Dicarboxylic acylcarnitine biomarkers in peroxisome biogenesis disorders.

The peroxisome is an essential eukaryotic organelle with diverse metabolic functions. Inherited peroxisomal disorders are associated with a wide spectrum of clinical outcomes and are broadly divided into two classes, those impacting peroxisome biogenesis (PBD) and those impacting specific peroxisomal factors. Prior studies have indicated a role for acylcarnitine testing in the diagnosis of some peroxisomal diseases through the detection of long chain dicarboxylic acylcarnitine abnormalities (C16-DC and C18-DC). However, there remains limited independent corroboration of these initial findings and acylcarnitine testing for peroxisomal diseases has not been widely adopted in clinical laboratories. To explore the utility of acylcarnitine testing in the diagnosis of peroxisomal disorders we applied a LC-MS/MS acylcarnitine method to study a heterogenous clinical sample set (n = 598) that included residual plasma specimens from nineteen patients with PBD caused by PEX1 or PEX6 deficiency, ranging in severity from lethal neonatal onset to mild late onset forms. Multiple dicarboxylic acylcarnitines were significantly elevated in PBD patients including medium to long chain (C8-DC to C18-DC) species as well as previously undescribed elevations of malonylcarnitine (C3-DC) and very long chain dicarboxylic acylcarnitines (C20-DC and C22-DC). The best performing plasma acylcarnitine biomarkers, C20-DC and C22-DC, were detected at elevated levels in 100% and 68% of PBD patients but were rarely elevated in patients that did not have a PBD. We extended our analysis to residual newborn screening blood spot cards and were able to detect dicarboxylic acylcarnitine abnormalities in a newborn with a PBD caused by PEX6 deficiency. Similar to prior studies, we failed to detect substantial dicarboxylic acylcarnitine abnormalities in blood spot cards from patients with x-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (x-ald) indicating that these biomarkers may have utility in quickly narrowing the differential diagnosis in patients with a positive newborn screen for x-ald. Overall, our study identifies widespread dicarboxylic acylcarnitine abnormalities in patients with PBD and highlights key acylcarnitine biomarkers for the detection of this class of inherited metabolic disease.

Immunoreactive Trypsinogen in Infants Born to Women with Cystic Fibrosis Taking Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor.

Most people with cystic fibrosis (CF) are diagnosed following abnormal newborn screening (NBS), which begins with measurement of immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) values. A case report found low concentrations of IRT in an infant with CF exposed to the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator, elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI), in utero. However, IRT values in infants born to mothers taking ETI have not been systematically assessed. We hypothesized that ETI-exposed infants have lower IRT values than newborns with CF, CFTR-related metabolic syndrome/CF screen positive, inconclusive diagnosis (CRMS/CFSPID), or CF carriers. IRT values were collected from infants born in Indiana between 1 January 2020, and 2 June 2022, with ≥1 CFTR mutation. IRT values were compared to infants born to mothers with CF taking ETI followed at our institution. Compared to infants identified with CF (n = 51), CRMS/CFSPID (n = 21), and CF carriers (n = 489), ETI-exposed infants (n = 19) had lower IRT values (p < 0.001). Infants with normal NBS results for CF had similar median (interquartile range) IRT values, 22.5 (16.8, 30.6) ng/mL, as ETI-exposed infants, 18.9 (15.2, 26.5). IRT values from ETI-exposed infants were lower than for infants with abnormal NBS for CF. We recommend that NBS programs consider performing CFTR variant analysis for all ETI-exposed infants.

Harmonization of Newborn Screening Results for Pompe Disease and Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I.

In newborn screening, false-negative results can be disastrous, leading to disability and death, while false-positive results contribute to parental anxiety and unnecessary follow-ups. Cutoffs are set conservatively to prevent missed cases for Pompe and MPS I, resulting in increased falsepositive results and lower positive predictive values. Harmonization has been proposed as a way to minimize false-negative and false-positive results and correct for method differences, so we harmonized enzyme activities for Pompe and MPS I across laboratories and testing methods (Tandem Mass Spectrometry (MS/MS) or Digital Microfluidics (DMF)). Participating states analyzed proofof- concept calibrators, blanks, and contrived specimens and reported enzyme activities, cutoffs, and other testing parameters to Tennessee. Regression and multiples of the median were used to harmonize the data. We observed varied cutoffs and results. Six of seven MS/MS labs reported enzyme activities for one specimen for MPS I marginally above their respective cutoffs with results classified as negative, whereas all DMF labs reported this specimen's enzyme activity below their respective cutoffs with results classified as positive. Reasonable agreement in enzyme activities and cutoffs was achieved with harmonization; however, harmonization does not change how a value would be reported as this is dependent on the placement of cutoffs.