RESUMO
CONTEXT: Previous studies have shown that the prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) may vary according to race/ethnicity, although few studies have assessed women of different ethnicities who live in similar geographic and socio-economic conditions. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of PCOS in an unselected multiethnic population of premenopausal women. DESIGN: A multicenter prospective cross-sectional study. SETTINGS: The main regional employers of Irkutsk Region and the Buryat Republic, Russia. PARTICIPANTS: During 2016-19, 1398 premenopausal women underwent a history and physical exam, pelvic ultrasound, and testing during a mandatory annual employment-related health assessment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: PCOS prevalence, overall and by ethnicity in a large medically unbiased population, including Caucasian (White), Mongolic or Asian (Buryat), and mixed ethnicity individuals, living in similar geographic and socio-economic conditions for centuries. RESULTS: PCOS was diagnosed in 165/1134 (14.5%) women who had a complete evaluation for PCOS. Based on the probabilities for PCOS by clinical presentation observed in the cohort of women who had a complete evaluation we also estimated the weight-adjusted prevalence of PCOS in 264 women with an incomplete evaluation: 46.2 or 17.5%. Consequently, the total prevalence of PCOS in the population was 15.1%, higher among Caucasians and women of Mixed ethnicity compared to Asians (16.0% and 21.8% vs. 10.8%, pz <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a 15.1% prevalence of PCOS in our medically unbiased population of premenopausal women. In this population of Siberian premenopausal women of Caucasian, Asian and Mixed ethnicity living in similar geographic and socio-economic conditions, the prevalence was higher in Caucasian or Mixed than Asian women. These data highlight the need to assess carefully ethnic-dependent differences in the frequency and clinical manifestation of PCOS.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Abdominal obesity is associated with endothelial dysfunction and poorer vascular health. Avocado consumption improves postprandial endothelial function; however, the longer-term effects remain unclear. It was hypothesized that the daily addition of 1 avocado to a habitual diet for 6 months would improve flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in individuals with abdominal obesity (waist circumference ≥35 in for women, ≥40 in for men), compared with a habitual diet low in avocados. METHODS AND RESULTS: HAT (Habitual Diet and Avocado Trial) was a multicenter, randomized, controlled, parallel-arm study that investigated the health effects of adding 1 avocado per day to a habitual diet in individuals with abdominal obesity. At the Pennsylvania State University, University Park study center (n=134; age, 50 ± 13 years; women, 78%; body mass index, 32.6 ± 4.8 kg/m2), markers of vascular function were measured, including endothelial function, assessed via brachial artery flow-mediated dilation, and arterial stiffness, assessed via carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. Between-group differences in 6-month change in flow-mediated dilation and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity were assessed using independent t tests. Prespecified subgroup analyses were conducted using linear regression. No significant between-group differences in flow-mediated dilation (mean difference=-0.62% [95% CI, -1.70 to 0.46]) or carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (0.25 m/s [95% CI, -0.13 to 0.63]) were observed. Results of the subgroup analyses were consistent with the primary analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Longer-term consumption of 1 avocado per day as part of a habitual diet did not improve measures of vascular function compared with a habitual diet low in avocados in individuals with abdominal obesity. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03528031.
Assuntos
Endotélio Vascular , Obesidade Abdominal , Persea , Rigidez Vascular , Vasodilatação , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Abdominal/fisiopatologia , Obesidade Abdominal/dietoterapia , Obesidade Abdominal/diagnóstico , Rigidez Vascular/fisiologia , Vasodilatação/fisiologia , Endotélio Vascular/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Velocidade da Onda de Pulso Carótido-Femoral , Fatores de Tempo , Análise de Onda de Pulso , Resultado do Tratamento , Artéria Braquial/fisiopatologia , DietaRESUMO
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a highly prevalent disorder in women, and its diagnosis rests on three principal features: ovulatory/menstrual dysfunction, clinical and/or biochemical hyperandrogenism, and polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM). Currently, data on age- and ethnicity-dependent features of PCOM remain insufficient. We aimed to estimate ethnicity- and age-dependent differences in ovarian volume (OV) and follicle number per ovary (FNPO) in a healthy, medically unbiased population of Caucasian and Asian premenopausal women, who participated in the cross-sectional Eastern Siberia PCOS epidemiology and phenotype (ESPEP) study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05194384) in 2016-2019. The study population consisted of 408 non-hirsute, normo-androgenic, eumenorrheic premenopausal women aged 18-44 years. All participants underwent a uniform evaluation including a review of their medical history and a physical examination, blood sampling, and pelvic ultrasonography. The statistical analysis included non-parametric tests and the estimation of the upper normal limits (UNLs) by 98th percentiles for OV and FNPO. In the total study population, the upper OV percentiles did not differ by ethnicity or age group. By contrast, the UNL of FNPO was higher in Caucasian women than in Asian women, and women aged <35 years demonstrated a higher UNL of FNPO compared to older women. In summary, these data suggest that the estimation of FNPO, but not OV, should take into account the ethnicity and age of the individual in estimating the presence of PCOM.
RESUMO
This introduction is to a Views and Reviews series of articles outlining best practices in the design and analysis of reproductive medicine articles. The investigators are experienced researchers and biostatisticians who highlight key points with illustrative examples from both published and theoretical clinical studies. This series is meant not only to educate readers in the interpretation of clinical research studies but also to inspire better-designed studies in the future.
Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Medicina Reprodutiva , Projetos de Pesquisa , Humanos , Medicina Reprodutiva/normas , Medicina Reprodutiva/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Projetos de Pesquisa/normasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe the serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentrations in a large, well-phenotyped cohort of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and evaluate whether AMH predicts successful ovulation induction in women treated with clomiphene and metformin. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): A total of 333 women with anovulatory infertility attributed to PCOS who participated in the double-blind randomized trial entitled the Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome I (PPCOS I) study (registration number, NCT00068861) who had serum samples from baseline laboratory testing available for further serum analysis were studied. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The association between the baseline AMH levels in each of the 3 treatment groups and ovulation, pregnancy, and live birth rates were assessed. RESULT(S): A total of 322 individuals had a baseline AMH concentration available, of which the mean AMH was 11.7 ± 8.3 ng/mL (range 0.1-43.0 ng/mL). With each unit (1 ng/mL) increase in baseline AMH, the odds of ovulation decreased by 10% (odds ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.93); this effect did not differ by treatment group. Women with a high baseline AMH concentration (>8 ng/mL) were significantly less likely to ovulate compared with those with a normal baseline AMH concentration (<4 ng/mL) (odds ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.68). This remained statistically significant when controlling for confounders, including age, body mass index, time in study, and Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance score. Ovulation occurred even at very high AMH concentrations; there was no maximum level noted at which no ovulation events occurred. Baseline AMH concentration was not associated with pregnancy or live birth rates when controlling for confounders. CONCLUSION(S): These AMH values in well-phenotyped individuals with PCOS add to the literature and will aid in identifying AMH criteria for the diagnosis of PCOS. In women with infertility and PCOS, a higher AMH concentration was associated with reduced odds of ovulation with ovulation induction with clomiphene, clomiphene + metformin, and metformin. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The original trial from which this analysis is derived was entitled "Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A 30 Week Double-Blind Randomized Trial of Clomiphene Citrate, Metformin XR, and Combined Clomiphene Citrate/Metformin XR For the Treatment of Infertility in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome" and was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as number NCT00068861. The URL for the trial is https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00068861. The first subject was enrolled in November 2002.
Assuntos
Infertilidade Feminina , Metformina , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Clomifeno/uso terapêutico , Hormônio Antimülleriano , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/complicações , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/diagnóstico , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/efeitos adversos , Ovulação , Infertilidade Feminina/diagnóstico , Infertilidade Feminina/tratamento farmacológico , Infertilidade Feminina/etiologia , Indução da OvulaçãoRESUMO
Objective: To determine if moderate physical activity is associated with live birth rates in women with unexplained infertility and obesity. Design: Secondary analysis of the Improving Reproductive Fitness through Pretreatment with Lifestyle Modification in Obese Women with Unexplained Infertility trial. Setting: US fertility centers, 2015-2019. Patients: A total of 379 women participated in Improving Reproductive Fitness through Pretreatment with Lifestyle Modification in Obese Women with Unexplained Infertility trial, a lifestyle modification program with increased physical activity (phase I, 16 weeks) and up to three cycles of clomiphene citrate treatment and intrauterine insemination (phase II). Interventions: Participants were instructed to add 500 steps/day weekly until a maximum of 10,000 steps/day was reached and maintained. Participants were stratified as active (top third, N = 125) and less active (lower third, N = 125) on the basis of the average number of steps per day recorded using a FitBit activity tracker. Main Outcome Measures: Live birth rate. Results: Active participants were more physically active at the time of enrollment than less active participants (average baseline steps per day, 8,708 [7,079-10,000] vs. 4,695 [3,844-5,811]; P ≤ 0.001) and were more likely to reach 10,000 steps/day than less active participants (average steps per day, 10,526 [9,481-11,810] vs. 6,442 [4,644-7,747]; P ≤ 0.001), although both groups increased their average steps per day by a similar amount (1,818 vs.1,747; P = 0.57). There was no difference in live birth rates (24/125 [19.2%] vs. 25/125 [20%]; P = 0.87) between active and less active participants nor were there differences in clinical pregnancy rates (P = 0.45) or miscarriage rates (P = 0.49) between the two groups. Conclusions: Active participants were more likely to achieve the physical activity goal, although this was not associated with benefit or harm with respect to live birth. Clinical Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02432209), first posted: May 4, 2015.
RESUMO
In vitro studies show that 5α-androstane-3,17-dione (5α-A) is an important intermediate in the formation of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) from androstenedione (A) in women and men. Many studies involving hyperandrogenism, hirsutism, and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) have measured A, testosterone (T), and DHT, but not 5α-A due to lack of a readily available assay to quantify this androgen. We have developed a specific and sensitive radioimmunoassay to measure 5α-A levels, together with A, T, and DHT, in both serum and genital skin. The present study involves 2 cohorts. Cohort 1 included 23 mostly postmenopausal women who provided both serum and genital skin to measure those androgens. In cohort 2, serum androgen levels were compared between women with PCOS and non-PCOS controls. Tissue-to-serum ratios were significantly higher for 5α-A and DHT as compared to A and T. None of the androgens showed a significant correlation between serum and genital tissue. In serum, 5α-A was significantly correlated with A, T, and DHT. In cohort 2, A, T, and DHT were significantly higher in the PCOS group compared to the control group. In contrast, 5α-A levels were similar between the 2 groups. Our findings support the view that 5α-A is an important intermediate in DHT formation in genital skin. Also, the relatively low levels of 5α-A in PCOS women suggest that it may play a more important intermediate role in the conversion of A to androsterone glucuronide.
Assuntos
Androgênios , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Androstenodiona , Testosterona , Di-HidrotestosteronaRESUMO
Objective: To determine the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of an oil-based, iodinated contrast using office-based, ultrasound-imaged hysterosalpingography in women with infertility. Design: Randomized Controlled Double Blind Clinical Trial. Setting: Academic health center. Interventions: Tubal flushing with oil-based contrast medium (Lipiodol UF) versus saline. Main Outcome Measures: Ongoing pregnancy rate, pain, quality of life, and thyroid function. Results: Forty-eight patients (24 in each group) were analyzed. The groups were well-matched at baseline. Ongoing pregnancy was noted in 17% (4/24) of the oil-contrast group versus 37% (9/24) in the saline group. Saline group patients more frequently initiated infertility therapy in the six-month follow-up period (saline, 67% vs. oil, 33%), and no serious adverse events in either group. There were no differences in pain from the procedure between groups. There were no differences in thyroid function tests postprocedure between groups, but within the oil-contrast group, there was a slight increase in thyroid-stimulating hormone (post vs. preratio of geometric means: 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.38) and decrease in Free T4 (postdifference vs. predifference in means: 0.08 ng/dL; 95% CI, -0.14 to -0.01). Immediately after the test, the physicians correctly guessed 79% of oil and 71% of saline randomization assignments, whereas patients correctly guessed 63% of oil and 38% of saline. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of giving an oil-based contrast medium during ultrasound-imaged hysterosalpingography. Pregnancies were seen after oil-based administration, and this contrast is associated with minor thyroid function impairment.
Assuntos
Obstetrícia , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Sociedades Médicas , Estadiamento de NeoplasiasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Promoting behavioral strategies to better regulate pain and decrease the use of prescription pain medications immediately after childbirth is an attractive approach to reduce risks for adverse outcomes associated with the maternal mortality crisis. This study aimed to understand women's beliefs and experiences about pain management to identify important insights for promoting behavioral strategies to control postpartum pain. METHODS: N = 32 postpartum women participated in a semi-structured interview about beliefs/experiences with managing postpartum pain. Higher- and lower-order themes were coded; descriptive statistics were used to summarize results. RESULTS: Major trends emerging from the data were: (1) most women used a combination of medications (e.g., oxycodone and acetaminophen) and behavioral strategies (e.g., physical activity) in the hospital (94 %) and at discharge (83 %); (2) some women reported disadvantages like negative side effects of medications and fatigue from physical activity; and (3) some women reported they would have preferred to receive more evidence-based education on behavioral strategies during prenatal visits. CONCLUSION: Our findings showed that most women were prescribed medications while in the hospital and at discharge, and used non-prescription, behavioral strategies. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Future research is needed to test behavioral strategies in randomized clinical trials and clinical care settings to identify impact on reducing adverse maternal health outcomes.
Assuntos
Mortalidade Materna , Parto , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Parto Obstétrico , Período Pós-Parto , Dor/prevenção & controleRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Dietary and/or physical activity interventions are often recommended for women with overweight or obesity as the first step prior to fertility treatment. However, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) so far have shown inconsistent results. Therefore, we propose this individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dietary and/or physical activity interventions in women with infertility and overweight or obesity on reproductive, maternal and perinatal outcomes and to explore if there are subgroup(s) of women who benefit from each specific intervention or their combination (treatment-covariate interactions). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include RCTs with dietary and/or physical activity interventions as core interventions prior to fertility treatment in women with infertility and overweight or obesity. The primary outcome will be live birth. We will search MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and trial registries to identify eligible studies. We will approach authors of eligible trials to contribute individual participant data (IPD). We will perform risk of bias assessments according to the Risk of Bias 2 tool and a random-effects IPDMA. We will then explore treatment-covariate interactions for important participant-level characteristics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval for the project (Venus-IPD) was exempted by the medical ethics committee of the University Medical Center Groningen (METc code: 2021/563, date: 17 November 2021). Data transfer agreement will be obtained from each participating institute/hospital. Outcomes will be disseminated internationally through the collaborative group, conference presentations and peer-reviewed publication. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021266201.
Assuntos
Infertilidade , Sobrepeso , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Dieta , Exercício Físico , Metanálise como Assunto , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/terapia , Sobrepeso/complicações , Sobrepeso/terapia , Revisões Sistemáticas como AssuntoAssuntos
Infertilidade , Humanos , Infertilidade/diagnóstico , Infertilidade/terapia , Idade MaternaRESUMO
The associations between female obesity and adverse maternal and fetal outcomes are exhaustively documented with associations with ovulatory dysfunction, delayed time to pregnancy, increased pregnancy loss in all trimesters, increased rates of fetal anomalies, higher rates of gestational diabetes, increased rate of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy including pre-eclampsia, increased spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm delivery rates, conversely also higher rates of large for gestational age infants at term and increased risk of maternal and fetal birth trauma, increased rates of thromboembolic events. Although preconception weight loss is often recommended as the first step for women with obesity and infertility, there is no clear best method and the role of the treating infertility provider in managing the weight loss is often secondary, if at all. The risk benefit ratio of preconception weight loss is uncertain. Rebound weight gain often follows weight loss, especially after conception with recommended weight gain during pregnancy even among women with obesity. Even less is known about the effects of obesity and preconception weight loss in males.
Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional , Infertilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Infertilidade/complicações , Masculino , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/diagnóstico , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Aumento de Peso , Redução de PesoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: We analyzed the exclusion of pregnant and breastfeeding individuals and those capable of pregnancy in COVID-19 vaccine and clinical treatment trials. METHODS: Inclusion and exclusion criteria were extracted from all listed COVID-19 vaccine and treatment clinical trials from May 1, 2020, to October 31, 2020, using the U.S. National Library of Medicine database. We report rates of rates of exclusion for pregnant and lactating individuals and requirements for contraception for pregnancy-capable participants in COVID-19 vaccine and treatment clinical trials. The analysis included the association between clinical trial exclusion and vaccine and treatment type, study location, sponsor, and phase. RESULTS: Pregnant and lactating individuals were explicitly excluded from most COVID-19 vaccine and treatment clinical trials. Of the 90 vaccine trials, 88 (97.8%) excluded pregnant individuals, 73 (81.1%) excluded lactating individuals, and 56 (62.2%) required contraception use. Of the 495 treatment trials, 350 (70.7%) excluded pregnant individuals, 269 (54.3%) excluded lactating individuals, and 91 (18.4%) required contraception use. Although vaccine type was not associated with pregnancy exclusion, it was associated with lactation exclusion (p = .01) and contraception requirement (p < .001). Treatment type was associated with pregnancy exclusion, lactation exclusion, and contraception requirement (all p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccination and treatment clinical trials mirrored historical trends restricting participation owing to pregnancy, lactation, and contraception nonuse, despite known safety profiles. People of childbearing potential should be considered for and afforded the same opportunity as males to make informed decisions on study participation, particularly in the setting of a global pandemic.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , VacinaçãoRESUMO
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) affects 5-18% of women, and is a reproductive, metabolic, and psychological condition with impacts across the lifespan. The cause is complex, and includes genetic and epigenetic susceptibility, hypothalamic and ovarian dysfunction, excess androgen exposure, insulin resistance, and adiposity-related mechanisms. Diagnosis is recommended based on the 2003 Rotterdam criteria and confirmed with two of three criteria: hyperandrogenism (clinical or biochemical), irregular cycles, and polycystic ovary morphology. In adolescents, both the criteria of hyperandrogenism and irregular cycles are needed, and ovarian morphology is not included due to poor specificity. The diagnostic criteria generates four phenotypes, and clinical features are heterogeneous, with manifestations typically arising in childhood and then evolving across adolescent and adult life. Treatment involves a combination of lifestyle alterations and medical management. Lifestyle optimisation includes a healthy balanced diet and regular exercise to prevent excess weight gain, limit PCOS complications and target weight reduction when needed. Medical management options include metformin to improve insulin resistance and metabolic features, combined oral contraceptive pill for menstrual cycle regulation and hyperandrogenism, and if needed, anti-androgens for refractory hyperandrogenism. In this Review, we provide an update on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and clinical features of PCOS, and discuss the needs and priorities of those with PCOS, including lifestyle, and medical and infertility treatment. Further we discuss the status of international evidence-based guidelines (EBG) and translation, to support patient self management, healthcare provision, and to set research priorities.
Assuntos
Hiperandrogenismo , Resistência à Insulina , Metformina , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico , Feminino , Humanos , ObesidadeRESUMO
Background Excess visceral adiposity is associated with increased risk of cardiometabolic disorders. Short-term well-controlled clinical trials suggest that regular avocado consumption favorably affects body weight, visceral adiposity, and satiety. Methods and Results The HAT Trial (Habitual Diet and Avocado Trial) was a multicenter, randomized, controlled parallel-arm trial designed to test whether consuming 1 large avocado per day for 6 months in a diverse group of free-living individuals (N=1008) with an elevated waist circumference compared with a habitual diet would decrease visceral adiposity as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Secondary and additional end points related to risk factors associated with cardiometabolic disorders were assessed. The primary outcome, change in visceral adipose tissue volume during the intervention period, was not significantly different between the Avocado Supplemented and Habitual Diet Groups (estimated mean difference (0.017 L [-0.024 L, 0.058 L], P=0.405). No significant group differences were observed for the secondary outcomes of hepatic fat fraction, hsCRP (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein), and components of the metabolic syndrome. Of the additional outcome measures, modest but nominally significant reductions in total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were observed in the Avocado Supplemented compared with the Habitual Diet Group. Changes in the other additional and post hoc measures (body weight, body mass index, insulin, very low-density lipoprotein concentrations, and total cholesterol:high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio) were similar between the 2 groups. Conclusions Addition of 1 avocado per day to the habitual diet for 6 months in free-living individuals with elevated waist circumference did not reduce visceral adipose tissue volume and had minimal effect on risk factors associated with cardiometabolic disorders. Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03528031.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Dieta , Obesidade Abdominal , Persea , Adiposidade , Índice de Massa Corporal , Peso Corporal , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , HDL-Colesterol/metabolismo , LDL-Colesterol/metabolismo , Frutas , Humanos , Obesidade Abdominal/complicaçõesRESUMO
Objective: To determine the reproducibility of the World Health Organization Fifth Edition (WHO5) strict grading methodology by comparing the percentage of morphologically normal sperm (PNS) recorded by the core laboratory with results obtained at the fertility centers participating in a multisite clinical trial. Design: Secondary cohort analysis of data from the Males, Antioxidants, and Infertility trial. Setting: Fertility centers. Patients: Semen values of 171 men participating in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the effect of antioxidants on male fertility. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Strict morphology expressed as PNS as determined at each fertility center and the core central laboratory for the same semen sample. Results: No correlation was found in the PNS values for the same semen sample between the core laboratory and fertility center laboratories either as a group or by individual site. Interobserver agreement was similarly low (κ = 0.05 and 0.15) between the core and fertility laboratories as a group for strict morphology, categorized by the WHO5 lower reference limits of 4% and 0, respectively. Moderate agreement was found between the core and 2 individual fertility laboratories for the cutoff value of 0 (κ = 0.42 and 0.57). The remainder of the comparisons demonstrated poor to fair agreement. Conclusions: Strict morphology grading using the WHO5 methodology demonstrated overall poor reproducibility among a cohort of experienced fertility laboratories. This lack of correlation and agreement in the PNS values calls into question the reproducibility, and thereby the potential applicability, of sperm strict morphology testing.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Existing randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing a freeze-all embryo transfer strategy and a fresh embryo transfer strategy have shown conflicting results. A freeze-all or a fresh transfer policy may be preferable for some couples undergoing in-vitro fertilisation (IVF), but it is unclear which couples would benefit most from each policy, how and under which protocols. Therefore, we plan a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of RCTs comparing a freeze-all and a fresh transfer policy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CENTRAL) and trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) from their inception to present to identify eligible RCTs. We will also check reference lists of relevant papers. The search was performed on 23 September 2020 and will be updated. We will include RCTs comparing a freeze-all embryo transfer strategy and a fresh embryo transfer strategy in couples undergoing IVF. The primary outcome will be live birth resulting from the first embryo transfer. All outcomes listed in the core outcome set for infertility research will be reported. We will invite the lead investigators of eligible trials to join the Individual participant data meta-analysis of trials comparing frozen versus fresh embryo transfer strategy (INFORM) collaboration and share the deidentified individual participant data (IPD) of their trials. We will harmonise the IPD and perform a two-stage meta-analysis and examine treatment-covariate interactions for important baseline characteristics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study ethics have been granted by the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (Project ID: 30391). The findings will be disseminated via presentations at international conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021296566.