Key Role of Choline Head Groups in Large Unilamellar Phospholipid Vesicles for the Interaction with and Rupture by Silica Nanoparticles.

For highly abundant silica nanomaterials, detrimental effects on proteins and phospholipids are postulated as critical molecular initiating events that involve hydrogen-bonding, hydrophobic, and/or hydrophilic interactions. Here, large unilamellar vesicles with various well-defined phospholipid compositions are used as biomimetic models to recapitulate membranolysis, a process known to be induced by silica nanoparticles in human cells. Differential analysis of the dominant phospholipids determined in membranes of alveolar lung epithelial cells demonstrates that the quaternary ammonium head groups of phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin play a critical and dose-dependent role in vesicle binding and rupture by amorphous colloidal silica nanoparticles. Surface modification by either protein adsorption or by covalent coupling of carboxyl groups suppresses the disintegration of these lipid vesicles, as well as membranolysis in human A549 lung epithelial cells by the silica nanoparticles. Furthermore, molecular modeling suggests a preferential affinity of silanol groups for choline head groups, which is also modulated by the pH value. Biomimetic lipid vesicles can thus be used to better understand specific phospholipid-nanoparticle interactions at the molecular level to support the rational design of safe advanced materials.

The protein corona suppresses the cytotoxic and pro-inflammatory response in lung epithelial cells and macrophages upon exposure to nanosilica.

Engineered amorphous silica nanoparticles (nanosilica) are one of the most abundant nanomaterials and are widely used in industry. Furthermore, novel nanosilica materials are promising theranostic tools for biomedicine. However, hazardous effects of nanosilica especially after inhalation into the lung have been documented. Therefore, the safe development of nanosilica materials urgently requires predictive assays to monitor toxicity. Here, we further investigate the impact of the protein corona on the biological activity of two different types of nanosilica (colloidal and pyrogenic) in lung cells. As previously described, adsorption of serum proteins to the nanosilica surface suppresses cytotoxicity in macrophages and lung epithelial cells. As the increase of pro-inflammatory mediators is a hallmark of inflammation in the lung upon nanosilica exposure, we studied the potential coupling of the cytotoxic and pro-inflammatory response in A549 human lung epithelial cells and RAW264.7 mouse macrophages. Indeed, cytotoxicity precedes the onset of pro-inflammatory gene expression and cytokine release as exemplified for IL-8 in A549 cells and TNF-alpha in RAW264.7 macrophages after exposure to 0-100 µg/mL nanosilica in medium without serum. Formation of a protein corona not only inhibited cellular toxicity, but also the pro-inflammatory response. Of note, uptake of nanosilica into cells was negligible in the absence, but enhanced in the presence of a protein corona. Hence, the prevailing explanation that the protein corona simply interferes with cellular uptake thus preventing adverse effects needs to be revisited. In conclusion, for the reliable prediction of adverse effects of nanosilica in the lung, in vitro assays should be performed in media not complemented with complete serum. However, in case of different exposure routes, e.g., injection into the blood stream as intended for biomedicine, the protein corona prevents acute toxic actions of nanosilica.