Feasibility criteria for total thyroidectomy in outpatient surgery.

INTRODUCTION: France is pursuing a policy of cutting healthcare costs, and outpatient surgery is one of the objectives of this policy. Thyroid surgery could be suitable for outpatient management, provided there is an appropriate patient selection process. The aim of this study was to assess the risk factors for postoperative complications in total thyroidectomy (TT). DESIGN: A single-center observational study was carried out from January 2010 to December 2015. METHOD: Correlations between, on the one hand, age, gender, obesity, history of surgery, antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation treatment, the surgeon's experience, surgery time, repeated lymph node dissection, and surgical indication (cancer, lymphocytic thyroiditis, Graves' disease or multinodular goiter) and, on the other hand, onset of postoperative complications (postoperative hypocalcemia, uni- or bi-lateral lesions of the recurrent laryngeal nerves, and premature compressive hematoma) were assessed. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-four consecutive TTs were included. 85 patients showed postoperative hypocalcemia (20.04%), 18 recurrent laryngeal nerve lesion (4.25%), and 4 compressive cervical hematoma (0.94%). Overall morbidity was 24.06%. Risk factors identified for postoperative hypocalcemia comprised: female gender [OR=3.2584; 95%CI (1.5500-7.7515); P=0.0036], surgery time [OR=1.0095; 95%CI (1.0020-1.0172); P=0.0129], and surgical indication for benign adenoma [OR=5.0642; 95%CI (1.7768-14.5904); P=0.0022]. None of the study variables emerged as risk factors for recurrent laryngeal nerve lesion. Repeated dissection increased the risk of re-do surgery for compressive hematoma [OR=25.1373; 95%CI (0.8468-32.2042); P=0.0347]. CONCLUSION: Surgery time, female gender, repeated dissection and total thyroidectomy for benign adenoma are risk factors that should be considered in decision-making for performing TT on an outpatient basis.

Perioperative Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation to Reduce Postoperative Ileus After Colorectal Resection: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative ileus involves an inflammatory pathway characterized by an increase of inflammation mediators in the colon wall; this could probably be prevented by sacral nerve neuromodulation. The posterior tibial nerve can be stimulated electrically to mimic neuromodulation. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to assess the efficacy of transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in reducing the delay in GI motility recovery, to assess the safety of posterior tibial nerve stimulation in a perioperative setting, and to assess the efficacy of posterior tibial nerve stimulation in reducing the occurrence of postoperative ileus. DESIGN: This was a preliminary randomized controlled study. SETTINGS: This study was conducted in 1 academic hospital in France. PATIENTS: Forty patients undergoing an elective colectomy were included and randomly assigned into 2 groups, posterior tibial nerve stimulation or placebo, according to the side of colectomy and the surgical access size. INTERVENTION: Perioperative posterior tibial nerve stimulation or placebo was performed 3 times per day according to the randomly assigned group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Delay in GI motility recovery (passage of stool and tolerance of solid food) was measured. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients included, 34 were included in the final analysis, in which 2 patients in the placebo group were allocated the incorrect device. The 6 other patients were secondarily excluded because of protocol deviation. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean delay in GI motility recovery was 3.6 and 3.11 days (in the placebo and tibial nerve stimulation groups; p = 0.60). Occurrence of postoperative ileus was not significantly higher in the placebo group (35.3% vs 17.6%; p = 0.42). In the per-protocol analysis, we observed the same trends except for the occurrence of postoperative ileus, which was significantly higher in the placebo group (p = 0.045). Tolerance to posterior tibial nerve stimulation was good, and all of the patients completed the protocol. LIMITATIONS: The amplitude of stimulation is set according to patient sensation, so some patients could have been aware of their group. In addition there were some inherent limitations because of the preliminary nature of the study and several deviations from the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior tibial nerve stimulation was safe in a perioperative setting and had a potential effect on GI motility recovery. The results of this study will be useful for sample size calculations in a larger prospective randomized trial. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A708.