioSEAL-STARflex group at 30 days with significant differences between the Helex and Amplatzer occluders (p=0.0005) and the Helex and CardioSEAL-STARflex occluders (p=0.0003). PFO closure can be performed safely with each device. In conclusion, the Helex occluder embolized more frequently. Device thrombus formation and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were more common with the CardioSEAL-STARflex occluder.

Atrial and ventricular septal defects can safely be closed by percutaneous intervention.

Various transcatheter devices and methods to close congenital heart defects are currently available. Devices have been designed specifically for atrial septal defect (ASD), patent foramen ovale (PFO), and ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure. The trend in interventional treatment of intracardiac shunts shows toward defect-specific systems. The PFO is a tunnel defect requiring occluders that adapt to its length while common ASD strongly vary in their diameter, making a large scale of device sizes indispensable. VSDs are predominantly sealed by coils or tissue-adapted devices like muscular or perimembranous occluders. Since VSDs may occur with an aneurysm (VSA), a multi-perforated septum, an instable myocardial situation (postinfarction) or a high interventricular pressure gradient, closure of these defects is regarded sometimes as complicated. But during the last 30 years (since King and Mills implanted the first double-umbrella occluding system) several studies have proven procedure efficacy and safety of both ASD and VSD closure. This article reviews a large scale of studies and includes our single center data on 1,609 PFO, ASD, and VSD patients.