RESUMO
BACKGROUND: A surgical site infection (SSI) is a major post-operative complication from elective colorectal surgery; however, few studies have focused on evaluating the risk factors for SSI. This study aimed to analyze the relative correlation of medical and environmental factors as well as patient-related factors that contribute to the incidence of all types of SSI. METHODS: A retrospective search for eligible patients was conducted using the patient database of the Gastrointestinal Surgery Center of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2011 to August 2017. Pre-operative demographic and surgical data were extracted and recoded according to the study protocol. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to clarify factors affecting the incidence of SSI. Propensity analysis was conducted to minimize bias in the demographic characteristics to explore the prophylactic effect of pre-operative administration of oral antibiotics. RESULTS: Univariate analysis of the baseline characteristics revealed that younger age (odds ratio [OR]: 0.378; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.218-0.657) and pre-operative oral antibiotic use (OR: 0.465; 95% CI: 0.255-0.850) were protective factors, while pre-operative anemia (OR: 4.591; 95% CI: 2.567-8.211), neoadjuvant chemotherapy history (OR: 2.398; 95% CI: 1.094-5.256), and longer surgical duration (OR: 2.393; 95% CI: 1.349-4.246; Pâ=â0.002) were identified as risk factors for SSI. Multivariate analysis indicated that age (Pâ=â0.003), surgical duration (Pâ=â0.001), and pre-operative oral antibiotic use (Pâ<â0.001) were independent factors that affect the incidence of SSI. Furthermore, a propensity-matched analysis confirmed the protective effect of oral antibiotic use, with a 1-day course of oral antibiotic producing a similar effect to a 3-day course. CONCLUSIONS: Age, surgical duration, and pre-operative oral antibiotic use were associated with the incidence of SSI. However, pre-operative oral antibiotic use was the only controllable factor. From the results of our study, pre-operative oral antibiotic use is recommended before elective colorectal surgery and a 1-day course is enough to provide the protective effect.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Pontuação de Propensão , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: It remains controversial whether patients with Stage II colorectal cancer would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy after radical resection. The aim of this study was to establish two mathematical models to identify the suitable patients for adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: The current study comprised of two steps. In the first step, 353 patients with Stage II colorectal cancer who underwent surgical procedures at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between June 2006 and December 2015 were entered and followed up for 6-120 months. Their clinical data were collected and enrolled into the database. We established two mathematical models by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis to identify the target patients; in the second step, 230 patients under the same standard between January 2012 and December 2016 were entered and followed up for 3-62 months to verify the two models' validation. RESULTS: In the first step, totally 340 surgical patients with Stage II colorectal cancer were finally enrolled in this study. Statistical analysis showed that tumor differentiation (TD) (P < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (P < 0.001), uncertain or positive margins (UPM) (P < 0.001), and fewer lymph nodes (LNs) (<12) retrieved (P < 0.001) were correlated with the overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS). We obtained two models: (1) OS risk score = 1.116 × TD + 2.202 × LVI + 3.676 × UPM + 1.438 × LN - 0.493; (2) DFS risk score = 0.789 × TD + 2.074 × LVI + 3.183 × UPM + 1.329 × LN - 0.432. According to the models and cutoff points [(0.07, 1.33) and (-0.04, 1.30), respectively], patients can be divided into three groups: low-risk, moderate-risk, and high-risk. Moreover, the high-risk group patients could benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. In the second step, totally 221 patients were finally used to verify the models' validation. The results proved that the models were accurate and feasible (P< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: According to the predictive models, patients with Stage II colorectal cancer in the high-risk group are strongly recommended for adjuvant chemotherapy, thus facilitating the individualized and precise treatment.
Assuntos
Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Modelos Teóricos , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of preservation of Denonvilliers' fascia (DF) during laparoscopic resection for mid-low rectal cancer on protection of male urogenital function. Whether preservation of DF during TME is effective for protection of urogenital function is largely elusive.Seventy-four cases of male mid-low rectal cancer were included. Radical laparoscopic proctectomy was performed, containing 38 cases of preservation of DF (P-group) and 36 cases of resection of DF (R-group) intraoperatively. Intraoperative electrical nerve stimulation (INS) on pelvic autonomic nerve was performed and intravesical pressure was measured manometrically. Urinary function was evaluated by residual urine volume (RUV), International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), and quality of life (QoL). Sexual function was evaluated using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scale and ejaculation function classification.Compared with performing INS on the surfaces of prostate and seminal vesicles in the R-group, INS on DF in the P-group exhibited higher increasing intravesical pressure (7.3â±â1.5 vs 5.9â±â2.4âcmH2O, P = 0.008). In addtion, the P-group exhibited lower RUV (34.3â±â27.2 vs 57.1â±â50.7âmL, P = 0.020), lower IPSS and QoL scores (7 days: 6.1â±â2.4 vs 9.5â±â5.9, P = 0.002 and 2.2â±â1.1 vs 2.9â±â1.1, P = 0.005; 1 month: 5.1â±â2.4 vs 6.6â±â2.2, P = 0.006 and 1.6â±â0.7 vs 2.1â±â0.6, P = 0.003, respectively), higher IIEF score (3 months: 10.7â±â2.1 vs 8.9â±â2.0, P = 0.000; 6 months: 14.8â±â2.2 vs 12.9â±â2.2, P = 0.001) and lower incidence of ejaculation dysfunction (3 months: 28.9% vs 52.8%, P = 0.037; 6 months: 18.4% vs 44.4%, P = 0.016) postoperatively.Preservation of DF during laparoscopic resection for selective male mid-low rectal cancer is effective for protection of urogenital function.
Assuntos
Colectomia/métodos , Fasciotomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Disfunções Sexuais Fisiológicas/prevenção & controle , Transtornos Urinários/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Seguimentos , Humanos , Período Intraoperatório , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Disfunções Sexuais Fisiológicas/etiologia , Disfunções Sexuais Fisiológicas/fisiopatologia , Sexualidade , Micção , Transtornos Urinários/etiologia , Transtornos Urinários/fisiopatologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Situs inversus totalis (SIT) is a rare congenital anomaly presenting with complete transposition of thoracic and abdominal viscera. Laparoscopic surgery for either rectal cancer or gallbladder diseases with SIT is rarely reported in the literature. A 39-year-old woman was admitted to hospital owing to rectal cancer. She was diagnosed with SIT by performing radiography and abdominal computed tomography scan as a routine preoperative investigation. We performed laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer successfully in spite of technical difficulties caused by abnormal anatomy. One year later, she was diagnosed with cholecysticpolyp, and we performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for her uneventfully. With this case, we believe that performance by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon, either laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer or cholecystectomy with SIT is safe and feasible.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Synchronous gastrointestinal multiple primary cancers (SGMPC) is infrequent. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted combined resection for SGMPC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 16 cases of SGMPC underwent either open or laparoscopy-assisted combined resection in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from Jan. 2005 to Jan. 2014. RESULTS: Sixteen cases contained synchronous colon cancers (n = 10), gastric and rectal cancer (n = 5), gastric and duodenal cancer (n = 1). Either laparoscopy-assisted or open procedure was performed. Compared with the open group, the laparoscopy group presented less blood loss (77.1 ± 46.3 ml vs. 145.0 ± 75.9 ml, P = 0.047) and shorter incision length (5.2 ± 0.7 cm vs. 16.4 ± 1.9 cm, P = 0.000), while no differences in operative time (228.3 ± 38.8 min vs. 188.8 ± 47.7 min, P > 0.05) and postoperative hospital stay (10.0 ± 3.4 days vs. 12.0 ± 4.8 days, P > 0.05). Two cases of postoperative complications occurred in the open group and one case of incision infection occurred in the laparoscopy one. Upon follow-up, 2 cases of open group (50.0%) and 8 cases of laparoscopy group (66.7%) were under status of disease free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy-assisted combined resection for SGMPC is feasible, safe and effective.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas/cirurgia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) syndrome (SMAS) is a rare condition caused by compression of the third portion of the duodenum by the SMA. The effect of the laparoscopic management of SMAS remains poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and effect of the laparoscopic management for SMAS. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 19 cases of SMAS who underwent surgical interventions in The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between June 2006 and October 2013, consisting of 8 cases of duodenojejunostomy (DJ) and 11 cases of laparoscopic lysis of the ligament of Treitz (LL-LOT). A telephone survey was conducted to collect the follow-up status. RESULTS: Either DJ or LL-LOT was performed smoothly. The median operative time of the laparoscopic procedure and DJ was 56 and 95 min, respectively. Median blood loss was 10 versus 35 ml. Median postoperative hospital stays in both were 8 days. Ten cases of the laparoscopic group recovered uneventfully, while 1 case still presented symptoms of abdominal distention. Upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy showed marked 'to-and-fro' peristalsis. An additional DJ was performed 35 days later to resolve her symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: LL-LOT is simple, feasible, minimally invasive and effective for SMAS with no severe duodenum 'to-and-fro' peristalsis.