Complications and Patient-Centered Outcomes of an Implant- Supported Single Crown After Immediate and Delayed Loading: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess the complications, satisfaction, and quality of life of patients rehabilitated with delayed and immediate loading of single crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases up to February 2023. Only prospective studies and randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials comparing immediate and delayed loading were included. For the quantitative analysis, dichotomous and consistent variables were evaluated with a 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: A total of 20 studies were evaluated. No statistically significant difference was observed between protocols: satisfaction (I2: 0%; P = .42), quality of life (I2: 0 %; P = .05), biologic complications (I2: 9%; P = .17), mechanical complications (I2: 58%; P = .84), and survival rate (I2: 0%; P = .38). The subgroup analysis showed significant differences only for marginal bone loss (MBL) when immediate implants were placed in the mandible (I2: 15%; P = .01) and posterior zone (I2: 0%; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Complications and patient-centered outcomes for immediate single-implant crowns were comparable to delayed loading. Scientific evidence showed no significant difference between loading protocols for survival rates. Note that several factors could interfere with the complication events, implant failures, and MBL. The subgroup analysis showed that only immediate implants placed in the posterior mandible had a higher and statistically significant mean MBL.

Complete denture rehabilitation for a patient with Parkinson's disease using clinical strategies: A case report.

OBJECTIVE: To present clinical strategies for prosthetic rehabilitation with complete dentures (CDs) of a Parkinson's disease patient. CASE REPORT: An 82-year-old patient sought the Department of Dentistry at UFRN, reporting retention dissatisfaction and hamper to the mandibular CD adaptation. Patient-reported a dry mouth sensation, and exhibited disordered mandibular movements, tremors, and resorbed mandibular ridge. Aiming retention and stability, double molding with zinc enolic oxide impression paste, neutral zone technique, and non-anatomic teeth were proposed as clinical strategies. At delivery, identification and relief in the supercompression areas were performed to facilitate the acceptance and use of the new dentures. CONCLUSION: The strategies promoted patient satisfaction regarding retention, stability, and comfort. This treatment may be considered for the rehabilitation of Parkinson's disease patients, favoring the adaptation process.