Examining the reliability and validity of the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms within the Management of Schizophrenia in Clinical Practice (MOSAIC) multisite national study.

The current study sought to expand on prior reports of the validity and reliability of the CAINS (CAINS) by examining its performance across diverse non-academic clinical settings as employed by raters not affiliated with the scale's developers and across a longer test-retest follow-up period. The properties of the CAINS were examined within the Management of Schizophrenia in Clinical Practice (MOSAIC) schizophrenia registry. A total of 501 participants with a schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis who were receiving usual care were recruited across 15 national Patient Assessment Centers and evaluated with the CAINS, other negative symptom measures, and assessments of functioning, quality of life and cognition. Temporal stability of negative symptoms was assessed across a 3-month follow-up. Results replicated the two-factor structure of the CAINS reflecting Motivation and Pleasure and expression symptoms. The CAINS scales exhibited high internal consistency and temporal stability. Convergent validity was supported by significant correlations between the CAINS subscales with other negative symptom measures. Additionally, the CAINS was significantly correlated with functioning and quality of life. Discriminant validity was demonstrated by small to moderate associations between the CAINS and positive symptoms, depression, and cognition (and these associations were comparable to those found with other negative symptom scales). Findings suggest that the CAINS is a reliable and valid tool for measuring negative symptoms in schizophrenia across diverse clinical samples and settings.

The Management of Schizophrenia in Clinical Practice (MOSAIC) Registry: a focus on patients, caregivers, illness severity, functional status, disease burden and healthcare utilization.

BACKGROUND: The Management of Schizophrenia in Clinical Practice (MOSAIC), a disease-based registry of schizophrenia, was initiated in December 2012 to address important gaps in our understanding of the impact and burden of schizophrenia and to provide insight into the current status of schizophrenia care in the US. Recruitment began in December 2012 with ongoing assessment continuing through May 2014. METHODS: Participants were recruited from a network of 15 centralized Patient Assessment Centers supporting proximal care sites. Broad entry criteria included patients diagnosed with schizophrenia, schizophreniform or schizoaffective disorder, presenting within the normal course of care, in usual treatment settings, aged ≥18years and able to read and speak English. RESULTS: By May 2014, 550 participants (65.8% male, 59.8% White, 64.4% single, mean age 42.9years), were enrolled. The majority had a diagnosis of schizophrenia (62.0%). Mean illness duration at entry was 15.0years. Common comorbidities at entry were high lipid levels (26.9%), hypertension (23.1%) and type II diabetes (13%). Participants were categorized by baseline overall Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia Severity Score as minimally (9.1%), mildly (25.3%), moderately (39.9%), markedly (22.3%) and severely (3.4%) ill. Most commonly used second generation antipsychotics at entry were risperidone (17.8%), clozapine (16.5%), olanzapine (14.0%), aripiprazole (13.6%) and quetiapine (5.6%). CONCLUSIONS: No large-scale patient registry has been conducted in the US to longitudinally follow patients with schizophrenia and describe symptom attributes, support network, care access and disease burden. These data provide important epidemiological, clinical and outcome insights into the burden of schizophrenia in the US.

Association of host pharmacodynamic effects with virologic response to pegylated interferon alfa-2a/ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C.

UNLABELLED: Patients receiving therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection frequently experience cytopenias and weight loss. We retrospectively assessed the pharmacodynamic effects of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alfa-2a and ribavirin by evaluating the relationship between changes in hematologic parameters, body weight, and virologic response. Patients with HCV genotypes 1, 4, 5, or 6 receiving 24 or 48 weeks of PEG-IFN alfa-2a and ribavirin therapy were pooled from four phase 3/4 trials. Maximum decreases in hemoglobin level, neutrophil count, platelet count, and weight during therapy were assessed according to virologic response category (sustained virologic response [SVR], relapse, breakthrough, and nonresponder) and race/ethnicity. Of 1,778 patients analyzed, more than half were male, non-Hispanic Caucasian, and infected with HCV genotype 1; had a baseline HCV RNA >800,000; and had alanine aminotransferase levels ≤3 × the upper limit of normal. Virologic responders (SVR, relapse, and breakthrough) experienced greater maximum decreases from baseline in hemoglobin level, neutrophil count, platelet count, and weight compared with nonresponders; however, no clear trend was observed between SVR, relapse, and breakthrough. After adjusting for drug exposure and treatment duration, only decreases in neutrophil count remained associated with virologic response. Significantly greater declines in neutrophil (P < 0.0001) and platelet (P < 0.005) count were observed at weeks 4, 12, and 24 of therapy in virologic responders compared with nonresponders. This difference between responders and nonresponders was also observed among racial/ethnic groups, although statistical significance was not consistent across all groups. CONCLUSION: This post hoc analysis of HCV patients treated with PEG-IFN alfa-2a and ribavirin shows that maximum decreases from baseline in hematologic parameters and weight loss were associated with virologic response. However, after adjusting for drug exposure and accounting for duration of therapy, only neutropenia was independently associated with virologic response.

Histologic outcomes in hepatitis C-infected patients with varying degrees of virologic response to interferon-based treatments.

UNLABELLED: Patients with chronic hepatitis C with partial virologic response or nonresponse to interferon-based therapies can experience treatment-related improvements in liver histology. This retrospective analysis assessed the histologic response to treatment in patients with varying degrees of virologic response (sustained virologic response [SVR], breakthrough, relapse, or nonresponse), time to hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA undetectability, and duration of viral suppression. Patients (HCV genotypes 1-6) with baseline and follow-up liver biopsies from eight phase 2 to phase 4 interferon-based trials were analyzed. Blinded biopsies were evaluated by a single pathologist. Improvements or worsening of METAVIR necroinflammatory activity and fibrosis were defined as increase or decrease of ≥1 grading category from baseline to 24 weeks after end of treatment. A majority of the 1571 patients with paired biopsy data were white, male, with HCV genotype 1/4, baseline HCV RNA levels >800,000 IU/mL, and baseline alanine aminotransferase levels ≤3 × upper limit of the normal range; mean baseline activity and fibrosis scores were 1.8 and 1.7, respectively. Overall, 80% of patients received peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy or peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin combination therapy. Mean treatment duration was 46 weeks. There was a positive correlation between the degree of virologic response and improvements in METAVIR activity and fibrosis, and an inverse correlation with worsening activity and fibrosis (all comparisons, P < 0.0001). Patients with SVR had the greatest histologic benefit. As a combined group, relapsers and patients with breakthrough had significantly greater benefits than nonresponders (activity, P = 0.0001; fibrosis, P = 0.003). Consistent with these results, a better histologic response was correlated with a shorter time to undetectable HCV RNA and a longer duration of viral suppression (all comparisons, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In patients with chronic hepatitis C who were treated with interferon-based therapies, histologic benefits may be observed even in the absence of an SVR.

Peginterferon α-2a plus ribavirin in Latino and Non-Latino Whites with HCV genotype 1: Histologic outcomes and tolerability from the LATINO Study.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the histologic response, safety, and tolerability in Latino and non-Latino patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 treated with peginterferon α-2a plus ribavirin (LATINO study). METHODS: LATINO was a prospective, open-label, multicenter study that enrolled 269 Latinos and 300 non-Latinos receiving peginterferon α-2a 180 µg/week and ribavirin 1,000/1,200 mg/day for 48 weeks. Liver biopsies were obtained within 18 months of baseline and at week 72. Improved or worsened liver fibrosis and necroinflammatory activity were assessed by the Ishak-modified histologic activity index scoring system. Efficacy and safety parameters were monitored during treatment and the 24-week follow-up period. RESULTS: The primary study results published elsewhere showed a higher sustained virologic response (SVR) rate among non-Latinos than Latinos (49% vs. 34%; P<0.001). Paired biopsy data were available for 157 Latinos and 201 non-Latinos. At baseline, more Latinos vs. non-Latinos had alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >3 × the upper limit of normal (20% vs. 18%) and cirrhosis (13% vs. 10%). Both groups experienced improvement in Ishak activity at week 72, although the improvement rates were higher in non-Latinos than Latinos (59% vs. 47%; P=0.03). For both groups, more patients with SVR compared with non-responders had improved Ishak fibrosis scores. In both groups, baseline Ishak activity score (P<0.0001 for both) was predictive of Ishak activity response. Additional predictors in Latinos were age (P=0.0023), body mass index (BMI) (P=0.068), baseline ALT quotient (P=0.031), and baseline Ishak fibrosis scores (P=0.021). There were no significant differences in steatosis changes between the two groups. Adverse events (AEs) and withdrawals due to AEs were more frequent in non-Latinos. CONCLUSIONS: Significant proportions of patients in both groups had histologic response to peginterferon α-2a plus ribavirin. However, histologic response was higher in non-Latinos than in Latinos regardless of virologic response. This study highlights the need for additional strategies to improve virologic response in Latinos.

Pegylated interferon alpha-2a with or without ribavirin in HCV/HIV coinfection: partially blinded, randomized multicenter trial.

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of peginterferon alpha-2a (pegIFNalpha-2a), with or without ribavirin, in 154 HCV/HIV coinfected patients. All received pegIFNalpha-2a (180 microg/week) for 12 weeks, with those achieving an early virologic response (EVR) continued on monotherapy through week 48. Patients without an EVR were randomized at week 14 to also receive ribavirin (800 mg/day) or placebo through week 48. Patients with detectable HCV RNA at week 24 were discontinued. An EVR occurred in 59 of 154 patients on monotherapy, and a sustained virologic response (SVR) occurred in 19 of 55 of those achieving an EVR and continuing monotherapy through week 48. One week 12 nonresponder receiving pegIFNalpha-2a plus ribavirin, and none receiving pegIFNalpha-2a plus placebo, achieved a SVR. Discontinuations for adverse events occurred in 10 of 154 patients before, and 16 of 131 after, week 14. HIV RNA and CD4 counts did not change significantly during treatment. PegIFNalpha-2a was therefore at least as effective as standard interferon and ribavirin combination therapy and was well tolerated, without a negative impact on HIV parameters.

Peginterferon alpha-2a combination therapies in chronic hepatitis C patients who relapsed after or had a viral breakthrough on therapy with standard interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin: a pilot study of efficacy and safety.

There are no established therapeutic regimens for hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients who relapse following treatment with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin or those who break through while on interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin. We therefore evaluated various combination therapies in HCV patients who relapsed or experienced a viral breakthrough. Patients (n = 124) were randomized to 48 weeks of treatment with once-weekly subcutaneous injections of 180 microg pegylated (peg-) interferon alpha-2a plus oral ribavirin (800-1000 mg/day), mycophenolate mofetil (2 g/day), amantadine (200 mg/day), or ribavirin and amantadine and followed for an additional 24 weeks. The sustained virologic response was higher in patients administered peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin (38%) or ribavirin and amantadine (45%) than in those administered peginterferon alpha-2a plus mycophenolate mofetil (17%) or amantadine (10%). As in previous studies, patients with genotype non-1 and those with lower viral loads had better responses than those with genotype 1 and high viral loads, though the differences did not reach significance. The four treatment regimens had similar safety profiles, except that patients receiving ribavirin had greater maximal hemoglobin decreases. These findings suggest that the combination of peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin or with ribavirin and amantadine is effective in some HCV patients who relapse after treatment with interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin.