Incidence of Legionnaires' Disease among Travelers Visiting Hotels in Germany, 2015-2019.

We determined whether the incidence rates of travel-associated Legionnaires' disease (TALD) in hotels in Germany increased after a previous occurrence and whether control measures required by the European Legionnaires' Disease Surveillance Network after a cluster (>2 cases within 2 years) restored the rate to baseline. We analyzed TALD surveillance data from Germany during 2015-2019; a total of 307 TALD cases (163 domestic, 144 nondomestic) in hotels were reported. The incidence rate ratio was 5.5 (95% CI 3.6-7.9) for a second case and 25 (95% CI 11-50) for a third case after a cluster had occurred, suggesting that control measures initiated after the occurrence of TALD clusters might be inadequate to restore the incidence rate to baseline. Our findings indicate that substantial LD preventive measures should be explored by hotels or other accommodations after the first TALD case occurs to reduce the risk for future infections.

Could oral hygiene prevent cases of at-home-acquired Legionnaires' disease? - Results of a comprehensive case-control study on infection sources, risk, and protective behaviors.

Introduction: The "LeTriWa study" on community-acquired cases of Legionnaires' disease (LD) found that most cases likely acquired their infection at home (AHALD). However, which sources confer the infection is largely unknown. We therefore analyzed the data set from the LeTriWa study to find out if individual sources were associated with AHALD and if specific behavioral habits may increase or lower the risk for AHALD. Methods: During the study we had used two comparison groups: (i) controls matched for age group and hospital ("controls"), (ii) household members of cases with AHALD ("AHALD-HHM"). We inquired about exposure to water sources, such as showering or wearing dentures, as well as behavioral factors and habits related to oral hygiene. We took standardized household bathroom water and biofilm samples of both cases with AHALD and controls, and in addition from households of cases with AHALD only samples from suspect residential (non-)drinking water sources. We first conducted bivariate analyses for infection sources and behaviors, followed by multivariable analyses. Results: There were 124 cases with AHALD, 217 controls and 59 AHALD-HHM. In bivariate analyses using controls for comparison, wearing dentures was the only variable significantly positively associated (odds ratio (OR) = 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.1-2.7, p-value = 0.02). Behavioral factors such as showering, letting water run before use and not being alcohol abstinent were significantly negatively associated, smoking was significantly positively associated. In a multivariable analysis, we identified good oral hygiene as a preventive factor for both denture wearers (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.13-0.83, p-value = 0.02) and non-denture wearers (OR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.10-1.04, p-value = 0.06). Analyses of comparisons with AHALD-HHM showed similar effects but lacked statistical power. We identified Legionella in 16 residential (non-)drinking water sources, one of which was a PCR-positive scratch sample of dentures. Discussion: Wearing (inadequately cleaned) dentures or poor oral hygiene might confer an increased risk for AHALD, and oral hygiene may prevent AHALD. The hypothesis that Legionella in oral biofilm or dental plaque may be the cause of cases with AHALD should be examined further. If confirmed this may open new and simple avenues for the prevention of LD.

Respiratory infections in children and adolescents in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: Before the COVID-19 pandemic, acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in children were mainly characterised by three pathogens: respiratory syncytial viruses (RSV), influenza viruses and rhinoviruses. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the measures taken in Germany (especially until the end of 2021) on the incidence of ARI in children and adolescents aged 0 to 14 years and the pathogens causing them has not yet been comprehensively analysed. Methods: The evaluation is based on data from population-based, virological and hospital-based surveillance instruments up to the end of 2022. Results: After the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020, ARI rates remained almost consistently below prepandemic levels until autumn 2021, with only rhinoviruses continuously continuing to cause ARI. Only when the Omicron variant became predominant in 2022, there were measurable COVID-19 rates at population level in children, although COVID-19 hospitalisation rates remained comparatively low. RSV and influenza waves were initially absent and then occurred 'out of season', but were more severe than usual. Conclusions: While the measures taken were effective in inhibiting the number of respiratory infections for almost 1.5 years, moderately frequent but rather mild COVID-19 cases occurred when measures were lifted. When Omicron emerged in 2022 COVID-19 became moderately frequent but led predominantly to mild illnesses. For RSV and influenza, the measures resulted in changes in their annual timing and intensity.

How valid is the 2- to 10-day incubation period for cases of Legionnaires' disease?: A reappraisal in the context of the German LeTriWa study; Berlin, 2016-2020.

The evidence for the incubation period of Legionnaires' disease is based on data from a small number of outbreaks. An incubation period of 2-10 days is commonly used for the definition and investigation of cases. In the German LeTriWa study, we collaborated with public health departments to identify evidence-based sources of exposure among cases of Legionnaires' disease within 1-14 days before symptom onset. For each individual, we assigned weights to the numbered days of exposure before symptom onset, giving the highest weight to exposure days of cases with only one possible day of exposure. We then calculated an incubation period distribution where the median was 5 days and the mode was 6 days. The cumulative distribution reached 89% by the 10th day before symptom onset. One case-patient with immunosuppression had a single day of exposure to the likely infection source only 1 day before symptom onset. Overall, our results support the 2- to 10-day incubation period used in case definition, investigation, and surveillance of cases with Legionnaires' disease.

Delta and Omicron: protective measures and SARS-CoV-2 infections in day care centres in Germany in the 4th and 5th wave of the pandemic 2021/2022.

BACKGROUND: During the five waves of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic so far, German early childhood education and care (ECEC) centres implemented various protective measures, such as wearing a face mask, fixed children-staff groups or regular ventilation. In addition, parents and ECEC staff were increasingly vaccinated throughout 2021. During the 4th wave, variant of concern (VOC) Delta-driven transmission indicators reached record values at the end of 2021. Those values were even exceeded in the 5th wave at the beginning of 2022 when Omicron dominated. We examine which factors facilitated or prevented infection with SARS-CoV-2 in ECEC centres, and if these differed between different phases within wave 4 (Delta) and 5 (Omicron). METHODS: Since August 2020, a weekly online survey among approximately 8000 ECEC managers has been conducted, monitoring both incident SARS-CoV-2 infections and protective measures taken. We included data from calendar week 26/2021 to 05/2022. We estimate the probability of any infections and the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections in children, parents and staff using random-effect-within-between (REWB) panel models for binomial and count data. RESULTS: While children, parents and staff of ECEC centres with a high proportion of children from families with low socioeconomic status (SES) have a higher risk of infections in the beginning of wave 4 (OR up to 1.99 [1.56; 2.56]), this effect diminishes for children and parents with rising incidences. Protective measures, such as wearing face masks, tend to have more extensive effects with rising incidences in wave 5 (IRR up to 0.87 [0.8; 0.93]). Further, the protective effect of vaccination against infection among staff is decreasing from wave 4 to wave 5 (OR 0.3 [0.16; 0.55] to OR 0.95, [0.84; 1.07, n.s.]). The degree of transmission from staff to child and from staff to parent is decreasing from wave 4 to wave 5, while transmission from child to staff seems to increase. CONCLUSION: While Omicron seems to affect children and parents from ECEC centres with families with all SES levels more equally than Delta, the protective effect of vaccination against infection is decreasing and the effect of protective measures like face masks becomes increasingly important. In order to prevent massive closures of ECEC centres due to infection of staff, protective measures should be strictly adhered to, especially to protect staff in centres with a high proportion of children from families with low socioeconomic status.

[Symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infections in children of day care age]. / Symptomatik einer akuten SARS-CoV-2-Infektion bei Kindern im Kita-Alter.

Background: The symptoms of SARS-CoV­2 infections in children are mostly mild; however, the symptoms are highly variable. There are only a few studies on non-hospitalized children. The clinical picture described in hospitalized children cannot be transferred to non-hospitalized children and the frequency of certain symptoms in children may thus be overestimated. Furthermore, most studies include a broad age group (up to 18 years). The symptoms of younger children have so far been described in less detail. Objective: The paper aims to describe the frequency of COVID-19 symptoms in younger children (1-6 years old). Data of the two modules COALA (Corona: Anlassbezogene Untersuchungen in Kitas) and CATS (Corona-KiTa surveillance) of the Corona-KiTa study are evaluated and the results of the two studies are compared and discussed against the background of the different methodologies. In the COALA study, the type and frequency of symptoms of children infected with SARS-CoV­2 are evaluated and compared to symptoms of children who tested negative for SARS-CoV­2. Symptom frequencies of SARS-CoV­2 infected children of the COALA study are compared with data collected from surveillance data (CATS). Material and methods: The COALA study investigated 30 SARS-CoV­2 outbreaks in day care centers where at least 1 SARS-CoV­2 case was reported between October 2020 and June 2021. Using a prospective study design, day care children who were infected with SARS-CoV­2 and their contact persons were studied over a period of 12 days (including regular SARS-CoV­2 testing, retrospective interviews and daily symptom reporting). The results from the COALA study were compared with data from COVID-19 surveillance cases (CATS) for the same age group and time period. In Germany, SARS-CoV­2 cases are reported to the local health authorities by physicians and laboratories. When reporting cases symptoms can be reported as well. Results: From the COALA study, interview and reported symptom data were available for 289 children from the participating day care centers. Of 39 children with a SARS-CoV­2 infection (wild-type, α­variant), 64% had at least 1 symptom; of the children who tested negative for SARS-CoV­2, 40% had at least 1 symptom. In both groups, rhinitis was the most common symptom (36% vs. 25%, n. s.). From the surveillance data (CATS), clinical information was available for 84,371 SARS-CoV­2 positive children; fever was most common (27%) along with rhinitis (26%). Severe symptoms such as dyspnea were rarely reported in the outbreak investigations and in the surveillance data (3% and 1%, respectively). Conclusion: Day care-aged children infected with SARS-CoV­2 usually have mild or asymptomatic courses. Their symptoms are similar to those of children who tested negative for SARS-CoV­2 from the same day care centers; thus, the observed COVID-19 symptoms are nonspecific. Combining data from the two modules is useful: findings from a very large database, as provided by the surveillance data, are complemented by findings from day care center outbreaks, where detailed prospective data on infected children can be compared with those of children who tested negative for SARS-CoV­2.

COVID-19 infections in day care centres in Germany: social and organisational determinants of infections in children and staff in the second and third wave of the pandemic.

BACKGROUND: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, German early childhood education and care (ECEC) centres organised children's attendance in different ways, they reduced opening hours, provided emergency support for a few children, or closed completely. Further, protection and hygiene measures like fixed children-staff groups, ventilation and surface disinfection were introduced in ECEC centres. To inform or modify public health measures in ECEC, we investigate the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 infections among children and staff in ECEC centres in light of social determinants (i.e. the socioeconomic status of the children) and recommended structural and hygiene measures. We focus on the question if the relevant factors differ between the 2nd (when no variant of concern (VOC) circulated) and the 3rd wave (when VOC B.1.1.7 (Alpha) predominated). METHODS: Based on panel data from a weekly online survey of ECEC centre managers (calendar week 36/2020 to 22/2021, ongoing) including approx. 8500 centres, we estimate the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections in children and staff using random-effect-within-between (REWB) panel models for count data in the 2nd and 3rd wave. RESULTS: ECEC centres with a high proportion of children with low socioeconomic status (SES) have a higher risk of infections in staff and children. Strict contact restrictions between groups like fixed group assignments for children and fixed staff assignments to groups prevent infections. Both effects tend to be stronger in the 3rd wave. CONCLUSION: ECEC centres with a large proportion of children with a low SES background and lack of using fixed child/staff cohorts experience higher COVID-19 rates. Over the long run, centres should be supported in maintaining recommended measures. Preventive measures such as the vaccination of staff should be prioritised in centres with large proportions of low SES children.

[SARS-CoV-2 incidence, transmission, and containment measures in daycare centers during the COVID-19 pandemic-findings from the Corona Daycare Study]. / Infektionsgeschehen und Eindämmungsmaßnahmen in Kitas während der COVID-19-Pandemie ­ Erkenntnisse aus der Corona-KiTa-Studie.

BACKGROUND: Daycare centers are of substantial sociopolitical and pedagogical relevance; at the same time, the close contact of children in daycare groups among each other and with employees favors the transmission of infections. In the COVID-19 pandemic, questions arose about how infection events occur in daycare centers, what role daycare children play in the pandemic, and what protective and hygienic measures are implemented in daycare centers. From 06/2020 to 12/2021, we conducted the "Corona Day Care Study," in which we address pedagogical and infection epidemiological topics in a joint approach. METHODS: In the study, data are collected from different sources. Official reporting data as well as weekly data from daycare centers in the so-called KiTa Register are continuously evaluated. In addition, SARS-CoV­2 outbreaks in daycare centers are investigated on site by repeated sample collection and interviews. RESULTS: SARS-CoV­2 infection incidence in daycare centers or in daycare-aged children was very dynamic from 03/2020 to 05/2021. In the second and third pandemic waves, the number of SARS-CoV­2 outbreaks in daycare centers rose sharply, accompanied by a substantial increase in daycare and group closures. Most recently, the proportion of affected children in outbreaks increased steadily. However, preliminary examinations of SARS-CoV­2 outbreaks (n = 28) revealed that, on average, only a fraction of daycare contact persons (6.8%) were infected by child index cases. Transmission frequencies differed markedly between the individual daycare centers. DISCUSSION: The combination of regularly collected reporting and survey data as well as outbreak investigations allows a multilayered monitoring and understanding of infection events in daycare centers; its findings could be incorporated into recommendations for public health measures.

SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.1.7 susceptibility and infectiousness of children and adults deduced from investigations of childcare centre outbreaks, Germany, 2021.

We investigated three SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.1.7 childcare centre and related household outbreaks. Despite group cohorting, cases occurred in almost all groups, i.e. also among persons without close contact. Children's secondary attack rates (SAR) were similar to adults (childcare centres: 23% vs 30%; p = 0.15; households: 32% vs 39%; p = 0.27); child- and adult-induced household outbreaks also led to similar SAR. With the advent of B.1.1.7, susceptibility and infectiousness of children and adults seem to converge. Public health measures should be revisited accordingly.

Disease severity of the first COVID-19 wave in Germany using reporting data from the national notification system.

As of December 31, 2019, initial reports circulated internationally of an unusual cluster of pneumonia of unknown cause in China. By the end of January 2020, the virus affected Germany with the first case confirmed on January 27, 2020. Intensive contact tracing and infection control measures contained the first two clusters in the country. However, the dynamic of the first wave gained momentum as of March, and by mid-June 2020 over 190,000 laboratory-confirmed cases had been reported to the Robert Koch Institute. This article examines these cases as part of a retrospective descriptive analysis focused on disease severity. Most cases (80%) were mild and two thirds of the cases were younger than 60 years (median age: 50 years). Severe cases were primarily reported among men aged 60 or over who had at least one risk factor (particularly cardiovascular disease, diabetes, neurological disorders and/or lung diseases). Cases between the ages of 40 and 59 years had the longest interval between symptom onset and hospitalisation (median: six days) and - if admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) - also the longest ICU stay (median: eleven days). This analysis provides valuable information about disease severity of COVID-19 and particularly affected groups.

Source attribution of community-acquired cases of Legionnaires' disease-results from the German LeTriWa study; Berlin, 2016-2019.

INTRODUCTION: Sources of infection of most cases of community-acquired Legionnaires' disease (CALD) are unknown. OBJECTIVE: Identification of sources of infection of CALD. SETTING: Berlin; December 2016-May 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Adult cases of CALD reported to district health authorities and consenting to the study; age and hospital matched controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Percentage of cases of CALD with attributed source of infection. METHODS: Analysis of secondary patient samples for monoclonal antibody (MAb) type (and sequence type); questionnaire-based interviews, analysis of standard household water samples for Legionella concentration followed by MAb (and sequence) typing of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 (Lp1) isolates; among cases taking of additional water samples to identify the infectious source as appropriate; recruitment of control persons for comparison of exposure history and Legionella in standard household water samples. For each case an appraisal matrix was filled in to attribute any of three source types (external (non-residence) source, residential non-drinking water (RnDW) source (not directly from drinking water outlet), residential drinking water (RDW) as source) using three evidence types (microbiological results, cluster evidence, analytical-comparative evidence (using added information from controls)). RESULTS: Inclusion of 111 study cases and 202 controls. Median age of cases was 67 years (range 25-93 years), 74 (67%) were male. Among 65 patients with urine typable for MAb type we found a MAb 3/1-positive strain in all of them. Compared to controls being a case was not associated with a higher Legionella concentration in standard household water samples, however, the presence of a MAb 3/1-positive strain was significantly associated (odds ratio (OR) = 4.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7 to 11). Thus, a source was attributed by microbiological evidence if it contained a MAb 3/1-positive strain. A source was attributed by cluster evidence if at least two cases were exposed to the same source. Statistically significant general source types were attributed by calculating the population attributable risk (analytical-comparative evidence). We identified an external source in 16 (14%) cases, and RDW as source in 28 (25%). Wearing inadequately disinfected dentures was the only RnDW source significantly associated with cases (OR = 3.2, 95% CI 1.3 to 7.8) and led to an additional 8% of cases with source attribution, for a total of 48% of cases attributed. CONCLUSION: Using the appraisal matrix we attributed almost half of all cases of CALD to an infectious source, predominantly RDW. Risk for LD seems to be conferred primarily by the type of Legionella rather than the amount. Dentures as a new infectious source needs further, in particular, integrated microbiological, molecular and epidemiological confirmation.

Surveillance of COVID-19 school outbreaks, Germany, March to August 2020.

Mitigation of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in Germany included school closures in early March 2020. After reopening in April, preventive measures were taken in schools. We analysed national surveillance system data on COVID-19 school outbreaks during different time periods. After reopening, smaller outbreaks (average: 2.2/week) occurred despite low incidence in the general population. School closures might have a detrimental effect on children and should be applied only cautiously and in combination with other measures.

Probable reinfection with Legionella pneumophila - A case report.

In Germany community-acquired Legionnaires' disease is usually caused by the species Legionella pneumophila. Recurrent cases of Legionnaires' disease are rarely reported and are due either to a second infection (reinfection) or a relapse of a previous case. We report a case of recurrent Legionnaires' disease in an 86-year-old female patient infected with Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, monoclonal antibody-subtype Knoxville, sequence type unknown. Between the two disease incidents the patient had completely recovered. Legionella pneumophila was detected with the monoclonal antibody-subtype Knoxville, sequence type 182, in the drinking water of the patient's apartment. Exposure to contaminated drinking water was interrupted after the first incident exposure through the application of point-of-use water filters. The filters were later removed due to low water pressure, and the second illness occurred thereafter. It is unclear if immunological predisposition has contributed to this case of probable reinfection of Legionnaires' disease. Clinical, microbiological and epidemiological information combined suggest this is a case of reinfection of Legionnaires' disease. In cases of recurrent Legionnaires' disease complete collection of patient and water samples is necessary to differentiate relapse from reinfection cases, to implicate the source of infection and to gain more evidence for the role of immunological predisposition.