Empagliflozin is associated with lower risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in routine care in East Asia: Results from the EMPRISE study.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: The EMPA-REG OUTCOME® trial demonstrated benefits of empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), on cardiovascular, renal outcomes and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease. The EMPRISE study program evaluates how these effects translate in a broad population of patients with type 2 diabetes in routine clinical care across countries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included patients ≥18 years with type 2 diabetes initiating empagliflozin or any dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) from large administrative databases in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Propensity score-matched (1:1) 'as-treated' analyses comparing the risk of cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality between empagliflozin and DPP-4i use were performed in each country. Pooled hazard ratios (pHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed using random effects meta-analysis models comparing both empagliflozin and SGLT2i with DPP-4i use, respectively. Intention-to-treat and subgroup analyses in patients with/without cardiovascular disease and in patients receiving 10 mg empagliflozin were performed. RESULTS: The study included 28,712 and 70,233 matched patient pairs for empagliflozin/DPP-4i and SGLT2i/DPP-4i analyses, respectively. The risk of composite outcomes including (i) hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) and all-cause mortality was lower with empagliflozin (pHR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.86) and SGLT2i (0.71, 0.65-0.77); (ii) combined myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality was also lower with empagliflozin (0.74, 0.61-0.88) and SGLT2i (0.69, 0.60-0.78) compared to DPP-4i. The intention-to-treat and three subgroup analyses were consistent with results of the main analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that both empagliflozin and SGLT2i compared with DPP-4i are associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in routine clinical care in East Asia.

Healthcare resource utilization in patients treated with empagliflozin in East Asia.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: We investigated the utilization of healthcare resources in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in clinical practice in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the Japanese Medical Data Vision database (December 2014-April 2018), the South Korean National Health Information Database, and the Taiwanese National Health Insurance claims database (both May 2016-December 2017). Patients with type 2 diabetes starting empagliflozin, 10 or 25 mg, or a DPP-4 inhibitor were matched 1:1 via propensity scores (PS). We compared inpatient care needs, emergency room (ER) visits, and outpatient visits between the treatment groups using Poisson regression and Cox proportional hazards models, pooled across countries by random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: We identified 28,712 pairs of PS-matched patients; the mean follow-up was 5.7-6.8 months. Empagliflozin-treated patients had a 27% lower risk of all-cause hospitalization compared with DPP-4 inhibitor-treated patients (rate ratio [RR] 0.73, 95% CI 0.67-0.79), and 23% reduced risk for first hospitalization (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.73-0.81). The risk for an ER visit was 12% lower with empagliflozin than with DPP-4 inhibitors (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.94) while the risk for outpatient visit was 4% lower (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.96-0.97). These findings were generally consistent across countries, regardless of baseline cardiovascular disease, and in the subgroup starting empagliflozin with the 10 mg dose. CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin treatment was associated with lower inpatient care needs and other healthcare resource utilization than DPP-4 inhibitors in routine clinical practice in East Asia in this study.

Sepiolite-zeolite powder doped with capric acid phase change microcapsules for temperature-humidity control.

A composite material with temperature-humidity control functions was prepared by using sepiolite-zeolite powder as humidity control matrix and capric acid phase change microcapsules as temperature control material. The micromorphology, thermal conductivity, compressive strength, hygrothermal effect were studied by environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM), thermal conductivity test, strength test and hygrothermal effect test, respectively. The results showed that the phase change temperature of capric acid phase change microcapsule is between 31 °C ~ 32 °C, the phase change enthalpy is 123.91 J/g, and it has good thermal stability. The humidity control performance is the best and the maximum humidity absorption rate is 6.28% when sepiolite-zeolite powder ratio is 9:1. The humidity control matrix@CAM (Capric acid microcapsules) can control the relative humidity of the environment at 51.74 ~ 58.54% and reduce the temperature fluctuation range by 2 °C ~ 3 °C. Capric acid phase change microcapsules are embedded in the interlaced sepiolite and zeolite powder to form a frame space body which produce capillary condensation adsorption and surface adsorption, absorb and desorb heat through phase changes, thus giving humidity control matrix@CAM a good temperature-humidity control performance.

Cardiovascular and renal effectiveness of empagliflozin in routine care in East Asia: Results from the EMPRISE East Asia study.

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of empagliflozin in clinical practice in East Asia in the Empagliflozin Comparative Effectiveness and Safety (EMPRISE) East Asia study. Materials and methods: Data were obtained from the Medical Data Vision database (Japan), National Health Insurance Service database (South Korea) and National Health Insurance database (Taiwan). Patients aged ≥ 18 years with type 2 diabetes initiating empagliflozin or a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor were 1:1 propensity score (PS) matched into sequentially built cohorts of new users naïve to both drug classes. This design reduces confounding due to switching treatments, time lag and immortal time biases. Outcomes included hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and all-cause mortality. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using Cox proportional models, controlling for > 130 baseline characteristics in each data source and pooled by random-effects meta-analysis. Results: Overall, 28 712 pairs of PS-matched patients were identified with mean follow-up of 5.7-6.8 months. Compared with DPP-4 inhibitors, the risk of HHF was reduced by 18% and all-cause mortality was reduced by 36% with empagliflozin (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.71-0.94, and HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.50-0.81, respectively). Reductions were consistent across countries, and in patients with and without baseline cardiovascular disease. ESRD was also significantly reduced with empagliflozin versus DPP-4 inhibitors (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.24-0.58). Conclusions: Empagliflozin treatment was associated with reduced risk for HHF, all-cause mortality and ESRD compared with DPP-4 inhibitors in routine clinical practice in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.

A survey of allergic rhinitis in Taiwanese asthma patients.

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) often coexists with and can significantly worsen bronchial asthma (BA). We evaluated the proportion of patients with BA and concomitant AR (BA+AR) diagnosed and treated in an average clinical practice. METHODS: A cross-sectional study methodology was used to determine the prevalence of AR in patients more than 15 years of age with a documented history of asthma who experienced wheezing during the prior 12 months. The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood standardized written questionnaire was used and therapeutic class choices were recorded. RESULTS: Among 750 surveyed asthma patients, 524 patients (69.9%) experienced AR. Of those with BA and AR, there were 44 patients (8.4%) who were not diagnosed with AR, and the treatment rate for AR was 62.1%. The most frequent severity level of BA and AR were moderate persistent (38.9%) and intermittent mild (52.5%), respectively. There were no significant differences between patients with AR and without AR. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of AR in patients with asthma was 69.9% in this study. Despite Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma guideline recommendations encouraging evaluation and treatment of AR among asthmatics, nearly 8.4% of asthmatics with AR were undiagnosed, and 37.9% of asthmatics with AR were untreated for AR.