Female Sexual Dysfunction After Pelvic Fracture: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) after pelvic fracture (PFx) has garnered little attention in the urology literature. AIM: To review and summarize the current evidence regarding female PFx-related sexual function. METHODS: We performed a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, including PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. We included only English-language manuscripts and abstracts with sufficient data for inclusion. We used the search terms "female sexual dysfunction AND pelvic fracture," "sexual dysfunction AND pelvic fracture," and "female pelvic fracture AND sexual dysfunction." A total of 177 articles were identified; 41 abstracts were reviewed; of which, 19 manuscripts were reviewed. Fifteen met inclusion criteria for analysis. OUTCOMES: The main outcome measures of this study are rates and types of female sexual dysfunction after pelvic fracture. RESULTS: FSD is prevalent after PFx, with reported rates between 25% and 62%. Three studies used the validated Female Sexual Function Index. The other 12 used non-validated questionnaires or adapted quality-of-life questionnaires with specific questions regarding FSD. The most common complaints include difficulty with intercourse, dyspareunia, orgasmic dysfunction, genitourinary pain, decreased interest in intercourse, decreased satisfaction with intercourse, and pelvic floor dysfunction. Only 1 study addressed resolution of dysfunction (30 of 98 patients [30.4%]). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: FSD is prevalent and an under-recognized sequela of pelvic fracture. This requires future prospective study to better characterize sexual dysfunction and identify effective treatments in trauma survivors. STRENGTH AND LIMITATIONS: To Increase awareness of FSD after pelvic trauma and the impact on the quality of life in trauma survivors. The current literature is limited by a lack of standardized assessment of FSD, limited follow-up, and minimal discussion of treatment options, in addition to the inherent bias of retrospective studies. CONCLUSIONS: FSD after traumatic PFx is not uncommon, occurs mostly in young women, and can be morbid. FSD after PFx is underreported in the urology literature. Thus, all female PFx patients should be screened for FSD by validated questionnaires. The published literature offers little knowledge as to the epidemiology, evaluation, definition, and potential treatments of FSD after PFx. Prospective studies are needed to better understand female sexual function in trauma survivors and the potential methods for prevention and rehabilitation, all within the context of a multidisciplinary approach. Walton AB, Leinwand GZ, Raheem O, et al. Female Sexual Dysfunction After Pelvic Fracture: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. J Sex Med 2021;18:467-473.

Reviewing the Demographic, Prognostic, and Treatment Factors of Primary Adenocarcinoma of the Bladder: A SEER Population-based Study.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to characterize the demographic, prognostic, and treatment factors for patients with primary adenocarcinoma of the bladder by analyzing the impact of histologic subtype in a large sample size and interpreting newly released Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) chemotherapy data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SEER 18 Registry was utilized to identify cases of primary adenocarcinoma diagnosed from 1973 to 2015. Demographic data, tumor and disease characteristics, treatment information, and survival outcome data were collected. Overall survival and disease-specific survival were determined using Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were then completed using SAS JMP. RESULTS: A total of 2305 cases of primary adenocarcinoma of the bladder were identified. Overall survival at 2-, 5- and 10-year intervals was 54.8%, 36.1%, and 25.4%, respectively. Disease-specific survival at 2-, 5- and 10-year intervals was 62.0%, 47.1%, and 40.1%, respectively. Patients were treated with surgery (86.4%), chemotherapy (21.9%), and radiation (15.0%) (P < .0001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed independent prognostic value for gender, stage, grade, primary tumor location, and histologic subtype. The urachus/dome location conferred survival advantage over non-urachal locations on univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis. The papillary adenocarcinoma subtype conferred the best survival outcome, whereas signet cell carcinoma (hazard ratio, 2.069; P < .0001) and unclassified adenocarcinoma (not otherwise specified) (hazard ratio, 1.524; P < .0001) conferred the worst prognoses. CONCLUSION: This study utilized a population-based analysis to showcase the utility of various prognostic features in primary bladder adenocarcinoma cases. In characterizing treatments, we find the prevailing treatment remains surgical intervention, whereas a sizable minority receives chemotherapy and/or radiation, often in combination with surgery.

Synchronous Urothelial Bladder and Renal Malignancies. Case Report and Review of Urologic Cancers in Patients With Familial Rb Mutations.

We present a urologic case report associated with retinoblastoma (RB1) mutation. A 65-year-old man, who has a history of bilateral retinoblastoma treated with primary radiation therapy at approximately 1 year of age. He presented with a 3-month history of gross hematuria and, on initial workup, was found to have synchronous renal and urothelial malignancies. The patient underwent complete transurethral resection of high grade Ta urothelial cancer and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for a pT3a leiomyosarcoma. He remains responsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, and shows no recurrence of his renal malignancy. Through targeted sequencing, Rb mutations can predispose patients to several urologic malignancies.

Rethinking active surveillance for prostate cancer in African American men.

Active surveillance (AS) is a treatment modality for prostate cancer that aims to simultaneously avoid overtreatment and allow for the timely intervention of localized disease. AS has become the de facto standard of care for most men with low-risk prostate cancer. However, few African American (AA) men were included in the prospective observational cohorts that resulted in a paradigm shift in treatment recommendations from active intervention toward AS. It has been established that AA men have an increased prostate cancer incidence, higher baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values, more aggressive prostate cancer features, greater frequency of biochemical recurrence after treatment, and higher overall cancer-specific mortality compared to their Caucasian counterparts. As such, this has given many physicians pause before initiating AS for AA patients. In the following manuscript, we will review the available literature regarding AS, with a particular focus on AA men. The preponderance of evidence demonstrates that AS is as viable a management method for AA with low-risk prostate cancer as it is with other racial groups.