Choosing a career in oncology: results of a nationwide cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Little information is currently available concerning young medical students desire to pursue a career in oncology, or their career expectations. METHODS: This project is a cross-sectional epidemiological study. A voluntary and anonymous questionnaire was distributed to all young oncologists studying in France between the 2nd of October 2013 and the 23rd of February 2014. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 75.6%. A total of 505 young oncologists completed the questionnaire. The main determining factors in the decision to practice oncology were the cross-sectional nature of the field (70.8%), the depth and variety of human relations (56.3%) and the multi-disciplinary field of work (50.2%). Most residents would like to complete a rotation outside of their assigned region (59.2%) or abroad (70.2%) in order to acquire additional expertise (67.7%). In addition, most interns would like to undertake a fellowship involving care, teaching and research in order to hone their skills (85.7%) and forge a career in public hospitals (46.4%). Career prospects mainly involve salaried positions in public hospitals. Many young oncologists are concerned about their professional future, due to the shortage of openings (40.8%), the workload (52.8%) and the lack of work-life balance (33.4%). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation provides a comprehensive profile of the reasons young oncologists chose to pursue a career in oncology, and their career prospects.

Implementation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancers in routine practice.

PURPOSE: To report on patterns of relapse following implementation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and subsequent changes in practice in a tertiary care centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2008 and 2011, 188 consecutive patients (mean age 59 years old) received intensity-modulated radiotherapies with curative intent for squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity (17.5%), oropharynx (43%), hypopharynx (21%), larynx (14%), sinonasal cavities (6%), nasopharynx (1.5%) at the university hospital of Besançon. There were stage I and II 9%, III 24.5%, IV 66.5%. One hundred and thirty-eight underwent exclusive intensity-modulated radiotherapy, 50 underwent postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy, 174 had concurrent chemotherapy, 57 had induction chemotherapy. Dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy with static fields was performed for all patients using sequential irradiation in 174 patients and simultaneous integrated boost irradiation in 14 patients. RESULTS: With a median follow-up was 27.5 months, there was 79% of locoregional failures occurred in the 95% isodose. Two-year overall survival, disease-free, local failure-free and locoregional failure-free survival rates were73%, 60%, 79% and 72%, respectively. Prognostic factors for disease-free survival were stage (IV vs. I-III) with a relative risk of 1.7 [1.1-2.8] (P=0.02) and T stage with 1.6 [1.04-2.5] (P=0.03). CONCLUSION: The current series showed similar patterns of failure as in other tertiary care centres. We did not identify intensity-modulated radiotherapy specific relapse risks.

[Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: experience from one centre]. / Chimioradiothérapie préopératoire du cancer du rectum : expérience d'un centre.

PURPOSE: In recent decades, the management of rectal cancer has been significantly improved by optimizing the surgical treatment with the total mesorectal excision and the development of neoadjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. In this study, we investigated the impact of changes in practice over a period of 15 years in an expert centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A monocentric study was conducted retrospectively on cT3-resectable T4 patients who received chemoradiotherapy for a locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma between 1993 and 2008. We studied sphincter preservation, pathological complete response (ypT0), survival, and toxicities by different concomitant chemotherapy and treatment period. RESULTS: Among the 179 patients who had a chemoradiotherapy, 56.4% were received concomitant 5-fluoro-uracil-leucovorin, 28.5% with concomitant capecitabine, and 15.1% with concomitant oxaliplatin and capecitabine. The average dose of radiotherapy was 45 Gy (25×1.8 Gy). Five-year disease-free survival was 74.3% and overall survival 68.8%. The rate of local recurrence and distant metastases were 6.1 and 23.6%. In multivariate analysis, concomitant chemotherapy oxaliplatin and capecitabine improved the pathological complete response rate (ypT0; capecitabine: 6%, 5-fluoro-uracil-leucovorin: 10.3%, capecitabine-oxaliplatin: 22.2%), but not significantly (P=0.12) and with more toxicities, and treatment interruptions. Sphincter preservation rate was not improved significantly during the study period (1993-2004 vs. 2005-2008), but disease-free survival improved from 72.2% up to 87.5% (P=0.03). CONCLUSION: Our results are consistent with those published in the literature. Concomitant chemotherapy with 5-fluoro-uracil or capecitabine remains the standard scheme. Upfront chemotherapy, before chemoradiotherapy, should be investigated with regard to the predominance of metastasis.

[Neoadjuvant before surgery treatments: state of the art in prostate cancer]. / Traitements néoadjuvants préopératoires : mise au point dans le cancer de la prostate.

GOAL: To study the impact of systemic treatment in neoadjuvant strategy before surgery in prostate cancer. MATERIALS: Literature reviews with data analysis from PubMed search using the keywords "neoadjuvant", "chemotherapy", "hormonal therapy", "prostate surgery", "radical prostatectomy", but also reports from ASCO and ESMO conferences. The articles on neoadjuvant treatment before radiotherapy were excluded. RESULTS: First studies with former therapy are more than 15-years-old and with questionable methodology: lack of power to have a clear idea of the impact on survival criteria such as overall survival or relapse-free survival. However, the impact of neoadjuvant hormone therapy on the classic risk factors for relapse (positive margins, intraprostatic disease, positive lymph nodes) was demonstrated by these studies and a Cochrane meta-analysis. The association with hormone therapy seems mandatory in comparison to treatment based solely on chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy. Promising data on the use of new drugs and their combinations arise: abiraterone acetate combined with LHRH analogue showed a fast PSA decrease and higher rates of pathologic complete response. Other results are promising with hormonal blockages at various key points. CONCLUSION: Studies with 2nd generation anti-androgene agents or enzyme inhibitors seem to show very promising results. To provide answers about the effectiveness of current neoadjuvant strategy in terms of survival, other studies are needed: randomized phase III or phase II exploring predictive biomarkers. The design of such trials requires a multidisciplinary approach with urologists, oncologists, radiologists and methodologists.

[Glassy cell carcinoma: a rare cervical neoplasm. Case report of two patients and review of the literature]. / Glassy cell carcinoma : un cancer rare du col de l'utérus. À propos de deux cas et revue de la littérature.

The main histological types of cervix cancer are squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. The glassy cell carcinoma is a rare form found in less than 2% of cases and it is an entity, aggressive and unknown, of worse prognosis, whose current treatment is not distinguished from other histological types. We report the cases of two patients with glassy cell carcinoma of the cervix with a review of the literature.

[Evaluation of a predictive score for malnutrition in patients treated by irradiation for head and neck cancer: a retrospective study in 127 patients]. / Évaluation d'un score prédictif de dénutrition chez les patients pris en charge par irradiation pour un cancer des voies aérodigestives supérieures : étude rétrospective chez 127 patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to establish a pre-therapeutic score that could predict which patients would be at high risk of enteral tube feeding during (chemo)-radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A monocentric study was conducted retrospectively on patients receiving a radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy for a head and neck cancer. A logistic model was performed in order to assess clinical or therapeutic risk factors for required artificial nutrition during treatment. Significant parameters, issued from multivariate analysis, were summed and weighted in a score aiming at estimating a malnutrition risk during radiotherapy. RESULTS: Among the 127 evaluated patients, 59 patients required artificial nutrition during radiotherapy. In multivariate analysis, predictive factors for malnutrition were weight loss superior to 5% in the 3 months before radiotherapy, advanced tumor stage (III-IV vs. I-II), and pain requiring strong analgesics (step II-III vs. I). Concurrent chemotherapy was identified as a significant risk factor also, but it was strongly correlated with the tumor stage. The score, estimated from these previous factors, allowed a prediction of a risk of enteral feeding with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 85%. CONCLUSION: A predictive score of enteral nutrition before radiotherapy of head and neck cancer should be a useful clinical tool to target the patients who would need a prophylactic gastrostomy. Our study evidenced some risk factors of malnutrition requiring artificial feeding. However, we need a prospective study to confirm the validity of this score.

Delegation of medical tasks in French radiation oncology departments: current situation and impact on residents' training.

OBJECTIVES: A national survey was conducted among the radiation oncology residents about their clinical activities and responsibilities. The aim was to evaluate the clinical workload and to assess how medical tasks are delegated and supervised. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A first questionnaire was administered to radiation oncology residents during a national course. A second questionnaire was mailed to 59 heads of departments. RESULTS: The response rate was 62% for radiation oncology residents (99 questionnaires) and 51% for heads of department (30). Eighteen heads of department (64%) declared having written specifications describing the residents' clinical tasks and roles, while only 31 radiation oncology residents (34%) knew about such a document (P=0.009). A majority of residents were satisfied with the amount of medical tasks that were delegated to them. Older residents complained about insufficient exposure to new patient's consultation, treatment planning and portal images validation. The variations observed between departments may induce heterogeneous trainings and should be addressed specifically. CONCLUSION: National specifications are necessary to reduce heterogeneities in training, and to insure that the residents' training covers all the professional skills required to practice radiation oncology. A frame endorsed by academic and professional societies would also clarify the responsibilities of both residents and seniors.